I move that we ban Laurie

and others with DP names except for Ron Paul of course. :)

"Why would a Ron Paul supporter be against Steve?"

Because his posts are often divisive? Because he has posted attacking Trevor Lyman before in the past? Because not everyone in the movement is slavishly lockstep with the "delegate takeover" strategy, and some favor a Third Party run?

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

zzzzzzzzzzz...

************
"Basically I'm in the idea business — whether it's a musical idea or a spoken idea ... If you wind up with a political system that wants to put idea men out of business, then you have worry on your hands."

-- Frank Zappa

You guys may as well beat your heads against a wall. Only nature taking it's course will fix this. All of you cannot. Opposites attract. I predict they fall in love and live happily ever after. : ) They fight like husband and wife. I say send them best wishes.

This idea that one has to agree with every single action, thought or utterance from a particular person is EXACTLY what RP supporters are supposedly against....Gilgamesh--you sound like dubya! "You're either with us or against us"!!!

You know who else you sound like? SGP!!! When SGP called ME to the mat for having the effrontery to suggest that we call for accountability from campaign headquarters. My allegiance to RP was questioned and that's CRAP.

SGP is to be commended for his astounding work at educating people in the delegate process. I think he has done an amazing service to the campaign in that regard. But calling Trevor out with the thinnest of "evidence" isn't right, and those who say so are NOT traitors to the cause. "If you are a Ron Paul supporter you MUST agree, otherwise you are hurting us all."

Get out of the group mentality...PLEASE. Dissent is NOT disloyalty!!!!!!!!!!

I'm not certain what disputes brought this about, but this may be the worst post i've ever read on here. First off, what right do you claim to have to tell us that we MUST agree to ANYthing, let alone your opinion of the situation based on "if you are a Ron Paul supporter". That sounds more like Bill O'Reilly talk, shutting down opposition by forcing only one resolution. Second of all, though i haven't read many posts by Laurie, i'm certain you do not have the right to silence her views simply because you disagree with them, that's unbelievably unAmerican and counter to all we're fighting for in this revolution. We all have the responsibility to voice our true mind, no matter what it may be, and to LISTEN to those who dissent to our view. Common ground may not be found, but certainly it NEVER will if we silence or ignore that dissent. Again, this is a major battle we face against the government right now, and to see it's ugly face here in the DP saddens me. There are greater battles to fight than against each other, so with all due respect, end this blithering and focus yourself on the real situation at hand, the LOSS OF OUR NATION TO IMPERIALISTS. Lastly, if you truely have issue with Laurie, take the responsibility to discuss it with her personally first, and come to an understanding of each other. This does not require agreement, only understanding. To spout this agregious speak in open forum serves no one and offers nothing to resolution, merely serving to showcase lack of respect or responsibility. I will look into Lauries writings and form my own conclusions, but whatever i see in them, i will not agree to this.

Remember, who is your real opponent? who is really taking your rights? who is really trying to own you as their property? who should we really be banning, and from where? Be honest with yourself and the answers will come. Thank you.

~I will never again accept the lesser of two evils.~

Is Ron Paul banned
www.dailypaul.com/node/45...

Digg has blocked RP supporters.

The MSM comment boards have implemented monitors to limit RP supporters.

Hasn't YouTube also deleted RP videos?

It's kind of hard to get the message out, isn't it.

What is your definition of free speech?

Interesting that I have not received a single reply to this very important post:
http://www.dailypaul.com/...
What is "Taking Personal Responsibility"?

Look at this thread of yours in the context of the very legitimate issues I raise.

I'll be curious to see your reply.

Whatever his qualifications, Parent has been presenting himself as an uber delegate expert and yet he was also claiming until recently that McCain qualified on the ballot in PA via opting for public financing. That information was poppycock. Let those who don't like Parent's ideas continue to speak their mind.

THIS is truly a sad day now.

I don't know who is a sockpuppet and who is an actual user. I don't care.
I'm not going to flag or decry any users post unless it is obscene or spam,
of which neither SGP's or Laurie's is, whoever annoying the posts are.

Again, this whole drama seems to me to be a bit manufactured, but if indeed this is the result of a compunded series of greivances, then I again call for a peace treaty, because no redress can be found for differences like this, save time, and alas, 100% open communication.

Calling for bans in this situation is a bit akin to calling for bombs and embargoes.

I think you both should treat this shite like any other: pinch it off, wipe your @ss, and get back to work.

Respectfully,
Matt
Walden_Paragon

That's a ridiculous idea. Just because somebody disagrees with Steve Parent means they should be banned? Give me a break. So much for tolerance.

This web site belongs to one person. If he wants to ban her, he can. If he doesn't, then that's his choice, too.

-jcr

I move that we quit this fighting...this just keeps important posts off the list. Talk to Manystrom. No, i will NOT flag this post. I dont flag unless its racist, sexist, or otherwise offensive.