HAVING PROBLEMS VIEWING THE SITE? GET FIREFOX! | A NOTE ON ADVERTISING

   

A Winning Independent Ticket: Dr. Ron Paul for President with Ralph Nader for Vice President

A Paul/Nader Independent Ticket can win in November! After the Republican convention let's ask Ron Paul to run as an independent with Ralph Nader as his VP running mate. The convention would give great exposure and these two can get on the ballot in all fifty states. What an October surprise! The organization is already in place. The Libertarians, Constitution Party, Green Party and Independents could back a team that would appeal to everybody and finally break the establishment's two party system. Wouldn't the debates be fun to watch, especially if Lou Dobbs were the host.

output

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Nader is a distraction

and that's ALL!! I don't know much about him, but I'd think him more to the affect of talk the talk, and NOT walk the walk. I'd rather wait for Paul's decision. It is very suspenseful.

I'm sick of people trying to fill his ticket!! He would most likely pick someone we have never heard of. I think if I had one question for him ,it would be who he would consider has a running mate.

in the end

Nader's the same as Hillama McRombee.

NO.

What the hell is wrong with you people? Paul/Nader, Paul/Kucinich?

We all really appreciate that you may have once been Nader or Kucinich supporters. But THEY ARE SOCIALISTS. They are no different than the establishment candidates with the exception of maybe on civil liberties, but that's it.

And for the umpteenth time - he's not doing a third-party run. The end.

Can you say guilt by association?

The only outcome of a combined ticket, Ron Paul being on the down side of any such combination. Align yourself with the previous spoiler candidate? NOW WAY! Stupid neocon shill...

Nader would have backed Paul...

if Paul were doing better in the race. I saw an interview a while back in which Nader said that, although he didn't agree with everything Ron Paul wants to do, Paul is the only candidate who is serious about making real (and much needed) change. He actually said in essence that, with the government being as bloated and dysfunctional as it has become, America would really benefit from a "Ron Paul enema."

Nader is a prop for the CFR,

Nader is a prop for the CFR, and Bilderberg group. Info was found in David Estulin The builderberg Group Book page 92." John D. Rockfeller Iv is an advisor to Nader"Naders fianciers are Ford Foundation and Field Foundation. Why do you think Nader hasn't endorsed him so far?

Grasping at straws now

no offense meant. Nader has no drawing power...Ron Paul does not need to dumb down his campaign to accomodate Ralph. RP has dedicated his political career to his principles; whereas, Nader is an opportunist.

Nader will be newsy this week and then burned. Not a good association IMO.

Diametric opposites

Please let this nonsense go.

I have to wonder why, why

I have to wonder why, why people come up with these odd-ball combos of Dr. Paul with others who are diametrically opposed to Dr. Paul's message, such as Nadar. Nadar is not only a soft-socialist statist, but would add nothing to the Paul Revolution only detract.

they post because of desperation of RP needing a "now boost"

it's all good...not totally informed...give them some slack...we want Ron back up in the lime light...that's all...

I'm not much on the troll mindset; rather that the posters are uninformed and are "searching"...

DELETE RETARDED NADER POSTS. THANKS.

'Live for yourself, there's no one else more worth living for,
Begging hands and bleeding hearts
Will only cry out for more...'

Here's What I Can Do (Since I Can't Delete) -- Next Best Thing

Vote RON PAUL 2008
____________
http://www.youtube.com/wa...

Ron Paul & Ralph Nader?

These 2 are like apples and oranges. I don't even see how "Freedom" loving INFORMED individuals could even come close to comparing these two in the same sentence! Nader is a globalist sellout and all I can say is.... Google Ralph Nader and study his green globalist stances and you will see that he is NOT even close to being a patriot such as Congressman/Dr Ron Paul! Nader is a JOKE! Wake Up Ron Paul Supporters!

A great idea.

NOT.

Obviously

You do not understand Ron Paul's stance on limited government. Take some time to study this before making such an absurd suggestion.

well said

'nuff said

nice joke

www.rprradio.com

When freedom is at stake, silence is not golden – it is yellow- Tom Anderson writer patriot. 1910-2001

"Any people that would give up liberty for a little temporary safety deserves neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin

NO!

Ralph Nader is not only a socialist, but a lying, pandering, self-promoting ass. He is the white Al Sharpton. If he is on the ticket hundreds of thousands (including me) will not vote. But this is a silly discussion anyway because RP would never select Nader as a running mate.

This is a joke, right?

It's kind of disturbing to think that there are people in this movement who think the advocates and ideas of socialism, let alone hard-core socialism a la Nader and Kucinich are compatible with what is going on here.

No Insult Intended In Your Direction RUSTYSHAKELFORDJR

Vote RON PAUL 2008
____________
I think the people are just fed up to the max with business as usual around here -- i.e., the major two political party joke that has and continues to be played upon us all. You've boiled a stumbling fix down to a select number of those you personally see as 'socialist' yet somehow fail to see that we here in this land are already a socialist society but paying the $$ to major corporations and not to ourselves as would be otherwise expected. I think you've missed the point in everything in that regard.

We're looking for change in this country we love and that change is anyone that has anything good (true and honest with the best interest of everyone at heart) and not someone who would continue business as usual around here. I see beyond the few individual names you picked out of the air (Nader/Kucinich) and see some good that might come from them as well in this regard. Some has already come from both of these folks -- believe it or not, it has.

Certainly nothing good can be expected coming from those two major political systems other than RON PAUL at this moment in time and that's because he is truly a real Republican and a true Constitutionalist unlike what the system tries to suggest we have available to us now as is in the choices available. They are all hoax-based; all except RON PAUL -- and even he is human and capable of a few mistakes now and again. It's the 'over all' I find to be good in him, as I do looking deeper in both of those other names you seem so disturbed over. My suggestion is don't be so narrow-minded.

reply

Nader would be better off running with Kucinich or Gravel, Dr. Paul has some fellow Republican Congressman that would be excellent as his running mate and I'm sure he probably already has a few in mind.

True

Kucinich or Gravel would be perfect for Nader. I have not confirmed this, but I heard Nader endorsed Edwards. Do you know if this is true?

I voted for Nader when he was a Green party member and I still think it would not be a good match for Dr. Paul, even though the name recognition of both could make an impact on the sheeple of America.

No Nader

Hopefully Ron Paul will continue to work within the framework of the Republican party and should never consider Mr. Nader as a running mate.

Do you really understand

Do you really understand these people's positions? Ralph Nader represents a vastly different viewpoint from Libertarianism.

Darth Nader has turned to the dark side.

Dr. Paul has emphatically stated he will not quit the Republican Party. Now get Devvy Kidd on the phone and make her an offer she can't refuse: The Dynamite Redhead and Dr. No ticket. Hurry. Now. Go. ; )

Now that's a winner!

I'd LOVE to see Devvy laying the smack-down on Hillary in an open debate [even if Hillary wasn't there :)].

It's curious that this keeps

It's curious that this keeps coming up. Ron Paul and Ralph Nader are almost opposite ends of the political spectrum yet somehow people can't see this.

I think some of those in the Revolution need to learn a little bit about what a right actually is, what freedom is, and the proper role of government.

http://libertyradiounderg... has short under 10 minute audio examples of various issues taken from a liberty minded standpoint. The website is ugly but the issues are brilliantly described.

You listen to those and you will see why Ron Paul would never accept Ralph Nader as a running mate. It boils down to a problem with economic freedom that Nader is quite clearly against.

I worry that some of you out there may not entirely understand Ron's message.. you MUST learn it, as that may be all the campaign and our hard work accomplished. (It however is also the largest battle to be won.)

Edit: I might note that it takes a LONG time to discover what true liberty actually is. I've been on this path for 20 years and I still learn new things and am delighted when I do.

No Fricken Way!

Nader?

Socialist....Leftist

Ron Paul!

Libertarian....Conservative

They don't mix!

Who wrote this?

www.ronpaul2008.com

There is life at the end of the tunnel my friends!

Right. Socialist Ralph

.
This idea is just staggeringly dumb. Ralph Nader was a good guy when he took on Detroit and was the champion of the consumer, but those days are long gone. He's in the same mold as Noam Chomsky - socialist to the core.

Pat Buchanan - even with his squeaky voice - would be a better choice. Even William F. Buckley, Jr., but he's a bit long in the tooth, literally and figuratively.
.

Not Buckley....

CFR....so thereby, not a Constitutionalist!

Nuck

Ralph Fader

and

Nrank Luntz, too.

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD ALREADY!

ABSOLUTLY NO 3RD PARTY! WE ARE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY NOW GET USED TO IT TROLL! IF YOU ARE NOT A TROLL THEN WHY ARE YOU GOING AGAINST THE GRAIN??? IF RON PAUL SAID NO THIRD PARTY I THINK HE MEANT NO THIRD PARTY!WHICH IN TURN MEANS NO THIRD PARTY!IS THIS MESSAGE ON POINT?

Ralph Nader is a Socialist.

Ralph Nader, except for the fact of being against corrupt establishment, is opposite of Ron Paul in everything he stands for.

Are you making a joke? This cannot be serious.

As is Kucinich

it irks me that people are always trying to pair them up. RP needs someone who has a strong reputation and record of standing by constitutional standards to stand by him on the ticket. I would love to know who he would pick...

Don't be ridiculous.

Nader is a socialist. Were you trying to be funny, or can you really not see why that's a problem?

-jcr

What about

a Ron and Dennis ticket?

oil and water

I sincerely doubt that either would go along with it.

Also..

You guys are giving Nader WAYYY too much credit.

He's a schill...nothing more than a pawn used by republicans to screw over the democrats. He's raised a rediculous amount of money in the past from Republican donors.

Let's not start a bandwagon here.