 |
 |
IN YOUR OPINION??? - What would be better for the Amercian People?
Posted March 18th, 2008 by ralphwaldo
output
What would be more effective and more beneficial to the American people in the long run? Please rank the following and explain why.
1. A class action lawsuit to abolish the Fed
2. A nationwide energy boycott
3. A new grassroots currency
4. A law requiring professional sports teams to reimbuse the public for training their employees with that money going to real education.
5. Electing RP president
Bookmark/Search this post with:
If we elect Ron,
he will enlighten the masses to all of the above. Then it will be only a matter of time before we are free.
Abolish
the fed. but hopefully #6 if elected could at least get that done
Abolish the Federal Reserve
Once we break the power of the Money Changers, all the other problems; war, mercury in vaccines, Real ID, rigged elections, corruption in gov't, conciousless corporations, NAU/NWO, the suppression of Christianity, occult indoctrination, gay lifestyle indoctrination, widespread abortion, propanganda, over-taxing, over-spending, etc. etc. etc. etc.... would just...disappear
#6, bring our troops home
#6, bring our troops home
#6 equals
number 5 Elect Ron Paul.
Matter of fact, most of the numbers equal Elect Ron Paul.
I'm going to go with number
I'm going to go with number 5: electing Ron Paul as president, because I'm confident he could get rid of the FED, take care of energy and currency problems, and get us back on the right track in pretty much every area....
I like to have my cake and eat it too.
i'm with you!
i'm with you!
Abolish the Federal Reserve!
Abolish the Federal Reserve! That is what Aaron Russo said to do and I think he is right. Everyone needs a stable currency and with that other things will fall into place.
Trade with all nations; alliances with none. ~Thomas Jefferson
It would be interesting
to hear what RP would think would be the most important.
I like your list
I have been saying for a while that the huge salaries given professional ballplayers should partially go back to the institutions who trained them to begin with. The government puts our children in these schools and rewards them for being huge athletes with all the privileges so that they become professionals and dumb down the public with tv watching all the sports. It is a real great propaganda method for people like us. We know nothing, but we know our teams.
I would put your list in this order:
#5 Get Paul elected
#1 Get rid of the Fed
#4 Give that money to the schools, change education, get our phony heroes back into their true position, eliminate property tax
#3 Then we could have competing currencies
#2 (cause I am not sure I understand this one. We need energy-don't we?)
An nationwide energy boycott just one day a week could
cut the demand by 1/7 th or 14%.
The second #4, the first one is funny but BS!
It proves we CAN still reclaim our government, and removes the need for all the others. Was this a trick question?
#4 is not BS
Sports is the number one subject and consumes the largest amount of public education money than any other subject.
The American people are NOT obligated to subsidize the professional sports teams.
Ever wonder why the general public is so dumb when it comes to the constitution, liberty and History. YEAP - YOU GOT IT!
That's true
When I was in high school, I never saw the jocks having to sell candy bars and magazine subscriptions to fund their extracurricular activities the way the kids involved with music, forensics and other things did. I don't think there's a chance that will change any time soon though: people who work in public schools do so because they never wanted to leave school, and that's often because they were a popular jock or cheerleader! Sports are popular among most of the kid's parents, too. Cutting funding for sports is a good way to get lots of people up in arms, while cutting most other areas inspires little more than yawns for most.
As far as getting professional athletes to fund schools goes, I think most of them get used to having things handed to them and feel they're worth it. I can't imagine many people in the professional sports world would be very cooperative, and I don't know how many spectators would support a #4 type legislation either, especially if they were told it would drive up ticket prices.
#4.... hmmmm there is no way
#4.... hmmmm there is no way that would be Constitutional.. you are forcing one entity to be forcefully required to take there own money and give it to soemone else.. thats what the friggin IRS does! why is it that you can't bring up... lets call these 5 things. legislation... bring up something that is not biased in one persons view who is writing the legislation.. the "legislator who is writting this 5 point bill undoubtedly has a bias against athletes and that is wrong... all legislation should be made to benefit the individual.. not the group as a whole.. i hope you guys can understand where i'm coming from! but the cities and states should never have subsidised 500 million dollar stadiums with public funds!
Currently the public is subsidizing the sports
industrial complex and our educational systems is suffering in the process.
What I am suggesting is a movement that
eventually passes local and then state laws that require that the professional sports team's owner's reimburse the public for all of the expense it takes to produce 1 professional athelete.