Tucker has a job with a huge old media corporation. He is not stupid; he knows all about the political game in this country. He is doing the best he can in his position. Let me tell you, he's better than a stick in the eye (Hannity, O'Reilly,..). I, for one, am very glad that it was Tucker that interviewed the PFK (pimply-faced kid). He really dismissed the punk as a fool. Also, we don't know who's decision it was to have him on. It may have been an "assignment" given to Tucker against his better wishes.
Also, the allegations may have taken Tucker off guard like it did for a lot of us. We knew that the truth would come - and it has. Now, think of the publicity and awareness that has come of this.
The 'neo-cons' meant it for evil, but good has come of it.
My vote is: Tucker is voting for Ron Paul out of a true conviction of the heart.
Has anyone read this book about William F. Buckley Jr.? It's called The Pied Piper. It's about how WFB was a wolf in sheep's clothing, doing the CFR's bidding. Reminds me a lot of Tucker. Just a thought!
Tucker is apparently, based on a comment from his sidekick Willie Geist on Morning Joe a few weeks ago, a fervent Ron Paul fan.
I have a difficult time believing Tucker when he has a guest on his show who presents the TNR racist story about Ron Paul, though. I can only hope that there's a method to his madness; that he is doing whatever he can to put Dr. Paul's name out there, using the time-proven "any publicity is good publicity" technique. I don't like it, but it keeps Dr. Paul's name in the news when nothing else works. And, if the stuff is going to come out anyway, why not get it out now and diffuse it before it eclipses his message?
It is us against the world people! i hope you have the stomach for it cause I sure do, in fact, I'm looking forward to it! This will be seen for what it is, trash.
People will see this as a lowdown typical dirty hit piece. People will want to know more and research him and stumble upon his message of liberty and personal freedom. Have no fear this will be good like the fox exclusion, because when people actually drag themselves away from the mainstream media for a minute and do some research on their own they will see the superior message of Dr. Paul and the REVOLUTION. No one rejects this message once they are exposed to it, it is just the matter of getting people exposed to it. The only people that will revel in this bogus news are people who have decided to vote for someone else anyway.
Ron Paul needs to attack his opponents more for wanting to ban pornography (COPA basically bans it from the Internet and it is one judge away from having its restraining order removed).
He could get a lot more votes if he stopped worrying what evangelists would think of him on this topic.
Tonight he said that blacks should be released from jail who sold drugs.
That was a lot more risky in front of the SC primary than saying that SC should make prostitution legal.
Heck: Does everyone here know of the video going around the Internet where an innocent man in California was tricked by a police vice squad who worked with a beautiful topless woman sitting in a park. The man met the woman and she flirted with him physically and asked him to expose himself. Nobody was within 200 yards and the police camera did not really see him to what she asked...but that did not stop a full squadron from falling down on him like he was one of those guys on "To Catch a Predator". He is a respected local fireman but his colleagues in the police, who should have put a stop to the nonsense, betrayed him like the girly-men neocons would want them to.
Men will be men. I would not use a prostitute but some men would, especially if they are not so good looking. ;-)
Most people agree with me and Ron Paul that you cannot be making laws that restrict individual liberty, especially where sexuality is concerned.
So I believe Tucker is tapping into a huge well of support for RP.
He's done so much for Ron Paul.
Trying to get his name known.
It was a blessing that Tucker was the one that had the TNR guy on his show first, would you prefer Hannity?
I mean, really, Tucker made the TNR guy look like a tin foil hat.
Tucker got the TNR writer to start talking about ''codes'' that Ron Paul talks in. For a second I thought the guy was going to start saying ''9/11 was an inside job'' or '' I was abducted by aliens''
The interview with Wolf on CNN tonight should help. We, the campaign, need to use this to our advantage. This is the worst thing they can do to Ron other than make fun at his positions.
Tucker has stated before, a few weeks ago, that he does not agree with Ron Paul on Foreign Policy, however he was going to vote for him for all the other reasons.
You're a real fool. First of all, stop calling it the "Kerdick" interview. The prick's name was Kirchick. Second of all, you're not designated as a friend or foe based on whether you refuse to talk about an issue or not. Tucker was reporting what is a very big story, and now it's being addressed head on.
Tucker may or may not be careless or have bad judgment, but his interest in and support for Ron Paul is genuine.
You call Kirchick a prick, I call him Kirdick, got it?
Tucker giving Kirdick the interview is what made it a bigger story.
I'm entitled to my opinion and I think Tucker Carlson is a snake in the grass and a liar! The guy caused bad media for us in Reno (RP said it too, btw) and now he brings this jerkoff on national TV for a full, on air TV interview. Who's the fool? Sorry to piss you off, but once bitten twice shy.
NOTE: You made it personal so I made mine personal, got it? Good.
I also see his point. let me pose this question to you. When would you have wanted this to get out? and by whom would you have liked it to be exposed by? let's not kid ourselves here, they are feeling our pressure or else they would not have thrown in their only "ace in the hole" skeleton. You know this was bound to come up right? That is a definite! I remember a month or so ago it got a little press but went away rather harmlessly and I had a feeling we hadn't heard the last of it. So regardless of how it got our or who is responsible it was good that Dr. Paul finally had the opportunity to deal with it head on and i must say he knocked it right outta the park. After you have had a little time to digest the Wolf Blitzer interview, watch how tame Wolf was, he knew this wasn't Ron Paul's writings. Wolf surprised me again with his fairness and respect towards Dr. Paul. I didn't much care for the lead in to the story but Ron Paul did very well and Wolf was almost speechless and offered almost no resistance to Dr. Paul's explanation and allowed him to complete his point without spinning anything as of yet.
lets face it men, this is a fight! These people are dead serious and we had better get united and get united quick. We all know what's at stake here, the very future of our country, our posterity. A most pivotal point in this nations time. You never know at what point in time history will be made and i truly believe this is one of those times. If someone other than Ron Paul is elected president, I fear the type of America that will be ushered in after that. Some portions of the Country are already in a recession imagine another year from now and lets say Hilary or Rudy as president? Yikes, you fearful yet?
This is it, this is the time to stand our ground recognize the neocons desire for us to be infighting , to divide us and conquer us. Looks like we are going to get a recount in NH to put the scum on notice that we are watching their every move. And so are all the other vote fraud anti-neocon groups across America. You don't think these timid people will come out of the woodwork and realize they have to align with our huge movement or their causes are certain to be defeated by themselves.
If Ron Paul is not preparing to defend individual rights in terms of sexuality, then he will miss out on the biggest well of support.
In fact, my only reason for supporting RP is that he and Tom Tancredo are the only Republicans in Congress against Internet Regulation in terms which assumes that all men are sex offenders who use the Internet.
John McCain almost made it impossible for any of us to post here without the webmaster first having to run our email addresses through the National Sex Offender Registry.
Guys like McCain and Romney are incredibly anti-male because they pander to the feminist vote. I migrated here from www.mensnewsdaily.com where legal atrocities against males by powerful radical feminist groups are discussed.
In fact, for me to donate more money, I have to hear Ron Paul specifically say in public that he is against Internet Regulation especially when it comes to the horrifying excuse: "we must background check everyone to see that they are not a sex offender".
You (and I) should get down on our frikkin KNEES and Thank Almighy God for these guys!!
We have PLENTY of real enemies. Do not alienate the few true friends we have.
Those newsletters were HORRIBLE. RP HAD to repudiate them. Tucker short-circuited the story by having that punk on and getting it out (it was out for DECADES folks)!!
Then Wolf gives RP the opportunity (and absolutely deferential) to blow it up, hit it out of the park, whatever.
Thank you TUCKER, WOLF!! You are friends of Ron Paul and you are friends of mine.
better to have an RP supporter report the "bad news" than have one of the warmonger neo-cons reporting it! Imagine how much worse the TNR thing Tucker did would have been had it been someone like Hannity or OReilly?
Sorry wrong thread
Sorry wrong thread
Put yourself in his position.
Tucker has a job with a huge old media corporation. He is not stupid; he knows all about the political game in this country. He is doing the best he can in his position. Let me tell you, he's better than a stick in the eye (Hannity, O'Reilly,..). I, for one, am very glad that it was Tucker that interviewed the PFK (pimply-faced kid). He really dismissed the punk as a fool. Also, we don't know who's decision it was to have him on. It may have been an "assignment" given to Tucker against his better wishes.
Also, the allegations may have taken Tucker off guard like it did for a lot of us. We knew that the truth would come - and it has. Now, think of the publicity and awareness that has come of this.
The 'neo-cons' meant it for evil, but good has come of it.
My vote is: Tucker is voting for Ron Paul out of a true conviction of the heart.
At the risk of being gross
remember high school?
remember popping a pimple?
think of this story as a pimple.
think of kirchik as a pimple while your at it.
anyway, the story was gonna come out. we knew that. now it's history.
"hi, honey, oh THIS? It's a little scratch from football practice. Naaaw didn't hurt. Made 16 yards on that play"
AMEN my brother!
AMEN my brother!
The Pied Piper
Has anyone read this book about William F. Buckley Jr.? It's called The Pied Piper. It's about how WFB was a wolf in sheep's clothing, doing the CFR's bidding. Reminds me a lot of Tucker. Just a thought!
Tucker
Tucker is apparently, based on a comment from his sidekick Willie Geist on Morning Joe a few weeks ago, a fervent Ron Paul fan.
I have a difficult time believing Tucker when he has a guest on his show who presents the TNR racist story about Ron Paul, though. I can only hope that there's a method to his madness; that he is doing whatever he can to put Dr. Paul's name out there, using the time-proven "any publicity is good publicity" technique. I don't like it, but it keeps Dr. Paul's name in the news when nothing else works. And, if the stuff is going to come out anyway, why not get it out now and diffuse it before it eclipses his message?
Yeah this will be our galvanizing event to rally around our man
It is us against the world people! i hope you have the stomach for it cause I sure do, in fact, I'm looking forward to it! This will be seen for what it is, trash.
People will see this as a lowdown typical dirty hit piece. People will want to know more and research him and stumble upon his message of liberty and personal freedom. Have no fear this will be good like the fox exclusion, because when people actually drag themselves away from the mainstream media for a minute and do some research on their own they will see the superior message of Dr. Paul and the REVOLUTION. No one rejects this message once they are exposed to it, it is just the matter of getting people exposed to it. The only people that will revel in this bogus news are people who have decided to vote for someone else anyway.
Exactly!
I do believe that's at least a good part of Tucker's strategy. He's helping as best he can, within the constraints of his employment.
I disagree
I forget where he wrote the story about his trip to Vegas, but after reading it in Tuckers words I understood he meant no harm.
The part where he talks about eating the brownies with RP was hysterical.
Tucker is a baitor
After Reno and the Kerdick interview, you are considering this guy RP friendly? Tucker has played RP and all of us for suckers.
He's a liar and a baitor.
The prostitute scene was brilliant not bad
Ron Paul needs to attack his opponents more for wanting to ban pornography (COPA basically bans it from the Internet and it is one judge away from having its restraining order removed).
He could get a lot more votes if he stopped worrying what evangelists would think of him on this topic.
Tonight he said that blacks should be released from jail who sold drugs.
That was a lot more risky in front of the SC primary than saying that SC should make prostitution legal.
Heck: Does everyone here know of the video going around the Internet where an innocent man in California was tricked by a police vice squad who worked with a beautiful topless woman sitting in a park. The man met the woman and she flirted with him physically and asked him to expose himself. Nobody was within 200 yards and the police camera did not really see him to what she asked...but that did not stop a full squadron from falling down on him like he was one of those guys on "To Catch a Predator". He is a respected local fireman but his colleagues in the police, who should have put a stop to the nonsense, betrayed him like the girly-men neocons would want them to.
Men will be men. I would not use a prostitute but some men would, especially if they are not so good looking. ;-)
Most people agree with me and Ron Paul that you cannot be making laws that restrict individual liberty, especially where sexuality is concerned.
So I believe Tucker is tapping into a huge well of support for RP.
I disagree
He's done so much for Ron Paul.
Trying to get his name known.
It was a blessing that Tucker was the one that had the TNR guy on his show first, would you prefer Hannity?
I mean, really, Tucker made the TNR guy look like a tin foil hat.
It's called damage control. And it worked.
I agree with soul
Tucker got the TNR writer to start talking about ''codes'' that Ron Paul talks in. For a second I thought the guy was going to start saying ''9/11 was an inside job'' or '' I was abducted by aliens''
The interview with Wolf on CNN tonight should help. We, the campaign, need to use this to our advantage. This is the worst thing they can do to Ron other than make fun at his positions.
Tucker has stated before, a few weeks ago, that he does not agree with Ron Paul on Foreign Policy, however he was going to vote for him for all the other reasons.
You're a real fool. First
You're a real fool. First of all, stop calling it the "Kerdick" interview. The prick's name was Kirchick. Second of all, you're not designated as a friend or foe based on whether you refuse to talk about an issue or not. Tucker was reporting what is a very big story, and now it's being addressed head on.
Tucker may or may not be careless or have bad judgment, but his interest in and support for Ron Paul is genuine.
I'm a fool?
GFYS
You call Kirchick a prick, I call him Kirdick, got it?
Tucker giving Kirdick the interview is what made it a bigger story.
I'm entitled to my opinion and I think Tucker Carlson is a snake in the grass and a liar! The guy caused bad media for us in Reno (RP said it too, btw) and now he brings this jerkoff on national TV for a full, on air TV interview. Who's the fool? Sorry to piss you off, but once bitten twice shy.
NOTE: You made it personal so I made mine personal, got it? Good.
I see your point but...
I also see his point. let me pose this question to you. When would you have wanted this to get out? and by whom would you have liked it to be exposed by? let's not kid ourselves here, they are feeling our pressure or else they would not have thrown in their only "ace in the hole" skeleton. You know this was bound to come up right? That is a definite! I remember a month or so ago it got a little press but went away rather harmlessly and I had a feeling we hadn't heard the last of it. So regardless of how it got our or who is responsible it was good that Dr. Paul finally had the opportunity to deal with it head on and i must say he knocked it right outta the park. After you have had a little time to digest the Wolf Blitzer interview, watch how tame Wolf was, he knew this wasn't Ron Paul's writings. Wolf surprised me again with his fairness and respect towards Dr. Paul. I didn't much care for the lead in to the story but Ron Paul did very well and Wolf was almost speechless and offered almost no resistance to Dr. Paul's explanation and allowed him to complete his point without spinning anything as of yet.
lets face it men, this is a fight! These people are dead serious and we had better get united and get united quick. We all know what's at stake here, the very future of our country, our posterity. A most pivotal point in this nations time. You never know at what point in time history will be made and i truly believe this is one of those times. If someone other than Ron Paul is elected president, I fear the type of America that will be ushered in after that. Some portions of the Country are already in a recession imagine another year from now and lets say Hilary or Rudy as president? Yikes, you fearful yet?
This is it, this is the time to stand our ground recognize the neocons desire for us to be infighting , to divide us and conquer us. Looks like we are going to get a recount in NH to put the scum on notice that we are watching their every move. And so are all the other vote fraud anti-neocon groups across America. You don't think these timid people will come out of the woodwork and realize they have to align with our huge movement or their causes are certain to be defeated by themselves.
Yours forever in liberty
Stephen Dupont
Ron Paul was embarrassed by Air Force Amy?
If Ron Paul is not preparing to defend individual rights in terms of sexuality, then he will miss out on the biggest well of support.
In fact, my only reason for supporting RP is that he and Tom Tancredo are the only Republicans in Congress against Internet Regulation in terms which assumes that all men are sex offenders who use the Internet.
John McCain almost made it impossible for any of us to post here without the webmaster first having to run our email addresses through the National Sex Offender Registry.
Guys like McCain and Romney are incredibly anti-male because they pander to the feminist vote. I migrated here from www.mensnewsdaily.com where legal atrocities against males by powerful radical feminist groups are discussed.
In fact, for me to donate more money, I have to hear Ron Paul specifically say in public that he is against Internet Regulation especially when it comes to the horrifying excuse: "we must background check everyone to see that they are not a sex offender".
I just posted on the CNN thread about Wolf B.
and I'll say the same here.
When is it good enough for some of you people???
You (and I) should get down on our frikkin KNEES and Thank Almighy God for these guys!!
We have PLENTY of real enemies. Do not alienate the few true friends we have.
Those newsletters were HORRIBLE. RP HAD to repudiate them. Tucker short-circuited the story by having that punk on and getting it out (it was out for DECADES folks)!!
Then Wolf gives RP the opportunity (and absolutely deferential) to blow it up, hit it out of the park, whatever.
Thank you TUCKER, WOLF!! You are friends of Ron Paul and you are friends of mine.
Got that right..... read my post above
Agreed 100%
I see both sides of this....
I mean,it [Tucker story] WAS on the even of the NH primary,after all.
That is suspect to me.
wait a sec
no, the story was already out.
Tucker didn't break it.
He INTERCEPTED it.
You don't even have to buy that he's a good guy. I do but that's beside the point.
He pre-emptively interviewed this punk and helped him to look like the sleaze-ball he is.
Count yer blessings. Tucker is one of 'em.
This was a response to mash
thegas
Who's ok, mostly.....
Good cop Bad cop syndrome.
Way to keep on the R.P. followers good side. I think. While continuing the onslaught with the rest.
www.ronpaul2008.com
There is life at the end of the tunnel my friends!
Yes, I'm giving him the
Yes, I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt. You are assuming he makes programming decisions. None of us know that to be true.
good point!
better to have an RP supporter report the "bad news" than have one of the warmonger neo-cons reporting it! Imagine how much worse the TNR thing Tucker did would have been had it been someone like Hannity or OReilly?
This Begs For Video
*
SERIOUSLY...
SERIOUSLY...