Why did the thread on Ron Paul potentially being a Freemason get locked?

you can ONLY fully trust yourself,

who cares if he's a part of the machine, if he is then they fucked up big time because it causes all of us to lok into things we wouldn't have on our own, and that personal research is all that matters in the end if you are going to expose "them"

“One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.” Plato

Whatever RP is, the NWO has figured out how to use him to their best advantage. Surely you can see the truth in that?
Again, all that counts is who YOU are, and what YOU do, unless you are being a sheep.

But keep in mind that the one who wrote those letters was actually John Adams son, John Quincy Adams, the 6th president.

All the ones who fought them are mocked by being on some of their funny money. Kennedy on the last silver coin issued for circulation... nice touch, eh?

It's just that I experienced something similar if I have a lot of tabs open.

You are signed-in on one tab, but not another..it will act weird and give you an "access denied" message.

This is a Ron Paul SUPPORT site. You are accusing him of being a Mason with absolutely NO PROOF & alluding that he is a "secret-society scumbag," not to mention his wife Carol. This is blatant breaking of more than one guideline (name-calling & personal attacks). Hopefully you get banned, 8-weeker.

Obama = O.ne B.ig A.ss M.istake A.merica

I think the vote is in. Most of us more informed DPaulers ignore posts like this. So perhaps one cannot gauge our true native sentiments. But here you have it. Read the rest of the posts. This IS why we don't bring it up. However, unsubstantiated rumors and accusations about the Doc, in of all places called the Daily "Paul," which stands for Ron Paul, posted by enlightented NON-Cult of personality, citizenry whom simply respects a man for all his past and present endeavors, one should expect a smack-down, least of all a verbal bitch-slap.

Just because a thread is posted, it doesn't make it anymore or less significant. But if FreeMarket is of any lesson, OUR liberty/Freedom/DailyPaul customers vote NO, Ron Paul is NOT a mason, based on the best info available to third parties that can help us ascertain one way or another.

Plus, if you are of the discernment and deductive reasoning skills you've displayed here, perhaps YOU are not the Patriot, and the FreedomFighter that "this movement" is looking for, nor need. Your own suggestion infers that you are somehow of necessary merit to warrant a need by this "movement." Are you to be the sole arbiter of who is fit, or not to be fit for this "movement?" To which, one proffers kindly, "Sir, get over yourself."

There you have it.

If we took millions of photos of a person's daily life and all iterations in which your limbs end up, the fake "devil horn" may be found.

Don't know if you're speaking of Bill Maher show, or some opportune pix of RP's tired fingers that inadvertently formed the "horns," but are you aware that he has an injury in that hand from long ago? Plus I don't know IF you've ever been on TV, or lived in public limelight, but everyone acts unnatural to varying degrees, in front of a camera, because talking to a machine with polished glass lens beaming out photon transmissions to billions of people, IS un-NATURAL.

Folks, some of you are really reaching... There is substantiated vigilance, and outright fear-mongering, and paranoia for its own sake, so that one is always right about things that can never be definitively proven, or unproven, one way or another. If you suspect everyone, you're always right, aren't you? That's a sad way to live. I'd ask you to use the judgment and discernment skills you've acquired over your life time and re-assess.

Truly chomping at the bits.

Plus, the Doc's been asked flat out, "ARE YOU a FreeMason, or have now or ever been a member of any secret societies?" He answered simply with both hands visible, "NO," with the exception of his medical profession's fraternity.

Enough with the bullsh*t occult myth. There are REAL occultists; there are porch masons, whom on the most part, are oblivious as to their own upper echelon's collusion with the NWO or whomever is really in charge, and then there are the NWO and their sycophantic minions. Guess where RP falls into? NONE of those.

While nobody truly "knows" anyone that is not in one's own personal sphere, the best we can do is go by their record, and if they walk the talk: Isn't 30+ yrs of DOCUMENTED public service enough? What more do you want, or need? You want him to prove to you, of his everyday on a reality tv show, with a minute by minute daily affirmation that he is NOT a Mason? And frankly, even IF he were in some parallel universe, IF the Doc hasn't done anything evil or conspiratorial in his entire life, who the frakk cares? Have you delivered over 4000+ babies into this world? Have you contributed to waking up the minds of millions of Americans and foreigners to OUR heritage of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and Austrian School of Economics? My guess? NO.

This isn't about preventing freespeech. But, it IS about NOT wasting time on insensate and incessant unsubstantiated rumors.

Enough, is enough.

The New World Order is sort of an umbrella term to describe all the power elite throughout the world.

Most of them just rule over their designated areas of interest and maintain their own power while playing nice with other fraternal orders.

A rebirth of American Ideals, in my opinion, will shatter the concept of secret societies.

I reserve the right to govern myself.

Secret societies have been around for hundreds, if not, thousands of years before JFK was born. By the time he was elected President all the secret societies where corrupted so of course you'd expect that stance from him.

To put it into further perspective many of our founding fathers had ties to secret societies, if not for secret societies America may not have come to be.

I'm not saying I like them, I'm just giving to you my viewpoints.

I reserve the right to govern myself.

Kennedy was addressing an audience of newspaper and TV reporters. The bit about secrecy was a lead-in to him asking them not to report things that he thought would might compromise national security with regard to the soviets. So he was not just asking people on one private venue with specific political goals to stay on topic. He was asking reporters in general to censor themselves. Google it and read the entire speech.

BTW, I was fooled also. I made a video and a poster for HR 1207 in which I used the quote, not knowing its origin. My bad.

Just ask me!

"Walls are stronger than the men that defend them."

Ghengis Khan

Peace be to you Oruval. You will tear chunks in the wall, but remember, those are our brothers and sisters once we meet them on the inside.

"Walls are stronger than the men that defend them."

Ghengis Khan