Revolution is a Duty of the People

Where in the USC are the organic laws? Are they in a section before Title 1? I googled, and googled, and I cannot find it.

----------------
Ron Paul Supporter Since 1997
`Wise people, even though all laws were abolished, would still lead the same life'- Aristophanes -

http://www.freedomworks.org/publications/why-we-must-march-o...

http://www.resistnet.com/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKhUKCPtf2g

D.R.Worthy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2Vr4BCBxwE&feature=related

on the mall. It would have to be a continuous sit in or camp out by thousands to get our govt back and to get people to wake up and throw out the crooks. Prbably would get negative press from CNN and MSNBC and the rest of the paid for media but may wake up some and never know where it could grow. Good time to start it would be when the Tea Party Express pulls into town.

Revolution?

No.

You learn the truth and stop watching these talking heads on TV.

They are selling you down the river...lose them.

Stop giving your power away to other people.

Find your own moral authority, The one that God gave you.....then the world of men telling you what to do will be over.

See Kelldor's post below!

Ron Paul's Convention Speech

our duty, are we!

He doesn't say how to do it !

(By the way, Abraham Lincoln said a similar thing about dismantling and overthrowing the government in his Second Inaugural address).

Anyhow, I get weary of people continually calling for a revolution (which might be a fine idea) but without any specifics of how it is to be done.

I honestly do not think that civilians with weapons will prevail, but that's just my opinion. Maybe they will. Is that what the Judge is calling for? Hard to tell from this short speech.

run for office......This guy is right on point.

http://electricheadroom.blogspot.com/

Access denied ?
Good people do Good deeds
and are no respecter of person

When / where is this speech from? I would like to look up the full version so that I can watch / listen to it.

I really enjoy speeches by The Judge. He is one of the most fierce defenders of individual liberty and understands our Constitution better than probably all others. He truly believes in liberty and of the notion that the government works for us (and not the other way around).

This is someone who I definitely would support as a political candidate at any level of government, including the Presidency. He is a true patriot.

Great speaker!

I have a new beef that has nothing to do with the Judge. WAKE UP, America!! That is a phrase that has been hijacked by the propaganda neocons. Everyone, including us, who does not like what is going on right now is saying, "Wake up, America." And acting all frustrated. They, the really-good-at-propaganda neocons, know darn good and well that they are pretending a person is awake when he JUST doesn't like what Obama is doing. They know Waking Up is to understand the whole CFR/Trilateral Commission thing, but they are pretending that a person is awake if he/she simply is against what is going on in the Obama administration. They really still think what Bush did was mostly ok, well except for this or that, they will say. They have hijacked our message and are pretending to "be awake" and to be "really with it" is to "follow them/" but they are still very much Muslim killing, globe occupying neocons. The neocons have gone nowhere except out in front of US. We have to fight this. Glenn especially is good at this and others, like his replacement on his radio show today. They are totally neocons and you can hear it if you listen closely. Come election, they will have all the "still asleep" conservatives following them blindly over the cliff. They are keeping them asleep by not really teaching them what waking up is all about. Bush is their leader/that is why no 911 skepticism is allowed. We aren't truthers--we are skeptics. We don't believe 911. Surely everyone on planet earth is a "truther." Doesn't everyone want the truth? No, we are skeptics. We don't believe what the government dishes. Waking up is realizing the government doesn't tell the truth about FEMA, chemtrails, 911, JFK, space program, or any other darn thing.

He really needs his own t.v. show.

reddit qwerty, ((BUMP))

The Fabian Society's motto is "Make Haste Slowly"..., "incrementalism".

I reddit'ed it up and give you a bump :o)

http://PolygraphRadio.com

"Don't start a revolution, ignite the past!"

"Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes,"...

but we've been seduced away from our responsibility to take make these judgments, and coerced into accepting incremental "change" that has ensnared us in government crisis-management expedience.

"and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed."

Corrupt political science involves the application of this knowledge to expand unjust powers as stealthily as possible, while maintaining a level of sufferable evil in the public sentiments.

"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism,"...

We can no longer excuse their actions as either incompetent or misguided, because overwhelming evidence of their bipartisan design always undermines our rights and consolidates their power.

"it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

We must appeal the God of heaven and the hearts and minds of all liberty-loving people, to help us do all that is within our right and duty as free people if we are to secure our future.

Way to go, Judge Napolitano! Thanks for the thread qwerty1.

First, to establish authority, the following site is from the Congress. It has a .gov suffix.

http://uscode.house.gov/lawrevisioncounsel.shtml

Office of the Law Revision Counsel

The Office of the Law Revision Counsel prepares and publishes the United States Code, which is a consolidation and codification by subject matter of the general and permanent laws of the United States.

Next, once there, click "Search the U.S. Code" which brings you to...

http://uscode.house.gov/search/criteria.shtml

Then, in the very first "Search Word(s)" box, type "Declaration of Independence" and hit [Enter]. This takes you to the a massive search list of results. The very top result has a score of 100. It is titled...

USC THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE - 1776

It is located here.

Note the designation in front of it "USC". That stands for United States Code.

Therefor, The Declaration of Independence IS officially the "law of the land", and so is everything in it.

In closing, Judge Napolitano incorrectly stated the quote:

"It is the Right of the people to alter or abolish it". That part does not say "Duty", it says "Right". This next part later in the document does say "Duty" though:

"But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

He may have mixed up the words a little, but his point is still valid.

P.S. I'm not advocating any violence. Also this clip is from Nov. 2008.

The constitutional and legal status of the Declaration of Independence is curiously ambiguous. John Hancock (in his capacity as president of the Second Continental Congress) and James Madison both considered it to be, in Madison's words, “the fundamental Act of Union of these States.”

Reflecting that view, Congress has placed it at the head of the United States Code, under the caption, “The Organic Laws of the United States of America.” The Supreme Court has infrequently accorded it binding legal force, for example, in resolving questions of alienage (Inglis v. Trustees of Sailor's Snug Harbour, 1830). Yet lawyers generally, and the Supreme Court in particular, have been reluctant to treat the Declaration as part of American organic law, or even to accord it the restricted status of the Preamble to the Constitution.

Conservatives like Daniel Webster denied that there is a constitutionally recognized right of revolution, and those state supreme courts that have addressed the issue in the twentieth century have adopted Webster's view. Reformers, such as antebellum abolitionists, insisted that the Declaration was part of the constitutional order, while their opponents, including John C. Calhoun, denigrated its authority and validity. The adoption of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments allayed the urgency of that question by incorporating concepts of equality, freedom, and citizenship into the operative constitutional text.

http://www.answers.com/topic/united-states-declaration-of-in...