Granny Warriors Collecting Funds for a Grassroots Recount

Knew you'd come around! 20k or so more to go.

I donated before the crash. Will my donation be counted? I think it went through - paypal and then back to chip-in and back to the grannywarrior site.

I may be a vegetarian, but I'll defend to the death my right to eat pork!

Thanks Virginia!

You contributed $50.00 to RECOUNT $$$
Payment Details
Save or print this page for your records
1/15/2008
Receipt ID 13c59494884cf6a8
Paid By: Virginia
For: RECOUNT $$$
Method: PayPal
Total: $50.00

This receipt confirms that you authorized a payment to Granny Warriors for the event RECOUNT $$$ . Should you have questions regarding this transaction, please visit our FAQ or contact us at contact.chipin.com.

committed by "some unknown"- thats a problem to me- who is this "unknown" and how does he rationalise writing "0" instead of "31" or some other variation with a "1" or a "3" in it? Was it a Freudian slip? or a fraudian slip? Who did it? Are they protecting his identity for the obvious reasons- or is she admitting that she hasnt a clue as to who is involved in the vote count process- allowing some "unknown" have the power so often quoted as - not the one who votes, but the one who COUNTS the votes.

I may be a vegetarian, but I'll defend to the death my right to eat pork!

fruit face?

yeah.........i'm talkin' ta yuh.

it makes sense to stay on target (like star wars)......stay on target......

but needlessly following the examples given by the OLD MEDIA to divide us in our effort to better shape our world comes across, to this paul supporter anyway, as completely contradictory to paul's message. i call you no fruit for not having the capacity to understand that modern steel structures do not fail symmetrically and without cause. blind as a bat........but no fruit. and anyway, i'd rather be a fruit than a vegetable any day. but thanks for playing!

I respect Alex Jones as a defender of freedom so I am offended that you casually cast him as a kook.

Alex Jones works tirelessly to support Ron Paul and has quite a large audience. Click on www.Prisonplanet.com and go to the Alex Jones Radio show and give it a listen. Today he has devoted several hours talking positively about the Paul campaign.

'Nuff said.

Vote RON PAUL 2008
______________
Do you realize that you are calling people kooks and crazy 'fruits' who have good reason to believe that justice has not been properly executed as regards a horrible, terrible crime carried out against this country of ours? And I say good reason because many of those folks you slander are respected and knowledgeable scientist, government related people, educators, etc.

You're calling people kooks and crazy 'fruits' who believe that the murder of over 3000 innocent people is terribly wrong and that the destruction of property mounting into the multiple millions of $$ is also wrong and that those guilty of these horrific crimes have yet to be punished.

You're calling people kooks and crazy 'fruits' because they have evaluated all the various facets of the official narrative and come to the understanding that hardly none of it makes a lick of sense.

You're calling people kooks and crazy 'fruits simply because you disagree with them, and you do so without one drop of proof to the contrary -- you obviously just choose to take the opposite stand regardless of the mounting evidence and facts.

I could go on and on BUT you're not worth the time and effort. You make the term "9/11 truthers" sound like it's a dirty word. Shame on you for that.

By giving that statement, MSM cannot comeback and attack him if we cannot find the proof of vote fraud. You gata know how to play the political chess. Thats why you call it politics,never show your whole card. Never tell your wife about your girl friend if you want to stay with her, I will guaranteed you that your marriage will be over if you did. Same with 911 truth, its smart for him to dismiss it. chip in money for recount and support Ron Paul

Seriously, you're out of your tree.

Obviously. Fraud must be fought by any means necessary. What is at stake here is just as important, if not more so, that getting Paul elected! My position on this will NEVER change.

Vote RON PAUL 2008
______________
I can see that RON PAUL has divorced himself from closer examination of facts and figures (the numbers) in Iowa and New Hampshire // so that means that this recount effort is over, isn't that right?

It certainly would be nice if the playing field was as HONEST as I believe RON PAUL is, and his outlook on the world is; unfortunately, I believe there are truly really bad people out there in the world that are greedy and sneeky and skillful and capable of all kinds of bad things -- even when it comes to taking advantage of an honest person.

I know we all must respect our man's wishes (and I sincerely do) BUT DAMN when (??) will this good against evil ever get a fair playing field if we continue to accept the odds stacked against us as they surely are.

Don't you just think that all the questionable history of those lousy Diebold machine use and the rumors of what got all this started in the first place and those related rumors of GWB stealing the earlier election process away from the People -- might be reason for serious concern here, folks.

Not trying to stir up a hornet's nest -- Just wanting what's fair to be fair (for both sides fair). I don't see how something like that can be a wrong thing to ask for.

January 12, 2008
New Hampshire Recount?

After a careful investigation, I have decided against seeking a recount in New Hampshire. I am confident that not asking for a recount is the right decision.

I carefully considered the arguments for and against a recount before instructing my campaign staff not to pursue it. Without a firm belief that vote fraud had taken place, and without the possibility that a recount would have increased the chances for success of our campaign, a recount would have diverted campaign resources, time, and energy away from crucial battles elsewhere.

We have taken concerns about vote fraud seriously. In Iowa, campaign volunteers carefully monitored the caucuses. Campaign staff placed Paul supporters in every precinct to watch and verify the voting and count. We had supporters phone in results from their precincts to a campaign hotline while others ensured that those numbers were reflected on the official display board at the Polk County Convention Center. The numbers our caucus watchers reported agreed with the official tally, and both results also aligned with the campaign’s internal polling. In relatively pro-Paul counties, our sampling pegged support at 11.5%. This is consistent with an overall 10% finish for the entire state.

In New Hampshire, while I would have hoped for a better result than eight percent, I am convinced that vote fraud played no role in this result. Rumors of vote fraud were investigated, and in the end they proved to be the result of errors in early media reports that were not reflected in the official numbers. In one notable case, when a campaign staff member contacted an individual who had on the evening of January 8 claimed that his vote had not been counted, the person said that he had made a mistake and that the next morning the error in reporting on a newspaper website had been corrected both in the media and -- most importantly -- in the official tally.

Many have expressed concerns that those ballots counted by machine yielded a 2% lower total than those counted by hand. However, machine counted vote totals were more than 2% lower for both John McCain and Mike Huckabee. Hand counted votes were more likely to be cast in rural areas. Results almost always vary between urban and rural areas.

My campaign staff and I have analyzed the numbers in New Hampshire and I have reached the conclusion that it was the high turnout -- not vote fraud or counting errors -- that left us with eight percent of the vote. Our total vote count of over 18,000 votes was well within what we projected given the efforts of our extensive statewide get-out-the-vote program, giving me no reason to believe that vote fraud played any role in the results of the Granite State's primary.

In both Iowa and New Hampshire there is much to be proud of. Taking both states together, I am honored that over 30,000 people cast their vote for me -- more than either Rudy Giuliani or Fred Thompson. Unlike many other candidates’ efforts, our campaign for freedom is growing and our message is spreading.

Now is the time to redouble our efforts. Our resources must be spent on the upcoming primaries and caucuses, and on ensuring that, with your help, we organize every state yet to vote with our Precinct Leaders program.

We can't win primaries and caucuses that have already happened -- but we can win those yet to come. To become the Republican presidential nominee, a candidate must have 1,191 delegates. Iowa, Wyoming and New Hampshire determined only 32 delegates, so we have much opportunity remaining.

Today, I ask you to join me in focusing on the battles ahead as we continue our fight for liberty and our Constitution.

Sincerely,

Ron Paul

http://ronpaul2008.typepa...

While your imput is appreciated ( sometimes) please note on your messages that the Warriors Chip in is funding this and that donations should be sent to that fund so a complete transparent view can be had by people donating. You seem to have made several posts advising sending the funds directly to Howard? This is not the way we need to do this. We need to be able to account for every dime of donations which cannot be done if private donations are sent directly to Mr. Howard. Eric is working very hard to keep every thing open and above board and we do not want to have anyone worry about where their money was spent.

Granny Warrior
www.grannywarriors.com

RSK If your vote total is within 3 percentage points of the Primary winner, it only costs $2,000 total. Any other scenario, you are required to pay the full amount of which the minimum is $65,000.