meaning: it is 'normal' to have all nations trade in a currency of their choice. we should look at this as a normalizing on the trade front,in my opinion.
Of course,since the US has this history of making money off of being an empire,and now off of being a consumer,with little to no manufacturing,the transition WILL be difficult and for some gnarly.
So,this means two different things-one it is the beginning potentially of free-market trade world-wide,which edges out the intl banker monopoly [and hence the globalists]. This is good.
Two-as mentioned-the US will have a transition period that could be as bad as suggested,or perhaps better or worse?
We should prepare but be not 100% reactionary that this is a 'bad' thing overall/long-term,in my opinion.
of course,I personally believe that the petro powerhouses in the middle east are part and parcel with the international global elite. So they are all in the same game here. [The higher level players,that is.]In which case,it is hardly the beginning of free-markets,only more of the same corporate monopolies and ownership. That is my personal opinion. BUT
on Petrodollar warfare:
He recommends the multilateral pursuit of both energy and monetary reforms within a United Nations framework to create a more balanced global energy and monetary system thereby reducing the possibility of future oil-depletion and oil currency-related warfare.
I would hardly want the UN to create a framework for more balanced global energy and monetary system.
2)We need not dictate our policies by oil depletion-SINCE the peak oil concept is also not a sure thing. This whole shennanigan is based on a willing consensus that we have a limited supply,and with those at the helm telling us how long that supply will last.
3)Even if we did have a limited supply,that is precisely the point: Oil economies cannot wage warfare forever. [And this says nothing about the fact that it would be completely possible and not as hard as believed to create a working economy without using oil as primary.]
4)While Iraq,according to the book referenced,is considered the first 'petrodollar war' [though I bet others were heavily waged on the same concept],we have had coal,gold,silver,copper,etc. warfares in the past. It is always the fossil fuel or mineral of the day that creates the drama.
5)I have not read the book,so do not know what you are referring to specifically. Only read an excerpt and review.
6)Point being: Whether for petro. OR any other resource,commodity or good/service,whether consider 'precious' or not,we should expect that sovereign individuals and nations will trade with whatever the want. That is NORMAL. What we have been doing is NOT NORMAL.
So everyone getting up in arms about the gasp idea that the dollar will not hold it's monopoly but the Euro or gold will???
Sorry,that is why we are in this thing with RP and why he wants to legalize competition for currencies,alternative fuels,energy markets,and de-regulate trade and business.
Implementing these does not mean the US dollar will maintain strength.
In the long term,it is likely that the US dollar's strength will no longer be the defining point of a strong and healthy economy. Thanks for referral,btw.
but what a 'full collapse' means will be different depending on your circumstances. I'm not diminishing it's impact,just saying that the process will bring about a transformation that has it's upside,as well.
It will really be a 'new system'.
We can contribute to it's architecture.
Alot of people will be in shock b/c they did not see it coming. That is different than the actual effects in real terms. Identities are formed around the very system that is collapsing-ie,not just financial wellbeing,survival,but who and what one is and one's place i society are formulated around a concept that is giving way. This will impact people's responses/reactions to what happens For better or worse. Just an observation.
that this blog is touching upon the real cause of the Mid-east wars. Everyone in the nation needs to know the facts in this article. What are the odds MSM will discuss this issue?
The author does a brilliant job explaining the whole structure of the problem, in not a only a historical context, but also the "how's" and "why's" in plain language.
THIS IS REQUIRED READING.
I highly encourage everyone to read this thoroughly.
The jury is still out on peak oil. I've read all of Mike Ruppert's material and his writers such as Stan Geoff, etc. Their points seem valid enough and it does in fact also seem that some fields are losing their productive capacity such as Ghawar in Saudia Arabia.
This interesting aspect about oil, that is never spoken about to the public anymore, is where does oil actually come from. It seems a foregone conclusion that it's just mashed up dinosaurs and plants. Now, on the face of this argument it seems reasonable..... to an 8th grader.
I'm tending to believe that the earth creates oil from its cored outward. There are cases of oil fields that have been pumped dry only to re-fill again. Regardless of whether or not peak oil is a reality physically, peak oil for the sake of slowing down the world and causing the dollar to remain viable due to the pegging of the dollar to oil would seem more the plausible.
/agree just look at yesterdays NASA announcement of findings on "Titan" its RAINING liquid hydrocarbons! see http://www.space.com/scie...
Saturn's smoggy moon Titan has hundreds of times more natural gas and other liquid hydrocarbons than all the known oil and natural gas reserves on Earth, scientists said today.
here's a comment from WRH's Mike Rivero "I am pretty certain Titan never had any dinosaurs. So this strongly supports the abiotic theory for the origin of oil. "
this article
is worth it's weight in gold
both good and bad
meaning: it is 'normal' to have all nations trade in a currency of their choice. we should look at this as a normalizing on the trade front,in my opinion.
Of course,since the US has this history of making money off of being an empire,and now off of being a consumer,with little to no manufacturing,the transition WILL be difficult and for some gnarly.
So,this means two different things-one it is the beginning potentially of free-market trade world-wide,which edges out the intl banker monopoly [and hence the globalists]. This is good.
Two-as mentioned-the US will have a transition period that could be as bad as suggested,or perhaps better or worse?
We should prepare but be not 100% reactionary that this is a 'bad' thing overall/long-term,in my opinion.
i recommend
reading william clarkes book:
petrodollar warfare
Eastern Oregon is Ron Paul Country!
ps
of course,I personally believe that the petro powerhouses in the middle east are part and parcel with the international global elite. So they are all in the same game here. [The higher level players,that is.]In which case,it is hardly the beginning of free-markets,only more of the same corporate monopolies and ownership. That is my personal opinion. BUT
From a review
on Petrodollar warfare:
He recommends the multilateral pursuit of both energy and monetary reforms within a United Nations framework to create a more balanced global energy and monetary system thereby reducing the possibility of future oil-depletion and oil currency-related warfare.
I would hardly want the UN to create a framework for more balanced global energy and monetary system.
2)We need not dictate our policies by oil depletion-SINCE the peak oil concept is also not a sure thing. This whole shennanigan is based on a willing consensus that we have a limited supply,and with those at the helm telling us how long that supply will last.
3)Even if we did have a limited supply,that is precisely the point: Oil economies cannot wage warfare forever. [And this says nothing about the fact that it would be completely possible and not as hard as believed to create a working economy without using oil as primary.]
4)While Iraq,according to the book referenced,is considered the first 'petrodollar war' [though I bet others were heavily waged on the same concept],we have had coal,gold,silver,copper,etc. warfares in the past. It is always the fossil fuel or mineral of the day that creates the drama.
5)I have not read the book,so do not know what you are referring to specifically. Only read an excerpt and review.
6)Point being: Whether for petro. OR any other resource,commodity or good/service,whether consider 'precious' or not,we should expect that sovereign individuals and nations will trade with whatever the want. That is NORMAL. What we have been doing is NOT NORMAL.
So everyone getting up in arms about the gasp idea that the dollar will not hold it's monopoly but the Euro or gold will???
Sorry,that is why we are in this thing with RP and why he wants to legalize competition for currencies,alternative fuels,energy markets,and de-regulate trade and business.
Implementing these does not mean the US dollar will maintain strength.
In the long term,it is likely that the US dollar's strength will no longer be the defining point of a strong and healthy economy. Thanks for referral,btw.
ALL oil transactions made in the world are in US dollars...
the transitionary period will be a rough for the US...
basically a full collapse...
which is fine- but make your own preps...
Eastern Oregon is Ron Paul Country!
agreed.
but what a 'full collapse' means will be different depending on your circumstances. I'm not diminishing it's impact,just saying that the process will bring about a transformation that has it's upside,as well.
It will really be a 'new system'.
We can contribute to it's architecture.
Alot of people will be in shock b/c they did not see it coming. That is different than the actual effects in real terms. Identities are formed around the very system that is collapsing-ie,not just financial wellbeing,survival,but who and what one is and one's place i society are formulated around a concept that is giving way. This will impact people's responses/reactions to what happens For better or worse. Just an observation.
you are correct...
it is the old boiling frog analogy..
Eastern Oregon is Ron Paul Country!
I think others had the same idea though...
The Russians...lol
http://www.presstv.ir/det...
As usual though your post is spot on.. Hiyas Laurie!
Which one?
Which Laurie? Me or Lauriem? Haha!
Print and
share with everyone you know. This is simple enough for an eighth grader to comprehend. Keep it in your canvassing / campaign folder.
This is a great article. I
This is a great article. I had one of those "a-ha" moments while reading this. Thanks for posting, invaluable information.
college
this needs to be sent to every college in the us.
Incredible article
I understood the threat the Bourse presented, but this article must be read by anyone who doesn't understand teh backdrop.
Ongoing Bourse Thread
Tons of data
www.dailypaul.com/node/34...
bump
bump
wow did i learn alot,
wow did i learn alot, totally makes sense
every american ...democrat, independent, republican
must read this
b/c people in the rest of the world already know this...
It's good to see
that this blog is touching upon the real cause of the Mid-east wars. Everyone in the nation needs to know the facts in this article. What are the odds MSM will discuss this issue?
this information has been blacked out
just like RP...
the truth hurts the establishment...
if you are interested in more
google peak oil--
or try the oildrum.com --- lifeaftertheoilcrash--- dieoff.com--- yahoo energy groups...
Eastern Oregon is Ron Paul Country!
The author does a brilliant
The author does a brilliant job explaining the whole structure of the problem, in not a only a historical context, but also the "how's" and "why's" in plain language.
THIS IS REQUIRED READING.
I highly encourage everyone to read this thoroughly.
peak oil...
is already biting us...
US foreign policy is nothing more than a reaction to it..
Eastern Oregon is Ron Paul Country!
The jury is still out on
The jury is still out on peak oil. I've read all of Mike Ruppert's material and his writers such as Stan Geoff, etc. Their points seem valid enough and it does in fact also seem that some fields are losing their productive capacity such as Ghawar in Saudia Arabia.
This interesting aspect about oil, that is never spoken about to the public anymore, is where does oil actually come from. It seems a foregone conclusion that it's just mashed up dinosaurs and plants. Now, on the face of this argument it seems reasonable..... to an 8th grader.
I'm tending to believe that the earth creates oil from its cored outward. There are cases of oil fields that have been pumped dry only to re-fill again. Regardless of whether or not peak oil is a reality physically, peak oil for the sake of slowing down the world and causing the dollar to remain viable due to the pegging of the dollar to oil would seem more the plausible.
have you read or followed matthew simmons...
he was bush cheney energy advisor...
google him.
richard duncan
colin campbell
ken deffeyes
google them too..
Eastern Oregon is Ron Paul Country!
The peak oil myth
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig5/crispin8.html
is supply and demand a myth?
Eastern Oregon is Ron Paul Country!
/agree just look at
/agree just look at yesterdays NASA announcement of findings on "Titan" its RAINING liquid hydrocarbons! see http://www.space.com/scie...
here's a comment from WRH's Mike Rivero "I am pretty certain Titan never had any dinosaurs. So this strongly supports the abiotic theory for the origin of oil. "
more info in Peak Oil here: http://www.prisonplanet.c...
"Great men do not seek power, they have great power thrust upon them" - Klingon proverb
www.myspace.com/chapel_of...
www.ronpaul2008.com
they pretty well know where all of the oil on earth is...
Eastern Oregon is Ron Paul Country!
B
Eastern Oregon is Ron Paul Country!