FORUM QUICK LINKS > News | Economy | DP Liberty Forum | Activism | DIGG! | Books | Videos | Events | RP Repubs | Rand Paul 2010

   

Obama pushes for 'global taxation'

I am posting this here because I am very disturbed to read comments on blogs and hear people calling C-SPAN claiming that if RP does not get the nomination, they will vote for Obama in the general. Please, get a clue!

For those of you who are still so naive to think that Obama is a viable alternative in the general election, YOU'D BETTER THINK AGAIN. This article proves that he's merely a tool for the world government and promoter of a tax to be paid to the UN to fuel its control over us and to redistribute the wealth to other countries. SPREAD THIS EVERYWHERE!

"A nice-sounding bill called the "Global Poverty Act," sponsored by Democratic presidential candidate and Senator Barack Obama, is up for a Senate vote on Thursday and could result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States. The bill, which has the support of many liberal religious groups, makes levels of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations."

Read the rest here: GOP USA

The article is by Cliff Kincaid who has a handle on this UN Marxism stuff and has been writing about it for years. Maybe the GOP is starting to stop being RINOs and catch on to something. (This is NOT the RNC, it's another group of REAL conservatives)

- Jane (I *am* the GOP)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

No, the GOP is not 'catching

No, the GOP is not 'catching on'. The liberal elite Rockefeller Wing is firmly in control.

I note that all three of the "contenders" are pro-gun control liberals. Get thee to a Gun Show, before January 2009.

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

Names with Two Interpretations

I am both amused and disgusted at the names used to describe some of these acts/operations/etc... like "The Patriot Act" (which facilitates government surveillance over patriots.) or "Operation Iraqi Freedom" (which was this government's usurpation of Iraqi sovereignty.) and now the "Global Poverty Act"... ughhh... sounds like an attempt to spread poverty around the world...

The overwhelming majority in congress are too cowardly to call out such obviously veiled power phrases for the evils they are actually describing. Why is that?

http://youtube.com/watch?...

Opportunity Cost

If all the passion and energy here that is going into anti-Obama rants or Ron Paul loss laments was instead working support for Ron Paul Republicans we might be able to double the movement's presence in the US legislature. How come all their money goals are struggling?

Strategically I would advise differently

Obama may have politically undesirable ideas but in the current landscape the GOP is no different. In the short term voting Demarcate can be used to undermine the GOP and weaken the current leadership, helping us set up a new constitutional leadership in the GOP.

Winning national elections will be dependent on us setting up ourselves in local political positions and working up. A strong GOP will have a much easier time directing funds and supporting their candidates against ours and delay our movement.

You are sooooo right!

If supporters of Dr. Paul want to take over the GOP they will have to go through the present "leadership". A good start would be to have them, and their obscene platform, humiliated and crushed in the general election. Then, and only then, can the GOP reform into something relevant and useful to the citizens of this country.

You forget

Fortune Favors the Bold

They are the same party. Vote for RPR.

I did vote Ron Paul In the primaries

But with the the primaries over and the general election coming up. Even if Ron Paul is the best candidate, a write in for him or a third party candidate isn't going to count for anything.

Do what is right

The lesser of two evils is still evil. Do what is right and your vote can never be "wasted"

I personally think

that Obama is racist, underqualified and most of all DANGEROUS!

On the MTV debate this man spoke of building schools in Africa! WHY WOULD WE BUILD SCHOOLS IN AFRICA when we can not even afford to properly educate OUR OWN CHILDREN IN THE U.S.?!?!?!

I live in California, which is the most populated state in the country and IS BANKRUPT! In the Bay Area the schools are over-crowded, poorly staffed, old and in disrepair. There are NO school buses (only for handicapped) and they are firing teachers and cutting classes and programs because of serious budget problems! All of this in the area that boasts the highest rents, property values and gas prices in the country!

I for one am sick to death of our government taking on all of the world's problems while we SERIOUSLY NEGLECT our own people! Most of all our children, who will be the future of this country!

If Ron Paul is not on the ballot, I am writing him in! I don't care what people say about wasting my vote! I will know in the end when the shit hits the fan that I voted for the only candidate that I believed in!

Global Poverty Act - Obama Bill passes Senate

Obama bill: $845 billion more for global poverty Democrat sponsors act OK'd by Senate panel that would cost 0.7% of gross national product.

Sen. Barack Obama, perhaps giving America a preview of priorities he would pursue if elected president, is rejoicing over the Senate committee passage of a plan that could end up costing taxpayers billions of dollars in an attempt to reduce poverty in other nations.

---> while the Global Poverty Act sounds nice, the adoption could "result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States" and would make levels "of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations."

The bill, called the Global Poverty Act, is the type of legislation, "We can – and must – make … a priority," said Obama, a co-sponsor.

He said the legislation, if approved, dedicates 0.7 percent of the U.S. gross national product to foreign aid, which over 13 years he said would amount to $845 billion "over and above what the U.S. already spends."

A statement from Obama's office this week noted the support offered by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

"With billions of people living on just dollars a day around the world, global poverty remains one of the greatest challenges and tragedies the international community faces," Obama said. "It must be a priority of American foreign policy to commit to eliminating extreme poverty and ensuring every child has food, shelter, and clean drinking water. As we strive to rebuild America's standing in the world, this important bill will demonstrate our promise and commitment to those in the developing world.

"Our commitment to the global economy must extend beyond trade agreements that are more about increasing profits than about helping workers and small farmers everywhere," he continued.

"It is time the United States makes it a priority of our foreign policy to meet this goal and help those who are struggling day to day," a statement issued by supporters, including Obama, said.

Specifically, it would "declare" that the official U.S. policy is to eliminate global poverty, that the president is "required" to "develop and implement" a strategy to reach that goal and requires that the U.S. efforts be "specific and measurable."

Kincaid said that after cutting through all of the honorable-sounding goals in the plan, the bottom line is that the legislation would mandate the 0.7 percent of the U.S. GNP as "official development assistance."

"In addition to seeking to eradicate poverty, that (U.N.) declaration commits nations to banning 'small arms and light weapons' and ratifying a series of treaties, including the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol (global warming treaty), the Convention of Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and the Convention of the Rights of the Child," he said.

Those U.N. protocols would make U.S. law on issues ranging from the 2nd Amendment to energy usage and parental rights all subservient to United Nations whims.

Kincaid also reported Jeffrey Sachs, who runs the "Millennium Project," confirms a U.N. plan to force the U.S. to pay 0.7 percent of GNP would add about $65 billion a year to what the U.S. already donates overseas.

http://obama.senate.gov/p...

But in the larger picture,

But in the larger picture, is this anything new. We give money away like there's an endless pot. Just because we are categorizing it as a tax just makes us feel it is more invasive. It's just another part of our foreign policy. It's not anything new. It sucks, but this bill by Obama is not anything new.

I keep seeing

that this bill has passed already...can anyone show me that?

All I see is that it's still in committee...

http://www.govtrack.us/co...

If you love the New World Order . .

If you love George Bush and his "New World Order" and the one world government he is trying his best to form --- you will absolutely LOVE Barack Obama's philosophies and idea of government.

What the Bushes planted as seedlings, Obama will water and grow in ways never imagined before.

Now, if you will play TAPS, let us all give one last salute to the United States of America as she once was; may she R.I.P.

Good one Jane

Glen Beck has an interesting take on the passage of this bill.
I know, Sort of a love/hate thing with Beck.

Glen Beck's sarcasm:
"So he's proposing $210 billion yesterday and saying it's time to stop spending billions of dollars trying to put Iraq back together and start spending the money on putting America together. At the same time he proposed the Global Poverty Act. It just today passed the Senate. This is great."
The rest is here.
http://www.glennbeck.com/...

People need to know what the Obama package includes.
Higher Taxes, and worldwide babysitting.
Ack!! Obama is NOT a second choice to Paul.

I am

bound to no other sovereignty than my own country, I did not vote for or chose to have a world power to tax me. I refuse to pay for such a thing, and should be considered to be a violation of my rights under the constitution to which I have sworn to uphold and defend. I will sue the bastards.

One thing I do like in Obama’s platform is his idea

Well, I obviously disagree with global taxation of any kind. One thing I do like in Obama’s platform is his idea to go after pharmaceutical companies, although I may not agree with his direct limitation of profits, I can't think of another way to punish these pharmaceuticals besides fines and levies. I believe that they are in collusion with the government, monopolistic, that they price gouge Americans, over medicate the elderly, and make up all sorts of new phony illnesses, like PAD, RLS, ADD, ADHD etc. I believe that all this medication is harming more people than it helps.

That is why I am more of a populist than a Libertarian. I don’t always believe in total extreme capitalism, especially when it is a multi-national company that is more like a government than an individual with unalienable rights. What about all the money and privileges these large companies receive from government? Is that not a form of socialism? I also believe that government can and must legislate morality in certain circumstances. Government should almost certainly instill dread in evildoers, like murderers, for example. This last point is in line with John Locke's ideas on constitutionalism, in my opinion.

P.S. Site Administrator, please feel free to delete my other similar post that is in the cache as spam. I accidentally hit the post button many times. Sorry about that.

Under a Libertarian form of Government

we would have access to natural and alternative forms of medicine and there also would be no government sponsored drug programs which would remove a big part of the hold Pharmaceuticals have on the health industry right there. It is Obama's idea of involving the government in our medical affairs that got us into this mess in the first place. The government cannot and will not bail us out of this mess since they are in collusion with the drug companies to start with. The government funds research for drugs, promotes drug use, and freely distributes drugs. Free enterprise means we have choices and have access to those choices. It means that the government does not mandate our health care. Ron Paul.

Ummmm? Why are you here?

Your ideas belong on Obama's site...or Hillary's...or McCain's...or....

BUT not on Daily Paul. Take your populism elsewhere. It is repulsive to most on this board and most certainly would be to Ron Paul also I believe.

I don't mind seeing another

I don't mind seeing another point of view honestly expressed here, and it's not done spitefully or childishly (like the all too common "troll" accusing idiots). Thanks for your comments.

Well, Ron Paul said himself that when these big companies

Well, Ron Paul said himself that when these big companies collude with government, like Halliburton, that it is not good. You don't think it is good for companies to make up false diseases that don't exist, dope people up, and gouge elderly people do you? Plus, you don't want big government to violate your rights, but how about when a big company takes your rights away? Did you know that Alex Jones has said in the past that he is a "conservative populist". I heard it myself on the radio. You will have to tell him the same as you have told me. Plus, you don't need to be rude. It is only an opinion. Do you think that the Founding Fathers wanted huge multi-national companies to control the government like an oligarchy?

"Get off my phone...!" - Bob Grant
" Beam me up Scotty, there is no intelligent life here!" - James Trafficant

two-party stranglehold

A vote for a one-worlder Democrat is a vote for McCain.

"We don't have to start a brand new revolution...All we have to do is restore the original Constitution." -Ron Paul

...And a vote for either

...And a vote for either party is a vote for more of the same.

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

zionist traitors

google zionist agenda and get an education also you tube 911/zionists

Thank you for posting this!

Jane, thank you so much for helping to show fellow Paulites what Obama really stands for--just another brand of globalist collectivism financed by multinationals!

And to those still vouching for Obama in here: he is not your savior. He is not any different from Bush & Clinton, Inc. In fact, he is MORE dangerous than them because of his perceived popularity and slick politicking. You have all been forewarned, and I pity those of you who abandon the revolution for this CFR shill.

Do what you can to expose this fraud, keep forwarding to friends

*** God bless Ron Paul ***
* Ron Paul For President *

Well, I see two reasons to

Well, I see two reasons to vote for him. I don't care for him. I care for what he represents as an object. People support him because they think he will changes things. I want those people to feel supported because those people are the next best thing to us. They are more people for our "army." Considering that, I see a vote for him as, one, a repudiation of Bush and, two, once he fails at real change the people who supported him will leave and search for something different and better (though not necessarily Paul but something).

That's a very dangerous and

reckless rationale. I would never vote for Obama no matter how disaappointed I am in the Republican nominee. For the same reasons that Ron Paul will remain a Republican I will remain one as well and vote accordingly.

I see no reason

I am bringing it up because there are actually people suggesting that Obama is an alternative, or amazingly, that he should be a running mate!

So you people in the KUMBAYA crowd better get this clue RIGHT NOW, it is NOT an 'easy choice'.

It is NOT irrelevant to be AWARE that OBAMA is proposing a GLOBAL TAX which just about sums up the WHOLE THING WE ARE FIGHTING. Especially for people like you who don't have a clue about why you should NOT vote for Obama under ANY circumstances.

There is no reason you can't WRITE IN RP's name which is what I am going to do.

And yes oftentimes these bills contain a 'hook' to other things...
and one of those is ban on small arms.

OH so..

We should enable him in order to defeat him and how he fits into the world federalism goal? Dumb.

I will never support a totalitarian, ever again. D or R.

You don't get what I am

You don't get what I am saying. And just because presidential candidates want to institute some global tax, doesn't mean it will happen. I at least have some faith in people. But we could probably argue this forever.

mr obama gets no faith from me.

What has he done to earn it? Side with the UN and the globalists? He wants to tax us to help reduce world poverty and he wants the US to fall in line with the UN objective of disarming the planet. All in one bill.

He's no patriot.

Contacted my representatives with the below.

In regards to the United Nations Millennium Declaration and and the Global Poverty Act.

In regards to idea of elimination of small arms part of the inititive:

I fear if this goes into effect and there is an attempted collection of small arms in the US there will be a huge loss of life and limb to military members, police, and the civilian population.
I am a law abiding citizen, but I feel obligated to inform you of my stance on this issue and I need you to know if this goes into effect I will not willing give up my right to bare arms, and I know MANY people that have the same stance as I do. Many of these are in the military and civilian population, and will defend the right to bear arms to the death, so I ask that you do not support any bill that supports these initiatives, and hopefully prevent what ever may come about if these ideas/bills come to fruition in the United States.

Please note that

Chuck Hagel is a co-sponsor of Obama's bill.

God will work with you but not for you - Walter Russell

"Climat crisis"?

Since the media has indoctrinated most , if not everyone to believe in the "end of world scenario", please read the many peer reviewed articles from the below site, it will enlighten you and make you aware of how powerful the media is, when they have to make propaganda for this or that cause.

http://scienceandpublicpo...

Let the TRUTH be heard.

Barack Obama the Antichrist

http://barackobamaantichr...

Check this page out, it's pretty scary...

and then there's this:

http://wonkette.com/polit...
Barack Hussein Obama

Take
first letter of his first name
Second two letters of his second name
and last letters of his last name...

b u s m a = MABUS

Nostradamus' name for the third anti-Christ

You think that's bad?

Check this out - George Walker Bush:

Turn the 'W' upside down, to get an 'M'.
Then take the first two letters of his middle name "MA"
Take the first three letters of his last name 'BUS"

= MABUS. The letters are in order too.

Oh my goddddddddddd, Obama and Bush are tenth cousins too!! It's like a two-headed Anti-Christ!!! Please help us St. Ronald Paul!!!!!

666

Ronald Wilson Reagan = 666
(add up the letters)

proves nothing, the number is symbolic
and not to be taken literally---just like
the rest of the Bible!

ABC News - Obama Is More Aggressive Than Bush

http://rense.com/general8...

2-12-8

Barack Obama, the CIA-Brzezinski-Soros Machurian candidate specialized in duping gullible voters, wants to bomb Pakistan, a country of 160 million people that actually might fight back with nuclear weapons. This lunatic proposal makes Obama demonstrably the most explicit and outspoken warmonger in the Democratic field. And this is only the beginning: Obama's chief controller, Zbigniew Brzezinski, actually intends to court confrontation with Russia, which is fast becoming the most powerful nuclear state on earth. Time to stop the swoon before it is too late.

ABC News - Anti-War Obama Pushes Pakistan Invasion
Obama Delivers Bold Speech About War on Terror
Presidential Candidate Pushes Aggressive Stance Toward Pakistan
By Jake Tapper
8-1-7

In a strikingly bold speech about terrorism Wednesday, Democratic presidential candidate Illinois Sen. Barack Obama called not only for a withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, but a redeployment of troops into Afghanistan and even Pakistan, with or without the permission of Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf.

"I understand that President Musharraf has his own challenges," Obama said, "but let me make this clear. There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again. It was a terrible mistake to fail to act when we had a chance to take out an al Qaeda leadership meeting in 2005. If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will."
continues at link...

Thank you!

Thank you for this!

It was said that most totalitarian dictators garnered their support for people not by explaining where they stood on anything but by repeating words like 'change' and 'hope'.

I think it was the Rep. from Minn. that was on after me yesterday morning.

British Have Obama By The Short-Hairs

http://www.rense.com/gene...

Barack 'Change' Obama: Vacuous fraud and elite stooge who is scamming the minds of America

Lineage means nothing in

Lineage means nothing in this case. Policies mean everything.

Obama, Freemason, Related To Both Bush, Cheney

http://www.rense.com/gene...

By Leo Zagami
2-13-8

Obama outlines his ambitious geopolitical plans in a recent essay for Foreign Affairs magazine. Foreign Affairs is published by the Council on Foreign Relations, which describes itself as a non-partisan group of which he is a member. Established in the 1920's and headquartered in New York, its membership includes prominent politicians and business elite, including heads of academia and media. The organization seeks to centralize both political power and market power to craft legislation outside the checks and balances of democracy.

The CFR is rarely mentioned by the mainstream media... Obama is also a 32nd degree Prince Hall Freemason loyal to the Craft and devoted to his principles so forget about the "changes" and start thinking about the same old , same old , coming once again into power.

Obama is Illuminati aristocracy. his appearance from 'nowhere', and subsequent rocket to the front of the political line are no coincidence. Believe it or not, Barack Obama is related to both President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney as you can check here: http://www.nypost.com/sev...
news/dissing_cousins__obama__cheney.htm

So, the possible scenario is that Hillary might become the Vice President of Obama at the end of this political show , but in any case let's enjoy what the American call Democracy a good show in the hands of the usual suspects , and remember America the Pope is coming with His Blessings this spring..ha..ha....and make sure Brother Obama doesn't miss his Zionist masonic meetings as he would love to be the main actor in the reconstruction of the Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem.

Maybe the next Antichrist to hit the US presidential scene will be darker then some people have expected.

Mason

I haven't seen anywhere from Masonic authorities that he is a Mason. I am also a 32nd degree Mason and loyal to our Craft. We usually advertise who the famous Masons are. In fact, my Scottish Rite building has the pictures of all Masons including the Prince Hall Masons. I have not seen anything about Obama yet - I'll check into it when I go to my next, as you say, "Zionist masonic meeting."

And if you are, in fact, a 32nd degree Freemason,

WTF are you doing here??? Freemasonry is Luciferian and is a major force in the New World Order. In case you haven't figured it out, most of us here are fighting the NWO tooth and nail.

That's funny

He won't realize what he's into 'til he reaches 33rd degree LOL!!
Probably not even then! Notice, he himself called it a "CRAFT." He took an oath to...........................
Templars, the knights of blah blah blah search the history man.........
Probably COC member as well, and in "very good standing" in his community.

I did not say it, I found it on Rense...

That's why the link is at the top. It was written by Leo Zagami.

Look, this guy is a scumbag

Look, this guy is a scumbag as are his "competitors", which includes EVERY democrat and republican politician with the exception of 1 man and that man is being ignored and in some cases laughed at by these scumbag marxists.

However the American people "in general" have nobody else but themselves to blame for the continuation of this. They have allowed themselves to become ignorant and lazy. Why would any thinking person think that any sort of return to freedom is even in the realm of possibility here?

It's not and will go full circle before anything happens if anything is even possible.

nothing is worse

than being a Subject . Americans via 1776 are not subjects of neither government ,monarchy , nor association to entities . Are we subjects today ? Yes we are because along the way we have forgotten that very imortant tenet.In reality however We are nobody`s property we own ourselves.
I f i need to eplain this its already to F...ing late.