He put a statement on his official campaign website and gave two nationally aired interviews to discredit the story. He has already answered the questions. Put it to bed.
Stay on message ... which we all know he will do ... and nothing but positive results will come of this. Look, the media is frightened of the message! A true revolution is taking place and they know it. In fact as the campaign grows expect even more attacks.
No, I don't see no gift here. I can see how one newsletter like that might slip out, but how do several get out with those messages. Has this been answered? Once the first one slipped out, RP should of stopped the newsletter or made sure what was on subsequent ones. This is going to be bad.
This is the age of desktop publishing - I could, without your permission, write a "frankmcs" newsletter. I could put anything in it that I wanted to. I don't have to send you a copy, and if we are talking about a small circulation, it's likely that you would never see it.
The point is, this is just a distraction. There are much more important issues to talk about.
If my name was on something, the first time I would learn about it, heads would roll. I'd shut it down if need be. CNN quoted from editions in 1992 and 1995, three years later and not all THAT long ago in my book.
I know we're going against the grain on the website, and I'm trying to minimize this myself, but I just didn't think his explanation of how this continued was all that convincing.
Let's assume that Dr. Paul did write these. I don't think so, but let's assume it because others are going to assume it, too, and please follow me on this for a moment.
Would someone please tell me where a politician's long term beliefs have to be etched in stone and frozen in time?
I don't mean the daily pandering flip-flopping for votes that we see from the other candidates. I mean beliefs over years.
If Dr. Paul had said or written this stuff on this campaign or in the past few days or weeks then there would be a story here and real cause for concern.
But that isn't what happened. This was a decade ago.
If Dr. Paul wrote this stuff a decade ago and has changed his views for the better, then that's something we should applaud and point out that he has changed his views for the better based on better knowledge, experience, and wisdom. IOW, he has become a better person.
THAT'S how we educate the public on this if they are going to assume him guilty, even though the evidence is very weak: We send the message that we don't think he did it, but if he did, then he has shown he has grown and improved beyond those bad beliefs. The ability to get and do better in life is an admirable trait, and we advertise that to show the good doctor has enough character and sense to grow. Make it a positive.
It gives air time to Paul's message about individuality as in comparison to group identity. Our society is so imprinted upon group identity. So reliant on it.
I doubt they will be bringing up that topic at any GOP debate anytime soon, huh? Or dems either. Fear, Fear, Fear
Individuality is another viewpoint that threatens the established view at its core .. ROCK ON RP
But I have learned to pay close attention when someone is labeled a racist or anti semite as usually a blanket insult designed to deflect a larger message.
More often than not when you read into the accused philosophical view points you find that it has nothing to do with racism or anti semitism.
I believe that there is a lot of people who do the same.
It can only be negative to be labelled a racist. However, Ron Paul is doing what you can only do: defend yourself and talk about the positives in your campaign. The CNN interview was brilliant.
It is tragic. Check this out though. The next 48 hours are going to be pretty rough on somebody and perhaps Paul too. This is an unfortunate turn of events.
"My understanding over the years has been that the newsletter was in fact written by Lew Rockwell. Mr. Rockwell is notorious in libertarian circles for having been the author. The problem is that this was one of those issues that was so widely known that no one archived the evidence. It just was. And Rockwell is refusing to talk. Paul is refusing to the name the individual who wrote the hate material. "
THE PROBLEM IS IT WAS SO WIDELY KNOWN THAT NOONE ARCHIVED THE EVIDENCE?
Umm ,, to me thats what I call bs ...
Im not saying that the media cant crucify a saint these days, just remember what it is you are realy seeing.
She knows what is going on but will not say. I don't know anything but I will tell you that i have been reading LRC for the past 5 years religiously every morning. this whole story is bumming me out. It's not good for Paul and i am a big fan of LRC, its authors, and the mises institute.
So, yes, I am reading it and I am troubled by all of it. I don't think Wendy is trying to bring anybody down. She is interested in the truth. she is also a blog poster and an author at LRC.
Whether it's Lew Rockwell or someone else, the only name on this will be Ron Paul's until this guy steps forward. It's time for whoever has that name to admit to his words if they're his, even if it makes his life unpleasant for a while. Trying to keep it quiet will keep the issue going, and that truly WON'T be any sort of gift. Jesse Jackson survived "hymietown," and he can survive this.
JMR
Sorry, but it is not going to be a positive. The only positive is that it's still early and this all they have.
Did you just see CNN? I'm not talking about Wolf's interview. It just aired a few minutes ago 7:20 CST.
To paraphrase the talking head: Here's what Ron Paul said about Blacks (sotto voce, supposedly) 10 years ago. Reads the clip about riots and welfare. Here's what Ron Paul told Wolf Blitzer: and it's the clip cut to make Ron Paul sound like Bart Simpson.
Another thought, talking about releasing Black criminals (any criminal, really)--whether they deserve to be in jail or not--is really not going to play well with the GOP base. Especially when the other candidates are former prosecutors or played them on TV. Talking about intrusions into Liberty in the name of the War on Drugs, maybe.
Hate to rain on the parade.
PS--that's not to say I believe the good doctor wrote any of it or believes any of it. I think his life speaks to his belief in liberty for all individuals. I'm just saying that's not how this will be spun by the media.
People who are not already Paul supporters especially Blacks will just see and hear he is a racist. I'm sorry if you disagree this is just my honest opinion, our best hope is that the media just let's this die and nobody brings it up at any debate.
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free".
Goethe
I've concluded that they were statements of opinions, and not negative racial comments, but instead reflections of mainstream opinions of their time. That RP's newsletters printed these opinions is a positive, as repression of the feelings of the "commons" is nonproductive. When there is a problem in the commons, repression of these feelings is counterproductive. These feelings NEED to be expressed to make any needed change. It is never a positive to hold within negative feelings. Ron Paul does a TREMENDOUS service to communtity by providing an outlet for providing the community an outlet for expressing these ideas, for without such an outlet, these idea will only fester in the souls of men, and that will increase the problems, not solve them.
And after reading your post I've concluded that you're a wingding. If RP didn't think they were racist, why did the person get fired? And why am I arguing with you? If you were talking about the welfare state and aff action causing anger - that's something else - but you are not.
I feel sick to my stomach about the letters. I feel like my name might as well have been on them. I've told my family and friends all about Ron Paul and how I thought he had an outstanding character. Now I have the responsibility to go back to each one of them and tell them about this crap because they need to be informed about that as well. I can see overlooking some of it and giving Ron the benefit for not writing it but the fact is he was hanging around people who make racist comments; it's horrible and we should figure out why people like this are attracted to Libertarianism.
card and I think if Dr. Paul continues to press issues that he alone is pushing to help minorities they will study him and realize just like us he is REAL not a phony like the other candidates.
Of course it turned out to be postive but for how long and how many heard the responce. I hope as always we get a fair election and time for the message to be understood by all. I want to thank everybody for all the postive effort in getting the message out.
Many people never hear a rebuttal and many never believe a rebuttal even if they hear one.
gma
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety, and ultimately will have neither."...... Benjamin Franklin
there are many ignorant people that will just read the headline that says something like "Ron Paul's racist newsletter"
on the other hand, Ron Paul answered the question with fire in his belly. He showed how he was outraged at people calling him racist, he mentioned he is against the war on drugs and he said Rosa Parks and MLK were his heros. He was clear with his answer and hopefully people that saw it or will see it will look past the headline.
Will that little smug Chris Wallace try to bring it up.? If he has half a brain he knows that he better not give Ron Paul a chance to win over millions of black voters.
We have to remember nearly half of America has still not heard the name Ron Paul or is completely ignorant to his positions. This was ultimately Name Recognition for many people - dispite the smear. More people will be curious about the buzz and more learn the truth.
FOX won't try that s#$t with him
I bet you that they won't bring it up tonight.
HELPS foe show
HELPS foe show
Yes it was great
I loved seeing Dr. Paul all fired up.
It was also great incentive for the MLK money bomb. Lets show them that his supporters aren't racist either!
i hope it will make the mlk money day huge.
ron paul 2008
It's a positive
He put a statement on his official campaign website and gave two nationally aired interviews to discredit the story. He has already answered the questions. Put it to bed.
Stay on message ... which we all know he will do ... and nothing but positive results will come of this. Look, the media is frightened of the message! A true revolution is taking place and they know it. In fact as the campaign grows expect even more attacks.
REVOLUTION!
http://ronpaulrecount.blo...
Yes
Yes Yes Yes!!!
Wilmington NC LOVES Dr. Paul
Millions of AA are locked up in prison and they all have famlies
Ron Paul for President!!!
Listen, if you are uniformed you will believe this nonsense and if you are white you will check it out and see he is not a racist and see his message!
No, I don't see no gift
No, I don't see no gift here. I can see how one newsletter like that might slip out, but how do several get out with those messages. Has this been answered? Once the first one slipped out, RP should of stopped the newsletter or made sure what was on subsequent ones. This is going to be bad.
.
This is the age of desktop publishing - I could, without your permission, write a "frankmcs" newsletter. I could put anything in it that I wanted to. I don't have to send you a copy, and if we are talking about a small circulation, it's likely that you would never see it.
The point is, this is just a distraction. There are much more important issues to talk about.
that's my gut feeling too
If my name was on something, the first time I would learn about it, heads would roll. I'd shut it down if need be. CNN quoted from editions in 1992 and 1995, three years later and not all THAT long ago in my book.
I know we're going against the grain on the website, and I'm trying to minimize this myself, but I just didn't think his explanation of how this continued was all that convincing.
Just a cotton-pickin' minute here!
Let's assume that Dr. Paul did write these. I don't think so, but let's assume it because others are going to assume it, too, and please follow me on this for a moment.
Would someone please tell me where a politician's long term beliefs have to be etched in stone and frozen in time?
I don't mean the daily pandering flip-flopping for votes that we see from the other candidates. I mean beliefs over years.
If Dr. Paul had said or written this stuff on this campaign or in the past few days or weeks then there would be a story here and real cause for concern.
But that isn't what happened. This was a decade ago.
If Dr. Paul wrote this stuff a decade ago and has changed his views for the better, then that's something we should applaud and point out that he has changed his views for the better based on better knowledge, experience, and wisdom. IOW, he has become a better person.
THAT'S how we educate the public on this if they are going to assume him guilty, even though the evidence is very weak: We send the message that we don't think he did it, but if he did, then he has shown he has grown and improved beyond those bad beliefs. The ability to get and do better in life is an admirable trait, and we advertise that to show the good doctor has enough character and sense to grow. Make it a positive.
"Welcome to 2008: The Year of Ron Paul!"
Positive in One Sense at least
It gives air time to Paul's message about individuality as in comparison to group identity. Our society is so imprinted upon group identity. So reliant on it.
I doubt they will be bringing up that topic at any GOP debate anytime soon, huh? Or dems either. Fear, Fear, Fear
Individuality is another viewpoint that threatens the established view at its core .. ROCK ON RP
Perhaps I am jaded..
But I have learned to pay close attention when someone is labeled a racist or anti semite as usually a blanket insult designed to deflect a larger message.
More often than not when you read into the accused philosophical view points you find that it has nothing to do with racism or anti semitism.
I believe that there is a lot of people who do the same.
Negative but you have to make the best of it
It can only be negative to be labelled a racist. However, Ron Paul is doing what you can only do: defend yourself and talk about the positives in your campaign. The CNN interview was brilliant.
No
It is tragic. Check this out though. The next 48 hours are going to be pretty rough on somebody and perhaps Paul too. This is an unfortunate turn of events.
http://rightwatch.tblog.c...
Are You Reading This Crap ..
Here is a sample from your link
"My understanding over the years has been that the newsletter was in fact written by Lew Rockwell. Mr. Rockwell is notorious in libertarian circles for having been the author. The problem is that this was one of those issues that was so widely known that no one archived the evidence. It just was. And Rockwell is refusing to talk. Paul is refusing to the name the individual who wrote the hate material. "
THE PROBLEM IS IT WAS SO WIDELY KNOWN THAT NOONE ARCHIVED THE EVIDENCE?
Umm ,, to me thats what I call bs ...
Im not saying that the media cant crucify a saint these days, just remember what it is you are realy seeing.
More than reading this crap my friend...
I am reading it, following it, digesting it and bumming out by the whole sordid affair. Check out Wendy's Blog and read her last three entries.
http://www.wendymcelroy.c...
She knows what is going on but will not say. I don't know anything but I will tell you that i have been reading LRC for the past 5 years religiously every morning. this whole story is bumming me out. It's not good for Paul and i am a big fan of LRC, its authors, and the mises institute.
So, yes, I am reading it and I am troubled by all of it. I don't think Wendy is trying to bring anybody down. She is interested in the truth. she is also a blog poster and an author at LRC.
Until there's a name
Whether it's Lew Rockwell or someone else, the only name on this will be Ron Paul's until this guy steps forward. It's time for whoever has that name to admit to his words if they're his, even if it makes his life unpleasant for a while. Trying to keep it quiet will keep the issue going, and that truly WON'T be any sort of gift. Jesse Jackson survived "hymietown," and he can survive this.
JMR
A negative.
Sorry, but it is not going to be a positive. The only positive is that it's still early and this all they have.
Did you just see CNN? I'm not talking about Wolf's interview. It just aired a few minutes ago 7:20 CST.
To paraphrase the talking head: Here's what Ron Paul said about Blacks (sotto voce, supposedly) 10 years ago. Reads the clip about riots and welfare. Here's what Ron Paul told Wolf Blitzer: and it's the clip cut to make Ron Paul sound like Bart Simpson.
Another thought, talking about releasing Black criminals (any criminal, really)--whether they deserve to be in jail or not--is really not going to play well with the GOP base. Especially when the other candidates are former prosecutors or played them on TV. Talking about intrusions into Liberty in the name of the War on Drugs, maybe.
Hate to rain on the parade.
PS--that's not to say I believe the good doctor wrote any of it or believes any of it. I think his life speaks to his belief in liberty for all individuals. I'm just saying that's not how this will be spun by the media.
No it's a kick in the Balls
People who are not already Paul supporters especially Blacks will just see and hear he is a racist. I'm sorry if you disagree this is just my honest opinion, our best hope is that the media just let's this die and nobody brings it up at any debate.
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free".
Goethe
After reading many of the "Letters"
I've concluded that they were statements of opinions, and not negative racial comments, but instead reflections of mainstream opinions of their time. That RP's newsletters printed these opinions is a positive, as repression of the feelings of the "commons" is nonproductive. When there is a problem in the commons, repression of these feelings is counterproductive. These feelings NEED to be expressed to make any needed change. It is never a positive to hold within negative feelings. Ron Paul does a TREMENDOUS service to communtity by providing an outlet for providing the community an outlet for expressing these ideas, for without such an outlet, these idea will only fester in the souls of men, and that will increase the problems, not solve them.
After reading your post
And after reading your post I've concluded that you're a wingding. If RP didn't think they were racist, why did the person get fired? And why am I arguing with you? If you were talking about the welfare state and aff action causing anger - that's something else - but you are not.
As I asked Ourplan
I ask you. Which statements in RP news letters do you find to be racist?
Worst spin ever
I feel sick to my stomach about the letters. I feel like my name might as well have been on them. I've told my family and friends all about Ron Paul and how I thought he had an outstanding character. Now I have the responsibility to go back to each one of them and tell them about this crap because they need to be informed about that as well. I can see overlooking some of it and giving Ron the benefit for not writing it but the fact is he was hanging around people who make racist comments; it's horrible and we should figure out why people like this are attracted to Libertarianism.
I would be interested to know which of these comments
you feel are racist, as opposed to factual.
Everybody knows about the race
card and I think if Dr. Paul continues to press issues that he alone is pushing to help minorities they will study him and realize just like us he is REAL not a phony like the other candidates.
Seems hard to guage at this
Seems hard to guage at this point, but it's definitely given him an opportunity to make one of the most inspiring statements on race I've ever heard.
NO VOTE REQUIRED HERE...
Here's my take - it's all about principles - don't you get it?
Dr. Paul has principles which everyone should understand by now.
He lives them and breathes them.
He knew, that by following principles that have been around since Jefferson and Franklin, this was the only way to go.
Principles Rule!
newsletter
Of course it turned out to be postive but for how long and how many heard the responce. I hope as always we get a fair election and time for the message to be understood by all. I want to thank everybody for all the postive effort in getting the message out.
Thanks for the 7 minutes of
Thanks for the 7 minutes of air time on CNN in prime time to let RP pick up PLENTY of minority voters, woo!
Teflon Ron strikes again.
_____________________________________________________
Canvassing + Raffle = Viral Ron Paul!
A whole lotta people knew about the newsletters
We've known for years about them and feared for the day they were thrown back at us.
Dr. Paul is so squeaky clean that we knew this was the ONLY skeleton in the closet.
Listen, CNN is full of shit when they say "we've just learned of this" yada yada. THEY KNEW.
They and the rest of the old media etc were waiting for the perfect moment to pull this out and wave it around.
Well, that stupid punk at TNR f %^#^cked up!!!
He pulled it out too soon! (A mistake I NEVER make BTW)
They've shot their bolt!!!!
Good ol' Dr. Paul! You all thought he was just a nice old geezer huh? admit it!!!
He is ONE TUFF CUSTOMER!!! He is my all time HERO!!
I am SO frikken HAPPY!!
No.. a smear is never helpful..
Many people never hear a rebuttal and many never believe a rebuttal even if they hear one.
gma
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety, and ultimately will have neither."...... Benjamin Franklin
I agree
it is always harmful, creates doubt in some people who do not know ron paul
yes and no
there are many ignorant people that will just read the headline that says something like "Ron Paul's racist newsletter"
on the other hand, Ron Paul answered the question with fire in his belly. He showed how he was outraged at people calling him racist, he mentioned he is against the war on drugs and he said Rosa Parks and MLK were his heros. He was clear with his answer and hopefully people that saw it or will see it will look past the headline.
Will Fox try to continue the smear tonight?
Will that little smug Chris Wallace try to bring it up.? If he has half a brain he knows that he better not give Ron Paul a chance to win over millions of black voters.
give me YES for a thousand, Alex....
....no, make that a MILLION.
yes....YES....yes....YES....yes....
YES....yes....YES....yes....YES....
yes....YES....yes....YES....yes....
YES....yes....YES....yes....YES....
Yes
Blowback for being smeared and snubbed - Americans like an underdog
I say it's a big plus
We have to remember nearly half of America has still not heard the name Ron Paul or is completely ignorant to his positions. This was ultimately Name Recognition for many people - dispite the smear. More people will be curious about the buzz and more learn the truth.
YES
and nuff said.. it was perfect!!!
Doenst matter either way - We must turn it into an advantage
.
Abso(frickin)lutely !
Now if more people could just see it ,as soon as someone puts it on YouTube I'll download it and spread it around .
Yes
======================================================
Federal Reserve to the American People:
"Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam."
Yeah
I love how he spun it back on FAUX's "Knock Ron Down" campaign
I bet they don't bring it up in the debate tonight.
If they do they are really stupid. If I were trying to hurt RP I wouldn't give him an opportunity like this. Great stuff. He's got fire!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"a lot" is two words
sorry pet peeve.
agree on your post tho