Powerful, Powerful, Speech By Judge Napolitano! Hear! Hear!
Submitted by Anisha on Thu, 02/18/2010 - 15:03
All the more reason to get on board with the Articles of Freedom.
Now is the Time when millions of Americans will show these criminals that we stand on the side of the moral and that THEY do not have any authority whatsoever.
Every law that is unconstitutional is BOGUS because it has NO AUTHORITY!!!
Thank you for that speech Judge Napolitano!
Bad YouTube link -- favorite this vid
When you see great videos like this, it's good to make sure you "favorite" them on YouTube -- and subscribe to the original source if possible. That helps bring it closer to the top of various searches and to earn it more hits.
Here's the correct YouTube link for this speech:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lwgod62mlbw
thanks for mentioning that.
Probably why videos of Dr.Paul are so ubiquitous.
All of us in the Liberty movement can assist those like Dr.Paul and Judge Napolitano by reading the Articles of Freedom, become conscious of what this is all about and then sign the pledge.
The closer we get to 15 million, the more teeth these instructions to elected officials will be.
http://www.meetup.com/Articles-of-Freedom-Pledge/about/
www.articlesoffreedom.us
Bob Schulz 165 minute Webinar
http://www.republicmagazine.com/webinar/bob-schulz-continent...
As advertised
Very powerful. Thanks for posting it.
Bump
What have you done to help Medina today?
"it is good for the establishment to adopt liberty ideology, but it is not good for those who have already adopted liberty to fall to the feet of the establishment." ~ Annica2
What the judge doesn't say
The supreme court has found all of these acts of congress to be in accord with the constitution--so who is the most corrupt of all, Congress or the supremen court?
Moreover, how did the prosecutors know that the judge in the case cited was going to hold the patriot act unconstitutional. There is supposed to be no ex parte contact between prosecutors and judges. What a laugh that is.
What did this judge do to advance freedom when he was a judge? Easy to be a blowhard when your making a lot of money making speaches and getting paid by Fox news.
Sheldon Waxman
sheldonw72@gmail.com
www.independentcontractor.info
www.thelawyer.info
Dude,
I would bet a lot of money that, if you were given a private audience with Judge Napolitano and you were to call him a blowhard to his face, you would end up having your ass handed to you, one way or another. Seriously, I would bet everything I own.
Dude
If you read my book, "In The Teeth of the Wind" you would know that I have fought for freedom all my life and my qualifications exceed Judge Napolitano's. And I have been persecuted for my libertarian beliefs. I have been on the inside when I was an Assistant U.S. Attorney and found out that the FBI murdered Black Panther leader, Fred Hampton, and blew the whistle on the coverup. You should Google Shelly Waxman and you will find many pages that prove my point. I have asked Judge Napolitano to speak by his side and even sent him my books. I have also asked Fox, Ron Paul, who I have know since 1978, and have also sent emails to The Campaign for Liberty. They didn't even have the courtesy to send me a reply.
Napolitano and the rest of them are an inside closed group and they are all multi-millionaires. I'm not even a thousandaire. There are many victims of gov't. oppression who are not given a chance to tell their stories.
When the movie about my life, which is in the works, gets completed, make sure you don't go see to see it. I don't want your money.
I'd bet you everything you own that Judge Napolitano and I would get along fine, if he paid for my trip to see him.
Go to www.thelawyer.info and then shut your mouth. The real heroes get no recognition. The rest are phonies who are mostly in it for the money. Get some brains.
I am a true revolutionary, not Judge Napolitano.
Sheldon Waxman
sheldonw72@gmail.com
www.independentcontractor.info
www.thelawyer.info
YOUR TRUE COLORS, Sheldon so & so
You know, why don't you take your "fake" tea party elsewhere. There is noone, bar none, except Dr. Ron Paul, who is more of a TRUE PATRIOT than Judge Napolitano.
Your words belie your true attitude, Mr.
Judge Napolitano is feeling the DESPERATION we all are feeling. Gee, I wonder why...
With such massively corrupted politicians continuously on the "take" from Goldman Sachs and the FED, it should surprise you not at all that we are reaching.....reaching....
.....FOR JUSTICE....somehow....someway.
His speech just motivated me to ACTIVELY invade the little meetings of the Right Wingers today!!!
I think Sheldon asks a great question.
To be grass roots means you come from the ground up and not from Fox news down. Sheldon is simply bringing to light the issues that most of us should be aware of so that we do not fall into the "Tea Party" trap. The reality is nobody on this thread actually knows the Judge so there is no reason to fill your cup full with no room to speculate.
The role of a farmer, in Fukuoka's mind, is an observer, not an intervener, of the natural order in his/her particular landscape. How is that any different than Hayek in regards to Economics?
I am glad that you recognized my point
These guys: Ron Paul (who I like), Napolitano (who I like) and Peter Schiff (who I don't like) but I like his father, Irwin, who I represented and is now in federal prison after a federal judge set him up for a conviction, are all making money off their talk and they are not true Revolutionaries, as am I and other oppressive government victims that I can name.
Sam Adams and his Sons of Liberty didn't get paid for their Revolutionary zeal. Nor did Thomas Paine, nor did any of our founders, except, perhaps, that traitor, Alexander Hamilton.
Seems like everybody likes rock stars when it comes to the so-called Freedom movement. Instead they should honor the victims of gov't. oppression by allowing their stories to be told.
I agree with you we should let our leaders come from the bottom up not the top down.
Sheldon Waxman
sheldonw72@gmail.com
www.independentcontractor.info
www.thelawyer.info
The point is not "to be grass
The point is not "to be grass roots".
The point is "to increase liberty".
If you have a "force-amplifying" tool, like a a reputation, contacts, or show on national media, you can use it - as much as you can without destroying it.
If you have nothing you do grass roots organization and MAKE a tool.
= = = =
"Wunnerful, Wunnerful! Turn off the bubble machine!"
-Lawrence Welk (as satirized by Stan Freeberg.)
A "force-amplifying tool" does not come from reputation,
contacts, or political ties... that is the fallacy in bureaucratic behavior. To make a difference involves individual action. Fox news does not pander to the people ever, and they will only use our candidates in a systematic order to apply tactics for controlling the minds of the populace. Why is it that we should pander to Fox representatives when we do not represent their ideas on and off the airwaves… If I saw a trap in a trail in the woods I would make my own path and go around it.
The role of a farmer, in Fukuoka's mind, is an observer, not an intervener, of the natural order in his/her particular landscape. How is that any different than Hayek in regards to Economics?
I love to hear that man speak.
Liberty and freedom roll off of every word he says!
"You`re the Indians of the 21st Century, and that`s very sad."
Russel Means
I love to hear that man speak.
Liberty and freedom roll off of every word he says!
"You`re the Indians of the 21st Century, and that`s very sad."
Russel Means
Did not mean to double post but I am glad it happensd.
.
"You`re the Indians of the 21st Century, and that`s very sad."
Russel Means
How can freedom be defended by the government that wants to take
it away from us?? I caught that at the end of the speech and I don't quite get it.
However it was a great speech! Napolitano can definitely let freedom ring! However when it comes to the interstate commerce clause I do not understand why on earth somebody would want to delegate a power of regulating state commerce to a federal government. I do not believe the fed nor the states should have the power to interfere with any exchange.... they have no produce or service I want, they should not be there.
Nor should local or county officials interfere with these exchanges... this is how monopolies are born into existence
The role of a farmer, in Fukuoka's mind, is an observer, not an intervener, of the natural order in his/her particular landscape. How is that any different than Hayek in regards to Economics?
2012 Ron Paul and Judge Napolitano
Please let this be so!
This would be VERY exciting.
I think the Judge would make the sacrifice, for FREEDOM'S sake. We just need Ron Paul to decide.
May God bless this will happen, or something better.
"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford
hear hear
That case should be used by every Liberty candidate running as an example
The Judge Rocks!!!!!!
Peace
TRUST....BUT VERIFY !!
Someone Once Said, "Trust But Verify.."
The Judge Has No Voting Record...Does He ?
I Like What The Judge Says...But
Ron Paul Has A Voting Record...A Great One...An
11 Term Constitutional Voting Record..
BEWARE !! WATCH AND LISTEN...CAREFULLY
"Trust, But Verify !! "
First they came for Rand Paul.
First they came for Rand Paul.
Then they came for Judge Napolitano.
Who's next? R. J. Harris? Lew Rockwell? Debra Medina? Ron Paul?
= = = =
"Wunnerful, Wunnerful! Turn off the bubble machine!"
-Lawrence Welk (as satirized by Stan Freeberg.)
Your point?
nm
"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford
He truly is an American
He truly is an American hero...
I think i have a crush on the judge...
These guys are my versions of rockstars!
Great video.
The Judge is a great spokesman for liberty.
You know Hitler was a powerful speaker too
He knew exactly what to say to make you his friend, for as long as he needed you
The role of a farmer, in Fukuoka's mind, is an observer, not an intervener, of the natural order in his/her particular landscape. How is that any different than Hayek in regards to Economics?
...you made the accusation, now make your case...
...and try not to leave anything to the imagination if you can...
...RON PAUL runs INDEPENDENT in 2012 taking the politcal world by storm, winning the presidency...
http://towneforcongress.com
http://theronpaulteaparty.com/index.php
http://www.youtube.com/user/rogueliberty
And your point is
that we should be leery of the judge because he could be another Hitler?? I admit I'm dense but I'm afraid you've lost me.
Elect Peter Schiff:
http://schiffforsenate.com/
Hitler spoke of conservatism.
He came from the right wing of the political spectrum; he was a libertarian to Germans in the 40’s because their government has previously spent the country into turmoil. He spoke of Free Markets just like GB and the Judge, but he represented gov’t. I am worried that many libertarians will follow the Judges because he is a great speaker, but not pay attention to who he represents…if he does not practice what he preaches then we at the daily paul could be walking into the same trap as the tea party
The role of a farmer, in Fukuoka's mind, is an observer, not an intervener, of the natural order in his/her particular landscape. How is that any different than Hayek in regards to Economics?
Hitler and Nazis are the Left wing
National socialism (notice the 2nd word) is only barely to the right of communism. Hitler did not support free markets. Please watch a few minutes of "Overview of America" beginning at about 23:00. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_boAGNPmNQ. This is an important concept in the battle for Liberty and these concepts of left and right have had their meaning changed by the press and think tanks. They continue to do the same thing with the word 'democracy'. Our Founders were completely opposed to a democracy but go ask any school kid what form of gov't we have and I'd be surprised to hear anything other than "democracy".
You make a good point about the Judge being a captivating speaker. We all need to make sure we follow the message and not be hypnotized by any individual speaker or we might find ourselves looking at a fool in the mirror like so many of Obama's supporters.
silly argument
there are so many holes in this argument I don't know where to start. I guess I'll start first with Hitler didn't come to power in the 40's, but in the 30's. He was anti capitalist and had little in common with anything libertarian. Break out of the false right/left paradigm...there is freedom and statism...fascism is just one form of statism.
The HELL Hitler came from the right wing.
That's just the revisionist history you get because the LEFT wing has been writing the history books since.
He came from socialism. He came from vegetarianism. He came from mysticism. He came from animal rights (which became "medical experiments on human out-groups" in about three easy steps). He came from body-beautiful health fetishists. And on and on through the whole litany of what you'd now recognize as the new age left.
Then he used whatever means convenient to achieve power.
If you want a scary read, pick up "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich."
The most horrible thing about NAZIism was not just that it happened at all, but that it happened in Germany, which up to then had been Europe's shining light of freedom and tolerance for diversity.
Meanwhile The Judge is clearly trying to DESTROY centralized power, returning the power over people's lives to the individual people themselves.
If being a great speaker or a great speech writer means being a despot, what do you say about Thomas Jefferson? Or Tom Payne?
Or Ron Paul?
= = = =
"Wunnerful, Wunnerful! Turn off the bubble machine!"
-Lawrence Welk (as satirized by Stan Freeberg.)
Good Points
Where does our modern concept of right and left came from? While you can argue that National Socialism is to the right of Communism, it is only barely. See "Overview of America" for an explanation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_boAGNPmNQ. Start at about the 23:00 mark.
Based on the little that I have read about pre-Nazi Germany, it seems that Germany then and modern America now have much in parallel. I would like to get a hold of a paper that explains what was on the minds of the average German back then. Anyone have any suggestions?
Good point.
Has anyone done a search on the judges' record that shows beyond a doubt that this man puts into practice what he is saying publicly?
Any attorneys here who know how to do those law searches going back last 15 - 20 years?
He is a New Jersey judge. Let us satisfy our need to know then for the record.
http://www.meetup.com/Articles-of-Freedom-Pledge/about/
www.articlesoffreedom.us
Bob Schulz 165 minute Webinar
http://www.republicmagazine.com/webinar/bob-schulz-continent...
Hi
The judge has admitted to being a former neocon. He has described himself as one of the "law-and-order Nixonites" during the 70's, so I wouldn't be surprised if his words and actions in decades passed were not equivalent to what he does now.
Still, the idea that he could be another Hitler is rather absurd.
Hi
I think you should read some of Hitlers speeches before you call it absurd. I am not saying he is anti-semite or racist in any way, I am referencing hitler to show that just because somebody can speak well doesn't mean they will act well... that is all.
The role of a farmer, in Fukuoka's mind, is an observer, not an intervener, of the natural order in his/her particular landscape. How is that any different than Hayek in regards to Economics?
Yes, it is absurd to think of him as a 'Hitler'
but it is still appropriate for all of us to know if this fellow practices what he preaches today.
Do we have anything on the record that shows he has changed his ways and if so what has he done beside make incredibly stirring speeches!
I admit I love what he had to say but it is also valid that we see if he is putting this into practice.
Mr.Robert Schulz has some clashes with people and apparently has done controversial things in his past, yet what he has done spearheading the CC2009 and how they have successfully arrived at the Articles of Freedom is pretty remarkable.
I don't doubt that one can improve upon their ways and means but I am curious about our dear Judge Napolitano if there is anything he has done case wise in say the last two years at least that show for the record that he practices what he preaches.
http://www.meetup.com/Articles-of-Freedom-Pledge/about/
www.articlesoffreedom.us
Bob Schulz 165 minute Webinar
http://www.republicmagazine.com/webinar/bob-schulz-continent...
Great Ideal I will have our paralegal check the docket tomorrow
I work for a firm here in Tampa, but I will see what I can do and update you tomorrow.
The role of a farmer, in Fukuoka's mind, is an observer, not an intervener, of the natural order in his/her particular landscape. How is that any different than Hayek in regards to Economics?
Fair enough.
Could you post it here and make a thread for the record of what you find with all pertinent reference?
http://www.meetup.com/Articles-of-Freedom-Pledge/about/
www.articlesoffreedom.us
Bob Schulz 165 minute Webinar
http://www.republicmagazine.com/webinar/bob-schulz-continent...
I wonder if anyone here has
I wonder if anyone here has read his books, and what you think of them.
Debbie
Um, your point?
presumably just "I'm nonplussed."?
If | ⚒ The Daily Paul Improvement Project ⚒
No authority
If people just started doing what they want, so long as it is within the realm of the rule of law (i.e., no violence, force or coercion) en masse, this would effectively render the state moot. This goes along with what someone has posted on the "Draft Lew Rockwell" thread: It delegitimizes the state.
There is no possible way that the government could keep up with all the "law breaking", if you will. Thus, the state is delegitimized. It would have to happen en masse though for it to be truly effective.
In short, if we want a libertarian culture and lifestyle, let's just take it. Why are we trying to "bargain" with the system and the establishment? The real question is not about government wants, the real question is about what the people want. We're just playing "the game" by their rules.
Think about what I'm proposing here.
Gee wake up I hope.
This cenario you speak of would be the perfect storm for the Elite takeover.
STOP IT
gold is where you find it .
Perfect storm scenario
I don't mean riots and such. I mean stop obeying their unjust laws and stop asking them for permission to do what you don't need their permission to do. For if you do, it is at that point that you have chosen to remain subservient to their "laws" and, in essence, have sent them a signal that you agree that their "laws" are correct and should be obeyed. Get my drift here?
Do you think the origins of the founding of America came from a desire to break chains or remain within them? Do you think the founding fathers et al, once thought whether they should ask the king for permission for their actions and deeds?
Wow, that
was a powerful speech.
You have
to look beyond to defeat the future..
REACTION today is what fits their agenda, CHANGE.
gold is where you find it .
Quick question though!
If Judge Napolitano works for Fox, and Fox hates us (and also controls their employees on every level), what makes Judge Napolitano so deserving of his libertarian viewpoint?
The role of a farmer, in Fukuoka's mind, is an observer, not an intervener, of the natural order in his/her particular landscape. How is that any different than Hayek in regards to Economics?
I talked to Judge Napolitano
I met him last March at the first C4L event in St. Louis. He signed Ron's book for me.
I asked him about his TV show "Freedom Watch": "how in the world will Fox let you speak so boldly and freely about Freedom, won't they kick you off soon?"
He replied and I paraphrase, "I have a contract that says they can't control what I say"
Pure and simple.
I found it almost impossible to imagine Fox would agree to that contract, but that's what he said. I guess they can't remove his show either. Perhaps him getting fired is tied to ratings.
"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford
He's in their internet ghetto.
Unless I missed something...
The Judge's bread-and-butter program is in their internet-only ghetto. He makes appearances on other shows but hasn't been given an "air" slot.
IMHO: The Fox execs noticed that the freedom movement demographic has a bunch of money to spend. So they're keeping him on tap as a contingency backup: If this movement takes off enough that they need to pander to it to sell ads, they've got a program ready to go.
So they're Neocons. So what? "Fair and Balanced" was what they WERE claiming. When the two big demographics for a news show WERE the Liberals (all factions mostly getting along) and the Conservatives (all factions mostly getting along) they divided their time between them.
Think they liked Colmes? Think they liked giving about half their air time to him and his ilk? They did it because that's how you make enough of a rep as a news outlet to attract most of the eyeballs and most of the advertiser revenue.
During the presidential campaign they exposed themselves as only presenting the Neocon faction and outright suppressing the libertarian. But Ron's Liberty movement is growing. So to avoid losing their eyeball time and money they need to have liberty movement attractors. Thus The Judge.
Unlike the left-wing press, the operators of Fox aren't so committed to pushing their own ideological agenda - or so stupidly short sighted about how to do it - that they're willing to completely destroy their own network and income in the attempt.
= = = =
"Wunnerful, Wunnerful! Turn off the bubble machine!"
-Lawrence Welk (as satirized by Stan Freeberg.)
ahhh... I see. So they are only financially conservative
So why does the Judge promote Fox if he is a libertarian, does he not know he is being used, or does he not care?
The role of a farmer, in Fukuoka's mind, is an observer, not an intervener, of the natural order in his/her particular landscape. How is that any different than Hayek in regards to Economics?
Probably because he can do a
Probably because he can do a lot more to promote the cause of freedom by doing it than by not doing it.
He's got creative control. He's got a national show - even if it's internet only so far. He gets to be the voice of the liberty faction on a lot of multi-commentator panels. He gets to substitute host for Glen Beck on the national main feed - and do the show as much his way as he can get away with without offending Glen. These appearances give him enough credibility to be a star attraction on podia where he'd otherwise be just another voice or not even invited, practice honing his speaking, a budget, news sources, research assistance, contacts...
That's a LOT.
If there's ever a more liberty-friendly news outlet it might make sense to move. But for now Fox is the best there is.
It also gives him a chance to plant our ideas in the heads of people at Fox News. B-)
= = = =
"Wunnerful, Wunnerful! Turn off the bubble machine!"
-Lawrence Welk (as satirized by Stan Freeberg.)