"Set-up at CC09 - A concerted effort was made to set-up the entire patriot, constitutionalist, militia movement"

bump

bump.

Nobody says we can't organize our own dissention and block off DC and bring it to a halt. Personally, the next time I go to DC, I'm probably not coming home anytime soon. This ObamaCare bill is my line in the sand. My son will not grow up as a slave like I have. The cat is out of the bag, either we kill the cat ot it will kill us.

Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny."- Thomas Jefferson

How messed up is that! She, from what I could tell, and I did watch the entire webcast from day one, was also one of the people who enjoyed mucking up trouble.

I heard the original report for civic action. It had nothing on it that would stop traffic. People were encourage to break unconstitutional laws, and this is AFTER the Congress and states have been warned and told that these laws were unconstitutional and that people were no longer going to abide by these.

The problem began when the lawyers decided that their jobs were more important than freedom. They were afraid of recommending the civic actions for fear of losing their jobs. They pandered to the court system. So somehow, they managed to whine about it so much they swayed the rest of the delegates to remove any semblance of anything that seemed as though it was going to break a law.

The whole point of the civic report was to force the government to return to Constitutional rule by the citizens. You can't force a government to repeal unconstitutional laws if you continue to obey those laws. Duh! What;'s the point of declaring them unlawful if you plan to obey them!?

The lawyers neutered the civic actions so that now the gov't will simply laugh when we start to demonstrate. Originally, the actions were written to get the gov't where it hurts, in the pocketbook. They encourage citizens to not pay their taxes since the amendment was never ratified and they've been stealing from us ever since. They encouraged people to rightfully break unconstittutional laws.

If it weren't for the lawyers that are so in bed with the government that they are afraid to oppose them in any way, we'd have a list of civic actions that would really make a difference. Now, they've reduced them to no more than an average tea party movement, which as we know they just ignore.

Blessings )o(

not a Constitutional Convention

BUNK!

Check out this post: http://www.dailypaul.com/node/115905#comment-1257194

They're pretty much threatening to rebel.

I heard about the plan to stop traffic before the congress and not connected to the congress. I didn't think the effort at that time was an effort to label/identify dessenters and to cause martial law. It was touted as a peaceful movement that could not easily be disbanded in order to call full attention to the malcontent of the people. It did warn that participants were likely to be arrested, but they would be handcuffed to each other so it would be obvious to all that they were not there to bring any kind of violence to anyone. Not a malitia type of act. It is so difficult to tell the trolls from the patriots these days. The trolls are darn good. The question is always, "Who is derailing whom?" Today, anyone who carries a Bible, has a "Constitution" bumper sticker (waving hand in air wildly), voted for Ron Paul or Chuck Baldwin, etc., is labeled a terrorist. We are thoroughly identified right here. It doesn't take stopping traffic to know who we are. I do wonder about anything coming from CC2009 that was not thoroughly read. I would not think that would ever happen. I have never gotten the idea that Schulz is anything but sincere. I will look forward to further clarification of this issue.

I'll ask him what happened when he gets home.