New Posters - Listen to Ron Paul

Posted May 30th, 2007 by Michael Nystrom

CNN Debate

Dear Friends, Thanks to Dr. Paul's grandson Matt, I will be in attendance at the CNN GOP Debate on June 5th in Manchester, New Hampshire. I haven't been this excited since I was a kid! I'm looking forward to meeting the Paul clan who have already been so kind to me.

And the debate! Will Giuliani apologize to Dr. Paul, as Dr. Paul has suggested he should? Will Giuliani report back that he's read the books Dr. Paul has suggested he read? What will Giuliani say? "No - I don't need to read them." (?) or "Yes, thank you, Dr. Paul - they were really interesting. I learned a lot." (!) Whatever he says, this will be a big day for Ron Paul. The media is starting to take notice.

To help promote Dr. Paul in the upcoming debate, I've made up a new set of posters. These are intended to be printed out on a standard sheet of letter paper, color copied, then distributed widely. Two versions are available - a portrait version with one per sheet or a landscape version with two per sheet. You need the Adobe acrobat software to view and print them.

Here they are:

Portrait Version

Landscape Version

The message is simple: Listen to Ron Paul during the debate.

Please copy and distribute widely. Color copies would be best, but black and white copies are much cheaper!

Tell your friends - especially Democrats - to watch the debate. CNN, June 5, 7pm EDT.

Michael

p.s. - more posters, stickers, brochures and cards here: http://dailypaul.com/node...

Bookmark/Search this post with:

none

On June 4th, 2007 warflame says:

smtwngrl or someone can you cite a spot for that?
I can't find a comment like that. I'd think something that ridiculous would be all over the internet.

Giuliani has already spoken.

On May 31st, 2007 smtwngrl says:

Or his campaign manager has, anyway. He said Giuliani's response to the reading list was, "I don't need to read about 911. I lived through it."

Personally, I think his response is comparable to someone saying that they've lived through an illness, so that qualifies them to be a doctor--which is, of course, untrue. Just "living through" something does not mean you know anything about its causes or what preceded it.