HAVING PROBLEMS VIEWING THE SITE? GET FIREFOX! | A NOTE ON ADVERTISING

   

Federal Reserve Expansion, Would You Believe ?

Back to Story - Help
Bush seeks financial regulation overhaul By MARTIN CRUTSINGER, AP Economics Writer
4 minutes ago

The Bush administration is proposing a sweeping overhaul of the way the government regulates the nation's financial services industry from banks and securities firms to mortgage brokers and insurance companies.

The plan would give major new powers to the Federal Reserve, according to a 22-page executive summary obtained by The Associated Press.

The Fed would be given broad authority to oversee financial market stability. That would include new powers to examine the books of any institution deemed to represent a potential threat to the proper functioning of the overall financial system.

The proposal, which will be outlined Monday in a speech by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, is certain to set off heated debates within different sectors of the financial services industry and in Congress, where some Democrats are likely to complain that the proposal does not go far enough to crack down on abuses.

The administration divided its recommendations into short-term goals that could be adopted quickly, intermediate recommendations and an "optimal" regulatory framework, which contains a radical restructuring of how the government supervises banks and other financial institutions.

The recommendations are the product of a yearlong review that was begun in an effort to modernize the government's regulatory structure so that the country's financial services industries could better compete in a fast-changing global economy.

The plan also seeks to address problems that have been brought to light in recent months since a severe credit crisis began roiling financial markets last August.

That crisis has already claimed as its biggest victim Bear Stearns, the nation's fifth-largest investment bank, which came to the brink of collapse before a government-arranged purchase by JP Morgan Chase & Co.

"I am not suggesting that more regulation is the answer, or even that more effective regulation can prevent the periods of financial market stress that seem to occur every five to 10 years," Paulson will say in the remarks he will deliver on Monday.

But the plan does seek to address problems highlighted by the current crisis in which the Fed in an unprecedented move has begun making direct loans to securities firms in an effort to shore up a system badly shaken by billions of dollars of losses stemming from sour mortgage loans.

The proposal would allow the Fed, in its new role as "market stability regulator," to dispatch examiners to check the books not just of commercial banks but of all segments of the financial services industry.

The administration proposal would also consolidate the current scheme of bank regulation by shutting down the Office of Thrift Supervision and transferring its functions to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which regulates nationally chartered banks.

The plan recommends that the Securities and Exchange Commission, which regulates stock trading, be merged with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which regulates futures trades for oil, grains and various other commodities.

The plan would create a national regulator for the insurance industry, which is now largely governed by the states, and would create a Mortgage Origination Commission to try to address the abuses exposed in the current tidal wave of mortgage defaults.

The role Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and his colleagues have been playing to shore up the financial system would be formalized in the administration plan by giving Fed officials greater power to detect where threats might be lurking in the system.

The proposal is certain to generate intense scrutiny in Congress and within the financial services industry, where past efforts to change how regulation is handled have met with fierce resistance.

Many Democrats in Congress are already pushing tougher proposals that would impose much stricter regulation in an effort to crack down on abuses exposed by the current credit crisis.

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said he believed Paulson's plan offered some valid suggestions.

"In broad outlines, we agree with large parts of Secretary Paulson's plan," Schumer, chairman of the Joint Economic Committee, said in a statement. "He is on the money when he calls for a more unified regulatory structure, although we would prefer a single regulator to the three he proposes."

Under Paulson's approach, the long-term goal would be to designate the Fed as market stability regulator and to have a financial regulator who would focus on financial institutions that operate with government guarantees such as providing deposit insurance.

The administration plan, which was first reported by The New York Times on its Web site Friday night, also proposes a business conduct regulator who would be in charge of overseeing consumer protection issues.

The initial reaction from the securities industry was also positive.

"Treasury has delivered a thoughtful and sweeping plan which should provoke intense discussion, debate and potential legislative changes," said Tim Ryan, president of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association.

"Our present regulatory framework was born of Depression-era events and is not well suited for today's environment where billions of dollars race across the globe with the click of a mouse," Ryan said in a statement.

Can you believe this ?

GODBLESS US ALL

SORRY THIS HAS ALREADY BEEN POSTED>

output

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Makes no difference to me.

Makes no difference to me. What did make me very MAD, was finding out that the FED is not like "The People's Bank of the U.S.", but a private bank owned by individuals. Isn't that what the real problem is?

Where have you been?

Everybody learns in school that the Fed is nominally "private." It learned that in 5th grade I think and every social studies or government class since. But, it's only a nominally private. For all practical purposes, it's part of the government. The government hires the officers and takes 97% of the income.

Everything else

had been planned, in detail. Though it is new to us, they will continue with their mission.

I will write my legislators, even knowing it is completely out of their control.

Just like Bush - NAU - NWO, and on and on.

We MUST continue with our plans. Put RP people in office and take out the ones who do not support our freedom.

With so many collective ignorant, we must work on them one by one - that is what we want to do.

If you visualize the worst, you get the worst.

So, think positive, DO NOT SAY WHAT YOU DON'T WANT - as it attracts it to you.

Say what you want, visualize it, and work towards that goal every day. DO NOT listen to the old media - period. They are in to brainwashing and propaganda only. Direct your friends and relatives to reliable news sources - this is huge too!

Just too many cows...

Yeah...I'm in the camp that says prepare and hold on 'cause there are just too many cows willing to be herded to stop the murder/suicide of this country. I mean how much corruption and falsehood does it take for our fellow "citizens" to conclude that this juggernaut called the federal government is set to crush them completely? They want more? They "vote" for the Marxist Obama? They "vote" for the Marxist Clinton? They want Marxism? They want Marxism. They want slavery. What else can we conclude from this behavior?

Sorry. Just feeling bummed out this morning.

Kyrie Eleison

Down the road that I must travel...... Libera me, let the truth break, what my fears make--Leslie Phillips

Sorry. Future isn't looking to bright right now.

Our only chance is a third party run. I will still do all I can. But WE ARE SCEWED! RP will stay in Congress and still be the lone voice. More illegal laws will be created and our rights will futher diminish. Half the DEMS will be upfor grabs and at least a third of the Repubs, RP can win a third party run. But he won't even consider it. Darn shame. But. gotta keep on keepin on.

Peace

NOOOO!!!!!

If you're not writing your Senators & Congressional reps about this what are you waiting for?

Similar Argument on Drudgereport from the NY Times

http://www.nytimes.com/20...

Quite honestly these people have gone from dumb to dumber. The Federal Reserve from its very initiation was supposed to prevent this type of roller coaster ride for the markets.

Yet if you look at the different crises down through the years, the Fed has been the main instigator of the various down turns. The Crash of 29, 1945,
1973-75, 1981-82, and even the stagflation of 2001-2008 can be directly attributed to the Fed.

It took interest rates at 21% in the 80's to put the markets back on track. If you look now, the Fed is tweaking the dollar incorrectly.

If you remember in the movie, Pirates of the Caribbean: At Worlds End" the crew kept running back and forth at just the right time to get the ship to flip over. In the real world, we don't want that to happen.

The Fed is supposed to be what is called in the electronics industry as an AGC, or Automatic Gain Control, limiting those wild swings both positive and negative. What the Federal Reserve is doing right now is amplifying this recession into a full blow depression.

Their manipulations are damaging the dollar instead of strengthening it. The Fed should be increasing interest rates, not lowering them, letting the banks that over extended themselves with subprime loans to die or be gobbled up by their more intelligent competitors and stop the printing presses until the market has calmed down.

The Fed literally is that crew in the movie, doing everything it can to make our economy oscillate wildly until it flips our dollar into nothing.

Our best bet in surviving this coming depression isn't trying to stop the Fed, who seems even more determined to damage our economy, but help ourselves and as many people as we can to ride their stupidity out. Investing in commodities like Oil, Gold, Silver and Agriculture. Paying down our debts so we won't be swamped with Car and Mortgage loans and paying off our credit cards so they aren't a noose around our necks.

Be prepared, this is going to be a bumpy ride.

unbelievable

And it will be too complex for most people to understand that this means that financial dealings will all be under the control of an unelected body.

I suppose it will stabilize markets even more - but stability often means the rich stay rich and the poor stay poor.

Will Bush take our country

beyond the point of no return.

Will we even have a chance to elect
a new president, or will we be plunged
into a global war of catasrophic consequences.

I think the future hinges on us. We cannot let
this man, and his cronies, continue to rape our land
and hand it back to the Brittish Royal Commonwealth.

Remember how we whooped the British Crowns ass?
It wasn't about the people, it was about the government.

Well, they never got over it. They just used different tactics.

Every national debt in the world, can be traced back to the
London Interbank System and the Center of the Commonwealth
as the originator.

Once we realize who's pullin the strings, we can root em out.

nothing so dramatic

it all happens slow, with plenty of Bread and circuses to keep the masses happy. And if you are smart, and work really hard, you may make 100,000 a year instead of 50,000. Every once in a while someone wins the lottery, or may even move from commoner to one of the elite, like Bill Clinton.

The only way we will have a crisis is if the people in charge screw up. Otherwise, its the slow march to less and less control of your own lives.