Wolf Blitzer has been very fair to Ron Paul.

Only thing wolf is good at is reading a prompter....these people, all of them, are hired on how well they can read the script.

Don't go soft on the media.....wolf plays a roll in the blackout. The biggest disappointment is Cspans participation. I will never forgive Brian Lamb for this.

Remember, General Election owns the media....the war profiteers.

I used to think he was sort of bland, but now I realize he is just being an impartial journalist. Following the news as closely as I have, from MSNBC, to CNN to FoxNews, Wolf Blitzer has earned my respect as the most objective and fair. good post!

I remember watching him when i was a teenager in the late 90's, I think.

To me, the MSM is putting Ron Paul on a channel that appeals to democrats! Thus, I wish they'd let Ron Paul speak out on the "conservative networks" such as Faux.

A former AIPAC lobbyist

"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent" Thomas Jefferson

Blitzer has given Dr. Paul more coverage than anyone else.

What bothers me is MSNBC's bias. It's not right that they don't allow Tucker and Pat to talk about him. They only get to sneak him in every once in a while.

Keith Olberman is way bad - even when Paul placed second in NV and Chris Matthews was talking about it, Olberman changed the subject to McCain.
WTF?

I think Olberman is one of those crazy Progressive New Lefties from Daily Kos who hate Kucinich and Paul more than they hate Bush.

I may be a vegetarian, but I'll defend to the death my right to eat pork!

I think "most fair" implies that some, if not many, have been fair to start with.

So while I appreciate Wolf having Dr paul on more than most (second to maybe Tucker), I think we should say "least unfair."

Keith Olbermann is a good guy.

I disagree.

Rating the newtworks, I'd say Faux is the worst for bias. But all the others are tied for next to last place. None of the others treat Dr. Paul with anything near the respect he deserves.

Now about Wolf in particular. How many times has Wolf mentioned Julie Annie? How many times has Wolf mentioned Thompson? Now, how many times has Wolf mentioned Dr. Paul? If he was fair, Dr. Paul should have more mentions since he is doing better than those two by any objective measure.

I'd say all the networks are biased, none get a passing grade.

One more thing. I wish people would quit posting saying Wolf is about to talk about Dr. Paul. I see that as a blatant attempt by CNN trolls to boost their ratings by getting all of the thousands of Paul supporters to tune into CNN. Instead, don't tell us Wolf is getting ready to talk about Dr. Paul. Make a youtube video of it and post it and tell us about it. You can watch CNN so we don't have to.

He is one of them. His loyalty is to Israel more than it is to the U.S. He used to work for AIPAC.

Screw CNN also. They are showing candidates speeches on CNN taday. No mention of Ron Paul. No mention of his second place finnish. It's like it never happened again. Screw CNN!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I know Wolfie has to go by what he is told. But there comes a time that they should just bring up his name and ask the panalists some question about Ron Paul. He didn't even do that last night.

www.ronpaul2008.com

There is life at the end of the tunnel my friends!

Some people still remember their journalism courses.

I agree wholeheartedly! Bump this topic, let's all write him a letter for his great and accurate reporting.

He's seen the ratings boost, he knows what he's doing.

Wolf and Jack Cafferty have both been pretty good to Dr. Paul. I think Jack has even been more so.

Trade with all nations; alliances with none. ~Thomas Jefferson

"Anything worth doing is worth doing slowly." Mae West

He has been one of the most fair, I agree.

If not, sign up....