 |
 |
we must contact this website and demand removal...
Posted March 19th, 2008 by krazypolitico
output
this is terrible and disrespectful to a great leader. We must rally together and demand removal...
Bookmark/Search this post with:
ummm am I missing something?
Okay fill me in. What is so wrong with that website?
Are we supposed to be offended by women wearing makeup now?
Good God man, say it isn't so!
Depends on the woman and the
Depends on the woman and the make-up.
=)
Problem?
What is the issue here? I went to the linked website, and saw nothing much at all.
On page 14 of the main photo gallery
They also have some of Bush, McCain, Hillary and Obama.... He seems to be an equal-opportunity basher who is simply too ignorant to know that he defiled the photo of one of the only people fighting for his freedom. (For some reason when I click on the link provided above I get bounced right back to this page ... Anyone else?) Oh well ... we can't force people to respect the same people we do, just like we can't stop people from doing harm to themselves if they don't know any better.
--------------------------
"I killed the banks"
good in theory
Razorwind Studios is an official endorser of Ron Paul, and we will live free or die! 14th alternate to MN state!
----------------------------------------------------------
Remember: They are expressing their First Amendment rights. We, as Constitutionalists, have no right to tell them to take something down.
Actually...
.. we have every right to to tell them to take it down under threaten of boycott.
We can't use fraud and/or the government shouldn't be able to force them to take it down. But we certainly have a right to inform them we object to the content and the we will not be visiting their website anymore and that we will suggest the same to others.
haven't
haven't we threatened enough people ??
No, because I keep
No, because I keep threatening YOU, and yet it still has no effect! Really, just go and die and make everybody happy. Everybody hates you and nobody loves you.
BTW, the poster below is right --- you must live in farm country, to have such a vast and inexhaustable supply to strawmen to keep throwing out here.
I'm sorry, but I do not hate him...
I believe hate comes from the heart and its relation to the brain. I do not agree for the most part in what "he" or "she" says, only hard facts that display TRUTH to the contrary will make me dismiss an individual. I will defend truth with fact once gathered, until this time comes, I will learn! Thank you for your opinion.
Remember the past as you look forward to today...
Haha!
.. is that ALL YOU HAVE is one giant warehouse full of low-quality strawmen.
I guess Dr. Paul's threatening of the powers-that-be is "bad" too. He threatens the war machine, he threatens the Fed and the Wall Street banker, he threatens the Department of Education.
Get a grip!
=P
*rolls eyes*
how
How does he threaten them......he has no power over the fed or Education..he does criticize them, but threaten them, No Way
Umm...
.. by threatening to eliminate them.
You are weak in debate but I don't think your stupid. Just weak and ineffective in pubic discourse.
I imagine you think highly of yourself though even in the face of widespread knowledge that you are a bozo.
;-)
he
he can't eliminate them so how is that a serious threat
Just for the sake of
Just for the sake of argument, Shit-for-brains, I dare you to tell us all WHY the HELL you come here, when ALL you can do is be negative towards Ron Paul, his campaign, his message and liberty? Go ahead, ANSWER THE QUESTION!
He also claims that Dr. Paul
He also claims that Dr. Paul visibly squirms and shows discomfort on television when "truthers" are mentioned.
Yet I have kindly asked three times for a reference link to a video example and he has failed to provided one.
=*(
I've
Already answered that a million times, you just didn't hear it because your head is buried in the sand
all systems
Fortune Favors the Bold
can be traced. you can't hide forever.
Fuck off, troll.
Fuck off, troll.
Ouch
=P
Sometimes the bad dog simply
Sometimes the bad dog simply has to be slapped : - )
Do you..
.. know how to use online dictionaries?
Go look up "threaten"...
*rolls eyes*
But
Empty threats are meaningless, more like a bad joke
History shows that 5% of a
History shows that 5% of a population can effect radical political transformation (revolution). Example: The Bolshevik Revolution.
*my eye rolling muscles grow weary*
;-)
we
don't have 5%
You don't know what we have.
You don't know what we have. Reagan got about 5% in his first unsuccessful bid at the White House and it turned into a Revolution the next time around.
I live in Huckabee territory and I have been meeting people nearly EVERY DAY for the past 10 months who like Ron Paul but don't think he has a chance to win so they are voting for others.
You don't know, dude. And please don't try to equate Republican primary voters as the number of people who do and would support Ron Paul. It doesn't work that way.
;-)
With
With the nomination gone our numbers will quickly dwindle..In fact they already have.....Dr Paul is too old to run again !!
Asswipe, why is EVERYTHING
Asswipe, why is EVERYTHING you post derogatory and negative of Dr. Paul? God, I hate you! What a worthless sack of shit you are.
You have no point...
You have no point. The focus is now on electing Ron Paul Republicans to office. The first wave is happening now.
Again, you have no point. The Revolution is here! It's in your face! You can run but you can't hide!
>;)
If that's how you feel go back to your Hillary blog.
*** God bless Ron Paul ***
* Ron Paul For President *
And empty brains are
And empty brains are annoying, as you prove with every post
Ignore such trivial
Ignore such trivial crap.....besides Dr. Paul is only the spokesman for the movement of Liberty, he is not the embodiment of that Liberty. NO CULT OF PERSONALITIES PLEASE!
Our movement is not about a man, but the message! Our honor of him is more than enough, besides there will always be detractors willing to smear, poke fun and deride anyone who speaks a greater message than most are willing to hear because of apathy or ignorance.
Most detractors simply want the attention that we, at times, are more than willing to give them for their effrontery and slurs toward Dr. Paul.
We
we have no right to censor folks
I 2nd that.
Remember the past as you look forward to today...
You have no right...
... to tell people what to not boycott.
Unfortunately
all these folks we boycott have employees and stockholders who vote..and our results haven't been too hot..So if you want to boycott some one do it but shut up about it
Another...
... strawman. Your intellect is tres' boring onevoiceoftreason.
I guess German citizens shouldn't have boycotted concentration camp construction companies because it would have meant the workers would have lost their jobs.
If a news source is spewing lies they deserve to go out of business and their employees lose their jobs.
If your investment banker continually mismanages your assets they deserve to go out of business and it would be helpful to society for them to either go to jail or find some other vocation where they don't screw up.
Incompetent businesses going under HELPS society in the long run.
A website doesn't have some right to stay in business or have a sizable viewership just because it is a website. Get real and grow up. ;-)
*rolls eyes*
What grade are you in?
Also, as usual, you are just making stuff up like the assertion (mere) you made about the success of boycotts. See here for some examples of successful boycotts:
http://www.pbs.org/now/so...
HINT: Just because you say something (a mere assertion) doesn't make it true.
Reciprocal Rights
Mart,
Boycotting and badgering work both ways. Just as you have the right to organize a boycott, so too have I the right to advise against it.
Viva Agora!
Professor Bernardo de la Paz
www.citizenduquesne.org
Did I say..
... ANYTHING like "people don't have a right to advise against boycotts"??
I was countering "you have no right to censor" which is a thoroughly bogus strawman.
Advising to not boycott and also advising TO boycott have nothing to do with government censorship. Onevoiceoftreason twisted "hey let's boycott" into "hey let's get the government to censor". Which, if you peruse through onevoiceoftreason's posts, you will see that strawmen are his modus operandi.
Yup!
& I quote:
"You have no right...
... to tell people what to not boycott."
By way of offering advice one may say what to do or what not to do. Other than embarrassment, I fail to discern your beef with me. I have a right to tell you what not to do, but I have no right to enforce my dicta.
Viva Agora!
Professor Bernardo de la Paz
www.citizenduquesne.org
I have no "beef" with you...
I was using onvevoiceoftreason's phraseology in my response to him. His "right" was used as "right to force". Just keeping "poetic" consistency while highlighting his logical inconsistency.
Maybe you should have pondered the context a bit longer.
Again, I have no beef with you unless you agree with his strawman equating of "right to censor" with "right to boycott". THAT was the context.
Remember, his original response was a logical fallacy which sidetracks valid logic and debate until the strawman fallacy is dealt with.
Perhaps YOU should be embarrassed for avoiding the clear context using semantics and grammatical nit-picking... or perhaps for being lazy and missing the context altogether?
=)
STRAWMAN ALERT: You must hate cows (beef in a negative context) and think them disagreeable and ornery.
Definitely Lazy
I confess to being about the most lethargic person I know but am in no way embarrassed about it. Anyway...
onevoiceofreason says:
"we have no right to censor folks"
While he's superficially correct his statement is irrelevant, since the subject had nothing to do with censorship..
Your response was:
"You have no right...to tell people what to not boycott."
Which is simply wrong, as we all have that right.
If you insist that your response was intended to be sarcastic and therefore not to be taken seriously, then I thank you for the clarification, and apologize for any confusion arising from my failure to pick up the ironic tone of your typing. They're just shades of black and white on my screen and completely lacking any vocal cues.
Born ignorant, and struggling against it daily.
Professor Bernardo de la Paz
www.citizenduquesne.org
No problem..
.. I seriously have no problems with you. I've read some of your previous posts and I've liked what I've seen.
My apologies for my little "game" with onevoiceoftreason affecting an innocent bystander.
Me and you are cool!
=)
I wish
More people understood how the world works like you do !!
Dude!
The world doesn't operate according to one-line logical fallacies. Which is all you ever bring to the table.
;)
Weak..
intellectually devoid strawman.
Users or "consumers" boycotting a product or publication because the user or consumer objects to content or support by the manufacturer, supplier or information source does NOT equal censorship.
You are substituting some fake thing you made up for the express purpose of "knocking down" in place of the actual expressed opposition or belief.
Consumers boycotting a product or service because of objectionable practices or content is the OPPOSITE of the government censoring or banning.
Go back to sko0l you little silly neocon.
;)
Just keep flagging him, and
Just keep flagging him, and we can knock him out of here in five minutes.
Yeah..
.. but he's so easy to shoot down logically. Casual fun target practice...
=P
Shall we declare him sacred like Mohammed?
No images allowed? Perhaps I should melt all my metal and build a nice statue of Ron to worship? Keep your sense of humor - it is a great shield and weapon!
Yes ...
and, there are much bigger fish to fry.
I
I thought Dr Paul said to leave the Internet alone, no regulation !!