China topic censored here.

I was talking to someone from Panama today and the guy told me China owns the Panama Canal! What the hell!

BUT THEY WONT BECAUSE RIGHT NOW THEM F-ING COMMIES ARE BUYING OUR COUNTRY OUT FROM UNDER US AT AN EXPONENTIAL RATE FOR PENNIES ON THE DOLLAR IT IS CALLED A FIRESALE AND GEORGEWBUSH IS DOING IT AGAIN JUST LIKE THE SAVINGS AND LOAN DEAL A HUGE SCAM ! BOY I CANT WAIT TO SEE HIS NEXT SCAM ? Gold Oil Drugs is who they worship!

I CARE THAT YOU WILLFULLY IGNORANT PEOPLE WILL NOT STOP KILLING AMERICA BY BUYING POISON GOOD FROM A COUNTRY THAT HAS NO HUMAN RIGHTS THEY PUT LEAD PAINT IN OUR CHILDRENS TOYS THEY HAVE THE MOBILE DEATH TRUCKS CONCENTRATION CAMPS ORGAN THIEF RINGS RUN BY THE GOVERNMENT OR WHAT EVER THEY CALL THEMSELFS?THEY ARE THE WORST COUNTRY IN TERMS OF MURDERING NEXT TO THE USA THE PRC HAS KILLED THE 2ND MOST PEOPLE EVER IN HISTORY AS A WHOLE NEXT TO THE USA (INDIANS!) WE MAKE HITLER LOOK LIKE AN ANGEL! WE MUST SEE THE TRUTH OR WE CAN NOT MOVE ON ALL THE STAGED WARS BY THE BANKERS!
CHINA,USA,UN,WTO,AND THE WAY IT LOOKS LIKE OPEC AS OF LATELY?ARE ALL GETTING THE ORDERS FROM THE NEW WORLD ORDER AKA THE BANKERS AKA THE CROWN AKA 13 FAMILIES AKA THE ILLUMINATTI AKA THE ROBBER BARONS AKA THE
****************************R O T H S C H I L D S ******************************

No one ever censored my email. We send stuff to china by email all the time now.

There were some websites I could not access.

Some were blocked on the US side because the USA govt
blocked some IP addresses.

I am sorry my other post is gone now.
I dont think I could repeat it.

He's never called them an enemy (that I can recall), but I have heard him say a number of times that they are a threat to us, in that we support their economy more than our own and they are financially way better off than us. So much so, that they have financed our illegal occupation of Iraq and they have bailed out many companies that are suffering from the monetary problems this war has caused for our dollar. I think he's right on the money.

the chinese censor everything, my friend lives there and they read her emails before she can and they even delete things out of it....maybe they are watching

**That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them

ive been here awhile tonight and havent seen it.

ron paul 2008

It seems pretty lame that they would do that. How can we preach freedom but not practice it ourselves. It sounds more like a Bush ploy!

You misused the term, "free market". You should have said, "free trade".

These are not synonyms. The free market moves through the Invisible Hand, billions of unregulated free-will individual transactions. Free trade, however, is engineered, by government. That's two orders of magnitude different, even before you consider the fascist aspect of corporations.

Hopefully you've since read the post from realistUSMC and realized the error of your way.

-0-

LawfulGov.Org
Your Nexus to the Freedom Movement

More than likely your thread on China made any kind of sense at all, had valid points, was relatively civil in nature and got some people to start thinking.
It probably had something that could help promote RP, or at the least get people to consider things they had never thought of before.

That's why it is gone. It's a common occurrance here lately.

WTF is foul language.

Why am I the only one that remembers the story not so many years back about China's continuation of war with America by non-military means?

Here's a little snippet from some reading you might find interesting:

The Beijing government understands this with such clarity that one can only admire the intellectual integrity of Chinese strategic thinking. Confronted with integrated, well-designed challenges from China in the economic, financial, diplomatic and — least important for now — military spheres, our response, to the extent that we may claim one, has been piecemeal, intermittent, inept and weak. Brilliantly, the Chinese have managed to harness the greed of influential elements within our own business community to prevent the implementation of policies by Washington that might reduce China's artificial trade advantages and limit our own self-inflicted vulnerabilities. By allowing a relative handful of American corporations to grow rich, the Chinese have paralyzed our government's ability to defend our workers, our industries and our economy. We have reached the point where lobbying veers into treason.

The Chinese view our relationship as a war conducted through nonmilitary means. Under such advantageous economic conditions, they are perfectly happy to refrain from shooting.

Defense contractors, as well as desperate generals and admirals, warn of a military confrontation with China. But why on earth would China want one when Beijing is gaining all it needs through far less painful means? Certainly, countries have a way of blundering into war — but China would much prefer to avoid a violent conflict with the U.S. Why fight us, when we make a gift of all that Beijing seeks through our tolerance for rigged exchange rates, our acceptance of the dumping of manufactured products, our refusal to live up to our rhetoric about human rights, our rejection of serious policies to protect our intellectual property and copyrights — and our outright gifts of technology?

This is the Sun Tzu that we cite so glibly yet fail to understand.

The Islamist threat is even fiercer — far fiercer — than China when it comes to exploiting policy as a continuation of war with other means. Saudi Arabia, for example, has engaged in a merciless religious war against the West for more than three decades, yet it has not only done so while convincing our national leaders, Republican and Democrat, that we're "friends," but has managed to gain the protection of America's military on the cheap, even as it refuses meaningful cooperation with our forces. To preserve the profits of a handful of multinational oil companies, we protect a repellent, throwback regime that willfully created Osama bin Laden and his ilk. In country after country, I personally witnessed how Saudi money is used to spread anti-Western hatred (and to divide local societies), while America's taxpayers fund a military prostituted to the defense of the degenerate House of Saud.

If you could muster the attention span to read all that, click here for the whole thing.
http://www.armedforcesjou...
___________________________
There's no sheep here, there's wolves here, questioning our nation's government.

Former United States Marine
Patriot
For Ron Paul

is that they have ulterior motives. They want conquest. They will eschew the profit motive for a future opportunity to conquer. They are not doing things for their economic benefit, they are doing things to bring us down. They don't care if their citizens suffer to accomplish their goals. They use them for slave labor now, and force them to kill their babies. They are not motivated by normal economic and human motivations. They are more difficult to deal with than normal countries, even those with different types of governments.

Granted, we created the China that exists today with our actions since WWII. We created them and have sustained them with money and technology. Now we are letting them be our banker. But how they got where they're at no longer matters.What matters is what do we do about it now? They are fully intent on destroying us economically or militarily, with the complicity of our current traitorous gov't.

A policy on non-intervention will eventually be best for a country just concerned with themselves (like Iraq), but it won't work against a country like China.

seemed fine to me. I posted a response.
Apparently we have some book burners in the house.

I thought this was a great thread. It was a chance to show that China is doing well largely by virtue of good economic freedom. And to clear up misconceptions of people mostly steeped in MSM through no fault of their own.

It made clear that RP was the kind of President who would prevent problems with China.

I saw nothing detrimental in the post.

If we censor this, we're worse than MSM, and I'm going to tune out of this website.

and I think you should read my post on Trolling and Flagging... oh but they got it deleted too.

So, we must contact Manny and tell him this is becomming a Personality Cult where Ron Paul can do no wrong, nor can the Campaign, nor can the Revolution.

The bottomline is Manny needs to delete the automatic Flagging Feature.

Treg

If it was active for five hours, it would seem to prove the opposite. Anyway, it isn't fair.

IMissLiberty