Christian Newswire --Pro-life activist 'JANE ROE' (of Roe V Wade) and RON PAUL to make announcement on March for Life day
Submitted by AnAppealToHeavenWash on Mon, 01/21/2008 - 23:01
Contact: Patrick Semmens, 703-248-9115; www.RonPaul2008.com
WASHINGTON, Jan. 21 /Christian Newswire/ -- On Tuesday, January 22 – the 35th anniversary of the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision – Texas Congressman and Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul will hold a press conference with pro-life activist Norma Leah McCorvey. McCorvey, who runs Crossing over Ministry, is "Jane Roe" of the infamous Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision.
What: Announcement by Norma McCorvey ("Jane Roe") and Congressman Ron Paul
When: 10:30 AM ET, Tuesday, January 22, 2008 (The 35th anniversary of the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision)
Where: Phoenix Park Hotel (Capitol Hill North), Georgian Room (2nd Floor), 520 North Capitol Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001, Hotel phone: (202) 638-6900
[The Phoenix Park Hotel is two blocks from Hyatt-Regency Hotel where the March for Life Convention is being held]
Note: Open to the press. Light Breakfast will be served.
--
Help work your neigborhood for Ron Paul now... New ONLINE CHAT too!
https://voters.ronpaul2008.com/grassroots/signup.php?r=AnApp...
Try it!
AN APPEAL TO HEAVEN
"Washington's Cruisers" --google it and be inspired
Dr. Paul's position is consistent, unlike most other "pro-life"
candidates. Dr. Paul is both pro-life and anti-war. This is a consistent, principled position.
What I always fail to understand is how some of these other candidates can be pro-life and pro-war at the same time. If one feels it is essential to protect a fetus from the moment of conception, how can one also endorse bombing the crap out or an entire culture, killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people, including children and the unborn? If our goal had really been to "get the terrorists," why did we not send in special forces or CIA hit men to hunt down the actual individuals allegedly responsible for the terrorist acts? I don't think there is any way this can be justified. As usual, Dr. Paul is the only one who actually makes sense on this issue.
although i'm not christian or pro-life
i agree with ron paul's position on the matter.
As a doctor he vowed to uphold the value of life above all else. It was his job to make sure that babies were delivered healthy. He could have been sued if anything happened to the fetus.
As the leader of the free world I would expect him to have the same ethical regard for life. It is this same moral outlook that drives his desire to end the war and live in peace.
However he realizes that as much as he is personally opposed to abortion, it's not in the federal government's jurisdiction to decide when life begins. This means that the states need to work out legislation at a local level.
I don't have a problem with this. After looking into Roe v. Wade I realized that it needs to have some important details worked out. I would bet that if every american took the time to check out this piece of legislation they would agree that it needs a couple things ironed out.
And I think it's great that Ron Paul is doing an announcement with Jane Roe. I don't see this as being any different than if he meets with other groups like veterans, gun enthusiasts, gold bugs, whatever.
** Urgent ** SF Hero Traveling to DC
Carrying 105 lbs of pro-life Ron Paul fliers, California's Vince Nguyen has come to DC.
Revolution hero Vince Nguyen helped popularize the "Don't Tax Me, Bro" slogan and created many popular YouTube videos of his MeetUp in action. (Article about Vince: http://news.rgj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071121/NEWS... )
During his incredible experience at the San Francisco Walk For Life on Jan 19th, Vince found thousands of active voters that want to hear about Ron Paul. He helped pass out thousands of fliers and got hundreds of votes for Dr. Paul.
On Jan 22nd, the National March for Life will attract between 100,000 and 200,000 people to Washington, D.C. Most of them are undecided registered Republican. This is a golden opportunity.
That's why Vince got a ticket to D.C. and arrived Monday afternoon bearing 12,000 beautiful pro-life fliers.
At the SF Walk, it took 20 people to pass out 5,000 fliers. So we need many more Ron Paul supporters to help Vince on Tuesday morning. The best time to distribute fliers is when the buses unload and when the participants queue up waiting to begin walking.
Most people there won't know that Ron Paul has delivered 4,000 babies and has a sterling pro-life record that is second to none.
Many of them don't like their choices only because they don't know that Ron Paul is a OB/GYN.
Bringing people good news and information they want to hear is a pleasure. It's an easy way to get thousands of votes from a friendly audience!
We got hundreds of pro-life voters to support Ron Paul at the SF Walk last Sunday. With the Roe endorsement we can find tens of thousands of new supporters.
We made the local news, with great result for Ron Paul! http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local&id=5902392
If you'd like to print your own fliers the link is
http://files.meetup.com/621007/lifeflier.pdf
huge.
Wow. This on the same day CFRed (reportedly) drops out? Could be a very very big day for us.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Get active NOW to put Ron in the general election. ronpaul.meetup.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Join the Team! campaignforliberty.com
I am pro
life.
delete my account!!!
He is who he is
He has to be true to what he believes as an OBGYN and a man. I love that he stands in front of a bunch of mostly proabortion college kids and doesn't try to pander. That's obviously how you know you can trust him.
You don't have to be religious to be antiabortion btw. I just don't see it is a religious issue, unless you think religion is synonymous with morality.
I would feel a bit yuck voting for someone who was proabortion so he's just not going to please everyone and he is on the right side of the issue for the party he's in.
"What does conservatism today stand for? It stands for war. It stands for power. It stands for spying, jailing without trial, torture, counterfeiting without limit, and lying from morning to night."
Lew Rockwell
Thanks Annie, but...
....he is not simply answering questions about his position, or participating in a debate question......
He is INITIATING the topic and the statement. This will not be lost on those scrutinizing every word a candidate says these days. That impact and significance is what I regret the most.
Thank you for pointing out that an antiabortion position is not automatically tied to religion.....my post did unconciously suggest this. I most certainly do not give religion exclusive reign over morality.
Just curious.....if Ron Paul was EXACTLY the same man, with the same positions, message, history, integrity and experience.....
but was a pro-CHOICE Democrat, would you vote for him?
Yes
I registered just to respond to this.. I'd assume any former partylining Democrat who is onboard now is highly aware of their surroundings regarding the failure of the 1 party - 2 faction system, and the same would apply to any former rank and file Rep.
Most of us are ready to embrace anyone that stands for real change.
Due to Bush's betrayal of conservatism, I've come to discover how much I respect (and would support) Mike Gravel and Dennis Kucinich. They are miles ahead of most of the frontrunners from both parties, in a lot of ways they tell it like it is. His betrayal = my breakdown of rank and file loyalty to the party. Now on the other hand, the Democrats failure to end the Iraq war stopped me in my tracks from joining their ranks as a blind, dumb, yet reliable Democrat vote. Neither party are making good decisions if they intend to make it long with Thinking America.
Yes, I'd vote for Ron Paul if he was a pro-choice Democrat. But I'm not entirely certain Ron's stance from the governmental point of view is anti or pro choice. That might be his personal stance. He's kind of a state's rights guy right?
I don't have a dog in the race on that topic, but I generally tend to default on the side of life. All my life I've always been pretty libertarian in the way I've acted. All my relationships have been stable with birth control, and if I did have a child I wouldn't expect anyone else to raise it nor would I 'abort' it. I tend to take care of my own business and outside of rape fail to see how it's not a concious choice.
Lots of people get worked up when you make statements like that, but it makes sense to me..
That said, like everything else, if people want to do something they are simply going to do it whether you pass a law to stop it or not. so my personal view I realize is worth a grain of salt. I certainly don't want people clawing out babies with clothes hangers and risking a lot more.
I'm a Methodist, and as much as I tend to think it's not good, they also shouldn't pass laws telling people what they can/can't do to their bodies, just as the gov't should on the other hand not financially subsidize/encourage it. People are going to do it anyway if they are determined, just as gun control doesn't stop murder.
In my opinion this is a reasonable, sane approach. One that should satisfy everyone, fight it out in the private sector.
I'm uncomfortable personally with granting gov't the power to make decisions regarding personal lives at all, it's a tremendous leap to make.. because it's great when they rule your way, but not so great when you lose. So why give gov't that much power over your mental wellbeing and life? Take the fight local, where it should be. Gov't invades lives because people don't have the faith, or fortitude to actually spread their beliefs in their community. It seems a lot easier to win some legal case, and have a tyrannical state do it for you.
As FUN of a topic as this is to discuss, I think we need to secure things financially or the chaos that will erupt in our society will make the gov'ts stance on abortion a non-issue as we might not have a government! People aren't quite grasping the urgency behind our economic/military situation and how quite simply, everything else needs to take a back seat because we're going to take a backseat in the world if we don't get to work.
Thanks for joining the debate!
You bring a thoughtful and nuanced opinion....exactly what we can all benefit from!
I totally agree with your last paragraph (most). Our frank economic situation is going to make most other issues look like "colors of the deck chairs on the Titantic" arguements if things don't DRASTICALLY change, and soon.
Go Ron Paul!
I take your point
Yes, I do see your point that this is a campaign 'event' and not just an incidental endorsement.
And yes I would definitely vote for a pro-choice Dem who otherwise had the same positions in that case but I wouldn't be thrilled about it.
Abortion is getting lower and lower on my list all the time though. Things are so bad now I would just hold my nose and do it. I hope your pro-choice friends can.
"What does conservatism today stand for? It stands for war. It stands for power. It stands for spying, jailing without trial, torture, counterfeiting without limit, and lying from morning to night."
Lew Rockwell
Very SOLID.
Nice Annie!
I LOVE it when people want to discuss.....it helps me to grow.
I feel the same way. Things ARE so bad now. Our choices are not perfect. I am excited to vote for Ron Paul, and could really care less about his abortion stance personally. I will glady continue to work on convincing my fellow constituents, friends and family of the relative importance of certain issues. Don't worry....I hope they can see it that way as well.
Thanks again for the thoughtful and insightful posts.
Super Tuesday.....>Arizona delivers!
dp
double post..
Not sure this is all that
I'm glad for all of you that are pro-life here, but I am working on a LOT of people that are attracted to Ron Paul for his non-interventionist ideals, his hard-line illegal immigration practicalities, his Austrian economic theories and balanced-budget fiscal practices, his strong belief in privacy of the internet, his commonsense approach to "the war on drugs", his anti-taxation beliefs, his states-rights intentions, his personal liberty EMPOWERMENT.........
Two things that stand in the way of this movement becoming HUGE from where I stand are:
1. Ron Paul's fuzzy environmental stance/level of importance.
2. Ron Paul's pro-life stance.
I went to University for Environmental Science. I am studying to become an educator in this field. I am an ardent Ron Paul supporter, and can discuss the environmental issues because I have come to realize that lobbyist politics and big government corruption stand in the way of environmental integrity. I believe strongly in liberty and free markets as pathways to sustainability. I've got this area down pat, and have won MANY a debate with friends and colleagues.
I am also pro-choice. Up until TOMORROW, I was able to downplay the importance of Ron Paul being pro-choice by saying he wanted to stay OUT OF IT on a PERSONAL level as president...leaving it up to free people to get together in their communities (states) and decide on a more local level how they wish to live.
If, as I sadly suspect, Ron Paul comes out with some "I'm more Christian than that guy" statement by being STRONGLY pro-life, he has taken a HUGE step back, IMHO. First, he is not going to out "religify" Huckabee, Romney, McCain or Thompson, at least in the eyes of the debate-watching public, especially at this late stage. Second, he just made it incredibly personal......and EVERYONE that I had so close to that vote for Ron Paul is going to hear some statement about "no abortion anywhere" and just shut down.
Again, I'm sure this pleases many of you to no end, and I can respect that as I respect Ron Paul's PERSONAL pro-life stance. But I have been saying for weeks on Daily Paul that this is not some nice little private club....we need to reach out and attract NEW voters from OUTSIDE the traditional republican base. Ron Paul can do that on EVERY OTHER ISSUE. By making this one "THE ONE" he makes some big statement about....arguably the MOST contentious issue in our culture....turns OFF 50% of the public. Simple as that.
Please don't gloat about Ron Paul "finally making a stand" for Christian moral values or some such nonsense. This is not the Crusades. It's a democratic election and Ron Paul is a darkhorse, longshot candidate.
We shall see tomorrow, but I fear that this will be one more instance where the possibility of liberty for all men is sabotaged by religious insistence by some.
Freedom of Religion. Freedom FROM religion........?
Is this particular moral victory going to taste as sweet during the next four or eight years of irreversible moral decay on all other levels under a different president from EITHER party?
Ask your kids or grandkids what they might have chosen.
....as I suspected...."doesn't just talk the talk"...
“I support Ron Paul for president because we share the same goal, that of overturning Roe v Wade. Ron Paul doesn’t just talk about being pro-life, he acts on it. His voting record truly is impeccable and he undoubtedly understands our constitutional republic and the inalienable right to life for all. Ron Paul is the prime author of H.R. 300, which would negate the effect of Roe v. Wade. As the signor of the affidavit that legalized abortion 35 years ago I appreciate Ron Paul’s action to restore protection for the unborn. Ron Paul has also authored H.R. 1094 in Congress, which seeks to define life as beginning at conception. He has never wavered on the issue of being pro-life and has a voting record to prove it. He understands the importance of civil liberties for all, including the unborn.
“After taking all of the presidential candidates into consideration, it is obvious that Ron Paul is the only one that doesn’t just talk the talk. For this reason and those stated above, I am publicly endorsing Ron Paul for president.”
My kids and Grandkids???
MY kids and grandchildren are here because I was (and AM) prolife! Think about it...
It's not a Christian moral value, it's a HUMAN moral value.
Ira J. Madsen
Springfield, Mo
Ira J. Madsen
Springfield, Mo
I HAVE.
You CHOSE to be pro life. You did not need a LAW to tell you that.
PRECISELY because YOUR kids and grandkids will be around during a time of (potentially) 35% unemployment, the dollar worth 25% of what it is today, interest rates at 18%, $10/gallon gas, declining house prices, NO personal privacy, MANDATORY draft for our "endless" wars on terror, HIGHLY regulated internet, Patiot Act 5, No FREEDOM.......
.....I am going to guess that they just MIGHT wish WE had debated/focused on ANY OTHER issue TODAY that could have given Ron Paul more support....won him the nomination...won him the presidency...pulled our country back from the abyss.....
pro-life vote...
the pro-life vote = evangelical vote which is very much needed for Ron Paul's campaign and winning of the Presidency.
as for the pro-life or pro-abortion issue...let us think about that for a second in realistic terms.
i was adopted. i would not be here to vote or support Ron Paul or the millions of baby boomers social security checks if i would have been aborted. in fact you would not be here arguing against pro-lifers if you would have been aborted.
so ...the argument stands that i take the side of Praising God that i have a life and am responsible to Him what i do in and with my life. - and you take the side of pro-abortion...which is at the very least destructive...and at the most, your wish to never to have been born to have the rights granted to us by our Creator.
your argument makes no sense at all...for your argument would not even have a voice if you had your way...for you would not be here.
watch this video and tell me that it is alright...
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/dec/07121401.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0WXNl3HCA4
as for global warming...it is nothing other than a plan to install the 12 planks of communism to destroy this country's soveriegnty and to bring about global governance which treaty was signed at the UN by Bill Clinton...
http://www.un.org/millennium/
http://www.discerningtoday.org/key_international_meetings.htm
2Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
wow.
Pro life vote = evangelical vote....maybe so.....
Pro life statement (instead of pro-liberty, pro-antitaxation, pro-privacy, pro-non interventionism, pro-rationality in the war on drugs, etc....)
=
LIMITED growth of the Ron Paul r3VOLution
=
NO PRESIDENCY.
Please RE-read my post. I am NOT arguing against your pro-life views.
...and save your environmental hypotheses for someone else....you've picked the wrong guy this time....
what i want is...
freedom from my hard earned tax dollors paying for something that i abhor...i am against being forced to pay for something i consider murder. and Ron Paul has the only peaceful solution to end this force tyranny of the government to make me pay for something i would never support "freely"...that is the problem with Roe v. Wade...and that is not a religious answer it is a Constitutional one of authority of the federal government.
by the way...i would gladly adopt children who are not wanted.
2Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
But again, is this THE most important ISSUE?
At the potential EXPENSE of using any other constitutional or moral arguement (like gold and silver as money), would you be satisfied at having Dr. Paul LOUDLY STATE his pro life opinions tomorrow and strongly alienate alot of potential voters?
I'm not asking Ron Paul to change his opinion...I respect that. I'm suggesting that the choice to STATE it NOW could do more damage than good if winning the nomination is MOST important.
for "LIFE, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of Happiness..."
= )
2Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
I Don't Have Time To Address your entire comment
But suffice it to say this: Ron Paul believes that life begins at conception. He's an OB/GYN. If life begins at conception, then abortion is wrong.
That little tiny human being has the same rights that you and I do, only he/she can't defend them at all. Snuffing out that life has nothing to do with 'my right to choose.' Protecting that life is the only honorable thing to do.
If Ron Paul lost every voter's support, he would not condone the killing of the innocent.
Remember the Declaration: ...Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Do your part and help protect those who cannot speak nor act for themselves.
And for you to 'sadly suspect Ron Paul to say he's more Christ-like than the other candidates' is suspect in its self. However he is the most Pro Life candidate running today. I'm proud to say that my candidate comes down on the side of life and the innocent.
In Liberty's Cause
PRO-LIFE still remains PERSONAL
for Ron Paul -- have you studied everything but the man himself? He has taken a stand that the Federal Government should not be involved, and you know that he is consistent in his stands -- he is no flip-flopper! You need to explain that over and over again to the people you are trying to persuade. Nothing has changed.
Meanwhile, there are far too many people in the Christian camp who unfortunately a) think they MUST vote and b) only vote for someone who is personally PRO-LIFE. They are still a large segment of the population, whether you like it or not.
This is huge, and the media will ignore it, as usual. But the Christian media MAY sit up and take notice, and that will be all to the good.
Something you should understand from history -- The Baptists of America were some of the very most vocal in our history about religious freedom for ALL. Go check out the endorsements page at Ron Paul's official webpage and see how many of those endorsing pastors are Baptist. :)
(I can't help it, I have to add this: you say "ask your kids or grandkids what they might have chosen"? They might say they would have preferred to live rather than to have been aborted. But again, that should be their personal choice, don't you think? :) )
Born into slavery?????
I'm NOT posting to argue the abortion issue. Please RE-read my original pos if you question this.
OBVIOUSLY, YOUR kids and grandkids will be here (as they will not be aborted, to use your words) many, many years from now. If Ron Paul loses, in part because of an insistence on catering/making a statement to at best only 50% of the popluation (on this issue), and your kids and grandkids grow up and live in a country with 35% unemployment, a U.S dollar worth 25% of what it is today, taxation rates of 50%, A manditory draft for the endless wars we fight around the world, $10/gallon gas, interest rates at 18%, widespread violence and race riots, NO privacy, NO unregulated internet, NO FREEDOM ..........
......THEN, please ask them if they felt the "abortion" debate was THE most important issue to be debated TODAY.
My guess is that they MIGHT just chose ANY other issue that might have won Ron Paul more votes, got him the presidency....changed our country's path, etc......
Point is to keep fed govt out of our lives...nothing less/more
About abortion: What I understood is that he is not going to dictate a policy from DC saying tha abortion is illegal/legal. That is getting too deep in personal decisions of adults ( and yes in some non-adults, too)All he is saying that abortion issues should be resolved by local govts.... the more local it gets the more ppl will be happy with it....and that makes perfect sense to me. I have met people who are for it and some against it ( from two polarised communities of course) and there is no middle ground except what RP is mentioning. Middle , not in the sense to soothe majority opinion, but what as an executive head a person can do. If you really care about an individual as an individual, local (coucil/city/county) opinion is the best suited for complex issues like abortion and other such.
Environment:
As someone trained as an environmental engineer, I can safely say that his opinion about guarding the environment using property rights is the best I can find to really have a sustainable environmental policy. I dont want to go too detailed in this post ( I have talked hours on this particular topic with some friends/strangers)
For details about this you may want to refernce his library web site at ronpaullibrary.org particularly at http://www.ronpaullibrary.org/topic.php?id=8
Hope this might help you when you are discussing these issues with others. It definitely helped me when I was discussing on similar items.
Hate povery, not the poor - Gandhi
You make a valid point
And I know exactly what you mean... But I've heard Dr. Paul explain it before and he believes that a fetus has a right to life and is protected under the constitution. I also hope he doesn't explain it as a Christian value, but as the need to protect the fetus' individual liberties. Also, he has repeatedly said that there should never be a blanket law for all of America regarding an issue as volatile as this one. He believes that the states should handle this locally to better adapt the laws to fit the state's population. I was pro-choice for most of my adult life, but as I've gotten older I've moved more on the side of pro-life.... However, I think Dr. Paul's solution to this long-time hotbutton issue is the best fit for this country.
--------------------------
"I killed the banks"
Too tricky to be dealt with by the Fed
I've been struggling with a couple weird and complicated arguments myself.
My wife and I are going through our first pregnancy and we've taken all the standard tests. We've found that many of those tests aren't to diagnose problems, but to assess risks of complications such as genetic abnormalities. When high risk was assessed, then other more invasive tests are made available through our HMO. Our experiance was that on the down-low, this was so that if any sever problems existed, we could prepare for the complication at birth or terminate the pregnancy. Nobody that I am aware of makes the arguments for pro-choice or pro-life in terms of the impact to a family who will have to care for the severely handycapped and lifelong dependent. I'd like to see that debate. Fortunately for us, so far our little one is perfectly healthy and were not in the position to have to make that choice.
The second argument is the woman's right to choose in my state also the woman's right to defer and extort part of the responsability for making a choice that was entirely hers. I've seen many times where a man is "trapped" into fatherhood (and don't even try to deny it never happens) and 18+ years of child support. In adult consentual relationships, it is entirely the woman's choice if she becomes pregnant to carry the child to term. At that point, she can legally extort partial financial responsability from the father even if he never wanted to be a father in the first place. That's why some men put hot pepper juice in their used condoms. If their partners can't be trusted, they will soon hear the proof coming from the restroom. However, shouldn't a father be made to take care of his "responsability" even if the choice really isn't his?
Complicated. Which is why I don't think the Fed should be dealing with it. Should be a state issue because they are more capable of dealing with the complicated details.
Thanks friends, but.....
I greatly appreciate you calmly reading my post and responding, but look at what we are all doing? We appear to be putting words/ideas/policy in Ron Paul's mouth. I totally interpreted Ron Paul's message in the pro-life/pro-choice debate similarly to you all, and spread it far and wide. My point in the original post above is that IF tomorrow even SOUNDS similar to my hypothesis above, it will come to MEAN, in the eyes of undecideds (or avid pro-choicers) that it IS a presidential issue, and that Ron Paul is an ACTIVIST in the debate. At this particular point in time, him making "a stand" on this particular issue can NOT help but be interpreted as that.
Again I ask, why not ANY OTHER ISSUE??????? He stands out from ALL other candidates on any of them.
We all want mainstream media to give Ron Paul more coverage in these important days. My bet is that if he comes out with some strongly worded pro-life statement he will get significant coverage. This may please his supporters in agreement, but will hardly convince regular republicans and will most definitely short circuit any GROWTH in the movement.........EXACTLY what "they" would like.....(if you believe in the conspiratorial establishment fear, of course).
i agree.
He is not going to come out and say "no abortion anywhere" but he is an ob/gyn remember!? this is an important issue, and I think everyone can be (somewhat) happy with the way Dr. Paul wants to do things.
**That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them
Too bad
Too bad they could not have done this before NH. I tried to educate my otherwise bright evangelical friends about Huckabee being controlled by the most atheist pro-abortion group as the CFR, but they were just too stupid. If we'd had that 11%, we would have had 19%.
National Right To Life News
I called the national Right to Life and told them to take my name off their mailing list as they had supported Fred. Maybe one of you savvy computer people will forward the news of Jane Roe to them. Maybe politely ask them comment favarably about Dr. Paul. Please keep this up so others may see.
Dave Anrusko
daveandrusko@hotmail.com
steve
steve
If there's such a thing as a SUPER BUMP
here it is. This is awesome. I know so many people there right now and this will make them so happy. Very shrewd, good doctor.
Very shrewd indeed...
Ron Paul for the long haul!
Dr. No....Knows what He is doing...
very glad to hear of this...good going!
http://christiannewswire.com/news/977195441.html
Ron Paul to Hold News Conference with Norma McCorvey ('Jane Roe') on Anniversary of 'Roe v. Wade' Decision
Pro-life activist 'Jane Roe' to make announcement on March for Life day
Contact: Patrick Semmens, 703-248-9115; www.RonPaul2008.com
WASHINGTON, Jan. 21 /Christian Newswire/ -- On Tuesday, January 22 – the 35th anniversary of the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision – Texas Congressman and Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul will hold a press conference with pro-life activist Norma Leah McCorvey. McCorvey, who runs Crossing over Ministry, is "Jane Roe" of the infamous Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision.
What: Announcement by Norma McCorvey ("Jane Roe") and Congressman Ron Paul
When: 10:30 AM ET, Tuesday, January 22, 2008 (The 35th anniversary of the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision)
Where: Phoenix Park Hotel (Capitol Hill North), Georgian Room (2nd Floor), 520 North Capitol Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001, Hotel phone: (202) 638-6900
[The Phoenix Park Hotel is two blocks from Hyatt-Regency Hotel where the March for Life Convention is being held]
Note: Open to the press. Light Breakfast will be served.
2Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
Powerful endorsement!
Will give Dr. Paul added credibility with the LIFE wing of the Republican party. Frankly I can't see how anyone who is strongly Pro-Life can support any of the other candidates.
Anyone know if Dr. Paul plans to speak at the March for Life rally following this press conference? 70,000 + voters expected to be on hand in DC tomorrow!
Now THAT
would be the BOMB! Sorry, no pun intended.
If that's an endorsment
Holy crap! That's huge
This is BIG
Bump this.
Healthnuttie for Ron Paul
Healthnut4freedom
"Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge Him, and He shall direct thy paths." Proverbs 3:5,6
This is an exciting development!!
This is going to be HUGE!!! Watch!! Praise God!!!
delete my account!!!
Can you say
Genius?
Pro-Life and Pro-Choicers are going to have to consider him and maybe the gaping hole that politicians have tried to divide these two groups will begin to be mended. Because DeadFred is now interred his supporters are going to have to go someplace, and what better place than with the true Pro-Life candidate with a medical degree to back his conviction.
http://killfiat.blogspot.com/
Fantastico!
absolutely fantastic!!!
www.rprradio.com
When freedom is at stake, silence is not golden – it is yellow- Tom Anderson writer patriot. 1910-2001
"Any people that would give up liberty for a little temporary safety deserves neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
When freedom is at stake, silence is not golden – it is yellow- Tom Anderson writer patriot. 1910-2001
"Any people that would give up liberty for a little temporary safety deserves neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
Fantastico!
absolutely fantastic!!!
www.rprradio.com
When freedom is at stake, silence is not golden – it is yellow- Tom Anderson writer patriot. 1910-2001
"Any people that would give up liberty for a little temporary safety deserves neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
When freedom is at stake, silence is not golden – it is yellow- Tom Anderson writer patriot. 1910-2001
"Any people that would give up liberty for a little temporary safety deserves neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
An endorsement?
Could it be?
Ron Paul endorcement
ABC news is stating that Roe will give her endorsement to Ron Paul for president
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/01/roe-v-wade-a...