Never Trust a Government Conviction
Oct 21, 2009
Never Trust a Government Conviction
By Anthony Gregory
Megan Williams now says she was lying all along when accusing seven men of kidnapping, sexually abusing and assaulting her. The seven pled guilty to charges two years ago.
Indeed, “former Logan County prosecutor Brian Abraham, who was in charge of the case, said no one ever went to jail because of Williams’ statements. Instead, Abraham said Tuesday night, he decided early in the case not to rely on Williams’ statements, but on the physical evidence and the statements of the co-defendants.”
And what did the defendants admit to? “According to the admissions of those eventually convicted, Williams was physically and sexually abused. She was beaten repeatedly, held against her will, burned with hot wax, stabbed in the leg, and forced to perform oral sex on at least two defendants.”
So let me get this straight. The supposed victim claims all the crimes were made up, yet government officials claim that the evidence apart from her accusations — as in, the evidence of something that Williams now admits never happened — was enough to send them to prison.
Now, if something did not happen, and prosecutors claim the evidence and the process were still legally sufficient to put innocent people in jail, then the entire system isn’t even theoretically just.
Williams’s attorney muses, “It sounds to me that there are innocent people held in jail for something they did not do. I have no idea what convinced them to plead guilty.”
Well, I have an idea. The entire criminal justice system, like any socialist institution, is inherently rigged against actual justice. And so most people sent to prison never enjoy a trial, but instead are bullied into pleading guilty because they know their chances with a trial are slim, that the cards are stacked against them, and that if they lose a trial they will end up punished far harsher than what they could “negotiate” in a plea bargain. Despite all these plea bargains, our system is not one characterized by leniency, as we have more prisoners, both in absolute terms and per capita, than any other nation on earth. And so most convicts plead guilty, but we cannot be sure if they are actually guilty, as this was never proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even by the state’s own terms. When it is so much more attractive to cop to a heinous crime than to fight a false charge, even confessions must be doubted as a matter of course. Perhaps the standard should be to prove the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, regardless of what the accused says.
- xntryk1's blog
- Login or register to post comments














This is why plea-bargaining
This is why plea-bargaining is banned in many countries. A prosecutor will often threaten a suspect with a harsh sentence if the accused does not cop a plea and implicate others under oath.
Judges prevent defense lawyers from introducing evidence and from saying what they please. The practice is an abomination to the First Amendment, but it is routine. Judges also tell the juries what they may consider and that they must rule according to the law as the judge sees it. If a defense attorney tries to tell the jury the truth - that it is fully empowered to judge the law as well as the facts, and to bring whatever verdict they think is just, the attorney can wind up in jail for contempt.
compelled to convict themself?
i's sad that the defendants were so scared of a harsh sentence that they felt compelled to admit guilt when there was none. unbelievable. you might like the story of one man who bucked the system and fired his lawyers when facing life, and was aquitted pro per.in CA. his name is Vincent Arias, his site is shotinreverse.info. and he is an inspiration.