Find a Safe Bank

   

Being Pissed-Off Is Not Enough

Being Pissed-Off Is Not Enough
By Paul Rosenberg | 12 October 2009

If you are busy addressing the evil in the world, who is addressing the good? – Russell Means

The truth is that libertarians spend a huge number of brain-cycles on the concept of justice, and especially on all the ways they’ve been done wrong. These things should not occupy us as they do.

This is not to say that we don’t have reason to complain; after all, we’ve been born into a situation where one group of well-armed men tells everyone else, “Do what we say or we’ll hurt you.” Once you break through the brainwashing of your childhood and understand this, being pissed-off is entirely normal and entirely justifiable. It is not, however, something upon which to build a life, or even a philosophy.

Understand this: The things we complain about are legitimate and we should be mad, but they are surface issues; they are not the real deal. We need to see beyond injustice and our preoccupation with it. Being pissed-off is not nearly enough.

WE DEFEAT INJUSTICE, THEN WHAT?

Preventing injustice is not an end in itself – it is merely necessary to allow our work to proceed without molestation.

Does justice matter? For sure! But it is not the central issue – it is only necessary to keep destroyers away from our real work.

The purpose of law is to prevent successful coercion. It is necessary, even crucial, but it is not the end goal. Otherwise, once we kill injustice, we have nothing else; we are abandoned in a void.

Think of it this way: Let’s say that we were fully successful in getting rid of the state; then what? What do we do after the celebration party?

Play with this scenario for a minute:

It’s over. The state is gone. No big boss is telling you what to do any longer. There’s nothing to be angry about except some intermittent, garden variety crime. Now what do we do?

I hope you are not drawing a blank, but most of us do when presented with this scenario.

Here’s the big point I’m trying to make:

Whatever we would do after the celebration ends is what we should be doing now.

Continue

No votes yet

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Nicely put

We should all become what we want, not just fight what we don't.

I'm doing it

Every day I go to work and serve my clients, who have voluntarily chosen to engage me. I'm going to keep doing it no matter what. Knowing the system is corrupt is no excuse to be lazy.

I will keep singing the praises of Distributism ...

which is pretty much the opposite of what we have now. It puts major limitations on bigness ... big government, big corporations, chain stores, etc. so that all the people in a given community are needed to do some part of the job that society needs. In this society, most people get to work in their own communities. No one gets filthy rich, everybody gets to earn a decent living, raise a family, start a business, whatever they are capable of. Seems to me creativity would abound. Men are always happier when they work for themselves.

Subsidiarity is the idea that whatever can be done locally, should be done locally ... especially where government is concerned. The more remote the government, the smaller it should be.

Is it perfect, no! But it's about as just a system as we can hope for on earth. Perfect only happens in heaven.

Bump and marked

Thanks for this article.
I agree that complaints need to be followed by action, and good examples of future action.

Lindsey Graham says we are Angry White Men...

And the Democrats make the same point...

Maybe some introspection is in order here...

There is WAY to much partisanship going on among the Ron Paul people... joining in with the Bushy Neo Con republicans trying to make Obama look like the BEGINNING of all that is wrong in America... NOT! In fact there is nothing all that unusual about Obama compared to the rest of the Presidents we have had lately.

Ron Paul does NOT bash Obama. Just listen to his own words.

Ron Paul needs to lead in this however. Ron Paul is against govenment health care? Fine. I am listening... not for the reasons NOT to... but for his vision of what a TRUE free market solution should be. And NO you cant just say Free Markets will take care of it. We have all seen lately how greedy Capitalists can be just as anti Free Market as power crazy federal government people.

Ron Paul has convinced me and many Democrats and Independants that indeed the central government has gotten WAY out of control.

Ron Paul needs to move beyond this. I get it. We get it. NOW WHAT? Is he suggesting all of Americas Liberty Loving rich people start a nonprofit to replace the insurance companies? Because I sure dont trust the insurance companies on the basis of "free markets" alone.

If not central government to take care of these problems then what kind of system DOES he invision for replacing the current "anti-free market" Captialist system we have today? Because it isnt all being caused by the federal government... it is these companies in conjunction with the federal government that is the problem.

So what is the change that must occur in the current capitalist system? Tell us not only what the government must NOT do, but also tell us what the government SHOULD be doing. And not just tell us the government should enforce contracts... tell us what this modern world would look like in details we can understand in everyday life... how would getting health care be different? Getting a drivers license? How would public services be paid for? I sure dont want a smaller government while the greedy anti-free market capitalists run hog wild....

Capitalism and communism are flip sides of the same coin

Both are driven by godless materialism, both come out of the same philosophy (Enlightenment) run amok. They are Siamese twins, capitalism being the weaker one. And, being weaker, capitalism will always try to morph into communism because it's just easier to control people in a communist system.

Godlessness in action means there are no ethical and moral restraints on men's actions. Materialism (living for money and stuff) breeds greed. Greed is a capital sin which, when it becomes habitual, can never be satisfied. Are there a few capitalists who escape being amoral and greedy? Sure! Are there many? No way! How many Ron Pauls are there in Congress?

So, capitalism breeds men who have no ethical or moral restraints on how they become wealthier and more powerful. We, who live by the 10 Commandments, have no comparable earthly weapons with which to fight godless capitalists or communists.

"Pure" capitalism is not the answer to what ails us. It is doomed to fail as many times as it's tried because the greedy capitalists will always devise the best weapons.

The medical system we suffer under (AMA) was the creation of John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie (circa 1910). When it served their purpose so well that it became too expensive for most people, the very same fellows and their friends devised the insurance industry. These days they poison our air, our water, our foods and drinks just so that we will "need" their "health care" services. Hey, whatever is good for business! Right? Do you realize that Alzheimer's was almost unheard of 40 years ago? Today, they can predict how many Americans will contract it in the future. How do you suppose they know this?

You most certainly can say

You most certainly can say the free market will take care of it. Or more precisely, freedom will take care of it. Or that people themselves will take care of it, given the opportunity to freely go about making their choices unhindered by externally imposed coercion.

Ron Paul has no more of a clue about how a "free market" health care system will work than does Obama's teleprompter. Or anyone else, for that matter. What he realizes, is simply that with freedom to choose their own path, people will choose the one that is best for them. Whatever that may be, and whatever "health care system" that may lead to. The end is simply irrelevant, as long as the mechanism by which that end is achieved, is freedom.

Another thing to always keep in mind, is there is no such distinct thing as "the free market", as opposed to freedom. It's one of those insidious nonsensical distinctions the oppression have managed to almost universally indoctrinate into people over the years. Like the notion that there are differences between individual rights and "human rights", as if humans aren't individuals. In both cases, this rarely countered sleight of hand allows unapologetic statist thugs to pretend to still be in favor of that which even the densest public school indoctrinated mooch identifies with, namely freedom and human rights, while at the same time claiming their inevitable corollaries, the free market and individual rights, are somehow right wing, or anarchistic, or whatever, depending on the political leaning of the thug at hand.

Point is, if one is free, one is free to choose to engage in all the activities that is required for a market to be free. Without any coercive interference. If one is not free to do so, then one simply is not free, period.

While speculating about exactly how "free market" healthcare will end up looking in aggregate is no doubt entertaining, and may to some extent even be necessary to engage the statists in debate, it is ultimately irrelevant. How people choose to take care of their health care needs when allowed to do so however they please, is of no more importance than how people chooses to go about putting their shirt on in the morning. The only important point is that however they end up doing it, they do so completely of their own free will, with nothing being forced on them by anyone on the outside.

That is unworkable... the rich get richer and control people...

That is unworkable... the rich get richer and control people just like a central government if "freedom" is all there is to the system. The greedy have the Freedom to crush everyone else... and they do whenever given the chance.

What this article is about is people moving beyond the IDEA of Freedom and coming up with a society that gets all the things done that people expect to be done AND have freedom at the same time.

And you dont move the masses with pretty pictures of "Freedom" .. they want real answers to real problems... which is why this health care bill WILL pass.. the people want something done... and something WILL be done... and because the Ron Paul people dont have a clue how to deliver it the masses will turn to those who DO have a clue how to deliver it...THAT is what this article is all about... the Ron Paul type people must not join the GOP in saying NO NO NO about everything and instead step up and show how to DELIVER and have Freedom.

You have kind of a fairy tale idea of

economics in which there are magical bad guys that have powers beyond ordinary people who they will quash out of greed and meanness.

Then the fairy godmother government that is pure and good and will save us all from the "rich."

But that simplistic view ignores history and how governments actually work; the reality is that governments, whether democratic, monarchy, whatever, accrue power to themselves. With that power they loot the treasury and the people until ordinary folks gradually are impoverished and impotent; then they look to the governing elite to DO the things the populace no longer can.

The bigger the State the more complex and demanding and incompetent and corrupt it becomes. If people see this and take back their natural, innate power, they will care for their own communities and families. People are powerfully creative and productive if allowed freedom.

It is only fear and oppression that keep people down. the negativity is in thinking free people cannot be trusted to act with good will and energy and competence.

And to think we have to spell out solutions in detail is just picking up on the arrogance of central planners and politicians too small minded to realize their own limitations, and too self-absorbed to see the unlimited potential of free people.

Bump

for living well in liberty!

Oh no you don't...... get back up there on page one!

"Not armies, not nations, have advanced the race; but here and there, in the course of ages, an individual has stood up and cast his shadow over the world."

****
A Man's Country Is Not A Certain Area Of Land, Of Mountains, Rivers, And Woods, But It Is A Principle...
And Patriotism Is Loyalty To That Principle - George William Curtis
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCYr8TWAGn0&feature=related

Aho!

Long live the Republic of Lakotah.
http://www.republicoflakotah.com/

a Freedomain Radio staple

That's one of the strengths of Stefan Molyneux's approach - treating personal liberty as first class, instead of focusing exclusively on arguing history and economics with people. His effort to integrate the philosophy of liberty with psychology is really bringing in the last missing pieces to complete the puzzle.

Gonna print this one off....

and take it to work today...gonna share this marvelous insight with my liberty-minded co-workers. One fella keeps telling me that I am so angry all the time....that he spent a decade working on The Hill and was angry all the time too....but, he learned to say, "F*** it" and not let it eat at him anymore. He has a much more logical approach to preparedness than I do...gonna share this with him and change my own attitude, too!!
Thanks, xntryk1...you may have just saved me an embolism!

------------------
BC
Silence isn't always golden....sometimes it's yellow.

------------------
BC
Silence isn't always golden....sometimes it's yellow.

If I can save one life with my postings...

...I've done my job. :-)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Let them protest all they want, as long as they pay their taxes.” ...credited to Al Haig, Ronald Reagan's Secretary of State.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/liberty_outlook/
http://www.dailypaul.com/blog/11
Ron Paul = Red Pill

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Let them protest all they want, as long as they pay their taxes.” ...credited to Al Haig, Ronald Reagan's Secretary of State.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/liberty_outlook/
http://www.dailypaul.com/blog/11
Ron Paul = Red Pill

Your on a roll today

keep them coming X. lol

I just ran out of ammo...

Maybe more later... :-)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Let them protest all they want, as long as they pay their taxes.” ...credited to Al Haig, Ronald Reagan's Secretary of State.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/liberty_outlook/
http://www.dailypaul.com/blog/11
Ron Paul = Red Pill

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Let them protest all they want, as long as they pay their taxes.” ...credited to Al Haig, Ronald Reagan's Secretary of State.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/liberty_outlook/
http://www.dailypaul.com/blog/11
Ron Paul = Red Pill

WOW, WOW, WOW..... inCREdibly insightful article!

Thanks Xntryk for posting this. What a find.

You see this so often on this site. SO MUCH to complain and bicker about in the effort to preserve freedom.... but so little said about the fullness of living. So many arguments over what people think or believe OUTSIDE of the core belief in "freedom" .... and very little understanding that whatever it is that gives value and meaning and expression to someone's life - as long as it doesn't impose force on others - should, in fact be celebrated rather than criticized.

WOAH, this one is a keeper.
___________________________________________________
"Not armies, not nations, have advanced the race; but here and there, in the course of ages, an individual has stood up and cast his shadow over the world."

****
A Man's Country Is Not A Certain Area Of Land, Of Mountains, Rivers, And Woods, But It Is A Principle...
And Patriotism Is Loyalty To That Principle - George William Curtis
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCYr8TWAGn0&feature=related