HAVING PROBLEMS VIEWING THE SITE? GET FIREFOX! | A NOTE ON ADVERTISING

   

US House passes Chinese Crackdown with 1 Dissenter - Guess Who

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed a resolution Wednesday calling on China to end its crackdown on Tibet and release Tibetans imprisoned for "nonviolent" demonstrations.

The vote was 413-1. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, who recently dropped out of the presidential race, was the lone congressman voting against it. The resolution passed just hours before runners were to carry the Olympic torch on a six-mile route around San Francisco Bay. San Francisco, California, which is in House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's 8th District, is the only U.S. stop for the torch relay, which is wrapping up the first week of a 23-city international tour.

Pelosi and other House members introduced the resolution, which urges China to end the crackdown in Tibet and "enter into a substantive dialogue" with the Dalai Lama, who lives in exile in northern India. "It is my hope that the House of Representatives will send a clear message that we support the fundamental freedoms of the Tibetan people and a peaceful solution to the instability in Tibet," Pelosi said Tuesday on the House floor. "It is long past time for Beijing to reassess its failed policy to attack and demonize the Dalai Lama, and show the world it can have civilized discussions as a responsible world power," she said.

The resolution, which has no force of law, also asks the State Department to reconsider its decision to exclude China from its list of countries considered the "world's most systematic human rights violators," and calls Chinese officials to allow independent international monitors and journalists access to Tibet.
In the Senate, Sens. Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat from California, and Oregon Republican Gordon Smith introduced a similar resolution, The Associated Press reported.

By mid-morning, protesters were marching along the San Francisco's Golden Gate bridge, where on Monday three protesters scaled suspension cables and unfurled a large banner that read, "One World. One Dream. Free Tibet."
In some places in the city, protesters acted out violent confrontations between Chinese authorities and Tibetan monks. One protester moved through a crush of people in a makeshift military tank. However, pro-Chinese demonstrators also were out in droves, waving Chinese flags. In one incident, a man with a Tibetan flag snuck into a pro-Chinese crowd and a skirmish ensued. The pro-Chinese protesters surrounded the Tibetan demonstrator, yelling. No arrests were made.
San Francisco authorities have put up barricades around the flame's planned route. Police were also monitoring the protests from the bay, where they sat on jet skis and boats.

When the flame arrived in the city Tuesday, thousands of people chanted slogans and waved banners to demonstrate against China's human rights record, including its treatment of Tibet.
http://waronyou.com/2008/...

Their trying to say Paul dropped out ,again.

output

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Lies?

Isn't saying that Ron Paul dropped out of the Presidential race a lie? You'd think there would be higher standards for publishing articles...

You're right, but they

You're right, but they changed it ... I guess enough of us complained - lol
(see link provided in my earlier post)

Heh, guess the retraction

Heh, guess the retraction they printed will be read by probably...nobody. You gotta think that they misprinted on purpose knowing no one would read the change they made. Clever devils.

when I see one or only a

when I see one or only a handful of people that vote a certain way I don't jump to conclusions and judge them and say they hate people or they're not compassionate, etc. I question and research to find out why they felt they should vote against the majority and stand alone.

This bill was tied to so many ridiculous appropriations it wasn't even funny. We basically all were just forced to contribute to a charity that openly defies our international bankers, sends us further into debt, and orders another country what to do. Real smart.

Most of the money they're sending won't even go to the causes its meant to address...

Plus, this just doesn't make sense: We borrow money from China. We use it for wars and whatnot... then we also turn around and use it for causes in China. So, we just borrowed money from the Chinese to give it back to them. So now we're even further indebted to them and we don't even have any money from that whole transaction.

Why ?

Why would RON PAUL vote against this resolution ? Is this following the Constitution of non interference in foreign governments ?

GODBLESS US ALL

Why? To Paul supporters it is very clear why.....

UPDATE II: Congressman Paul’s Communications Director responds:

"Congressman Paul voted against it for the same reasons he has voted against recent measures on Burma and Turkey. In keeping with his non-interventionist foreign policy positions, he feels it is not the place of the US Congress to be making statements such as these about other countries. The US Congress is charged with looking after the freedom of its own people. This is not to say he has no sympathy for the plight of Tibetans, or that private US citizens shouldn’t express their views on the matter. He feels it is just not the role of Congress or the government to do so."

Latinos for Ron Paul

Hey Latino, Update accepted,

Hey Latino, Update accepted, arrogance isn't.... AMEN ?

This was on a thread

This was on a thread yesterday ... and you are correct :)

The article states that Rep.

The article states that Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas who RECENTLY DROPPED OUT OF the presidential race---

Yeah, when I saw that. . .

I didn't even read the rest. He has NOT dropped out.

CNN has changed it ... it

CNN has changed it ... it now reads exactly as you wrote, that he has not dropped out. There is another active thread that links to the current version of the article :)

New version: http://www.dailypaul.com/...

CNN appears to have updated

CNN appears to have updated it.