Ron Paul with Arnie Arnesen on 'Political Chowder' in NH
This show will air tomorrow the 24th locally on TV, but you get to have it now. :-) Please push the slider to 40:40 to where the interview starts.
![]() FORUM QUICK LINKS > News | Economy | DP Liberty Forum | Activism | DIGG! | Books | Videos | Events | RP Repubs | Rand Paul 2010 |


This has been the best, most productive interview
Dr Paul's great strength and his great weakness as a presidential candidate both emerged in this interview, thanks to the intelligence and professionalism of the interviewer. His strength had to do with his anti-war stand. Also, his reference to the Japanese not caring about the oil market was interesting. However, you can bet the Japanese put a lot of thought into energy-conservation in their engineering and architectural designs and there will be government intervention in that. Dr Paul's weakness is that he sounds very bookish and theoretical on economics, and as if he has read only books belonging to one particular minority school of thought, the so-called "Austrians". That is a big big BIG problem and it may get worse. It emerged when he was asked about his Cabinet. And it will emerge also when he starts talking about getting rid of this and that Department. Running the US Government like any other means you have to be seen as a good bureaucratic administrator to some extent. Ronald Reagan was very unbookish but got a good reputation for knowing how to choose a Cabinet perceived as competent. Dr Paul has to get way beyond his "Austrian" and even his free market/libertarian friends if he is going to choose a credible team and Cabinet. He must see that there can be persons who are not politically aligned to him who are also competent and therefore have to be reached out to.
so-called "Austrians"
However, you can bet the Japanese put a lot of thought into energy-conservation in their engineering and architectural designs and there will be government intervention in that.
Why?
and as if he has read only books belonging to one particular minority school of thought, the so-called "Austrians"
LOL... as if the majority is always right. I tend to agree that Ron Paul may not get any traction with economic ideas with the majority of Americans. But, this is not his fault. The so-called "Austrians" is the primary school of economic thought that promotes laissez-faire free markets. So, if people want to break out of the economic shackles they are in, maybe they should bone up on some economic theory instead of worrying about Paris Hilton, steroids in baseball, and other such nonesense.
Reply
Japan's political economy is notorious for government intervention; in the case of engineering and architectural designs, there will be many regulations. But Dr Paul's point was wholly right about the Japanese Government coolly relying on the world oil market to work well enough.
The main free market school of economic thought in the USA (and the world perhaps) derives from "Old Chicago" -- from Frank Knight, Jacob Viner, Henry Simons to Milton Friedman, James Buchanan, George Stigler and many others.
...in the case of
...in the case of engineering and architectural designs, there will be many regulations.
Do the regulations necessarily produce the intended results?
..."Old Chicago"...
So, which minority school of thought do you think influenced the Chicago School? Perhaps the so-called "Austrians"?
Chicago and Austrians
That is a good question. Hayek wrote or at least published The Road to Serfdom at the University of Chicago in 1945 if that is what you mean. (I am going by memory and have not checked my copy of the book.) What was Von Mises connection with Chicago? Perhaps you can tell. Rothbard was the generation after Knight et al. Harry Johnson, Milton Friedman and Don patinkin all discussed the Chicago School in the 1960s and 1970s.
Cabinet members
Does Paul Craig Roberts fit in anywhere?
Some really good stuff
What I liked about the video is that Dr. Paul talked about things I had not heard him cover before - people whom he might include in his cabinet, for one (assuming he wins); and an oil market without restraint or government meddling.
Arnie asked some good questions, with the promise of a full hour the next time, and I was struck by the fact that - at no point - was Dr. Paul caught for an answer. He has thought-through everything imaginable and speaks well.
What also came across was his ego-less, buoyant demeanor. Man, is this rare among candidates. Ron takes the issues seriously, but not himself and this is very wise.
Last, the video was horrifically out of sync; the audio was a good 2 seconds ahead of the video so it was a bit maddening to watch. Still, I'm glad I did.
i agree
i agree, that was a good interview, because if i heard another reporter ask him about that stupid giuliani spat which ron paul was obviously right about i was gonna scream. she asked alot of questions others havent asked and they were good ones and of course ron paul hit em right out of the park. thanks for posting this.
Great interview
I'm so tired of MSM asking him the same non-enlightening questions over and over. This was a great interview and I learned a lot more about some of Ron Paul's ideas from it. He NAILED the oil questions; cellphones for every American, I love the analogy... Although I find he nails almost any question that leaves other presidential hopefuls stuttering.
Ron Paul your common sense in this endless sea of political corruption acts to exponentially reflect your shining brilliance. Shine on sir; It's always a breath of fresh air in my lungs.
rlange's Great Interview post...
Gosh! I wish I had written that! You took the words right out of my heart!!
Arnie
Don't forget, Arnie is our resident liberal so she may have had trouble with free market ideas. Notice that was the only time she was speechless?
That in and of itself was not a small feat!
There are three more things that I will post when I get my hands on them...you will like our interview. It will be on the 28th...but we are limited in streaming so if someone could capture it and repost it to YouTube or something I'd be grateful.
Video Google
Is it still going to be posted on google like the other episodes? I've got some NY web-server bandwidth if you need a host for a higher definition stream or if you wanted help installing a youtube clone for higher definition videos, I can guide you through that. roblange17(at)hotmail.com
Local Radio - NHTR
Actually my radio podcasts are the problem because our CD burner takes them in full FM quality which equals 600 MB per hour! This is great to listen back to yourself in the car or copy and hand off to someone, but not for the web.
So I used to take the CD and have to resample each of the two hours down to 9 MB before posting. I used to do that by editing then reimporting an .aif file into .mp3 file in iTunes, while cutting out an intro that is not clear.
Then I wrote up the code in the pointer file and then linked it on our radio website page...but I was just so bogged down with other work I had to stop as it was too time consuming. I have recently purchased a little device that will capture the audio in the correct format live, so all I have to do is upload...
As for this Ron Paul radio interview, I tried to ask him even more questions that were never touched upon in the debates but there were two of us and I had to give the other host equal time. I had the research papers in my hand and had already had the benefit of listening to the 3 shows he did before mine so I think it was a very good interview that you will like. It will be broadcast on Thursday the 28th on the web...so you can capture it there.
Streams will fill up fast, and I hope our streaming server is up and running that night! I will post the information here that day...