HAVING PROBLEMS VIEWING THE SITE? GET FIREFOX! | A NOTE ON ADVERTISING

   

Michael Reagan: "I will support the Democratic nominee over Ron Paul"

Yes. Im not exaggerating. I'll try to find the audio... but this is what he said on his show. (On SIRIUS Patriot 144).

In no uncertain terms, he said he would support Hillary, Obama... whomever, over Ron Paul. He said that they are less crazy than "those Ron Paul people".

We need to do something to educate this ignorant hackjob.

output

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

How do we know this is true?

Where is the recording?

Maybe we should find out if this is true before sending him hate mail and death threats, don't ya think?

I always thought BALLET DANCERS were dem's anyway

did i say that out loud?

Oh, I'm keeping the faith

Don't get me wrong... I'm supporting ron paul 'til death.
But i'm tired of bitching about the media. It's not the way to win imho.

I'm going to knock on some doors, meet my neighbors and pass out some slim jims.

peace.

Michael is the *adopted* son

of a President who was made impotent from an assasination attempt, and Alzheimers.
Noone cares what Michael "my father" Reagan says.
He is not even on the low level of Glenn Beck.
For god sakes!

my feelings on this post:

WHO CARES.

i'm done with the media at this point.

I'm going to wash some dishes now and go walk my precinct.

have fun guys.

Let me sum up my feelings,

Ron Paul is the last defender of the founding ideology. When this is over win or lose, I shall keep my faith.

\\test\\\

:)

So here's what we will do...

When it's time for the general election, we won't support a CFR stooge like Romney and McCain, we'll write in Ron's name and then they can see how many votes their GOP nominee will have lost by.. Heh.

Write ins DON'T work

Unless a set of rules are followed. For example, Dr. Paul has to be registered as a write in candidate, then there is a deadline, no telling what else. So just to say, I'll write in his name sounds powerful, but it is not, unless criteria has been met.

Write in ?

Since you seem to be knowledgeable about write in rules, can you please refer me to a couple of accurate resources on the matter?

For Liberty,
Becky Blauvelt
Formerly known as Hestia

We can write in on our paper ballots (mail in election)

If I remember right, there are some blank lines to do so. I would suggest checking with your county clerk (county election officer).

One thing we discussed before to avoid using touch screen machines to vote on would be to request an absentee ballot, which should be paper. That would be another question to ask.

I watched "Hacking Democracy" (the whole thing) yesterday, and I found out it isn't ONLY the Diebold machines that can be hacked! We need to see that ALL votes are paper votes and hand counted!

Could this be about his need for higher ratings?

Or is it that his rancor on so many other conservative issues that makes his talk show rank much lower than someone with his name recognition might be expected to have? Talkers Magazine just came out with a national ranking list: http://www.talkers.com/ma...
and while they only assign numbers to the top 100, you can tell by the number of non-syndicated local programs above him, that wherever he is below the 100 mark can't be where he wants to be.

His disdain for Ron Paul, and whoever his Democrat preference might be, might get some newspaper or blog attention, but I seriously doubt it will translate into any higher ratings for his show. Most radio listeners would rather listen to NPR than Michael Reagan.

NPR Just as Biased as the Others

Too bad for them. NPR is turning out to be just as biased against Dr. Paul as other media outlets.

Ad hominem! Abusive!

http://www.dailypaul.com/...

Ignorant might be valid...
Sorry if I start to sound like a broken record....

Grow up

Those whole 7 hours are showing

If it wasn't for Ron, maybe

If it wasn't for Ron, maybe his father WOULD'NT HAVE BEEN PRESIDENT, considering he led the delegation to elect Ronald Reagan. How could he be so ignorant?

Dr. Paul was Reagan's protege of sorts...

Cannot believe Ron Jr would be such an ignorant 'patriot'...

He doesn't share the same

He doesn't share the same genes as Ronald Reagan nor the commitment.

Mike is a stooge who has

Mike is a stooge who has sold his soul and is a discrace to his adoptive father Ronald Reagan.

Tim
Active/Reserves/Retired
Join the
Military for Ron Paul
meet-up Group
http://ronpaul.meetup.com...

Well.. If he is taking his

Well..

If he is taking his point of view from what he sees in the mainstream media then yes the Ron Paul supporters do look crazy. Lynching Hannity, throwing snowballs at people, etc..

Look at the biased coverage the MSM has been pushing. Even Frank Luntz says the same thing, "you people act to damn crazy, calling my house saying 'F$%k you Frank', that is why I won't give you a break".

People are letting their emotions get the better of them and are making ALL supporters look like disrespectful idiots. Think about how this is working for the neo-cons in the way that they keep saying "Radical Islam" by making the entire religion a villain in the way they twist it because of a few idiots using the religion to push their agenda giving that religion a bad name.

Please people quit acting so disrespectful and focus on being a positive force for change.

"Politics is a dance of passive aggressiveness that takes intelligent assertiveness, not emotional belligerence." George E. Tarrant III

Oh, for pete's sake

Stop with the Hannity already. They didn't LYNCH Hannity. Throw a snowball. Give me a break. Every kid plays snowball throwing. You care what Frank Luntz says??? Frank is a proven fraud. He plants people and sways people by his own admittance. It is people within a group who make a big deal out of nothing that cause a group to look disjointed and incohesive. If you are in the group, stop criticizing the group. Allow a little individuality. Hannity had a smile on his face when he turned around. If he made a big deal out of it, we should not have followed.

Actually..

If I was Hannity, and someone protesting threw something, that someone would be in jail for assault. Period. It was a dumb friggin move, and those involved need to man-up and apologize.

Mike Stahl

Wrong about Luntz

Luntz has not admitted that he plants and sways people. He is on video saying that it CAN be done. That doesn't meant he does it. The Penn And Teller video that's been circulating around took portions of Luntz talking and took it out of context to manipulate you and so many other Paul supporters to think he was saying that he does this. My Statistics professor, like Luntz, showed us how this can be done as well. Does that mean that he does it when he conducts research? Of course not. This is taught in order to show us to beware of polls by closely examining the questions being asked.

Wrong about Luntz

Luntz has not admitted that he plants and ways people. He is on video saying that it CAN be done. That doesn't meant he does it. The Penn And Teller video that's been circulating around took portions of Luntz talking and took it out of context to manipulate you and so many other Paul supporters to think he was saying that he does this. My Statistics professor, like Luntz, showed us how this can be done as well. Does that mean that he does it when he conducts research? Of course not. This is taught in order to show us to beware of polls by closely examining the questions being asked.

Fine I give up

Lets all go act like emotional @sshat immature children and get labeled a violent revolutionary group so that everyone with a Ron Paul sign in their yard is a candidate for a cell at gitmo.

He was smiling because he knew that he could now use the event for justification to improve his ratings and further drive a wedge between his listeners/viewers and Ron Paul.

I understand that Fox is fraudulent but look at the SC debate, they expose themselves. Provoking them solves nothing because they have more people on their side. To win those people you have to give them a reason NOT to hate you as Hannity or Luntz may say.

I'm sorry but in principle a peaceful resistance does not mean screaming obscene comments and chasing someone en-masse down a street or throwing snow balls. It is immature and once people get it through their think heads that their actions reflect on their candidate then maybe we will see some progress with the media.

Look at how they took a supporter position of the 9/11 truth movement and made it a question at the national debates. Also look at the newsletters that they are playing out to no end smearing Paul as a racist because of one or two bad eggs connected to Paul who wrote that filth under a few newsletters bearing his name.

The media and politics will bury you with guilt by association. If you havent figured that out yet, then we have no hope of a diplomatic approach because most americans believe almost everything they see on the news and we might as well bend over for Hillary care, or revive the militia.

I agree

Many Paul supporters automatically hate anyone in the media that expresses disagreement with Paul, and attack them, either by being verbally abusive or by threatening them with violence in emails. I saw someone in here print out a letter to Luntz saying that he was going to "kick [him] in the throat." If I didn't know anything about Paul and saw the way so many Paul supporters are, I would think "What kind of leader has sent these vicious immature people out?" It's just natural instinct to associate a leader with his followers.

What Filth?

The only parts of the newsletters I heard were the ones Wolf Blitzer read when he interviewed Dr. Paul the other day. I heard no filth or racism, though I definitely heard non-PC opinions. In fact, most of what was being read was true if you examine it with a non-PC brain. It may not be truth that people want to hear.

We dont want change

We are the defenders of the founding ideology.

RINOs + Democrats = loose change, change on the loose.

Those of you that do not understand the horizontal political scale, and use msm rhetoric show your naivity everytime you speak.

*sigh*

Trying to convince the brainwashed masses by extremism doesn't cut it. The people will still tune in to the tube every night and gobble up what they see and you, who insulate that I am naive are obvious egotistically offended and probably think people are insane and / or stupid for not supporting Paul, yet look at the example the extremism has sent aside from giving free negative media coverage, it has actually turned off other supporters.

The principle behind Pauls campaign is to change the system within the system through peaceful resistance of the status quo, so what you need to do is not personally attack people because they cannot yet see the wisdom in supporting Paul. It makes ALL of us look bad and shuts people down from opening their minds. You would also do well not to attack Paul supporters who admonish extremism as you will get people so angry that they might withdraw their support for Paul with his peaceful option and take the second option, convince everyone to vote for the opposition so that they drive the country into the toilet and then the armed resistance can start, or maybe that is what you are trying to do.

Are you full yet?

You just gobbled a whole lot of MSM PC garbage.

You still don't get it. If

You still don't get it. If you do not play the game the way the rules are currently set you will not get anywhere. I havent heard Paul call for that yet. As a matter of fact I have heard him mention the word peace more than anything else and making sure that the system itself doesn't shaft him. I also heard him say in the SC debate that those who are shedding a bad light (ie, 9/11 truthers) should distance themselves and their rhetoric as it does not help his campaign and if they truly support him to STFU.

Your apparent lack of intellectual prowess and closed minded arrogance shines through just right. The PC crap that has happened has taken years to put in place and will take a fair amount of time to change back as well. The only way to fix it overnight in such extremist ways is an armed conflict.

Are you done attacking me yet for trying to actually help the campaign?

You still,

believe the msm is your friend.

"They will help us as long as the grassroots back off."

Please, I will stick to my politicaly incorrect "extremism".

When the founding Ideology is extreme, global empire and pre-emptive first stike are pc, I will choose extremism every day.

PS, dont treat yourself as the campaign saviour.

Look at your ignorance in

Look at your ignorance in your own statement.

"They will help us as long as the grassroots back off."

I never said that, actually when the grass roots was not seen as extremist the MSM begrudgingly gave Paul coverage due to fundraising efforts and the fact that we were killing them with kindness, now they play ALL Paul supporters as lunatics.

"When the founding Ideology is extreme, global empire and pre-emptive first stike are pc, I will choose extremism every day."

You show once again your idiocy, the founding fathers tried diplomacy first, the revolution took 20 years to gain support after all diplomacy and working within the system failed. You rail against pre-emptive first strikes and everything that has taken years to do but will not even take the opportunity to try to play the game. You want to resort to extremism and pre-emptive strikes against the system that we all despise.

Think for once and instead of letting your emotional actions get you into more trouble. The extremism by a few Paul supporters has sadly caused "blowback" and you, just like our ruling elites right now do not want to admit that the actions taken were wrong.

If you force people to accept something they will fight it at every turn, you are acting just like the neo-cons you hate only you believe you are in the right because you believe in Paul's message.

Quit stooping to their level and play the game. I know it is unfair at times but if you at least try then when the real Revolution kicks off there will be a certain level of vindication by at least having tried.

I never once said or think that I am the campaign saviour, I am just irritated that people take in only half of the message and run off half cocked and emotionally charged trying to force the rest of the country to change their minds about every thing that most of them have ever known to be true.

You keep playing THEIR game,

I am with Ron Paul till the end.

The establishment cares nothing for your spirited endevours, Ron Pauls campaign, or the founding Ideals.

To do the same thing on a daily basis and expect a different result is the definition of insanity.

You will get what you

You will get what you deserve.
I will still support Paul and I hope he can win the nomination and the general without anymore blowback from actions of his immature supporters, but I am done trying to reason with the children on Daily Paul.

EDIT:

Actually no I am not going to give up on you people.

"The establishment cares nothing for your spirited endevours, Ron Pauls campaign, or the founding Ideals."

You already conceded that they won diplomatically and by your own submission there Paul should drop out of the race right now. The establishment controls the system and therefore we have to play the game by their rules to win.

Read Michael's book

Michael Reagan wrote a book in '88 entitled "On the Outside Looking In" which discussed all the family disturbances...he was an adopted son by Reagan and Jane (1st wife)...was considered the "black sheep" of the family and disliked Nancy immensely. He also confessed to being sexually abused at a boy's camp when he was young. If you read the book...it explains how father and son probably don't see eye to eye on much of anything.

This is just one more

This is just one more indication that the Democrat and Republican parties are controlled by the same people, namely the Council on Foreign Relations. The leadership of either party, or their lackies in media will jump parties to support the agenda. We saw this with Clinton promoting NAFTA, a Republican plan. When the Clinton "Assault" Weapons Ban was up for renewal, Bush promised to sign it if the Congress passed it.

Aside from their posturing, these people all work for the same interests. All except Ron Paul. He is threatening to upset their apple cart.

We in effect have a one-party system in this nation, just like the Soviet Union had. They try to give us the illusion that there is a difference between Democrat and Republican parties. There is none. Any candidate who strays too far from the approved agenda will be attacked by either party.

The problem is the party leadership, and their loyalty to the Council on Foreign Relations. We can expect to see the Republican leadership sabotage their own candidate should Ron Paul get the nomination, just as they did to Barry Goldwater. The leadership needs to be purged from the Party, or the party needs to be abandoned.

Two party farce

RINOs + Democrats = change on the loose

Well,

This Right Wing family is bailing on the Republican party for what they have done to Ron Paul.

We are flipping this election and writing the GOP to tell them to stick it up their arse.

What are we gonna vote for is the question. Maybe we should just stock pile food and exercise.

We may just flipp out.

Shows that he is the now day republican

he believes in the war and the way the republicans have left the party. I thought at one time that he was a Christian.

His Father would be ASHAMED!

What is it with these Reagan kids?

It's Dr. Paul against the Establishment

and the Establishment comes from both sides of the spectrum. Everyone who has their snout in the public trough. That explains why the press is getting away with this Ron Paul brownout.......Democrats and Republicans are in favor of it. Our only chance, is grassroot people waking up, and a very professional handled campaign effort.

This is no Suprise

The Neo-Conservative movement is born out of the left plank of the Democratic party. Foreign intervention, social welfare state, controlled and planned economies - these are all the marks of statist regimes throughout history.

The false left-right dichotomy is going to fade away under the pressure of the freedom movement. Obama, Clinton, Edwards, Giuliani, McCain, Thompson, and Huckabee... they all stand against a free and proud America.

The left Fears DR Paul as much as the right

The attacks have started to come from the socialist left we must really be making headway despite all of the censorship and propaganda!

Reagan Democrats will flock DR Pauls message if they are allowed to hear it.

Fine By Me

I don't know him, anyways.

"He who exercises government by means of his virtue may be compared to the north polar star, which keeps its place and all the stars turn towards it." Confucius

this reminds me - speaking of father/son endorsement

Mark Levin had Fred Thompson on his radio show Friday - after the debate that the media decided to tell us that Fred "won" (LOL!)
and he introduced him with some words about how he s a true goldwater conservative!
Why not ask Barry Goldwater Jr who the true Goldwater conservative is!?!?

Mark Levin is the MOST disrespectful to Ron out of the talking neo-con heads, although I like the way he has been dismantling McCain and Huckabee lately.

-------------------------------
"Let me see if I get this right. We borrow $10 billion from China, and then we give it to Musharraf, who is a military dictator, who overthrew an elected government. And then we go to war, we lose all these lives promoting

Correction

I meant George "Steponallofus"
"Only by pride cometh contention." Proverbs 13:10

Can't Go Back

I wish we could go back to better days as well, but we can't. To live in a messed up world hoping things will get better is most vexing. So get out and DO something to help Ron Paul get elected. He is our only hope, humanly speaking, for a free, peaceful and truly prosperous country. However, he is not a guarantee. The neocons and the media (same thing) will do all in their power (and they have a lot) to make sure that doesn't happen.
George "Sneponallofus" saying, "That's not gonna happen" to Ron Paul's stating his goal was to win was more ominous than meets the ear. "That's not gonna happen" was said by someone who has a good idea just how powerful the neocon, one-world machine is.

With all that said, there is hope: "In hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie, promised before the world began." (Titus 1:2)
No matter what happens, I know that I will live forever when I get my new body and this corrupted one dies. God is too good a God to make a world the way it is has become. Too many people dismiss Him because of the way they see this world. This world is the way it is because of man and his sinful ways. God hates it, but He loves us - so much that the penalty that justice demands for all our sins, He paid, by taking on the form of man, yet without sin, and suffering in our place, and using unwitting, proud religious people to accomplish the nasty business. Then He arose and proved His power by appearing to over 500 people at a time and for forty days then ascended back up to heaven with the promise that He would return in due time. When He does come, He will take vengeance on them that know not God, that obey not the truth. Those of us who believed on Him as our Saviour and ONLY hope will live forever and rule and reign in His kingdom on this earth. Only then will will the world's problems be fixed.
So put your trust in Jesus Christ as your Saviour and then go out and vote for Ron Paul, not Mike Huckabee, he's a neocon in sheep's clothing!

"Only by pride cometh contention." Proverbs 13:10

God is us and...

...we are responsible now...for this body and for those bodies that rely on us. If God is some deity looking down 'hating' anything I would question his or her godliness. God is within us and his power flows through us and around us at all times. God is love and has no concept of hate. God loves Ron Paul and wants him to be president. Since you are god and have a great deal of power in this universe, make it so.

Goodness

We are not God. God has concept of anger. We have God's spirit in us. God often looks upon our free will choices and is not happy with what we have chosen. If you want to use the word "hate" which is thrown around too much today, then ok, He doesn't like it = He hates it.