Prediction The United States Supreme Court Will Astonish, all of us and WILL BAN GUNS

Court rulings have upheld the right of governments to ban guns. The Parker case, in which the Court is ruling on a the total ban of handguns in D.C., will consider the right of governments to ban guns. My guess is that they will rule against the D.C. and restore the right of citizens to own a handgun (with conditions) in D.C.

Join up today:
http://www.constitution.o...

To all the naysayers here, what makes you think that a Supreme Court that now allows government to take your house by eminent domain (for almost any use, including a superhighway), or just this week refuses to hear a case on illegal government wiretapping of US citizens would have any objection to promoting national security by preventing insurrections or removing tools of terrorism by these same citizens? That's how it could be framed in a broader case, and that's how it's going to ultimately be decided.

The events in New Orleans can and will be repeated elsewhere. The government has no interest in your independence or self-sufficiency.

Said the judge in the previous decision in favor of the ban:
To sum up, there is no dispute that the Constitution, case law and applicable statutes all establish that the District is not a State within the meaning of the Second Amendment. Under United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. at 178, the Second Amendment's declaration and guarantee that "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" relates to the Militia of the States only. That the Second Amendment does not apply to the District, then, is, to me, an unavoidable conclusion.

No Bloody F'N Way! This Country has way way to many Good Old Boys - RedNecks - Crackers - Ex Military - Hunters - Outdoors men - ETC ETC!
If you never been to a gun show - Go to one & you will see all of these fine folk in person, hell if you come to Ohio you'll run into me.

Also everyone of these individuals are crack shots & in fact most have also spent many an hour with their kids - target shooting. This is one of the prime reason that our country has never been invaded. There are arsenals of weapons thru out this country - every country hollar - small town - big town - middle of nowhere -

They fear an Armed Populace & Rightly So

Predictions are a dime a dozen and all yours are really way out there....You also have virtually nothing to base them on.....Simply not going to happen.....relax before you have a stroke or something

They took away guns from the people in Austrialia, we're next... the handwriting on the wall...

The MSM has been surprising me lately. They actually have been the GUN PEOPLE to have their say on this issue. Their point is that if the pilots and professors had guns much of this stuff would not happen.

Either way, we need more recruits and we have to keep getting RPs name out there... here is my two cents...
http://www.youtube.com/wa...

One word. Bull.

Last chance= RP2008

The SCOTUS does not have the power or authority to ban anything. They can only determine what the government's power is...

could post along with the first line.

we will ask for the "dismemberment" (

we will ask for the "dismemberment" (

everyone that owned guns all decided to trade guns with each other, at the same time, right out in public, at an organized function like a nation-wide rally or something of that nature?
Would it render any government gun registration system useless?

Whats next.

http://www.geek.com/fabri...

The experts retort:

http://technology.newscie...

Don't tase me, bro!

It almost sounds like you have realized that five (a majority) unelected, unaccountable, judges dispense "freedom", rather than the illusion that government exists by the consent of the governed.
Welcome.

Bush would need five guys to agree to let him run as a VP-its "illegal" you know.

By the way, I only bare arm in the summer, its just too cold otherwise.

Mike Stahl

They can have my guns when they pry them from my cold dead fingers.

States where it appears that AMMO CODING LAWS have been recently introduced:

ARIZONA

HAWAII

ILLINOIS

INDIANA

MARYLAND

MISSISSIPPI

NEW YORK

PENNSYLVANIA

TENNESSEE

The perps: http://www.ammocoding.com...

Search: AMMO CODING LAWS

Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 9:56 PM
Subject: Arizona Ammo Coding ..

ALL HAVE VIRTUALLY THE SAME LANGUAGE.....This is a concerted effort, orchestrated by someone.....

If you haven't called in PA yet, please do.....if you live in AZ,
please call now......

be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona :

Section 1. Title 41, chapter 12, article 5, Arizona Revised
Statutes, is amended by adding section 41-1772, to read:
START_STATUTE41-1772. Ammunition coding system database; sale of
ammunition; tax; fund; civil penalty; violation; classification;
definition

A. Beginning january 1, 2009, a manufacturer shall code all handgun
and ASSAULT weapon AMMUNITION that is manufactured or sold in this
state. This section applies to all calibers.

B. Beginning january 1, 2011, a private citizen or a retail vendor
shall dispose of all noncoded AMMUNITION that is owned or held by
the citizen or vendor.

C. The department shall establish and maintain an ammunition coding
system database containing a manufacturer registry and a vendor
registry.

D. A manufacturer shall:

1. Register with the department in a manner prescribed by the
department by rule.

2. Maintain records on the business premises for at least seven
years concerning all sales, loans and transfers of ammunition to,
from or within this state.

3. Encode ammunition provided for retail sale for regulated
firearms in a manner that the director establishes so that:

(a) The base of the bullet and the inside of the cartridge casing
of each round in a box of ammunition are coded with the same serial
number.

(b) Each serial number is engraved in such a manner that it is
highly likely to permit identification after ammunition discharge
and bullet impact.

(c) The outside of each box of ammunition is labeled with the name
of the manufacturer and the same serial number used on the cartridge
casings and bases of bullets contained in the box.

(d) Pay the tax levied by subsection I of this section.

E. A manufacturer shall not label ammunition contained in one
ammunition box with the same serial number as the ammunition
contained in another ammunition box that is produced by the same
manufacturer.

F. A vendor shall:

1. Register with the department in a manner prescribed by the
department by rule.

2. Record the following information in a format prescribed by the
department:

(a) The date of the transaction.
(b) The name of the purchaser.
(c) The purchaser's driver license number or other government
issued identification card number.
(d) The date of birth of the purchaser.
(e) the unique identifier of all handgun ammunition or bullets
transferred.
(f) All other information prescribed by the department.

3. Maintain records on the business premises for at least three
years after the date of the recorded purchase.

G. The department shall establish the ammunition coding system
database within the framework of any existing firearms databases.

H. Access to information in the ammunition coding system database
is reserved for law enforcement personnel. The department shall
only release information in connection with a criminal investigation.

I. A tax of one-half cent is levied on each bullet or round of
ammunition that is sold in this state. The department of revenue
shall collect the tax and deposit the tax, pursuant to sections 35-
146 and 35-147, in the coded ammunition fund established by
subsection J of this section.

J. The coded ammunition fund is established consisting of monies
deposited pursuant to subsection I of this section. The department
shall administer the fund. Subject to legislative appropriation,
monies in the fund shall be used for the purpose of establishing and
maintaining the ammunition coding system database prescribed by this
section.

K. a manufacturer that fails to comply with this section is subject
to a civil penalty of not more than one THOUSAND dollars for the
first violation, not more than five thousand dollars for a second
violation and not more than ten thousand dollars for any subsequent
violation.

L. a vendor who knowingly fails to comply with this section or who
knowingly falsifies the records REQUIRED to be kept by this section
is guilty of a class 3 misdemeanor.

M. a person who knowingly destroys, obliterates or otherwise
renders unreadable the coding REQUIRED by this section is guilty of
a class 3 misdemeanor.

N. for the purposes of this section, "code or coded" means a unique
identifier that has been APPLIED by etching onto the base of a
bullet or ammunition projectile.

END_STATUTE

Sec. 2. Requirements for enactment; two-thirds vote
Pursuant to article IX, section 22, Constitution of Arizona, this
act is effective only on the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds
of the members of each house of the legislature and is effective
immediately on the signature of the governor or, if the governor
vetoes this act, on the subsequent affirmative vote of at least
three-fourths of the members of each house of the legislature.
http://www.azleg.gov/Form...?
inDoc=/legtext/48leg/2r/bills/hb2833p.htm

Regarding Encoded Ammo, which would virtually make reloading a crime and demands you dispose of all ammo you own that is not encoded........

ALL HAVE VIRTUALLY THE SAME LANGUAGE.....THis is a concerted effort, orchestrated by someone.....I will call Todd Rock on Monday morning and try to get an appointment with him, I want to know what he knows about this.......

The National Rifle Association, which has for the past 20 years presented itself as the nation's premier resource for defending your 2nd amendment rights, has completely missed the larger issue: that the same bill (which would perform an 'end run' around the 2nd amendment) has been proposed in SIX states (Maryland, Illinois, Indiana, Mississippi, Hawaii, and now Tennessee)

** YOU can add PA & AZ to that list and I am still looking!

But has anyone noticed all the school shooting on tv? I mean they go on and on for weeks about it. Its almost like conditioning, anti gun conditioning. I also wonder about the NRA as well, I mean with the Veterans Disarmerment Act. I have read several articles on Diane Fienstien who introduced the bill, where she publicly stated that she thought the bill was a cake walk ( the first time they tried to get it thru ) and she had the FULL support of the NRA. Since when does the NRA give support to an anti-gun bill?

After all they've been judges forever.

********************************************
HQ knows what it's doing! Trust us! We are the experts, not you! Remember how popular the NH tv ads were! He's catching on I'm telling ya!

There was a tradgic school shooting in UK a few years back. (Dunblane Massacre). They then banned all guns-even used in just Olympic Shooting practice in UK. - There has been more gun crime in the UK since and rising fast and only the criminals own them now.
Let this be a hard lesson to you in the U.S. Don't give up your right to protect yourself with firearms because the cops can't always protect you as you know. (There are good cops, obviously, who are very brave but I mean in a police state of emergency etc.probably.

'I always think of all you canvassors and precinct leaders at the front line.
Good luck out there &Thank you. It's appreciated'.-fip -U.K

THE ILLEGAL opinion of the Supreme Court, should they decide that citizens can't own firearms! The State Militias where every man from age 15(?) to 60 (not sure of exact age on this one) were required to defend their homes and the homes and property of their communities. We need to re-establish these Militias if our own government rules against the Constitution!
State Militias were broken up and brought in under the government's umbrella, now the National Guard. If the citizens of America can't defend themselves legally, what recourse do we have left? The government is incurring more hatred and division among Americans than ever before in History. THROW THE BUMS OUT! Our own Representatives in Congress refuse to represent We The People by constantly disregarding their OATH of office, they MUST be REMOVED!
We already know that McCane intends to do as HE pleases, whether the American people agree or not, he will push for the amnesty for Illegals and continue to abolish what few rights we have left as citizens of the U.S. I have NO INTENTION of becoming a "global serf" for these self-serving elite SCUM BAGS who have stolen and terrorized our nation for too long!

You might be right, The Supreme Court Today decided not to issue an opinion about president shrubby's illegal domestic spying program. To me, it looks like the supreme court is bought and paid for, just like the rest of the government.

Daryl wrote:
"As the JACK BOOTED THUGS as we have heard them referred to, stops by a person on the train with his GERMAN SHEPARD, and ask of an unsuspecting passenger, may I see your "REAL ID CARD Please"?

Well everyone on the train will now be frightened by both you and him. What if dogs make you nervous? will you look like a suspicious person?"

Daryl, this has already happened. Four years ago, in fact. Ask any NH commuters who take the bus to Boston from Concord, Manchester and Londonderry. Ostensibly, the multiple, surprise, unlawful searches were conducted to prevent "terrorists" from smuggling explosives in their briefcases on the commuter bus into Boston around the time of the DNC.

Allegedly, the dogs were of the "explosive-sniffing" variety. But who knew what they really were all about? My usual bus was full of fellow commuters I considered good acquaintances, maybe a friend or two. We'd known each other for years. When word filtered down one morning what was going to be occurring (sporadic, surprise searches), the silence on that ride was deafening. Perhaps half of the riders resolved to not be searched, on principle.

Less than a week later, around 6:20 a.m. in the commuter lot: Surprise!

I was one of those who refused to be searched and decided to get back into my car in the commuter lot and drive into Boston. I was put under intense, offensive, unconstitutional scrutiny because of my refusal to be searched and to provide my "papers." I was technically "arrested," as I was detained and not allowed to go on my way- yet there is no arrest report. Thankfully I knew my Constitutional rights. And I wasn't alone, yet only one newspaper article (that I know of) even briefly alluded to the many commuters who refused to play the Fascist game.

It's the Hegelian dialectic. Problem, reaction, solution. They are creating the problem, IMO, with mind-controlled Manchurian candidates, so they can get the public reaction, demanding stronger gun control, which is their desired solution. Never give up your firearms. If we do, we're finished.

Hahahaha! McCain is such an ignorant fool!

Is pro- civilian machine gun ownership so I can't see it happening.