for all of you Ron Paul supporters who said they will vote for Obama if Ron Paul does not get the Republican bid.
you people need to wake up! AS A MATTER OF FACT.. THE WHOLE STUPID POPULATION OF THIS COUNTRY NEEDS TO WAKE UP! read the article below
output


















Troll stop tryng to keep
Troll
stop tryng to keep things on top that are inflammatory and not true
flag delete and ban
spoken like a true lover of freedom...
I think I remember reading that quote being from Thomas Paine:
"flag, delete and ban"...or was it Trotsky
communism is in america
the communists in russia centralized power and money and that's what we have in america today. so such a charge wouldn't make me "not vote" for my second choice, Obama. McCain is far worse (my opinion) because he's so wishy washy.
I know a lot of Ron Paul supporters
and they are all 'Ron Paul or bust' supporters.
There isn't going to be a lesser of two evils for Ron Paul supporters.
With Obama, Hillary, McCain, Romney, Huckabee, you'll get the North American Union.
Ron Paul is the only candidate openly opposed to the North American Union.
That's just one of the many reasons for voting for RP.
jane....
you have done a lot for the campaign and I have read all your posts for the past few months....
but calling someone a troll if he or she does not agree with you opinion?...
i share brightdrrk with his opinion on Mcain and hitlary...id rather vote for a guy with no blood on his hands....but we know with our foreign policies he will get his hands dirty too....but yes I too will write in Ron's name.....
stop calling people trolls and learn to be able to take other peoples opinion.....
Obama is glass..
Why has Obama not been at Dr. Paul's side? He has voted for funding plus every social program imaginable. He has blood.
Anyone promoting a communist sympathizer on a forum that promotes the candidate of liberty is a troll...
oh yes great ....
and hitlary and mccaine have been the epitome of ron's policy.....geez
atleast obama would respect Ron if he was debating next to him rather than scoff "we missed you"....
look dude ill be glad to meet you in person and discuss this on our march to washington but seriously just answer this....
hitlary, mccain, obama who would you rather have in the white house...
beware the eloquent tongue
Obama is no different than the others, he is just more charming / more polite in public, so the masses think he is "different"
kinda reminds me of Bill Clinton - people loved his charismatic ways, charming smile, speeches of helping the poor & using diplomacy around the world...
yet some 500,000 Iraqi children died, as he was sitting in office for 8 years with a Democratic Congress as the US military BOMBED IRAQ nearly EVERY SINGLE DAY up thru the end of his presidency in 1998, and beyond.
Which is more dangerous?
I'd say maybe the more charismatic ones, because people are more easily fooled.
All the remaining candidates are very dangerous for America (and the world)... except Ron Paul.
I could not in good conscience vote for ANYONE else but Ron Paul
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
To learn what really happened, check out
www.whatreallyhappened.co...
actually....
as much as Hillary and McCain are just downright nasty individuals with awful personalities and known corrupt qualities, I believe Hussein Obama to be the most dangerous of the 3.
There is only one candidate for president
worth supporting and voting for and that's Ron Paul.
There is no question about it and nothing more to say. It's pointless to spend one moment considering anybody else. Done.
Wow
Are you pissed?
Good!
Take that energy and educate as many folks as you can about Ron Paul. Our time to educate folks is now, and the window of opportunity is closing. Plant the seed. There is a cure for the cesspool that is the US government, and folks need to know the cure.
There is only one candidate and he is Ron Paul.
Granted id rather see Barak
Granted id rather see Barak bin Obama than Mcstain huckaloogey or Hitlery. They all have blood on their hands...I will have none on mine. Im writing in President Paul.
OK
I'm forced to say it -- TROLL!
you're
the troll
I agree
Anyone promoting a communist sympathizer on a forum that promotes the candidate of liberty is a troll...
The candidate of liberty,
Dr. Paul, would not suppress the right of free speech of another. When you folks call others "trolls" you subtract from the cause of freedom. And, you reveal yourself to be a petty little tyrant who would dismiss another so that you might feel more comfortable.
These people are not for real
They keep calling talk shows and C-Span saying they support McCain or Huckabee or Paul, but they are going to vote for Hillary or Obama and then they have a bunch of "reasons" prepared. They are plants. There seems to be a contest to see whether Hillary or Obama's supporters can play this card the most.
I maxed out for Ron Paul and was a member of my meetup..
Also I stood on streat corners and Went door to door as my precinct leader.. I am no plant.. I voted for Ron Paul now I will vote for Obama.. I will also be marching on washington with you...
timc
i despise the man and his "pseudo change" policy
but when i look at hitlary and mccaine I think I would rather have obama as my president .....
a lot of people on this forum here have voted for bush....not once but twice ...now they suddenly want us to vote for hitlary and mccaine over obama ....
I would tell those people they are responsible for me voting for obama....b/c right now people would vote for even che guevara over the neocons and hitlary....
tim you are NOT a troll and thanks for your work for Ron and hope to see you in the march to Washington....
Write In Ron Paul
That is what I will do if we don't get the GOP nomination.
Brent
"One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.”
Plato
http://AmericasBraveheart...
No paul, then vote AMERICAN
third party! anybody elese for a real "change"!
Simple Thought
Anyone who claims that ther're fighting for the DOC and considering a vote for "O-Bum-Us may very well be completely lost.
BFD... and you KNOW what that means...
Look.. if having a flag of che is the end of the world.. then AMERICANS REALLY DO HAVE PROBLEMS..
McNuts was BRAINWASHED BY NORTH VIETNAM... he is INSANE... UNBALANCED.. and just plain NUTS..
Obama has BALLS for REFUSING to wear some STUPID PIN ON HIS LAPEL...
That act actually gained some RESPECT from me... for Obomber...
Look... if it comes down to END THE WORLD MC-Nuts.. or OBOMBER...
Hell.. I WILL BE VOTING FOR OBOMBER.... TWICE.. maybe even THREE TIMES!!!
For that matter.. I will vote for Hillary... GOD FORBID... if she is up against McTotallyInsane..
McCrazy will BRING THE END OF THE WORLD.. he is so mentally unsound unstable and imbalanced... not to mention... INTOXICTATED BY POWER TOO... McCrazy is poison for LIFE AS WE KNOW IT!!!
While the others may be too.... I'll take my chances on an "unknown" versus a KNOWN CRAZY like McNuts
And Obama is not crazy?
You people are totally clueless. What is the difference in domination through taxes or a nutcase that goes to war? Didn't you read the post about Obama's bill in the Senate to empower the UN with a global tax?
You are proud of Obama for not wearing a pin? You lack substance sir.
All of you were so exercised by a few strong words in an anonymous newsletter that was NOT signed by RP, yet you are not incensed at the idea that he has a flag of an insane MASS MURDERING COMMIE on his wall?
This is DEFINITELY the spoils of the public education system.
http://www.gopusa.com/com...
jane...
lets do this....
compare how many people were killed in the last 7 yrs with that killed by che guevara....you know who caused more bloodshed....seriously if che himself was running today against bush....other than the bible thumpers i think the whole of america would vote for che....not b/c of che and his policies but that they are sick of the idiots neocons who have made the world their dominion....
i would definitely vote for obama over mccaine....now call me a troll too b/c i dont agree with you ....geez
now we're down to comparing who killed more people
than the others? LOL, wow.
The point concerning Castro's flag and portrait of Che Guevara hanging in a presidential candidate's Texas HQ is exactly in the symbolism and societies it represents. That is, one of a central government in total control of all assets, zero personal freedom, no private property, no right to privacy (I mean NO right to privacy...you think the Patriot Act takes away your privacy, LOL), forced labor, no internet (think you can just go "online" in Cuba, do some reading), all in the name of equality, "justice" and "fairness". Watch for the buzz words "social justice", euphamism for socialist control).
Sorry for the litany of evils, but that is exactly what those symbols related to. I didn't see an American flag and portrait of Thomas Jefferson, did you?
You cannot possibly be a Ron Paul supporter and believe that an Obama HQ flying the Che Guevara portrait and Cuban flag is meaningless.
Lastly, Che Guevara was the coordinator for all of Castro's political prisoner executions. That is, he directly oversaw the murder of thousands of anti-Castro individuals, many of whom were simply writers, poets, businessmen and former colleagues who were promised democracy instead of communism.
An amazingly naive post, sir.
Are you kidding?
You obviously don't know how many people were killed by Guevara. This is like those nutcases that deny the Holocaust.
All of a sudden the Hillary and Obama supporters are coming out on this website like there's no tomorrow. How sad that you strung us along for this much time.
No one has told me what difference it makes if it's 100 more years in Iraq or a global tax to start some NEW war in Africa? (or join one that is there now?)
Jane
you are 100% correct of course. Obama is smart or cunning: speak in general terms about hope and change and smile, and people like him. Yet they have NO idea about his policies or positions. It is like writing him a blank check. He is the most leftist senator in the Democratic party. Of course he will not only raise taxes, he will also throw the US open to all. People read all they want to have as an ideal president in him, but he is not, all psychiological control and manipulation.Those Paul supporters considering voting for him: he will bring about different change which is not needed and will appoint neocon advisers. Remember he voted with Clinton in the Senate regarding the Iraq war and also for the Patriot Act. One cannot vote for any other candidate than Paul. Remember also: the president has now much more power than ever int he history of the US!. With a Democratic Congress and Senate he (Obama) can steamroller things through. He has virtually no experience, you cannot judge him and has proven that he has lied, initially said he will never run. If it is McCain vs Clinton/Obama, the best you can do is to not vote, like many other conservatives in the GOP and then wait till the mid term elections and then take over the Senate and COngress again, while in the meantime take control of the GOP, kick the small neocon back to the Democratic Party (where they came from), and unite and draw in Independents as well as smart, conservative Democrats.
I love it.
What a post! Total agreement.
if you can't get it figured
if you can't get it figured out that a murdering commie bastard like this guy is supported by leftist liberal slime like obama then your moral compasse is so screwed up you can't find your own way out your front door! why are you guys even supporting Ron Paul you know he would not support che guevera or what ever that morons name is.. he is totally opposite everything Ron Paul stands for.. you people make me laugh!
Exactly
Some people vote based on principles, dumb asses vote for what they think is less evil, but how do they even know if Obama is less evil than Hillary? For all we know Bill and Obama are good budies, just like bush 1 and Bill.
Wasn't he the topic of the Motorcycle Diaries movie? Good
flik, you should check it out.
Go President Paul!
’In accordance with the principles of double-think it does not matter if the war is not real. For when it is, victory is not possible. The war is not meant to be won, but it is meant to be continuous.’ (George Orwell, 1984)
I will never vote for Obama,
I will never vote for Obama, Hillary, McCain, Huckabee...or if Romney happens to reappear he won't get my vote either. If Dr. Paul is not on the ballot...I will write him in!
If they dont follow the Constitution
They arent worth voting for. Only Ron Paul, or a third party candidate will. Why would you vote for Obama over Hillary. They are damn near the same. McCain too. They're all Traitors to Special Interests and the power brokers who have influence. I wouldn't give a thimble full of piss for either of them because I'd be wasting a good thimble.
There is one very good reason to.
Bush and company is the worst group of personnel in the executive branch of the federal government that to even compare them to the rest is insult to the rest. They are on a whole different spectrum. Other administration may have twisted things, misconstrued things, ignored matters, etc. about the constitution, but whatever it was there was at least recognition at some fundamental capacity of American law. This current administration just doesn't give a shit about that. It is a burden, an annoyance for them that is nothing but something in the way towards what they want to accomplish. They are sick people. They are either sociopaths or so narcissistic narcissism is embarrassment to be associated with them.
As such, you vote for two things within that context. First, you must vote for the repudiation of this crazy, sick, evil dynamic. That is what this election, at its best, should accomplish. It is less about policy and more about a healthy decision in reaction to this sick dynamic. Hence, you vote for a repudiation of that. Second, to do just that you have to vote for that which is viable, which can, considering all the laws and procedures etc., realistically get elected. Reasoning out these two factors you result in a vote for Obama.
I personally think Obama is a schmuck just like the rest of them but I care less about him and care more about what is represented by him as an object. And what he represents as an object is the people's wish for change. Hence, a vote for Obama is a practical, viable vote for some fundamental change. Not the empty BS change he thinks he is talking about, but the genuine desperate wish of change we the people want. And if he wins and he fails in that agenda it will only help matters in the bigger picture. Think about what the past 8 years have done to energize people. The more failure there is the more the people will succeed.
and the clintonnistas were
and the clintonnistas were just as bad.. clinton comitted treaso by selling nuclear war secrets to the red chinese.. specifically THE NUETRON BOMB! THEY ARE ALL THE SAME FOLKS FIGURE IT OUT.. WHY ELSE WOULD BOOOSHH#1 AND CLINTON BE SUCK GREAT FRIENDS... DUHHHHHHHH
No he was not.
He was not as bad. This is calling grouping people together. Many administration were not great and did not operate in benefit to the ideas of constitution and all that stuff. That is different then what has gone on in this administration. It is not the same and I am sorry you are so emotional that you have trouble seeing the difference.
If nothing else, consider this, though this may drawn a lot of discussion. I don't know the details, but apparently the amount of information known before September 11th, 2001 was relatively huge. And that info wound up on Condoleeza Rice's, the NSA, desk. Nothing was done. The administration just ignored the matters. Why? Cause they wanted to do what they wanted to do. They just didn't care. Previous administrations enacted the same relative foreign policy, though nothing as crazy as the current Middle East situation, but they did it with the acceptance that they would have to ensure a certain level of "maintenance" and "protection." They would have to manage the blowback in other words. Intelligence leads were followed and what not. I am not justifying anything. I am just trying draw out a difference. I mean there is just simply an enormous, definitive difference between this current administration and an other administration. They just simply do not serve the American people. Other administrations just served the American people badly. That is the difference and it is very important to realize.
Wrong,my friend.
There IS a larger plan,only we the sheeple do not see it usually until after the fact. Hindsight is 20/20.
They planned for GW/GOP to do this dirty work,b/c they did indeed want this dirty work done. But this could only be done after a foundation of 8 years of Clinton distractions and sneaky moves that took away our freedoms and deluded us into thinking we had a surplus.
Now,the plan was that we would of course be so tired of hard fascism,that we'd lovingly embrace soft fascism/socialism-ie,Obama/Clinto II-to go full on for the UN and NAU agendas,and further government programs to 'help us',after all that GW harship. Wah Wah. And we fall for it!!! Again and again!!!
Look,I say this as someone who voted for Clinton,twice!
Please,I employ you,we could debate the specifics: who used worse tactics,but in the end,the system was put in place and our rights usurped by both administrations jointly.
Do more research!!!!
They have tricked you(:
Nobody
has tricked me. You are just crazy. This crazy paranoia of authority is irrational and as twisted and self-fulfilling as the current administration is with their own crazy ways of thinking. You take facts and mix and match them to support what you want it to support. I don't deny anything that has happened whether it this current administration or some past administration. The difference is I process the information differently. You see conspiracy and malicious behavior from past administrations and I see well intended people enormously screw things up. I in essence see incompetence. This current administration is a completely different animal. I see dysfunction and disorder. I mean did you ever consider the fact that Bush is doing things his father decided not to do. I mean it was Bush's father...his father!...that decided not to overthrow the Iraqi dictatorship. What...was there some elaborate massive plan to keep him in power so one day his son can become President and invade and yada yada yada. I mean who are these people you are giving this enormous credit to. It's crazy what you are suggesting. Could you plan elaborate, absurd plans like you are suggesting these people do? I mean I can't. What makes them so special? I'd like to know. Are they superheros? Do they have special powers? Maybe they control everybody with some mind control stuff? That'd be nice. Less responsibility for me.
Anyway, you simply ignore the whole picture and just focus on what you wish for. It's as simple as that. That is why I am wrong. I am wrong from your point of view.
PS You're looking for "implore"
If you could vote for
Hitler or Stalin, what difference would that make. Thats about how much difference there is between Obama and Hillary or McCain and Romney, or any way you want to mix em. You have one choice and its not Freedom, Liberty, and the Constitution! Its slavery!
Of course
we have a good idea of what Hitler and Stalin did. We do not, however, know what these candidates would do as President. But, we can make informed opinions based on what they say and what they have done. Thinking this way, I'd say you are flat out wrong to say there is no difference. Just as there is a huge difference between Dr. Paul and these candidates, there is a huge difference between say, McCain and Clinton.
Slavery??
If only it were McCain and Clinton
It is not. It is their allegiance to a globalist governance. And they already have a plan. McCain is a show dog candidate. [and hardly a good one,at that.]He is there as a warm body.
In the 'official plan' that is.
Neither of them have allegiance with the American people. In this regard,they are no different. Yes,they may do it in different ways,but it is the same goal in mind. Guess you can pick which version of slavery you'd be more comfortable with? But shades of gray when it comes to freedom is not my thing,personally.
Yes,
exactly. What the other person is doing is grouping. It is immature thinking. There is a difference. If you can't see it, that is unfortunate that you can only focus on the similarities and flush out any differences at all.
What I meant
by slavery, is High taxes, no respect for privacy, guilty until proven innocent, redistribution of wealth, etc. Thats what each of them offers!
Unfortunately, we
have all of those things NOW. For me the primary issue is the situation in Iraq. It will get WORSE with McCain.
They want you to call for peace at all costs
so that you will even accept the UN and give up some sovereignty.
That is the point: Their plan is for Hillary and/or Obama,b/c everyone is SO tired of GW and hence McCain before he even starts. Playing into their hand-like RP said: You cannot look at Foreign Policy without looking at all the rest,and you cannot look at the economy without looking at FP.
It's all interrelated,folks.
The leg bone's connected to the ankle bone....
no difference at all wake
no difference at all wake up
I must say
Emotions were at an all time low when some of us said that. (present company included)
voting
We need to keep the message alive...positive dialogue with those that think different and as of now I can't imagine not voting for Paul.
We want healthy change
towards more freedom, not less. If Ron Paul does not get the nomination, not voting or voting for the poor choices offered by the Dems and GOP would not help our cause. The best choice is to get behind a third party 100% and get large enough percentages to really draw some attention and to get ballot access for the next election cycle. At this point I favor the Constitution Party as the closest to our ideals. Let's not give up hope for this election cycle, but if it doesn't work out, don't bail. We must look to the future. This two party system is not best for our country or freedom.