What did the Richmond and Wentworth NH precincts do to WIN?

Please watch this HBO documentary, Hacking Democracy, concerning voting machines and Diebold voting machines. the video is at:

http://cre8ive-design.net/blog/?cat=7

Thanks to everyone doing their part for themselves, this country and
for the future.

Jefferson County (appropriate name), IA, received more Ron Paul caucus votes than any other candidate. It is the only county in IA that did this. Maybe, the Ron Paul campaign could learn something from the Jefferson County caucusers.

Judge Andrew Napolitano has acclaimed Dr. Paul. See Dr. Paul's Web site at www.ronpaul2008.com.
Read Napolitano, Andrew(2007). A Nation of Sheep (Thomas Nelson). Judge Napolitano is a New York Times best selling author.

from satan telling them to make sure he was no higher than fourth place. The message got lost in voice mail and just did what they were supposed to do...oh well.

Obviously something (?) went right up there for this location.

All honest things that one would hope and pray should have been done elsewhere in the State.

Shouldn't this itself be an argument as to why a recount (forget everything else for a moment) a valid argument that says --

IF WE DID THIS SUPER GOOD 'HERE' THEN WHY ARE THE RESULTS NOT SHOWING (REPORTING) WITH SIMILAR RESULTS ELSEWHERE?

That should be the argument for a re-look // we all know that fraud is suspect in matters such as this. This contrast needs closer examination and comparison // and the only way to compare is to actually take another look. At the other ballots. Right?

Or are we to just shrug and say well that's how it goes, that's how the ball bounces. Seems to me it suggest that something this strong should rightfully be that (at least similar) strong elsewhere. Wouldn't you think so?

Vote RON PAUL 2008

Perhaps they actually counted the votes and reported them accurately! What a novel idea!

This r3volution needs to begin right now with a recount of the votes in New Hampshire. If we do not have legitimate elections, all else is already lost, and we live in a Fascist country. One of our main goals is to eliminate the horrendous corruption in this country, and it has to start with fixing the corrupt election process.

How can we ever restore Constitutional government to this country if our elections are rigged? If we don't demand a recount of New Hampshire, where we already know there were very serious discrepancies, even in the hand counted ballot areas, we will be cheated in every other state. If the other states see that there are serious repercussions, maybe even criminal charges, perhaps they won't risk it.

You can thank my uncle and aunt, their very large family, and the population of like-minded and faith-strong traditionalist Catholics who reside in Richmond for Ron Paul's win there. My uncle's family lives on a self-sufficient farm, home-schools, and does not participate in popular culture (no T.V.s, no computers.) They are pro-life, for very minimal government, and admonish the military-industrial complex.

At this point in the game, we need to look at the methods and the message. They both need to be tweaked. I'm not saying the good doctor should change his message, but maybe the way it's delivered: illegal war changes to bring troops home to their families; gold standard changes to keep more of your money/price of gas comes down; abolish the IRS stays the same. Patriot Act! Patriot Act! Does Obama promise to get rid of the Patriot Act? Soften the image with babies. We've talked about babies before.

1. If the campaign/grassroots effort in those precincts was substantially different than the others, can it be repeated in other precincts/states? And is it scalable to work on a larger level?
2. If the effort was not substantially different that other precincts, is the population that much different (demographics, psychographics)?
Can voters in those precincts be polled to see if they voted for Ron Paul, and if so, why and what message convinced them?
Conversely, can voters in the precincts with the lowest numbers be polled to find out why they didn't vote for Ron Paul.
3. If the effort and population is not substantially different and the only variable is hand counting vs machine counting, well then, we need a recount.

They did nothing more than any other precinct. They're votes were accurately HAND counted. The rest were electronically counted.

Until I trust the government again (That ain't gonna happen) I want hand counts all across the country. Paid for by the tax payers. If that means $67k per state then so be it. It would be the best $3,350,000 dollars this country ever spent! This is our country darn it.

Ron Paul 2008 - Washington County Iowa Chair

Hold on there fella. Fraud makes fools out of honest intelligent people.

I'm from Iowa. I voted for Paul. Keep in mind 10% of the votes in Iowa reported to go to Paul did. I'm sure with only 95% of the precincts reporting, there will be more and if a true hand counted system in the open was used and the majority of the U.S. gets away from this Electronic BS we'd see how RP did much better than is being reported. How come in hand counted precincts he's shown one way and in electronic he's reported another. Also, how come that such similar results were reported state wide for Hitlery instead of Barrack as polls showed.

The same people that said polls should be used to exclude candidates from debates are now being called "unreliable" or "they mean nothing". That is BS.

Ron Paul 2008 - Washington County Iowa Chair

As for the rest of the state. You can't make dumb people smart. How else does NH vote for a man who wants to be in Iraq for 100 years, is against tax cuts and is for amnesty for illegals. Ron Paul should have won in a landslide if Iowa and NH had brains . NH and Iowa should be called the scarecrow states.

We must recount so that the other 48 know that we mean business. If they know they might get dragged into court they will be less likely to cheat.

If you go over the spread difference in each precinct that used hand counting verses machine counts you will see that there is a questionable difference in the vote counts and what particular candidates consistantly receive more votes with the machine voting verses the hand count.
I do agree with the action for the class action filing regarding voter fraud.
Let us remember that any action taken in this country is not easy to do. Dr. Paul has been in politics for many years. He understands politics and the inner workings of the government. We the people must help him in areas that will assist moving him to the next level.
Finding the right people to help in this fight for freedom takes time and can not always be in the lime light for obvious reasons. Our opponents and or enemy are very secretive.
Let us be wise, be strong, be confident and not waiver from our position of freedom. If we lose our freedom we lose everything. Try to think before you react. Lets find individuals in positions that will strengthen our front lines in this war against tyranny.

There was a fair election in these areas. The election officials were not paid off and they did not use the machines to do the count.

I think you will find a similar result in other areas if the campaign had the guts to pursue a recount.

Good question. This needs a good answer by someone who was there. Some real DATE PLACE FORM AND EVENT answers. Jeferson County in Iowa also did eceptionally well.

When this is answered repost the aswer. No oppinions, lets get some facts. A Very Wise Question.

No magic as to why these precints showed strong results for Ron Paul.

They simply counted ALL the votes.

http://www.rpdvd.com

Please buy a stack of these $1 DVDs and send them to all the people you know who don't have internet access or don't hang out on line. Watching Ron Paul in action is way more convincing than sign waves.

http://www.legitgov.org/nh_machine_vs_paper.html

"Where Paper Prevailed, Different Results"

Total Democratic Votes: 286,139 - Machine vs Hand (RonRox.com) 09 Jan 2008
Hillary Clinton, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 39.618%
Clinton, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 34.908%
Barack Obama, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 36.309%
Obama, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 38.617%
Machine vs Hand:
Clinton: 4.709% (13,475 votes)
Obama: -2.308% (-6,604 votes)

Total Republican Votes: 236,378 Machine vs Hand (RonRox.com) 09 Jan 2008
Mitt Romney, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 33.075%
Romney, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 25.483%
Ron Paul, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 7.109%
Paul, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 9.221%
Machine vs Hand:
Romney: 7.592% (17,946 votes)
Paul: -2.112% (-4,991 votes)

They gave him his actual vote counts. These are most likely the only honest vote totals for the whole state.

Joe

did a great job of spreading the good word on RP. Also, these are little rural towns where Guiliani is not popular at all. THat really changes the %'s.

I am not quite sure what goes on at the AOL poll.
But McCain is leading right now.
And Ron Paul needs our votes over there. Again.

http://news.aol.com/political-machine/straw-poll

Just doing my duty.

"Happy Trails"
Tumbleweed Steve

what good does a recount do? did they not use Diebold machines? the paper printout "receipts" are just as easy to manipulate as the inner workings of the machines. One virus/hack can do both. So, what good can it really do? Fact is, people against the war voted for McCain, because they don't want good policies, they want rhetoric and electability. The vote count means nothing. We need to donate MORE to keep Ron Paul in the race. Through the primaries, through the national election. Through to 2012 if we can.

There was a county in Iowa RP won --it was a college town. I suspect the same in this case.

Rich Sage
http://www.bestofronpaulvideo.com/

The campaign sent people to hold signs at a Hillary event and we were chanting. The article listed that we were chanting "End The War" and "Ron Paul Revolution Give Us Back The Constitution". Free coverage at its best. Got it out that Dr. Paul is anti war and for the constitution.

better off to joint other camps... You can't slap some common sense or intelligence into those sheepeople. RP's message...you either get it or you don't.

Duh!

how did you do it. hurry the fuck up and let the HQ know.

everywhere else all i see is RP supporters turning off normal people.

its pissing me off, kuz the supporters are actually COSTING votes instead of adding them by behaving like idiots.

and obviously through fraud were able to manipulate the vote count.

After all, these vote counts were done by those evil computers in these precincts.

Same way the people did it in the other counties where Paul won and they fucked us.

http://operationwakethesefuckingidiotsup.blogspot.com/

This is why a recount is a worthwhile investment!

heh heh