The March For Freedom, Liberty, and the Constitution, Led By Ron Paul
Earlier today I started a thread entitled "The march must be about the message, not the man." I have had time to better nail down the point I was trying to make, and I wanted to share it with you, because I think it is important. Here it is in a nutshell:
This march should be, in essence, The March For Freedom, Liberty, and the Constitution, Led By Ron Paul, as opposed to simply The March For Ron Paul
The following was posted by someone on Daily Paul this afternoon. It was met with exactly the sort of passionate division that you would expect, and it illustrates why I feel the way that I do:
How are we going to get the message out to the 9/11 truthers (who mistakenly believe that Paul agrees that 9/11 was inside job), not to carry "9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB" signs at the March? If they carry signs like this, this will be shown on the news and it's what the public will focus us on if this happens. The public will generalize that we all believe that and are lunatics. This could be a nightmare for the Paul campaign.
Paul said at the debate that 9/11 truthers should stay quiet about it and that they hurt the campaign. So, far it doesn't look like they respect that advice.
(This is not a free speech issue. I'm aware that they have a RIGHT to carry such signs. I'm talking about PURSUADING them not to carry the signs, for the best interest of the campaign.)
It is an unavoidable reality that there will be individuals who show up at this march and express controversial points of view. Even if you were able to get every single Ron Paul supporter to agree on which views should and should not be expressed (which will never happen), there will be people who show up who are not even supporters of Ron Paul. Some will even be our enemies seeking to undermine and divide us.
If it is The March For Ron Paul, there will inevitably be some Ron Paul supporters who will try to silence those who express views that they find too controversial (with the good intentions of "protecting" Ron Paul and his campaign). There will division amongst the marchers and a widespread collectivist mentality that is contrary to what Ron Paul stands for.
If it is The March For Freedom, Liberty and The Constitution, Led By Ron Paul, we will not be prone to such division and collectivism. We won't encourage this collectivist mindset where everyone argues about what hurts Ron Paul and what doesn't and who needs to be censored by the majority. Though most of the people there will be loudly supporting Ron Paul (as they should), there will not be a need for one group of people to try to silence another. There won't be a discussion about whether or not "we" should "let" people exercise their first amendment rights. Instead, we can all embrace the fact that people are exercising their God-given right to speak freely, which is a big part of what we are fighting to preserve by marching in the first place.
Furthermore, we will show the country and the world that, unlike the supporters of other candidates, we support Ron Paul not because of a cult of personality, but because we share his core values and beliefs. We will demonstrate that we don't just talk the talk of freedom, we walk the walk and practice what we preach.
Thank you for reading, and please keep the discussion on this thread calm, friendly, and civilized.
"The freedom message brings us together; it doesn't divide us"
- Ron Paul






















Great slogan for the March
For Freedom, Liberty and the Constitution March led by Paul
Let Government know we want them to obey the law of the land.
Exactly. Unite behind the
Exactly. Unite behind the message and let Ron Paul lead us.
its a ron paul march about liberty.
if you want a freedom rally, do it on your own day. no one would even be talking about it if ron paul didnt do the video.
ron paul 2008
This is not a very
This is not a very constructive comment. Please elaborate on why you disagree with the specific points I make to support my thesis that this march should be, in essence, "The March For Freedom, Liberty, And The Constitution, Led By Ron Paul."
The Summer of Constitutional
The Summer of Constitutional Love
=)
Therein lies the issue that
Therein lies the issue that many of us have. Which one is it?
"If it is" starts both paragraphs describing the two different 'versions' of the march.
I dont really care which one it is, I just want to know which one it is.
Right, and I think the
Right, and I think the campaign should clarify that in advance. My hope is that they will take this distinction into consideration and make it a Ron Paul led march for freedom, liberty, and the Consitution rather than simply a march for Ron Paul. I think this will be much more effective, both in terms of spreading the message and furthering Ron Paul's campaign for president.
I like the sound of that !
"The March for Freedom, Liberty and the Constitution, Led by Ron Paul"
Me too.
Me too.
I Agree! I Never Thought it was a Ron Paul March!
It is a March for Liberty!
I think we should hand out mini Constitutions!
Take the poll: Will you go to the March?
http://www.vizu.com/poll-...
I may be a vegetarian, but I'll defend to the death my right to eat pork!
Agreed, or at least it
Agreed, or at least it should be. Ron Paul himself says in the video that we should march on Washington "if we want to really take a stand for freedom"