HAVING PROBLEMS VIEWING THE SITE? GET FIREFOX! | A NOTE ON ADVERTISING

   

CRAZY CALI RESULTS!

Look at this image...

http://img201.imageshack....

It is the first 3 congressional district results on the screen next to each other. Even more interesting is that it appears this way in all but one of the 53 districts (Romney won one district). Here are the results by district, compare for yourself...

http://vote.ss.ca.gov/Ret...

Someone named Holly reported this and it got posted on the LRC blog. I went to check it out and that's when I did the screen shot.

"In California, a state larger and more diverse than many countries, each and every congressional district returned the same result. The Republican candidates placed first through fourth in the same order and in nearly the same proportion except for CD 52 where in an inexplicable fit of randomness, Romney beat McCain."

http://www.lewrockwell.co...

output

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Blackboxvoting.org is doing the recount in NH, and shows you how

to go about recording the chain of custody. Plus you can get epdated on the progress in NH recount.

http://www.bbvforums.org/...

Investigate any suspecion

Investigate any suspecion and prosecute them. Get them out of there now that way we won't deal with them in the general!

I also find it weird that pretty much the same statistics through out all of the states. Paul around 5% and in fourth place. It just doesn't happen that way there are gaps of suport in different places and stats. I also question the vote tallying on television. The percents rarely change from 1% of the vote in till the end. I know they do exit poling and stuff but still how does that happen?

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis indicates fraud.

really?

what statistical test is that?

Ron Paul lost, therefore it must be fraud

It's the "nobody agrees with me test" -- if there are fewer votes for my candidate than other candidates, then the only possible explanation is fraud.

Only in 1 of 53 district Paul has more votes than Huckabee...

Impossible!....and that too was very close...When they say that RP received the maximum number of support (in donations and stuff) from the high tech companies (mentioned alas! in Cavuto's video on utube dated Feb 6) that in itself should indicate that he must be winning Santa Clara, San Mateo, etc. ...No way McCain has won in CA....

Hate povery, not the poor - Gandhi

I observed at

the precinct and where the votes were tabulated. I must say, having worked the county and having been a part of sign waving, etc, I was shocked that we got such a low percentage. Ron Paul was the only candidate with signs and bumper stickers, etc. I really thought we would get 30% or so, and we ended up with 5%?

Many of the seals on the machines were broken My friend wrote them down. I was advised to leave the precinct towards the end. The guy taking the ballots was obviously a McInsane supporter. The woman in charge of the count was very trustworthy. We are going to do a recount of 1% of the precinct.

Our county has 200,000 people, yet we had more Ron Paul google searchs than any other city in LA. We've been working or asses off for a year, and only got 1500 votes? WE have 170 meetup members. We were very surprised, but I am too new at this to really know what to do.

A few very dedicated supporters

Your observations are consistent with what we've seen in every other state: RP has a few very dedicated supporters who put up lots of signs and banners, but the vast majority of Americans haven't accepted his message yet. The only seal that's broken is that we've broken the seal of the political process and over the next few years can start to influence it.

Apparently so...

You need only look at the precinct leadership to figure out how this process is a very slow process.

I think that as the economic situation deteriorates, we're headed for economic disaster that throws water on the average American.

I just clicked on all the districts

That is the MOST BLATANT thing I have ever seen TO DATE.
Speechless.

I found another one

I live in Fresno County, the only one that Mitt won.

I checked the CDs near me, and Mitt won the 21 CD by a slim margin.

As far as votes for Giuliani and Thompson, many people vote absentee in California. It's stringly encouraged. They call it voting by mail now. Quite a few people voted over a month ago, before Rudy and Fred dropped out.

And at least one woman voted for Fred on principle. She was a caller on a local talk show, and said that's who she wanted to vote for whether he was in the race or not.

i do not believe that any

i do not believe that any sizable proportion of the population would vote for MC/Romney with out being mind controlled, oh wait i forgot about the media

What luck for the rulers that men do not think. - Adolph Hitler
Those who falsely believe that they are free, are the most enslaved. - Goethe

Oddities

I was a precinct inspector in Sonoma County last night and although my precinct had a crack team, I spoke with an area inspector for the county and she was shocked at how shoddy many of the precincts were being run. There is horrid training for poll workers and the drop off point for the ballots at the end of the night was awfully interesting. After some communication with some seedy folds at the drop off point it ended up with breaking the seals "for expediency".

Oh yeah - and no visible I.D. for the election worker at the drop off point. We just handed the ballot boxes over to some guys in sweatpants and t-shirts and off to home we went!

Not a tidy system at all. In fact - I was called two hours before voting ended and told to haul ass to the drop off point as soon as the precincts closed at 8PM and to not be concerned about auditing the vote count in the precinct,

No vote fraud evident but it was certainly not a tight ship.

I worked the 52nd

and in San Diego it was weird to me that the registrar had us turn in all of the ballots to the warehouse to be counted instead of having us scan them ourselves. I should have looked through the ballots at our site to make sure that people were actually voting the way it showed up in the results, but it was too hectic too. Not that I'm proposing that there was fraud, but I could see an opening for it.

Looks like..

... either the numbers have been digitally massaged or Arnold has put controller chips in nearly every Californian's brain -- kinda like Stepford Wives...

=|

I noticed that last night as

I noticed that last night as well
I couldn't believe it, but lam not a mathamatician
In san diego I thought we would have done better. Everyone I knew
was voting for Paul. Where are all these mc cain people I dont
know anyone for him.

Fred Thompson?

Ol' Fred got 1,326 votes, and he's not even running, weird.
-
Show your support on the Ron Paul Map !
People worldwide support Dr. Paul too :-)
http://www.pollingmatrix....

Those are from

early voting or absentee ballots mailed a while ago.

I noticed the same kinds of

I noticed the same kinds of trends happening in some of the early states like NH and Michigan... if I were a statistician I would be tossing my cookies.

I try to be as grounded as possible when it comes to the vote fraud stuff, I try not to embrace the black helicopter rhetoric too easily, but I'm a sucker for numbers and some of these just don't add up.

Lots of variation

You can only see numbers for two areas, but look at how much variation there is:

In one, McCain got 46%, in the other he got 39%.

In one, Romney got 26%, in the other he got 38%.

Even among districts YOU picked there's a huge difference.

Oh really!

In no district has Huckabee been defeeated by Paul! No way is that possible in CA.

Hate povery, not the poor - Gandhi

oh I bet !!

In the next couple days things are gonna get weirder :) i was telling my girlfriend the other day that with the election as dishonest as it is they are gonna make so many mistakes they will easily out themselves :)