LA Times Media Blackout

The timing of this (in my little world) is so strange. Only minutes ago did I finish watching the brilliant documentary, "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised" about the coup and counter coup to expel and then reinstall Hugo Chavez. It tells the story of how the corporate media of Venezuela worked closely with the wealthy elite of Venezuela (and likely the CIA) to overthrow the democratic government of Venezuela to replace it with a brutal dictatorship (though you've been conditioned to believe it was the other way around!). It showed how the people rose up in defense of the constitution, peacefully, to demand his reinstatement. God, what a powerful film!

The same tactics used then and there are being used here and now. This is good for us all in the long run because the MSM is so desperate that they are making these moves that will backfire horribly and irreparably.

Joe Naab
http://www.citizensforronpaul.org

The LA Times has a "non-scientific" poll they put up today that DOES have Paul's name listed. Let them know what would have happened if they'd actually had the forthrightness & honesty to list Paul in their "scientific" poll:

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/

(snip!)

To whom it may concern:

I was just reading your poll pdf from the 11th. I noticed that Dr. Ron Paul was not mentioned at all. Were you aware that he is an announced candidate? All other Republicans were mentioned.. including some that have not even announced that they were running.. How can this be? Im sure it was just an oversight as, I would hate to think there was any bias in your reporting. Whoever is in charge of compiling your candidates list is obviously inept or has been promoted to tasks that are well beyond their feeble abilty. I am sure this issue will addressed in any subsequent polling.

As always- happy to help!
(snip!)

Well at least I tried to be nice....

I copied the article and sent it, along with some profanity to the reader's representative.

Famous Quote from Justice William O. Douglas

"The Constitution is not neutral.
It was designed to take the government
off the backs of people."

I noticed last Friday that The News Hour with Jim Lehrer had an entire segment about campaigning on the Internet in which the spent a considerable amount of time discussing Mitt Romney and absolutely no time discussing Ron Paul.

And Brownback even got 0 and they put him in.

I swear Brownback and Gilmore arnt even in the race, and they talk about removing Paul?? I mean these guys barley have any presence in the online OR real world polls.

Most of us have known that, ever since the New York Times published The Pentagon Papers, that various government agents have not only put a clamp on a free media, they have the ability to "spike" stories they do not like. This was later true prior to Iran/Contra when, at the New York Times, Keith Schneider's "primary source" story--about massive amounts of cocaine being used to pay for weapons--was waved off by the Time's CIA overseer.

This kind of thing--the CIA and other government operatives--steering the stories in the media is not new, and most of us are well aware of it. So, with the LA Times, or the New York Times, or CNN or Fox, choses not to cover Ron Paul, there is a good reason: Ron Paul represents a sigfnicant threat to these agendas and the secrecies that cover it. When Dr. Paul says he will abolish The Federal Reserve... well, that story cannot be covered except by "nuts" on the internet, or a few brave media outlets.

That is why it is so important to continue to sent emails to the media; that we know they are lackeys, hired to do the bidding of the government, when the stories concern matters of national interest and security.

One thing I love about the Ron Paul supporters: they (we) are passionate, tenacious and growing in numbers. This is a very good thing.

If you follow the money, it is not surprising that USA Today would also have a blackout on Ron Paul. To have a major front page story (yesterday), titled "Each Voter Supports a Different Candidate" picturing 8 candidates including Gore and not mentioning Dr. Paul is slanted journalism and par for the course. Personally as the support base grows and the globalist media blackout continues, I believe this too will backfire. It is like one huge lie...one big flag on the play. It works in our favor and Ron Paul's, clearly spelling out how America has been bought by the neocon globalists who "think" they can create history with no regared for the constitution or the rights and will of the people. As the lie grows more blatant, it also grows more apparent to more people.

David G. Korten's "When Corporations Rule the World" is an eye-opener. Big part of the message is..We are on the brink of disaster. Corporations do own the world and have more control on any country's economics and trade policies than their own governments. Ask yourself why this enormous permanent base is being built in Iraq if a change in administration or bills in Congress might bring the troops home? The only answer is that the powers that be believe neocon globalist plans for the Middle East will continue on track regardless of which party is in the White House.

Can there really be proponents of nuking Iran? Could there be a false flag operation to sway public opinion toward such a wrong move?? ,,,before the next election?

Only Ron Paul will attempt to slowly dismantle this monster that so few people seem to know about. In the past, "truth" was easily dismissed as "conspiracy theory." Ron Paul's movement is resulting in a massive education of the public. The "powers that be" can no longer "create history" given an educated public that knows the truth. Television and mass market media does not matter to those who get their news elsewhere. No more TV for me (sigh goodbye Discovery Channel and <g> Wheel of Fortuhne. No more USA Today (it was a useless rag anyway).

ann