HAVING PROBLEMS VIEWING THE SITE? GET FIREFOX! | A NOTE ON ADVERTISING

   

Vote Manipulation in Ron Paul's Congressional District & The Ongoing Investigation

Could it be that our Elite Overlords have once again slipped up in their quest to silence the voice of the people they seek to rule over by manipulating the vote count in Ron Paul's District 14?

Remember when Ron wasn't invited to that Tax Reformers meeting?

Remember when Ron wasn't invited to be in the Fox debate?

Remember when his online and text polls were deleted and ignored?

Remember how it caused a surge in support for Ron Paul?

They were all blessings in disguise! Could this be one too?

Here's the facts:

* Ron Paul got 70% of the vote in his district for Congress-----37,220 votes.
District 14 Congressional Results

* In that same district he only got 6,697 votes for president.
District 14 Presidential Results

* That equates to approximately ONLY 1 in 5 people that voted for him for Congress supported him for President.

Do these numbers make you uneasy?

Are the majority of American voters really that ignorant and apathetic?

How can we know for sure these results are genuine?

Some Ideas:

1. We start a website where people from Ron's District can sign something to the effect that they voted for him for Congress and President until the amount of signatures exceeds the presidential vote count. The site must be setup so that only people from his district can sign and we must be able to verify it. We will get them to the site by finding lists and making calls or shooting emails.

2. Then we start making comparisons to all other states' presidential count to show that their votes were compromised as well.

If this turns out to be true and we can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there was vote manipulation and we can show and convince the average American that it did in fact occur, there could be a revolution the size of a miracle.

However, I will say there does exist a possibility that people voted for Ron Paul for Congress and not for president because they thought he didn't have a chance as president or that they thought he was no longer in the race.

One thing I know is that people are very apathetic and uneducated on the whole concerning a lot of things Ron Paul talks about and they just want to be entertained whether its two whiny guys bickering or some guy preaching or some girl being bitchy, people like entertainment and don't want to think about the things Ron Paul talks about.

We shouldn't kid ourselves that the whole country is behind our man Ron Paul but one thing is for sure, the elite know as we do that most people are apathetic and just want entertainment and that's what they give 'em. The other thing that seems for sure is that every other candidate but Ron seems to be hiding something and not fully addressing the real issues we're facing.

In conclusion, something smells fishy no matter how you slice it and it always has.

output

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Inconvenient Truth...

1) District 14 like most of America are Christians, you know the ones who watch TV churches with a lot of foreing flags outfront. (**globalist) MEGA Churches.

2) For Christians Support of Israel is a Biblical command and the return of the Jews to the Land of Israel is fulfilment of Biblical Prophecy.

3) Dr. Paul can get rid of all aid for every country in the world EXCEPT ISRAEL and promise Full Support of Israel and he would have gotten A lot of Romney's and Huckabee's support.

4) Any language or action that is deemed anti-Israel makes a person unacceptable to 70% of the VOTING American Population based on deeply rooted Religious Dogma that trumps their "patriotism". They may find other reasons to not vote for the person but this is the subconscious motivation behind those reasons.

Dr. Paul got on the JDL's hit list for voting against aid to Israel. Be it right or wrong that is just the political reality. Even with a fair and level playing field anyone percieved to be anti-Israel does not have a chance.

We had and still have the perfect opportunity to spin Dr. Pauls positions into being Strongly Pro Israel. But, there is anti-semitism in the camp and they spin this into what is percieved as anti-Israel.

Yes, I have posted that Israel taking aid is an offence per Isa 30, but you have to win hearts and minds to this idea and that can only be done through much time. So this is something that should have been kept in the political "Closet" and implemented over time. Cutting off Aid to Egypt and doing all to not enrich Saudi Arabia or other countries hostile to Israel while affirming support for Israel would be the perfect 1st step that would have them flocking to your door.

Thus, Dr. Paul's reputation is ruined by his own supporters because THEY HAVE AN ISSUE. Dr. Paul has always supported Israels right to defend herself from Rocket Attacks. The vote not to condemn Hezbolla was not about approving the terrorist actions but because of the language that indicted Iran for supplying the Rockets, which is unproven. It could be Lebanon, Syria, Even Egypt. HEck they could be bought with AID WE GIVE EGYPT !! But, now that is another proof that the JDL and AIPAC will use to fight Dr. Paul tooth and nail and do anything necessary to keep him out of the Whitehouse unless Israel is embraced and the talk is of ending support when their is "Peace in Jerusalem" as the bible says. That is one of Jesus' commandments to pray for the peace of Jerusalem for "christ's sake"!

http://www.terrorismaware...

The 9/11 Truthers didn't help a lot either. People want to Feel Good. Feel Good Sells. Hope for America Sells, A vision of the way things should be and can be sells.

Religion and core principles of being in the narrative of Israel and the Story of the Jewish People , the faith and permanence of the Jewish People although being without a land for 2,000 years and the fact that it is fulfilment of prophecy for most christians makes all your reasoned arguments WORTHLESS. This is one time when COMPROMISE WITH PRINCIPLES IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO.

When is it right to lie? Lying to make money or gain power is one thing but If lying will save someones life is it the right thing to do. I am not endorsing this but telling you through the gift of empathy what is going on in 90% of peoples heads. They (most of America) will not compromise on this and will vote for a absolute idiot rather than someone who is percieved as being anti-Israel.

This is an inconvenient truth that many just don't want to hear. You can't bring people on board unless you fully understand their motivation and core person. Most of you are very out of touch, especially athiest or those who don't attend church or synogogue regularly or watch someone like Rod Parsley. (Ohio) Copeland (Texas). No matter what you think , it is a matter of understanding what your "prey" are thinking and how their mind works, what motivates them.

"The truth that sets men free is NEVER the truth that men want to hear."

***(globalist Mega Churches ~ designed to erode national identity and subconscious acceptance of a one world government. First by a false messiah and then the real messiah. So much like the Sheeple who voted for McCain they will follow along. PS these Mega Churches are almost always run by "X Masons." And, are involved in a lot of profitible realestate transactions, often with ties to the county tax offices. The pastors seem to be astute "businessmen" and they are business clubs of sorts.)

Since the Koran Says the Torah and Gospels are correct and Both of those Say Jerusalem and Israel belongs to the Jews then what is the beef in the middle east?

Islamic Qur’an (Koran) itself declares that Israel belongs to the Jews

Muslims state that Jews have no right to live in the Holy land. Yet the Muslim "Bible" itself, the Qur'an says;

"And Musa (Moses) said to his people (Israel): O my people! remember the favor of Allah upon you when He raised prophets among you and made you kings and gave you what He had not given to any other among the nations. O my people! enter the holy land which Allah has prescribed for you and turn not your backs for then you will turn back losers." Sura 5:20-21 Looks like Muhammad learned something from his Jewish & Christian wives...

The Qur'an further states Jews are the Chosen People of God:

O Children of Israel! call to mind the (special) favour which I bestowed upon you, and fulfil your covenant with Me as I fulfil My Covenant with you, and fear none but Me. [Qur'an, Sura 2:40]
Children of Israel! call to mind the (special) favour which I bestowed upon you, and that I preferred you to all other nations (for My Message). [Qur'an, Sura 2:47]

As a Good Muslim - Have you read the Gospel of Jesus?

The Gospel of Jesus and Old Testament (Torah): "Guidance and Light"

- Sura 2:87 - And most certainly We gave Musa the Book and We sent apostles after him one after another; and We gave Isa, the son of Marium, clear arguments and strengthened him with the holy spirit,

- Sura 3:48 - And He (Isa/Jesus) will teach him the Book and the wisdom and the Tavrat (Torah) and the Injeel (Christian Gospel).

- Sura 3:50 - And a verifier of that which is before me of the Taurat (Torah) and that I may allow you part of that which has been forbidden t you, and I have come to you with a sign from your Lord therefore be careful of (your duty to) Allah and obey me.

- Sura 5:44 - "Surely We revealed the Taurat (Torah/Bible Old Testament) in which was guidance and light", with it the prophets who submitted themselves....

- Sura 5:46 - And We sent after them in their footsteps Isa, son of Marium, verifying what was before him of the Taurat (Jewish Torah) and We gave him the Injeel (Christian Gospels) in which was guidance and light, and verifying what was before it of Taurat and a guidance and an admonition for those who guard (against evil).

- Sura 5.68 - Say: O followers of the Book! you follow no good till you keep up the Taurat and the Injeel and that which is revealed to you from your Lord;

- Sura 6.154: Again, We gave the Book (Torah) to Musa to complete (Our blessings) on him who would do good (to others), and making plain all things and a guidance and a mercy, so that they should believe in the meeting of their Lord.

- Sura 6.155: And this (Torah) is a Book We have revealed, blessed; therefore follow it and guard (against evil) that mercy may be shown to you.

- Sura 29:46 "And dispute ye not with the People of the Book, but say, "We believe in the revelation which has come down to us and in that which came down to you; Our Allah and your Allah is one;

- Sura 32:23 - And certainly We gave the Book to Musa, so be not in doubt concerning the receiving of it, and We made it a guide for the children of Israel.

- Sura 43:63 - When Jesus came with Clear Signs, he said: "Now have I come to you with Wisdom, and in order to make clear to you some of the (points) on which ye dispute: therefore fear Allah and obey me.

- Sura 46:12 we are told.... "And before it the Book of Musa (Moses) (Torah) was a guide and a mercy: and this is a Book verifying (it) in the Arabic language that it may warn those who are unjust and as good news for the doers of good......"

The Great Muslim dilemma

The Christian Bible Says Jesus is God, and one with the Father

Muslims have no choice but to believe in the Christian Bible and the Apostles who wrote it. The Qur'an forbids anyone, on pain of shameful punishment, from making distinctions between the authority of the apostles and prophets of God, or from choosing between God's words. No one is permitted to believe in part and reject a part. Those who presume to do so, it says, are infidels in reality (Suras 4:150-152; 2:89; 42:13-15; 29:46-47). See Christian Bible references to who Jesus really is: here

Who is he talking about?

This Sura below shows how Muhammad had a complete misunderstanding of the Christian Gospel, and what the Trinity is. Apparently, Muhammad is referring to Christians. But his error here is that both Christians and Jews believe there is only One God. Muhammad also mistakenly thought the Trinity was the Father, Son and Mother (Mary).
- Sura 5:73-75, "They do blaspheme who say: Allah is one of three..."

Again, below Muhammad attests to the Torah's (Taurat) authority.
So, for Muslims to claim the Bible was corrupted is an argument already lost....

- In Sura 5:48 we are told that Muhammad is given the Qur'an as a confirmation of the bible; that is - it is meant to prove the bible's authenticity.... "And We have revealed to you the Book with the truth, verifying what is before it of the Book and a guardian over it,"

- In Sura 46:12 we are told.... "Yet before it there was the Book of Moses (Torah/Old Testement) which was an authority, and a mercy. This (the Qur'an) is the Book confirming it in the Arabic tongue....."

Torah/Taurat: This word occurs 18 times in the Qur'an. It refers to the 39 books that make up the Jewish & Christian Old Testament. Jesus Himself said "every iota" (or every bit) of this Torah/Taurat is true.

The Torah and Gospels Say Israel belongs to the Jews. Any Arab Against the Jewish State is violating the Koran and a Heretic and under their own religion should be killed as such.

Islam claims that Allah is the same God who was revealed in the Bible. . . . then if the Bible and the Qur'an have differing views of God, then Islam's claim is false. Don't forget that Muhammad claimed in Suras 2:87, 29:46, 32:23, 5:44, 6:154, 6:155 that Allah confirmed the Torah (Taurat) and Christian Gospel (Injeel) (Sura 2:87, 5:46, 5:68, 29:46 and 43:63). So, if the Torah and Gospel are correct, all the errors in the Qur'an shown below make the Qur'an false.

A tenet of Islam is that both Mohammed and Jesus of Nazareth were both Muslims. Islam says both were prophets sent by Allah. If this were true, then it is mandatory that these two great prophets must coincide exactly in all points and never contradict each other. Did not the same Allah send both of them? Then, aren't even the smallest of contradictions between the two, very big red flags? And there are a great many, which you will see here....

Sura 5:68 - Say: "O People of the Book! ye have no ground to stand upon unless ye stand fast by the Law (Torah), the Gospel (Injeel), and all the revelation that has come to you from your Lord."

Sura 29:46 Muslims are told by Allah, not to question the authority of the scriptures of the Christians, saying, "And dispute ye not with the People of the Book, but say, "We believe in the revelation which has come down to us and in that which came down to you; Our Allah and your Allah is one;

Even after Allah confirmed the Torah and Gospel, Islamic Mullahs and Imams have tried to sell the lie that the Christian Gospels and Jewish Torah have been corrupted.

This a complete lie! This lie is perpetuated by Islam, because of all the historic, scientific, and simple mathematical errors in the Koran/Qur'an - as you'll see below... The Qur'an just doesn't add up.

"They" could not have changed the Christian Gospels after Muhammad, since there are around 5,300 manuscripts of the whole or part of the Greek text of the New Testament (Injil) pre-dating Muhammad still in existence. Worldwide, there are 24,800 copies of these original manuscripts. These include the Codex Vaticanus (325-350 AD) located in the Vatican library and the Codex Siniaticus (350 AD) located in the British Museum. There are also 80,000 quotations in the works of early Christian writers which are so extensive that the New Testament could virtually be reconstructed from them without the actual New Testament documents. Then there is the obvious fact that the Christian Gospels were so widely distributed both before and after Muhammad, that any attempt to change (add/subtract) something in the Christian Gospels would have resulted in immediate discovery and condemnation. Additionally, the New Testament was handed down from apostolic times and its genuineness was guarded by Christian churches, and it was zealously watched by enemies of Christianity. A very wide protest would have resulted from both sides were it tampered with. Likewise, the Septuagint edition of the Old Testament was always in the hands of both Christians and Jews, both rivals in religion. Any attempts to change this by either side would have been vigorously attacked.

Some versions of the Bible from 1881 differ in a few words here and there. However, the essential theological points remain the same and are complete. Bibles we recommend, that have not changed are:

Protestants original Authorized King James (1611)
Catholics Catholic Douay Reims - older versions

The Christian Bible predates Muhammad and Islam by more than 575 years. The Jewish Torah predates Muhammad and Islam by 1,000 - 3,000 years. Muhammad said for Muslims to read the Bible for "Guidance and Light." For Islam to say they are corrupted, then is to call Muhammad a liar for recommending it.

Muslims should note that nowhere in the Qur'an there is even a suggestion that the Christian Biblical text has been altered or corrupted. The word "tahrif" is never used with reference to the Christian Gospels (Injil). The Qur'an occasionally accuses the Jews of altering their Scripture (like in Sura 5:13); but it never levels this accusation at Christians. It in no way implies that the text of the Gospel of Jesus (Injil) has been corrupted. In fact, the Qur'an attests to the validity of the Christian Gospels, Zabur (Psalms) and the Torah.

Islam doesn't even have an original Qur'an. It was made up supposedly from "memory" and a few scraps found under a bed. This was about 150 - 200 years after Muhammad died at his wife Ayish's home in Medina, and he was lowered into a hole in the ground, where he remains.

Al Bukhari, a Muslim scholar of the 9th-10th century, and the most authoritative of the Muslim tradition compilers, writes that whenever Muhammad fell into one of his unpredictable trances his revelations were written on whatever was handy at the time. The leg or thigh bones of dead animals were used, as well as palm leaves, parchments, papers, skins, mats, stones, and bark. And when there was nothing at hand the attempt was made by his disciples to memorize it as closely as possible.

Zaid b. Thabit said: “The Prophet died and the Qur’an had not been assembled into a single place.” (p. 118, Ahmad b. `Ali b. Muhammad al `Asqalani, ibn Hajar, "Fath al Bari", 13 vols, Cairo, 1939/1348, volume 9, page 9)

Zuhri reports, 'We have heard that many Qur'an passages were revealed but that those who had memorized them fell in the Yemama fighting. Those passages had not been written down, and following the deaths of those who knew them, were no longer known; nor had Abu Bakr, nor `Umar nor `Uthman as yet collected the texts of the Qur'an.

“During the battle of Yamama, 450 reciters of the Quran were killed.” (The True Guidance, An Introduction To Quranic Studies, part 4 [Light of Life - P.O. BOX 13, A-9503 Villach, Austria], p. 47- citing Ibn Kathir’s Al-Bidaya wa al-Nibaya, chapter on Battle of Yamama).

Muhammad's child wife said this after Muhammad died:
"The verse of the stoning and of suckling an adult ten times were revealed, and they were (written) on a paper and kept under my bed. When the messenger of Allah expired and we were preoccupied with his death, a goat entered and ate away the paper."

References: Musnad Ahmad bin Hanbal. vol. 6. page 269; Sunan Ibn Majah, page 626; Ibn Qutbah, Tawil Mukhtalafi 'l-Hadith (Cairo: Maktaba al-Kulliyat al-Azhariyya. 1966) page 310; As-Suyuti, ad-Durru 'l-Manthur, vol. 2. page 13

This Samarkand codice manuscript is considerably incomplete. It only begins in the middle of verse 7 of Suratul-Baqarah (the second Surah) and from there on numerous pages are missing. The next oldest Muslim manuscripts are also from the 8th-century. One is written in al-ma'il script and the other in Kufic. Neither of these correspond precisely to today's Qur'an. Also, in 1972, construction workers who were restoring the Great Mosque of Sana'a in Yemen found a cache of manuscripts scraps that differ and contradict today's Qur'an so badly, that Muslims try to hide this. These Yemeni Qur'an manuscripts date back to the 7th and 8th centures, and are actually the oldest found, and they are in Hijazi. Hijazi (Makkan or Madinan) script, is the script in which the earliest masahif of the Qur'an were written. These manuscripts calls to question whether the present Qur'an was delivered to Muslims in pristine form. Your guess is as good as mine as to who in addition to Muhammad made up the Qur'an.

Other than a few incorrect references to the patriarchs and Moses, the Qur’an is primarily centered on the period of time Muhammad himself lived in, including Muhammad's many military attacks on innocent caravans and Arabian villages. This seems to be hardly compatible with a holy revelation of God. Considering the complete absence of external and internal evidence that should effectively verify the revelatory character of the Qur'an, we find it very hard, if not impossible, to accept the Qur'an as a Message sent by God. This is particularly so, because the Qur'an contradicts earlier revelation, the evidence for the origin of which is given in Qur'an/Koran Suras below.

Ask a Muslim, by whom, and when were the Christian and Jewish Scriptures corrupted? You will get a blank stare. Muslims only know is that this lie has been "drilled" into them since childhood.

Even though their own prophet completely attested to the genuineness and authenticity of the Old and New Testaments, Islam makes the claim that they have been corrupted. Why? Because the Qur'an erroneously contradicts them both. And Islamic clerics know it. In Muslim cleric minds this also relieves them of Muhammad's statements such like:

Muslims who have received the Qur'an have no solid grounds of faith, and that the foundation of the Muslim faith is insecure and insufficient and the Muslim religion is futile, unless they observe and follow the Taurat (Torah) and the Gospel (Injil).

Many Muslims Imams and Mullahs falsely point to Sura 2:140 to try and prove that Jews and Christians had corrupted their Scriptures. Referring to the Jews, this sura says; "...who is more unjust than those who conceal the testimony they have from Allah?...?" Yet, nowhere does this Sura state that the Jews and Christians corrupted their scriptures. Muslim clerics need to point to something because they know that the Jewish Torah and Christian Gospels badly contradict the Islamic Qur'an. The fact that Muhammad and Allah told Muslims to believe in the Torah and Christian Gospels is a very bad dilemma for these professionals who wish to continue making a good living in Islam.

Suras 6:34, 6:115, 10:64 and 50:28,29 clearly says to Muslims, "No change can there be in the words of Allah" and that Allah cannot alter (or abrogate) his words." So the Torah and Christian Gospels are correct, because Allah did verify this fact -- this clearly makes the Muslim Qur'an false; because it contradicts Allah.

As you can see from these verses below in the Qur'an (Koran), the Gospel of Jesus and the Jewish Torah are the divine Word of Allah, and Muhammad commanded the reading of the Holy Injil (Gospel of Jesus) and the Torah (Taurat) as part of Islam

Muhammad's early attempts to unite with Christians and Jews were not successful

Because Muhammad thought the "People of the Book" (Jews & Christians) also claimed allegiance to this same God he invented, Muhammad's early recitations about Christianity and Judaism in the Qur'an were irenic (Tending to promote peace; conciliatory):

"O believers, be you God's helpers, as Jesus, Mary's son, said to the Apostles. 'Who will be my helpers unto God?' The Apostles said, 'We will be helpers of God' " (Sura 61:14).

When Muhammad started preaching his new religion in Mecca he was conciliatory and appeasing to Christians. He told them: "We believe in What has been sent down to us and sent down to you, our God is the same as your God." Sura 29:46. And in Sura 2:62 it says; "Surely those who believe, and those who are Jews, and the Christians, and the Sabians, whoever believes in Allah and the Last day and does good, they shall have their reward from their Lord, and there is no fear for them, nor shall they grieve. "

Christians and Jews in Muhammad's time treated Muhammad as a False Prophet:

Later, as Christians and Jews treated this self proclaimed prophet with sustain, recitations regarding the "People of the Book" (both Jews and Christians) became more belligerent:

Compare this with what happened later, in Medina, after Muhammad gained strength and Christians refused to follow Muhammad's Allah. Allah then tells him to "Fight those who believe not in God nor the last day...Nor acknowledge the religion of truth (Islam), (even if they are) of the people of the Book, until they pay Jizya (tribute tax) with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued". Sura 9:29

"And the Jews say: Uzair (possibly Ezra) is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; " (Sura 9:30); and

(The difficulty with Sura 9:30 above is with Uzair/Ezra, is the fact that no historical evidence can be adduced to prove that any Jewish sect, however heterodox, ever subscribed to such a tenet. What grounds were there for the accusation? It is probably a figment of Mohammed's own imagination.)

"O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people." (Sura 5:51).

Are the following words what one might expect to hear from an all-knowing, benevolent deity? Or, are they the words one might expect from an Arab terrorist who needs to discipline his marauding troops today - and even in the 7th century (Muhammad)?

- Sura 5.38 "And (as for) the man who steals and the woman who steals, cut off their hands as a punishment for what they have earned, an exemplary punishment from Allah; and Allah is Mighty, Wise."

Who is it that uses Islam to populate hell?

In his book, "Islam and Terrorism", the former professor of Islamic history at Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt (pen name: Mark A. Gabriel, PHD) says on Page 5-6: "Even the prophet of Islam, Muhammad, practiced his faith in many ways that contradicted the Quran. The Quran said that Muhammad was sent to show the mercy of God to the world. But he became a military dictator, attacking, killing and taking plunder to finance his empire. How is that showing mercy? Mark further writes: Allah, the god revealed in the Quran, is not a loving father. It says that he desires to lead people astray (Surah 6:39, 126; 43:36-37). He does not help those who are led astray by him (Surah 30:29) and desires to use them to populate hell (Surah 32:13)". So, the Qur'an says that the god of Islam works with Satan and demons to lead people astray.

Jesus is the "Good Shepherd", and the God of love - who does not lead people astray.

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. John 3:16-18

The Koran was written 500 years after the Christian Bible was completed. If it too is truly an inspired book from God, it too should measure up to be as infallible as the Jewish and Christian Bible. If you expect the Koran to be as internally consistent and as factually correct as the Jewish and Christian Bible is - you are wrong. A few examples follow:

The Islamic Qur'an was edited

Today the Islamic Qur'an (Koran) is made up of 114 chapters called Suras and then sub-divided into verses. In the days of Muhammad's wife A'isha, one chapter of the Koran (the Sura) had about 200 verses. Shortly after her death, this Sura had only 73 verses. Muslims say that 127 verses of the original text were lost and never found. Also, After the sudden death of Muhammad, Zaid-ibn-Thabith was ordered to compile and write down the Qur'an (Mishkat'ul Masabih). It is attested that at least three revelations were left out. One of these, according to Muhammad's wife, A'isha, with whom he resided at this death, was kept under their bed at the time of Muhammad's death, but was eaten by a domestic animal (a goat). When Uthman compiled the Qur'an, the missing verses could not be found. One of them was called the verse of Stoning, and is said to have contained the order to stone a man or woman who had committed adultery....This verse is said to have been part of the original Qur'an. Many early authorities say so, and what is very significant is that the first Caliphs punished adulterers by stoning; this is still the penalty prescribed in Muslim law-books, whereas the Qur'an (Sura 24:2) prescribed a hundred stripes." ("Islam" by A. Guillaume, p. 191). References: Musnad Ahmad bin Hanbal. vol. 6. page 269; Sunan Ibn Majah, page 626; Ibn Qutbah, Tawil Mukhtalafi 'l-Hadith (Cairo: Maktaba al-Kulliyat al-Azhariyya. 1966) page 310; As-Suyuti, ad-Durru 'l-Manthur, vol. 2. page 13:

Another tradition states (Sahih Muslim, page 912, Mishkat II, page 534 and others):

"Umar said: 'Verily Allah sent Muhammad with truth and revealed the Book to him. Out of the verses, the Almighty Allah revealed. there was the verse of stoning to death. The Messenger of Allah stoned to death (Sahih Muslim, page 920) and after him we also stoned to death: And in the BOOK OF GOD stoning to death is a truth against one, who commits adultery. The verse was thus: 'The old man and the old woman, if they have committed adultery, they stoned them both assuredly.' "

This passage too, is not in the Qur'an. See other corruptions of the Qur'an here.

Many Hadith, including Sahih Bukhari give proof that Stoning was ordered and practiced by Muhammed, for example:

Volume 2, Book 23, Number 413:
Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Umar :
The Jew brought to the Prophet a man and a woman from amongst them who have committed (adultery) illegal sexual intercourse. He ordered both of them to be stoned (to death), near the place of offering the funeral prayers beside the mosque."

http://www.cyclesurfer.co...

The spread of Islam

Islam works in much the same way as satanically-inspired communism, which is by subversive means. Islam has spread worldwide since its inception mostly by the sword and intimidation. Muslims actually call Islam themselves "Din e-Sif", or religion of the sword.

Islamic Laws are very clear - Jews and Christians have no rights whatsoever to independent existence. They can live under Islamic rule provided they keep to the rules that Islam promulgates for them. This method of conversion by the sword, intimidation and fear is one of the most convincing proofs that Islam is a pure human invention.

Concomitantly, it is precisely the fact that (Judism / Christianity) prevailed against all the forces and powers in the world out to destroy it, by merely the force of its truth, that points to the superhuman origin of Christianity. (Judism / Christianity)

http://www.cyclesurfer.co...

People Don't Vote Based on Reason

You are assuming that most people vote based on rational thought processes and a reasoned look at the issues. This isn't true. People vote for who they perceive will be the winner. People vote for the candidate who they have an emotional to. People vote for the 'R' or 'D' next to the name.

Ron Paul won overwhelmingly because the people in his district like him as a person and are attached to him emotionally, and they figured he would be the winner. Those same people voted for McCain for president because he's the winner. Ron Paul's district isn't overwhelmingly libertarian. They just like Dr. Paul the man.

I've got to agree with you.

The time I spent involved in campaign politics showed to me that most people vote for the first name on the candidate list (something like 80% of the time or more), unless they are specifically looking for someone to fill a seat. It makes sense to me that Dr. Paul would get first place for his congressional seat and not get first place in his presidential bid.

It doesn't matter, the delegates are going to win him the presidency, also.