A.B.C. = ANYBODY BUT CLINTON

Yeah, I want someone else just so I can say someone else was in the executive branch besides a Bush or Clinton since I was born. Since I've been alive it's been VP Bush, VP Bush, Bush, CLinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush. I'd like to change it up a bit. Something fresh. Something novel. I mean I'm just bored already of it.

**

Hillary, Obama, McCain Huckabee are all the same.

Actually, I probably rather Hillary than the other three. At least she can cry pretty good.

I've never voted. Never seen a candidate I liked.

I live in Australia now, but will come back to vote for Paul in the general if he makes the party ticket, or even as an independent.

None of the other candidates are worth my time. Or integrity.

Take your pick between those "electable" people, but a dictator is a dictator and I wear chains for no one.

ABCM -Anybody but Clinton or McCain sounds better to me.

I've been reading some local GOP blogs -- and they are now literally insane as some of them KNOW McCain will lose against Obama, so they are "crossing-over" and voting FOR CLINTON on the Dem primary.

This is why these idiots need to be displaced and put out of their misery -- literally they F'ing HATE McCain (because he is so much like Clinton) -- but they want to make CERTAIN that they are facing Clinton in the main election.

If they succeed in "stopping Obama" they will simply ASSURE that Clinton wins both the Dem nomination AND the main election.

IN-SANE.

Bush-Clinton-Clinton-Bush-Bush-Clinton??? Has America gone nuts? The definition of Aristocracy is a government or state ruled by an elite or privileged upper class. Sound familiar? And ours is the worst kind of aristocracy, one with a dynasty-duopoly twist. Visit EndTheAristocracy.com to get an Anyone But Clinton T-shirt and help us end this madness.

bump bump

BUMP

BUMP

ORP.

Lets be honest. Romney will be awful. His head of the campaign is high up in blackwater. That doesn't smell good. He was former head of bain capital. Which means he is connected to groups like carlyle. Bain capital owns clear channel communications now.

I would much rather have Clinton than these connections in the white house. I mean all other republicans other than Paul are tools for the giant capitalists. I watch their debates and they all scream about who is going to lower taxes more and be better on terrorism. Yet none talk about cutting spending. And when they "lower taxes" it never seems to help the middle class, its usually taxes aimed at helping the rich.

If Ron Paul does not get the nomination, I will write his name in. I'm all done with the lesser of two evils, the phoney left-right paradigm. If Ron Paul endorses a candidate I may consider following his lead.

To me there is no difference between Bush-Clinton-McCain-Obama-Romney etc. The ideas of the Ron Paul are important. We need to send a message to the establishment, the CFR, the MSM, and the corporate monopolists. We are not going away. We are here to stay. Get used to it.

We must be the freedom wing of the republican party. Win lose or draw we must take this as far as we can, all the way to the convention. We have money and resources. Keep the revolution going. Don't worry about Clinton.

As said below in a post, Julie, Huck, McBain would be MUCH WORSE!

Write in Ron Paul. Or don't vote at all.

Lesser of two evils got us this messed up country, if your memory can reach back 4 whole years.

Your sexist distastful comments are reasons why Ron Paul does not attract a significant amount of women.

I’ve been a true believer and a financial supporter for a long time but I won't bore you with the details, as you will no doubt not believe me.

But I for one now think it is more important than ever to STOP HILLARY. Just think about it, bush, Clinton, Clinton, bush, bush, Clinton?

Surely we can and must do better

That is why the new movement must be

A anybody
B but
C Clinton

should ever vote for someone against their conscience. It is better to abstain from voting altogether than vote for someone you know is evil.

It is the "ABC" thinking that got us in the mess we are in in the first place.

Either you are as foolish as Republicans were last time in voting Bush in, or you are a disinformation agent, seeking to disrupt and discourage people here.

I will not pay you any more attention.

Nobody but Paul.
For the most part, Dems and Reps are but two wings of the same bird. Take your pick, tax and spend Democrats or print and spend Republicans. At least with the Democrats you pay the bills as you go with high taxes. With the Republicans we just pass the debt on to our children.
If your serious about ABC you might want to join the Obama camp. The Democrats seem to be flocking to the polls and victory will be theirs if Republicans pick a pro war candidate (anyone but Paul).
How much difference can there truly be between the left and right wings of the CFR? Without Paul we will still get a national ID card (which I will refuse to take). We will still head towards a North American Union and a new world order and on and on.
For me it's NBP.

Evils mentality? Forget about it. I'm voting for Dr. Paul regardless.

----------------------------------------------------------------
A small body of determined spirits fired by an unquenchable faith in their mission can alter the course of history.
~Mahatma Gandhi

You are kidding yourself. It's true that Clinton is more obnoxious than any of the other candidates. I must admit I like seeing her lose in the primaries. But there is no difference between Clinton or Romney or Huck or Obama. Even the Manchurian Candidate. They all work for the CFR. It doesn't matter which of them get elected.

I will not vote for any of them. I am voting for Ron Paul, either as a Republican, a third party candidate, or if I have to write him in. I WILL NOT VOTE FOR A CFR CANDIDATE.

BUMP

ask Ron about the danger of a monarchy and if its more important to stop than any other issue facing us today ?

... Ron Paul will get the nomination... you read it here first... if not, he will win the White House, with or without the GOP.

I think it is pretty evident that she represents a different face on the same sick head. Isn't it crystal clear that in the long run she is no worse or better for America than any of the other candidates on either sides of the corporate candidate/front runner isle? Isn't the anyone but Hillary sentiment cultivated by the faulty premise that their is a big difference between a mainstream Republican or Democrat. The only rebuttal to my points is in pointing out the differing managing styles. They all are forced to subscribe to the same mission statement. I would love to see Ron Paul and Hillary in the General Election! It would be fun to listen to Rush and Hannity have to shill for her. They have both stated that the war in the Iraq is the most pressing issue facing America, with that guiding priority they would have to support Mrs. Clinton.

For Sean Hanity, we are tryign to get Dr. Ron Paul elected here.

Without Ron Paul, the Republican Party suffer its worst defeat in history. It may even mean the collapse of the party. Thanks Neo-Conservative! You've destroyed America.

I will vote third party, but those three are worse IMHO. The Republican party is history if Ron Paul is not nominated.

AMEN!!!

FUCK HILLARY, God knows she needs it!