Boston Globe shows some hokey figures

that is a little weird...

The fraud isn't in the reporting of the votes, but in the votes themselves. These machines are quite easily manipulated and we need to concentrate on that...

It's not column labeling.
There is a hidden column on the far right. To view it, do a search for "145" (this happens to be a number in the hidden column), then you can see the hidden column. Refresh, and the column is gone.

Here's what happened "Actual" means "Actual tally of the candidate's column:"

.... .................. Actual .. Reported .. What happened
Pcts. Reporting ... 289 .. ...... 289 ... ... no change
Total Pcts. ... ... .. 301... ..... 301 .. .... no change
Giuliani ............ 20054 .. .. 20054 ....... no change
Huckabee ........ 26035 . ... 26035 ....... no change
Hunter ...... ....... 1195 .. .... 1195 ....... no change
McCain ... ........... 207 .. .. 86802 ...... McCain's 207 discarded; Paul's total given to McCain.

Paul .......... ..... 86802 ..... 17831 ...... Romney's total given to Paul
Romney ...... .... 17831 .... 73806 ...... Tancredo's total given to Romney

Tancredo ...... .. 73806 ... ...... 66 ...... Thompson's given to Tancredo
Thompson ............ 66 ... ... 2808 ...... Other given to Thompson
Other ................ 2808 ... .... 725 ...... Write-ins given to Other
Write-ins ............. 725 .. ... 4058 ...... 4058 of hidden right column given to Write-ins

Question:

What did they do with McCain's vote tally of 207 when they replaced it with Paul's 86,802? If the 207 is not McCain's, then whose is it? Everyone else's votes can be accounted for ...

I smell VOTE FRAUD.

... and why only McCain's tally?
... and why was his campaign "stunned"?

So I could add the numbers quicker. Looks to me like the column headers might be wrong. The numbers add up, just to the wrong candidate. I would love to say that these are the actual results, with Dr. Paul getting 86802. I think it is probably a labelling issue.

I don't know what that extra column is for though.

Like to see hand signals of pyramids and eyes. Double blinking eyes give me a hard on when I see the ring finger move.

"I have found an honest man."

Diogenes of Sinope

They have Alan Keyes' numbers in the McCain column, and because of that, the rest of the column captions are off by one column.

I made screenshots of every single state on boston.com - It's always the same scheme. McCain gets Ron's results, Romney gets Tancredos - we get Romneys votes and Thompson gets all "Other"-Votes. Tancredo is not shown.

So - the table under the map is simply wrong, or something really horrible is going on here.

Sorry for my Englisch, Iam from Germany. :)

...an extra column of numbers that are off the screen on the right that has no column header. You have to select the text in the row and move it all the way to the right to view it.

Does anyone know how to directly retrieve the figures from the National Election Pool?

a screen shot of that page.

at a glance it just looks like the number columns don't line up with the names of the candidates. Perhaps bad *software*--whatever that is, I'm a total technoklutz.

However, after correcting for that offset, it does appear that NO VOTES are recorded for Dr. Paul in Sutton. Another Daily Paul article has a comment from a person who knows of at least 3 votes cast in Sutton for Dr. Paul.

And someone else has pointed out that the comparative totals of the different candidates in both GOP and Dem primaries didn't seem to vary all night by more than a point or two . . . for any of them!!!

This is a very odd pattern of vote returns. I've been watching election returns for almost 50 years and there is almost always a shift, a run, a "feint" here or there in the relative percentages, as returns are reported from various different parts of a state. And the chances of such variation would, I think, be greater with the large number of candidates in this particular contest.

NH is a small state, but there are local and regional variations in its voting preferences just as in other states. If there IS any of the $20 million left, I suggest the campaign spend it on resolving questions about accuracy of vote returns.

Bump

I scrolled over a few districts on the map to see the votes for that area.

Note the vote numbers, and go down to the chart & see how they were switched:

EG
Albany - on the map, McCain got 46
On the chart, it shows Ron Paul got 46

Eg
Conway
On the map, McCain got 571, RP got 76, Giuliani got 123
On the chart, McCain got 0, Giuliani got 76 Ron Paul 571

This needs to be recorded - print screens/video/photos of the chart and each region on the map

very fishy indeed -- switching votes around??

What is this???
Ron Paul in second place?
This is really weird.

Wilmington NC LOVES Dr. Paul

Looks like McCain is near the bottom!

Someone needs to save this, pass along to Bev Harris?

Tancredo 1st
Ron Paul 2nd

Then the total in the boton don't add up.