
New Initiative to Regulate Pot Use Filed in Nevada
Submitted by Jim Brown on Thu, 01/07/2010 - 09:41
A new initiative to tax and regulate adult use of marijuana in Nevada by licensing retail stores and growers was filed Wednesday with the secretary of state's office.
Nevadans for Sensible Marijuana Laws will need to gather 97,002 signatures to send the measure to the 2011 Legislature. If lawmakers fail to act, it would be placed on the 2012 ballot.
It will be the fourth attempt in the last decade to legalize marijuana in the state.
David Schwartz, manager of the campaign, said the group will focus on its claims that marijuana use is safer than alcohol.


















What I learned about pot that I didn't know yesterday
It was on the History Channel. During the 30's Mexicans were not wanted in the bread lines and an effort was made to send them home. Propaganda was started the they all smoked marijuana which lead to reefer madness There was then an all out effort to remove them both. It was very interesting. Randolf Hearst who owned a large chain of news papers and heavily invested in the timber industry did not want the competition of hemp and wrote ridiculous articles in his papers which turned the public against it. At this point Dupont had patented nylon and again did not want competition. The writing was on the wall.
Interesting stuff:
I read a link from another post that I found interesting also.
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/120992#comment-1302555
Follow the link and read how W. Randolf Hearst manipulated other things. History is jammed full of things like this that you will never learn in a government school.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I love my country
I am appalled by my government
Bravo ... & bless Rick Simpson.
Also good to visit L.E.A.P. for more info.
Discover Costa Rica
Read the details...
then compare with what Colorado did.
THE MORE I LEARN ABOUT GOVERNMENT
THE MORE I LOVE MY GUNS
FourWindsTradingPost
I hope they understand what they're getting into
Squirrel Monkeys will overrun the state. They L-O-V-E pot!!
Also, if you should ever decide to extract the THC from two or three pounds of pot and shoot it into your arm, you could get brain damage. Oh yeah, and don't shock or burn yourself after smoking weed, it will not kill the pain. Just ask Poptech.
The worst side effect is the Brain Damage
Memory, speed of thinking get worse over time with marijuana use (American Academy of Neurology)
"Memory, speed of thinking and other cognitive abilities get worse over time with marijuana use, according to a new study published in the March 14, 2006, issue of Neurology, the scientific journal of the American Academy of Neurology.
The study found that frequent marijuana users performed worse than non-users on tests of cognitive abilities, including divided attention (ability to pay attention to more than one stimulus at a time) and verbal fluency (number of words generated within a time limit). Those who had used marijuana for 10 years or more had more problems with their thinking abilities than those who had used marijuana for five to 10 years. All of the marijuana users were heavy users, which was defined as smoking four or more joints per week.
"We found that the longer people used marijuana, the more deterioration they had in these cognitive abilities, especially in the ability to learn and remember new information," said study author Lambros Messinis, PhD, of the Department of Neurology of the University Hospital of Patras in Patras, Greece. "In several areas, their abilities were significant enough to be considered impaired, with more impairment in the longer-term users than the shorter-term users."
The study involved people ages 17 to 49 taking part in a drug abuse treatment program in Athens, Greece. There were 20 long-term users, 20 shorter-term users and 24 control subjects who had used marijuana at least once in their lives but not more than 20 times and not in the past two years. Those who had used any other class of drugs, such as cocaine or stimulants, during the past year or for more than three months throughout their lives were not included in the study. Before the tests were performed, all participants had to abstain from marijuana for at least 24 hours.
The marijuana users performed worse in several cognitive domains, including delayed recall, recognition and executive functions of the brain. For example, on a test measuring the ability to make decisions, long-term users had 70 percent impaired performance, compared to 55 percent impaired performance for shorter-term users and 8 percent impaired performance for non-users. In a test where participants needed to remember a list of words that had been read to them earlier, the non-users remembered an average of 12 out of 15 words, the shorter-term users remembered an average of nine words and the long-term users remembered an average of seven words."
How about this?
Research Suggests Marijuana Analogue Stimulates Brain Cell Growth
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/10/051016083817.htm
The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing. ~ Albert Einstein
My News Twitter http://twitter.com/sharpsteve
My YouTube http://www.youtube.com/user/sharpsteve2003
Do you know any potheads? I
Do you know any potheads? I have many friends that toke everyday and I can definitely notice some brain cell and memory loss. I think that people should be able to do what they want and I know THC is a lot safer than other substances, however, it is not 100 percent healthy.
Nature and Liberty
Jack Conway
You must be from the Alcohol and Tobacco
industry let's see how many did you guys kill last year over a MILLION oh Blow it out your A$$ CUPCAKE!
"Human beings with love and compassion are some of the most beautiful creatures in the universe... Those without are a plague on us all."
Pot is worse than Tobacco
I am not from the "industry" and do not recommend smoking cigarettes anymore than pot.
Marijuana Smoke Contains Higher Levels Of Certain Toxins Than Tobacco Smoke (American Chemical Society)
"Here’s another reason to “keep off the grass.” Researchers in Canada report that marijuana smoke contains significantly higher levels of several toxic compounds — including ammonia and hydrogen cyanide — than tobacco smoke and may therefore pose similar health risks. Their study, termed the most comprehensive to date on the chemical content of marijuana smoke, is scheduled for the Dec. 17 issue of ACS’ Chemical Research in Toxicology, a monthly journal.
David Moir and colleagues note that researchers have conducted extensive studies on the chemical composition of tobacco smoke, which contains a host of toxic substances, including about 50 that can cause cancer. However, there has been relatively little research on the chemical composition of marijuana smoke.
In this new study, researchers compared marijuana smoke to tobacco smoke, using smoking machines to simulate the smoking habits of users. The scientists found that ammonia levels were 20 times higher in the marijuana smoke than in the tobacco smoke, while hydrogen cyanide, nitric oxide and certain aromatic amines occurred at levels 3-5 times higher in the marijuana smoke, they say. The finding is “important information for public health and communication of the risk related to exposure to such materials,” say the researchers."
Don't believe everything you read kids.
From the article linked below...
"The higher presence of ammonia, HCN, and aromatic amines(nitrogen-related chemicals) in marijuana were likely all due to the fact that Prairie Plant Systems cultivated the pot used in the trial with a high nitrate fertilizer. (By contrast, the tobacco used in the study was not treated with a similar fertilizer.)"
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2007/12/21/18468375.php
Couldn't have been the fact that the study was constructed in such a way as to ensure the desired outcome, could it have been? Noooo! I'm suure it wasn't.
Then eat it!
Or vaporize it!
Those 'pot' users are pretty inventive, huh?
You keep your liquid poison created from the decay and rot of good food items for yourself, and I'll stick with eating or smoking flowers, OK?
Or maybe you would like to see prohibition part 1 reoccur? And why did there need to be an amendment to the COTUS, TWICE(!) to deal with that nasty poison, but all other stuff is illegal by fiat?
And 'illegal drug' doesn't mean recreational tinctures. Why would I say that? Because viagra certainly qualifies as recreational, and to dope-heads like Rush Limbaugh, so does oxycontin. Since RL is so virulently (damn, how did I remember that word?) for the drug war, its kinda ironic that oxy also makes one deaf, eh?
THE MORE I LEARN ABOUT GOVERNMENT
THE MORE I LOVE MY GUNS
FourWindsTradingPost
You are not any brighter
Eating or vaporizing it does not prevent brain damage.
I realize you believe that calling it a "flower" makes it sound harmless but you do realize poisonous flowers exist as well as ones that cause brain damage.
You seem to have a hard time following the conversation, too much pot maybe? I am not talking about the legality of it.
A weak minded loser pot head calling someone else a dope-head? Too funny.
Overwelming evidence...
with boredom, that is...you should follow the argument: the story was in part, about 'safer than alcohol'...you start in with 'causes cancer' (you are smart enough to know that WE ALL have cancer cells in our body, right?) shortly after I had posted that the worst side effect was the penalties (legality if you must)...then you go on (and on, and on) all over the freakin' place about brain damage, DNA damage, nut damage, and even crack damage (plus throw in some anecdotal 'evidence' too). Then, what started this particular volley was your 'bury' post header lifting my post header, and then, STAY WITH ME HERE, you again start up with a study about SMOKE, to which I reply (only my second post in this whole thread) ways to avoid SMOKE and very pointedly ask you to distance yourself from the REAL POISON as you did with tobacco, then you violently insult me with 'weak minded loser pot head' after claiming I can't follow the argument!
I call bullshit! You are obviously suffering brain damage, caused by either alcohol or Rush Limbaugh (didn't he recently have some chest pains?), or maybe both (lol!).
And to continue with your weak argument here, did you notice the crap that leads you to the AAN?
"The American Academy of Neurology (AAN), is an international association of more than 21000 neurology professionals dedicated to providing the best possible ..."
Since your cognitive abilities seem to be compromised, I'll point it out to you: Why would an 'international association' need to call itself an 'American Academy'? Could it have anything to do with which government funds these studies? And which government profits by the findings? Like an Idiot, you are spouting the war establishment's cries of one reason why it must remain illegal. The war establishment profits not only in stolen property from those 'busted', but the stolen Liberties of ALL Americans.
Now, maybe you should kick back, spark one up(cancer be damned!), and then look at this thing through 'new' eyes. Global warming studies, mostly funded by the US government, have recently been exposed for massaging the evidence in the quest for power and control. Any chance 'we've' been duped here too?
Maybe you want some more anecdotal evidence? How can a person who has NEVER smoked, drunk, or otherwise strayed from the straight and narrow be stricken with cancer not but prove that keeping off the grass doesn't really matter in the long run? I am so thankful, that after decades of talking about the assault on Liberty in this country to this person, she has finally opened her eyes to what is going on in this country. If she would have just enjoyed some cannabis beforehand, she would most likely would have been our side within two years of my own awakening. And MAYBE, JUST MAYBE, with the aide of natural 'toxins' that are in cannabis (now remember, you babbling DORK, that chemotherapy is massive amounts of toxins given to the patient), my sister wouldn't have an excess of cancer cells threatening to metastasize throughout her body.
THE WORST EFFECT OF CANNABIS USE IS THE PENALTIES...BY FAR!!!!!!!!!!
THE MORE I LEARN ABOUT GOVERNMENT
THE MORE I LOVE MY GUNS
FourWindsTradingPost
Amen....
War on Drugs as with the War On Terrorism just really a War Of Government Control Over the people. Bennett to McCaffery to any other bullshit czar spewing crap at us to be afraid be very afraid hang em all!!!!!!
9/11 was an inside job .....time to get some answers..RP 2012
Bravo Thermo!
For both intelligence and hard-hitting passion!
I have noticed for almost 30 years arguing against Prohibitionism that nothing but idiotic, illogical, weak and hypocritical bullshit backs up the Prohibitionist stance. Show me a committed Prohibitionist, and I will show you a "babbling dork" every time!
*blush* Thanks!
Gunnies should realize that the war on drugs is a war on guns, and Heads should realize gun control is Liberty control.
And yes, I am very passionate about THE drug against war...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4-bUYU3BH8
I would have a hard time supporting this initiative, it really brings in the velvet fist. Cultivators charged a $5000 license fee, collecting wholesale tax on each ounce (inviting the state goons in any time they please, of course) and limiting how many licensed dispensaries may be opened statewide, just to name a few problems. MPP may think this is a babystep in the right direction, its more like a gnatstep at best.
In all reality, it looks more like a huge power grab! Those who advocate equal status with alcohol may unknowingly get just half of what they advocate: Lots of taxes and regulations, but no equality. {From wikipedia: There are few restrictions on the sale and consumption of alcohol in Nevada except for age. State law also renders public intoxication legal, and explicitly prohibits any local or state law from making it a public offence.[31]}
I wonder if this initiative is a preemptive strike by some corrupted, wet-brained nanny-stater?
THE MORE I LEARN ABOUT GOVERNMENT
THE MORE I LOVE MY GUNS
FourWindsTradingPost
As long as you smoke what, 18 pounds a day?
A lot of smokers don't smoke that much.
And how does all that compare
to the functioning of those who abuse alcohol over any equivalent time period?
This might all very well be true, but it is also irrelevant --- Prohibitionism never works, and is nothing but a hypocritical and nonsensical policy and a moral outrage, and only fuels the growth of all-pervasive government control over the population.
I support self inflicted brain damage and cancer
You don't understand, I fully support people giving themselves brain damage and cancer 100%!!!
"I support self inflicted brain damage"
at least you practice what you preach.
“We have allowed our nation to be over taxed and over regulated and overrun by bureaucrats, the founders would be ashamed of us for what we're putting up with” Ron Paul
Now
you just sound like my grandma Mildred. She, too, keeps repeating the things she learned some 80 years ago.
Do you think keeping it
Do you think keeping it illegal keeps it from being used you tool? It should be taxed and regulated like tobacco and alcohol.
I hope you enjoy you employment in the Alcohol and Tobacco industry.
"Human beings with love and compassion are some of the most beautiful creatures in the universe... Those without are a plague on us all."
Has the pot affected your brain this bad?
What part of I 100% support you being able to give yourself brain damage and cancer do you not understand?
Why do you want to tax and regulate it? Ron Paul does not support taxation and regulation.
Ron Paul supports decriminalization/legalization
*
“We have allowed our nation to be over taxed and over regulated and overrun by bureaucrats, the founders would be ashamed of us for what we're putting up with” Ron Paul
Oh blow it out your arse Poptart...
Write something about the ill effects of alcohol and tobacco. Cannabis is aspirin in comparison.
"Human beings with love and compassion are some of the most beautiful creatures in the universe... Those without are a plague on us all."
Memory, speed of thinking get worse over time.
Memory, speed of thinking get worse over time.
how about liver damage from
how about liver damage from Alcohol and the MILLIONS DEAD from Tobacco? sheesh!
"Human beings with love and compassion are some of the most beautiful creatures in the universe... Those without are a plague on us all."
Pot is worse than Tobacco
Impact on lungs of 1 cannabis joint equal to up to 5 cigarettes (British Medical Journal)
"A single cannabis joint has the same effect on the lungs as smoking up to five cigarettes in one go, indicates research published ahead of print in the journal Thorax.
The researchers base their findings on 339 adults up to the age of 70, selected from an ongoing study of respiratory health, and categorised into four different groups.
These comprised those who smoked only cannabis, equivalent to at least one joint a day for five years; those who smoked tobacco only, equivalent to a pack of cigarettes a day for at least a year; those who smoked both; and those who did not smoke either cannabis or tobacco.
All the participants had high definition x-ray scans (computed tomography) taken of their lungs and they took special breathing tests designed to assess how well their lungs worked.
They were also questioned about their smoking habits.
Seventy five people smoked only cannabis, and 91 smoked both. Eighty one people did not smoke either, and 92 smoked only tobacco.
Cannabis smokers complained of wheeze, cough, chest tightness and phlegm.
But cannabis still damaged the lungs and stopped them from working properly.
It diminished the numbers of small fine airways, which are important for transporting oxygen and waste products to and from the blood vessels effectively.
And it damaged the large airways of the lung, blocking airflow, and forcing the lungs to work harder.
The extent of this damage was directly related to the number of joints smoked, with higher consumption linked to greater incapacity.
The effect on the lungs of each joint was equivalent to smoking between 2.5 and five cigarettes in one go."
Lung Damage? no
Heavy Long-Term Marijuana Use Does Not Impair Lung Function, Says New Study
April 3, 1997, Los Angeles, CA: Habitual marijuana smokers do not experience a greater annual rate of decline in lung function than nonsmokers, according to the latest findings by researchers at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) School of Medicine. The results of the eight-year study appear in Volume 155 of the American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine. Dr. Donald P. Tashkin, who headed the study, is one of America's foremost experts on marijuana smoking and lung function."Findings from the present long-term, follow-up study of heavy, habitual marijuana smokers argue against the concept that continuing heavy use of marijuana is a significant risk factor for the development of [chronic lung disease]," concluded the UCLA study. "Neither the continuing nor the intermittent marijuana smokers exhibited any significantly different rates of decline in [lung function]" as compared with those individuals who never smoked marijuana. Researchers added: "No differences were noted between even quite heavy marijuana smoking and nonsmoking of marijuana." These findings starkly contrasted those experienced by tobacco-only smokers who suffered a significant rate of decline in lung function.
Researchers also failed to find any synergistic effect between marijuana and tobacco cigarettes. According to the report, individuals who smoked
both did not suffer any faster rate of decline in lung function than individuals who smoked marijuana alone. "The long-term findings of this study clearly refute the prohibitionist argument that marijuana smoking poses a significant danger to lung function," stated NORML Deputy Director Allen St. Pierre.
A total of 394 young Caucasian men and women agreed to participate in the study. Researchers classified 131 of the participants as heavy marijuana smokers who did not smoke tobacco cigarettes, while 112 smoked both tobacco and marijuana. An additional 65 men regularly smoked tobacco only and the remaining 86 participants were nonsmokers. All participants were screened for pre-existing chronic chest diseases and found to be healthy upon entering the study. Each participant underwent pulmonary function testing at the start of the study, and again on multiple occasions over the course of the next eight years. During that interval, a number of patients were lost to follow up, but 255 participants (65 percent) completed the study and were tested again at up to six additional sessions.
The results of this latest long-term study on marijuana and health echo findings reached by an Australian group of researchers at the National
Drug and Alcohol Research Centre just one month ago. That study, which involved interviews with 268 marijuana smokers and 31 non-using partners
and family members, concluded that the health of long-term marijuana users is virtually no different from that of the general population.
Researchers from both studies cautioned that their results do not imply that regular marijuana smoking is free of all potentially harmful
pulmonary effects. Both groups stated that regular marijuana smokers were more likely to suffer mild respiratory problems such as wheezing and
bronchitis than nonsmokers. For more information, please contact Allen St. Pierre or Paul Armentano of NORML @ (202) 483-5500. A summary of the UCLA study appears in the March 1997 edition of Forensic Drug Abuse Advisor.
=======
Marijuana Less Harmful to Lungs
than Cigarettes
by Louise Gagnon
Medical Post, Sept. 6 1994
L'ESTEREL, Quebec -- Heavy marijuana smokers show less evidence
of lung injury than heavy tobacco smokers, and it may be
cannabinoids that are protecting them from developing a condition
like emphysema.
That's according to the principal investigator of a study done at
the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA).
Speaking at the third annual meeting of the International
Cannabis Research Society here, Dr. Donald Tashkin, a
pulmonologist and UCLA professor of medicine, concluded heavy
marijuana use did not cause the same degree of lung injury as
tobacco smoke.
"My own feeling is that marijuana smokers probably will not
develop emphysema as a consequence of smoking marijuana," he
said, but cautioned that does not rule out the development of
other conditions like respiratory carcinoma.
"It may be that the THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) in
marijuana could have different effects on inflammatory cells,
which may mediate injury in the lung."
His study, which aimed to measure the pulmonary effects of
habitual marijuana use, followed nine tobacco smokers, 10
marijuana smokers, 10 nonsmokers and four smokers of both
marijuana and tobacco. He gave both quantitative and qualitative
explanations for his finding.
Marijuana users in the study smoked three or four joints daily
for 15 years on average, while tobacco smokers in the study
smoked 25 cigarettes daily over a period of 20 years, indicating
a marked difference in exposure to smoke.
"There is a seven-fold difference in the amount of smoke to which
marijuana and tobacco smokers are exposed," he said.
"It's the quantitative difference in smoke exposure that might
explain the difference in the degree of lung injury as assessed
by these physiologic indices."
Moreover, the phagocytes gathered from the lungs of marijuana
smokers do not have the same properties as those gathered from
the lungs of tobacco smokers.
"We have previously shown that the macrophages that are harvested
from the rinse-out of the lungs of marijuana smokers seem not to
be activated," he said. "They do not release toxic oxygen
species, either under basal conditions or under stimulated
conditions nearly to the extent that tobacco macrophages do. If
anything, basal secretion of superoxide seems to be reduced in
the marijuana smokers."
Dr. Tashkin measured the clearance of the molecule diethylene
triamine penta-acetate (DTPA) from the lung, believed to be a
more sensitive indicator of lung injury than measuring the lung's
diffusing capacity.
If DTPA clearance is accelerated, then it implies an increase in
the leakiness of the alveolar epithelial membrane, which implies
injury to the membrane, he said.
Dr. Tashkin noted DTPA clearance is accelerated in tobacco smoke-
related lung injury.
Initially, the chronic effects of marijuana smoke were measured
in comparison to those of tobacco smoke: DTPA clearance was
measured at about 12 hours after the last marijuana or tobacco
cigarette smoked.
To determine the acute effects of marijuana and tobacco smoking,
Dr. Tashkin restudied these smokers a week or two later, giving
them a single joint of marijuana or a single tobacco cigarette or
both, and then measuring DTPA clearance 15 minutes subsequently.
"What we found was the clearance of DTPA was abnormally rapid
from the lung in the tobacco smokers," he said. "It was about
twice the rate of non-smokers. In the marijuana smokers, there
was a tendency toward a much less rapid rate of clearance. There
was no acute effect in either tobacco or marijuana, and there was
no added effect of marijuana or tobacco."
As with the lungs to tobacco smokers, when the lungs of marijuana
smokers are "washed out", a marked increase in the number of
alveolar macrophages is witnessed.
But whereas tobacco smoke has a concomitant effect of activating
the macrophages, leading to the subsequent release of certain
toxic substances, marijuana smoke fails to activate the
macrophages, Dr. Tashkin said. He noted this difference could be
attributed to differential regulation of cytokins.
"It may be that the macrophages from marijuana smokers release
certain suppressive cytokins, like transforming growth factor-
beta, which is known to suppress the inflammatory activity of
nearly all of the site populations," he said. "That's our
hypothesis, which we are currently exploring."
===============
A marijuana-like chemical that occurs naturally in the body may control coughing and various respiratory functions, a University of California, Irvine, College of Medicine research team has found.
The finding, which appears in the Nov. 2 issue of Nature, provides the first insight into the causes of certain types of coughing and eventually may result in the development of new treatments to combat chronic, dry or nonproductive coughing spells. The study, conducted on rats and guinea pigs, also helps answer a decades-old question of why certain patients respond differently to anti-coughing drugs.
Daniele Piomelli, professor of pharmacology, and his colleagues found that a naturally occurring neurotransmitter related to marijuana called anandamide binds to receptors on muscle cells in the lung, controlling the lungs' reactions to chemical agents that often trigger dry coughing.
``Experiments with patients in the 1970s showed that the active ingredient in marijuana helped some patients with chronic asthma, but actually made the symptoms worse in several patients,'' said Piomelli. ``Naturally occurring anandamide in the lung controls the lungs' ability either to constrict and cough or to dilate and ease breathing. This gives us new insight into how coughing is regulated and may help us eliminate the side effects of certain drugs and create new and safer treatments for certain chronic coughing disorders, but without the long-term toxicity and side effects that marijuana's active ingredient causes.''
Types of chronic dry coughing affected by the body's anandamide system are seen in people with some cancers, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hay fever and asthma, and can be brought about by the side effects of medications for blood pressure and other disorders.
The researchers found that aerosols containing anandamide completely stopped the cough produced in the animals by the active ingredient of red pepper. Anandamide also relaxed muscles in the lungs and opened up tiny airways called bronchioles. However, when the vagus nerve -- a major nerve controlling lung constriction (and coughing) -- was cut, anandamide actually constricted the lung.
``Cutting the vagus nerve relaxes the lung muscle well below its normal tone. Under these conditions, adding anandamide contracts the muscles and restores normal muscular conditions in the lung,'' Piomelli said. ``But when the lung muscle is too contracted, as happens with various lung diseases, anandamide will relax it. At the same time, anandamide blocks coughing. All these actions occur in the respiratory tract, which explains why anandamide aerosols are so effective in animals.''
The researchers are now looking at what factors regulate the levels of anandamide in the lungs and how they may be related to disorders resulting in chronic coughing.
Piomelli has been studying the actions of anandamides in the body for several years, and was the first to discover the anandamide network in the nervous system. The network of neurotransmitters has been shown to play a role in the body's management of pain and movement, and has been implicated in a host of diseases, including schizophrenia, autism, Parkinson's and Huntington's.
Much of this research is taking place at the UCI Biomedical Research Center, which is providing much-needed laboratory and clinical facilities for researchers addressing the major health challenges of the 21st century. When complete, the center will focus on research in the neurosciences, the genetics of cancer, immunology and infection and other medical issues. The center's first building, the William J. Gillespie Neuroscience Research Facility, is home to the Reeve-Irvine Research Center and Institute for Brain Aging and Dementia. Construction of the second building, the Robert R. Sprague Family Foundation Hall, began in February.
Piomelli's colleagues in the study included Antonio Calignano and Giovanna La Rana of the University of Naples, Italy; Istvan Katona and Tamas F. Freund of the Institute of Experimental Medicine, Budapest, Hungary; Ken Mackie of the University of Washington, Seattle; and Franck Desarnaud and Andrea Giuffrida of UCI. The research was supported by grants from the National Institute of Drug Abuse and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Media Contact: Andrew Porterfield, UC Irvine Communiations
Phone: 949-824-3969
Contact: amporter@uci.edu
Complete Title: Marijuana-Like Chemical in Nervous System May Control Coughing, Lung Function
Posted: November 1, 2000
Irvine, Calif., Nov. 1 (AScribe News)
AScribe - The Public Interest Newswire - 510-645-4600
© 2000 St. Louis Post-Dispatch, postnet.com
Website: http://www.postnet.com/
Related Article:
Marijuana-Like Chemical Helps Relieve Coughs
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread7521.shtml
CannabisNews Medical Marijuana Archives:
http://cannabisnews.com/news/list/medical.shtml
“We have allowed our nation to be over taxed and over regulated and overrun by bureaucrats, the founders would be ashamed of us for what we're putting up with” Ron Paul
What about ingestion?
I had a huge brownie about 90 minutes ago and you're bringing me way down. Thanks.
Unfair
Don't tell me this.
It's just unfair.
I had no dessert tonight.
"I don't endorse anything they say"
~Ron Paul On the 911 Truth movement.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGyhlNY0y1k
That science was cooked up by
That science was cooked up by the Tobacco industry. FIND ME ONE PERSON WHO DIED FROM CANCER FROM CANNABIS? ONE!
"Human beings with love and compassion are some of the most beautiful creatures in the universe... Those without are a plague on us all."
Prove It
Prove that the science was "cooked up".
Poptech
You've been here for over a year and the only thing I've seen you comment on is pot. Why is that? Did you or a loved one have a bad experience with it? Just curious - I hope you don't mind me asking.
i always wonder what kind of music people like pop listens to?
Beatles? nope, brain damage.
the doors? nope, brain damage.
Willie nelson? nope, brain damage.
pink floyd? nope, brain damage.
bob marley? ahhhhh nope, brain damage.
john mayer? nope, brain damage.
Fleetwood Mac? nope, brain damage.
i know, he/she/it must be a rap music fan?
“We have allowed our nation to be over taxed and over regulated and overrun by bureaucrats, the founders would be ashamed of us for what we're putting up with” Ron Paul
Poptech
You've been here for over a year and the only thing I've seen you comment on is pot. Why is that? Did you or a loved one have a bad experience with it? Just curious - I hope you don't mind me asking.
First Hand Experience
First hand experience with users who wrecked their lives using it. Increased behavior problems, reduced school performance, school suspensions, fighting, depression and schizophrenia. The sad part is they were oblivious to what it was doing to them. Pot users are in absolute denial anything is happening to them. They now are mentally slower and have poor memory performance.
I sure wish you would write
I sure wish you would write some about Alcohol and Tobacco abuse and it's deadly side effects compared to Cannabis.
"Human beings with love and compassion are some of the most beautiful creatures in the universe... Those without are a plague on us all."
Would you feel
better about legalization if there were an age limit on it like there is with alcohol?
I don't care about legalization, I care about brain damage
I care about the propaganda that it is "safe". The sad part is those pushing legalized Pot don't push for legalized crack cocaine because they are brainwashed that pot is harmless.
Legalize Crack Cocaine
Legalize Methamphetamine
Legalize Lysergic Acid Diethylamide
Legalize Ecstasy
Legalize Freedom.
The health effects are irrelevant. The only significant issue is personal sovereignty. The owner of a body has the sole authority to determine the contents of that body, and total responsibility for the actions of that body.
Tell it to Dred Scot
Bump
*
“We have allowed our nation to be over taxed and over regulated and overrun by bureaucrats, the founders would be ashamed of us for what we're putting up with” Ron Paul
I think you are DAIN
I think you are DAIN BRAMAGED!!!
"Human beings with love and compassion are some of the most beautiful creatures in the universe... Those without are a plague on us all."
Impossible
I don't smoke pot.
Cannabinoids and Neuroprotection
Mounting in vitro and in vivo data suggest that the endocannabinoids anandamide and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol, as well as some plant and synthetic cannabinoids, have neuroprotective effects following brain injury. Cannabinoid receptor agonists inhibit glutamatergic synaptic transmission and reduce the production of tumour necrosis factor-α and reactive oxygen intermediates, which are factors in causing neuronal damage. The formation of the endocannabinoids anandamide and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol is strongly enhanced after brain injury, and there is evidence that these compounds reduce the secondary damage incurred. Some plant and synthetic cannabinoids, which do not bind to the cannabinoid receptors, have also been shown to be neuroprotective, possibly through their direct effect on the excitatory glutamate system and/or as antioxidants.
-----
The Journal of Neuroscience, April 15, 1999, 19(8):2987-2995
Cannabinoids and Neuroprotection in Global and Focal Cerebral Ischemia and in Neuronal Cultures
Tetsuya Nagayama1, Amy D. Sinor1, 2, Roger P. Simon1, Jun Chen1, Steven H. Graham1, Kunlin Jin1, and David A. Greenberg1, 2
Departments of 1 Neurology and 2 Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
Marijuana and related drugs (cannabinoids) have been proposed as treatments for a widening spectrum of medical disorders. R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-yl]-(1-naphthalenyl)methanone mesylate (R(+)-WIN 55212-2), a synthetic cannabinoid agonist, decreased hippocampal neuronal loss after transient global cerebral ischemia and reduced infarct volume after permanent focal cerebral ischemia induced by middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. The less active enantiomer S(-)-WIN 55212-3 was ineffective, and the protective effect of R(+)-WIN 55212-2 was blocked by the specific central cannabinoid (CB1) cannabinoid receptor antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide-hydrochloride. R(+)-WIN 55212-2 also protected cultured cerebral cortical neurons from in vitro hypoxia and glucose deprivation, but in contrast to the receptor-mediated neuroprotection observed in vivo, this in vitro effect was not stereoselective and was insensitive to CB1 and CB2 receptor antagonists. Cannabinoids may have therapeutic potential in disorders resulting from cerebral ischemia, including stroke, and may protect neurons from injury through a variety of mechanisms.
http://neuro.cjb.net/cgi/content/abstract/19/8/2987
“We have allowed our nation to be over taxed and over regulated and overrun by bureaucrats, the founders would be ashamed of us for what we're putting up with” Ron Paul
'cannabinoid receptors'
that's the key. Our brain, and it's function, are 'wired' (lol) to be enhanced with cannabis, rather than having our neural pathways impaired like they are with the effects of alcohol. Interesting about the agonists, but organic is the way to go!
Do you know of any studies about folks who can't handle the reefer lashing out? Purely anecdotal for sure, but the only person I know who did the 'carpet carp' after taking a hit, went on to murder someone. Another who smoked a couple of times, and suffered panic attacks each time, wound up to be a complete loser with kids running around from all kinds of different women. His biggest goal in life was to become a police officer, and last I heard, thankfully failed to realize his dream.
If poptart's assertion that use causes brain damage were true, you used to be a freakin' medical einstein before, and now you are getting closer to the level of general society's understanding of brain functions. In that vien, hurry up and smoke some more so you can talk down to him on his level!
THE MORE I LEARN ABOUT GOVERNMENT
THE MORE I LOVE MY GUNS
FourWindsTradingPost
Poptech
You've been here for over a year and the only thing I've seen you comment on is pot. Why is that? Did you or a loved one have a bad experience with it? Just curious - I hope you don't mind me asking.
Dang it!
I hate it when that happens!
See
That's what happens when you smoke too much pot. First you keep clicking, then you get cancer and die.