HAVING PROBLEMS VIEWING THE SITE? GET FIREFOX! | A NOTE ON ADVERTISING

   

Martial Law is Now Officially Underway

http://www.infowars.net/a...

We have now fully devolved into an authoritarian police state. If you haven't begun to make preparations, now is the time, and it is running out.

Good Luck patriots.....

output

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

information is a good thing

and so is discernement. I am tired of watching people thrash people on a forum for posting information. That is what a forum is for. right? posting and discussing, not necessarily attacking. Just my two cents, while I still can give it, living in FrEE America.

wow, ok.....

First of all, some of you need to chill out a little bit. You are taking what I am saying and trying to put words in my mouth.

Secondly, Rainey, you should probably just stay out of this, every comment I have seen from you makes you seem like you have no clue what you are talking about. Maybe I just can't read or something.....and by the way, if you feel obliged, you can stop with the acid jokes. I made this name when I was watching "drug years" on VH1. I have never done acid and I am not from the sixties. But, you don't have to take my advice....

Thirdly, I never said Somalia was 'good'. Of course they still experience a lot of residual violence from their chaotic past, and also they have violence because the international bureaucrats keep trying to install a central government. JeffH, if you read your article you put a link to, who is the one causing the violence? From your article, "Militias allied to the Somali government recaptured a southern port from Islamists on Tuesday, taking the death toll from an upsurge of fighting in recent days to nearly 100, witnesses said." It is the artificial goverment created by IGAD.

As for bbagnall, I'm not really sure what you are talking about. State-provided liability insurance? There is no government, that is why I brought Somalia up as a random example in the first place, and thats why some people flipped out (what?? an African country better off without government??). Here is a quote from a Dutch lawyer who has lived there for 12 years, this might help you understand what I am talking about, "For kritarchy to prevail, it is indeed necessary that its 'operatives' assume their responsibilities and form the country's new supra-structure. Who are these operatives ? Not only the private judges and policemen, but also, and even primarily, the insurance companies. In a kritarchy, everybody is insured for his liabilities under the law. Those who are not insured will find it almost impossible to do business or find employment; they will be treated as outlaws. In a kritarchy, a violation of the law may entail higher insurance premiums for the perpetrator. That constitutes a strong incentive for respecting the natural rights of other people. The insurance companies themselves also have an important stake preventing crimes and torts from being committed. The less crimes and torts, the less they will have to pay to their customers."

There you have it. Of course Somalia is not without problems, it still has a lot of unnecessary violence, but it is beginning to stabilize on account of it being stateless.

I understand your reactions, but I think you took what I said to mean "Somalia is an ideal place" instead of "Need an example for effective private law? Look at Somalia."

Look, I'm no expert on Somalia, but do a little research before you react so easily with all your outrages.

Dear HaightAshbury, your

Dear HaightAshbury, your comments would make MUCH more sense if you replied to others using "Reply" (inside their post to which you would like to reply) instead of just always hitting on "Add Comment". As it stands, we have no idea to what you are replying here.

well....

Look at present day Somalia, they do not have a government, and they have developed a very effective system. It is based on private property and voluntary association. Here is a quote about it from my blog, "

The five main characteristics of the Somali law are:
* No punishment for crimes, only restitution or compensation.
* No public prosecutors, no victimless crimes.
* Fines are limited and must be paid to the victim or to his family.
* Every person is insured for his liabilities under the law.
* Judges are appointed by the litigants, not by 'society'. "

Let's see here, no government cages, no forced state arbitration, no politically driven prosecutors, no arbitrary laws, an insurance network to ensure liability, and free market litigants instead of easily bribed public judges. And, best of all, the central tenets of their law system revolve around private property and voluntary association. Maybe we should take a hint from these uncivilized "barbarians", and privatize our law so that property can actually be protected instead of methodically abused and stolen. "

Here is where minarchism came from:

http://www.lewrockwell.co...

A stateless society creates order through the law which is based upon the intuitive principles of private property and voluntary association. Free market law allows for effectiveness and justice, and all without having to pay taxes to a corrupt state-owned justice system. Since there is no arbitrary force, there can be no devolution into oligarchy. Only a stateless free market society can hope to remain free and properous.

Somalia is not Libertarianism

When you talk about no punishment and no jails, and everyone is insured for liabilities under the law, are you saying I can murder someone, then have my state-provided liability insurance pay for my murder and I continue walking the streets? Wow, psychopaths must love that system but it sure isn't Libertarianism. Where is the personal responsibility?

Somalia as an example of 'good' anarchy?

You're kidding, right?

Somalia death toll nears 100 with fresh fighting
Tue 22 Apr 2008, 12:41 GMT
http://africa.reuters.com...

dropped out and turned off

Are you talking about Somali? Where people have spikes nailed into their heads for holding intollerant religious beliefs, over one million in the last few decades? Good example acid head.

bump

i saw this Friday over at aj's site. it defiantly deserves a bump.

be sure to watch the video.
http://www.wreg.com/Globa...
------------------------------------------------
"RON PAUL SUPPORTER SINCE 1997"
RON PAUL 2008 / RE-ELECT 2012

Oops-double

n/a

OK...

I was trying with all my might to ignore you, and then you pulled out the: "tyranical humanists" remark. Humanists aren't capable of tyranny. Only political power combined with the citizen's belief in authoritarianism can result in tyranny. Humanists, especially secular humanists, neither have political power nor a belief in authoritarianism.

I believe I shall put you in the "Doesn't know what they are talking about" or the "Blinded by too much spiritual gooble-gabble" categories.

And don't go accusing me of being an athiest acid-taker or whatever you might come up with. And, one philosophy that has never, ever worked is authoritarianism based on a few controlling people - you know - like powerful preachers and presidents - or kings.

Man will be governed by a

Man will be governed by a power within him or by a power without, by God or by the bayonet. The MOTO of the first American Revolution was, NO KING BUT KING JESUS. Take your pick, man or God. Dr. Paul has chosen God, and I'm on his team.

It's spelled "motto" unless you're talking cars then it is "moto

I'd like to know more about that motto -- can you provide a link?
___________

Lisa C.

www.women4ronpaul.com

The Liberty Tree

www.worldnetdaily.com/new...
metrovoice.net/2006/.../0706_articles/no_king_but_king_jesus.html
Google, Sam Adams and "The Sons of Liberty".
What is masquerading as "Protestant" religion today is as False a religion as the Roman religion was in 1500. Saint Augustine book, The City of God (versus the city of man) is a good place to start.

black regiment

Culture is Religion externalized. There are many excellent comments here, but George Washington declared the twin pillars of good government were Religion and Morality. Yes, the solution lies in the pulpits of America. Bad government is a reflection of bad culture; bad culture is a reflection of bad religion. Culture is Religion externalized. America is plagued by the FALSE RELIGION of Arminianism. Until America returns to the true religion recaptured from Rome in the protestant reformation, Augustianism, all efforts will end up in some humanistic form of the French Revolution. It is Arminianism, Dispensationalism, and Darwinianism that are destroying our constitutional republic. Sicko individual republicans and democrats are simply acting out the logical results of their belief systems. Everyone is religious. There is no neutrality

speaking of Black Regiment...

You have heard of Chuck Baldwin's Black Regiment, I presume? There seem to be a few members of group in our area.. you might be interested in checking out pastors in your area. www.chuckbaldwinlive.com

Libera me, let the truth break, what my fears make--Leslie Phillips

black regiment is growing

Chuck Baldwin and the other folks at newswithviews.com are trying to shake the public schooled brain washing from the lemmings, unfortunatly few see the philosophical dead end of humanism and evolution. The government control of education has done its evil deed.

I'd have to say i disagree with your analysis.....

All these things you bring up, whether really problems or not, are only symptoms of the real root cause, the existence of the state. The state creates insanity, ignorance, chaos, confusion, and then many things rise up as a result of all this idiocy. Bad government is not a reflection of bad culture, it is the State that infects the culture since it is the insanity of the State which must be justified with lie after lie, confusion after confusion, ignorance after ignorance, etc, etc....

Washington was great, but he wasn't the brightest person and he was an aristocrat at heart. I admire his incredible resolve and rejection of power (all the much more amazing considering his background), but I don't think he truly understood the root causes of our problems.

The sad fact is, even a Constitutional Republic eventually degenerates into oligarchy, and the forces that accomplish this are the inevitable result of positing an artificial institution like the state with a monopoly on violence and theft. If politicians actually abided by the Constitution, then everything woul work beautifully, but this will never happen. Even if we have a revolution and restore the Constitution, generations down the line will again be in our same position. No "return" to any religion or set of ideals can save a Republic from devolution into oligarchy and chaos. This ten thousand year experiment called government has failed, and it is time we did ourselves and all future generations a great favor by taking a giant leap for mankind and striking this monstrosity called government into the annals of history forever. If anarcho-capitalism is allowed to finally rise up in full form, government will never again be able to rear it's ugly head. Then mankind can finally step out of ten thousand years of darkness and truly begin to evolve into something greater than we now can conceive....

One Nation Under God

Liberty without Law has been the cry of anarchists since the Garden of Eden. America was founded on the principle of Liberty under Law. Your evolutionary humanist mindset severly limits your hopeless futuristic view too some mindless time plus chance event. Too much acid at haight-asbury?

Liberty is a law unto

Liberty is a law unto itself.

I can not believe in liberty for myself without believing in liberty for others.

It's a self reinforcing philosophy that needs no external support.

Ron Paul Explorer: The All Paul Search Engine

haha maybe so, but that is what we would expect right?

Without law?? I never advocated chaos! I believe in natural law, not legislation. Just look at how english common law use to work, or at Medieval Icelanders. They had a private court system with natural laws and it was very effective. The laws were developed by precedent and generally deal with private property and voluntary association.

If institutions like justice and protection were in the realm of the free market they would constantly be under forces of competition, and would have to constantly improve in order to keep up. Or, imagine the effect of having some truly free market media, not these conglomerates. Wouldn't Americans be so less dumbed down, and maybe even a little informed? Or think about how we can attribute most of our recent technological advancement since revolutionary days to simply removing the fetters placed on us by government. Imagine a society with no fetters to development, technology would explode. And what is more natural than private property and voluntary association? Let the market decide so that the individual is king.

You would make Robspierre

You would make Robspierre proud, at least untill the guillotine falls.

Don't believe in any garden of eden but

I do know that anarchists want liberty without the state. Anarchists have codes not laws and they can make great neighbors.
___________

Lisa C.

www.women4ronpaul.com

many kinds of government

The question is; is man basically good or basically bad, depraved? The Biblical answer is man is hoplessly depraved, sinful. The humanist answer that man is basically good and a product of environmental or external infulances. The historical evidence upholds the Biblical position. State government, called civil government, is only one government amoung many, familly government, church government, your work is a form of government, and even time is a form of government. Government, or authority, is an inescapable concept.

Guess I"ll stick with the humanists then because I believe

people are basically good. I don't subscribe to your holy book anymore. Best thing I ever did -- you can keep your dark clouds of sinfulness and depravity. I'm going to mow my neighbors lawn for him while he's on vacation. Guess I'm just one of those darned helpful Humanists.

Have a nice day.
___________

Lisa C.

www.women4ronpaul.com

well how do you define "government"?

I would say government is a monopoly on violence and theft, I never said anything about authority. Authority from a parent or teacher can be useful to a person who may lack discipline. But a group of people with the power to initiate coercive force to implement public policies which always accomplish the opposite of the intent seems pretty unnecessary.

It seems you define "government" as "authority"....church government?? The church doesn't govern me. Family government? Nope. Those are voluntary associations for me.

And "time" as a form of government? Doesn't "government" imply conscious control or manipulation?

Unfortunately, I've never

Unfortunately, I've never heard an explanation of how Anarcho-capitalism would work without developing government by default. A privatized legal system is still a legal system, i.e., government by default.

Not that I am at all unsympathetic to the anarcho-cap's basic concept, which is that all government is bad. No argument there. I just favor the Minarchist concept of extremely minimal government, which---while far from a perfect system---has at least been tried.

There hasn't been a true anarchist system established yet in world history. Tribalism does not count.

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

not sure about that....

Yes, anarcho-capitalism develops a legal system but NOT a government. The legal system is done through the free market and is purely voluntary, while the government does things through coercive force. Most problems can be done through 3rd party arbitration, and those who commit crimes and refuse to be taken to court simply become outcasts from society. Medieval Iceland had a private court system and it was very effective.

A-C's basic principles are private property and voluntary association, so yeah there can be no state. The only reason I'd be against a "minarchist" or limited government approach is that it always plants the seed for future devolution into oligarchy.

Well, I'd have to see more

Well, I'd have to see more factual information on how effective medieval Iceland's private court system was; obviously, they no longer have such a system, do they?

Which leads to the point you made; minarchism does indeed always plant the seed for oligarchy--because power and ambition will always fill a void. That's something we can't control with checks and balances. And if you had an anarchist society, power and ambition would inevitably fill that void as well--in my opinion, sooner than a minarchist system with its rule of law.

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

Noah Webster's 1828

Noah Webster's 1828 Dictionary of The English Language lists 12 definations of government. #1 direction; regulation, #2 control; restraint, # 3 is exercise of Authority; #4 is parental governent, #5 is state (civil) government. The fuse box in your home is a form of government. It regulates the flow of electricity and protects your home from overload, something you should have considered back at haight ashbury. Time is a restraint (or authority) (or natural law) we all live under and can not escape. Sorry to here you view family as a voluntary association. America was an experiment in self-government, which apparently is not doing too good right now.

haha. dude what are you talkng about.....

Quote "

Noah Webster's 1828 Dictionary of The English Language lists 12 definations of government. #1 direction; regulation, #2 control; restraint, # 3 is exercise of Authority; #4 is parental governent, #5 is state (civil) government. The fuse box in your home is a form of government. It regulates the flow of electricity and protects your home from overload, something you should have considered back at haight ashbury. Time is a restraint (or authority) (or natural law) we all live under and can not escape. Sorry to here you view family as a voluntary association. America was an experiment in self-government, which apparently is not doing too good right now.

"

First of all, we are arguing about definitions, which is pointless since they are arbitrary. A rose by any other name is still a rose. But, if I were to humor you here, each of those five things you list imply conscious control, that is the essential difference that you are missing. A fuse box can't think, and does not have any human aspects. Yes, it is governed by the laws of nature, but it is not conscious control. I see the point you are trying to make, which is determinism. If everything is controlled by the laws of nature then you cannot escape what is already predetermined by history and the laws of physics.....Not sure if I buy that.

neutrality?

Relativism is the main cirriculum of the government school system and you have learned your lessons well. Have fun with Tim Leary.

Actually that's odd

you said that. The very first time I saw Ron Paul's picture & watched a speech in California video, I thought he kind of reminds me of Dr. Timothy Leary...but in a focused, sane, healthier, friendly way! Perhaps it was just the enthusiasm & them both being doctors saying revolutionary ideas, though. Ron Paul is much more attractive and wise :)

I don't advocate chaos

Fortune Favors the Bold

but it exists, and is the fundamental mathematical model under which the market and all eco-systems operate, like it or not.

Liberty is not the domain of a singular dogma.

Many kinds of dogma have

Many kinds of dogma have produced many kinds of tyranny. Only America was formed under the dogma of Calvinism and the principles of the Protestent Reformation. Since God has been kicked out, enter the tyranical humanists. We are reaping what has been sown in government controlled "Public" schools.

A Grain of Salt

Alex has done some good work exposing the growth of the police state, but I also think he has a lot of paranoid and kooky ideas that make me question some of his conclusions.

No doubt this exercise was training for a federal crackdown within the United States, that however doesn't mean we're on the brink of martial law. Alex was reporting on supposed training sessions with foreign troops in what he supposed was practice for an NWO/UN takeover of the US. Last I checked, it still hasn't happened.

The situation in this country is pretty bad, seeing as we are living in a police state. The lines that are crossed in making a society a police state were crossed in the USA, a while ago. That doesn't mean that the National Guard will soon be rounding people up. That's a worst case scenario, though I admit that it is now in the realm of possibility, it doesn't mean it's a sure thing or even likely.

always a grain of salt......

I think Alex Jones is legit, but of course he is not perfect, nor immune from false info or the tendency to blow things out of proportion. As with anything else, you've got to have discernment, and have to do your own research rather than relying on others. So, with that, you are right on the mark. I guess my opinion is that full-fledged martial law is beyond "possibility" now, and is inevitability.

This exercise was more than training, they rounded people up like something from East Germany or the USSR. No, it does not necessarily guarentee that there will be full-fledged martial law, but when you are rounding up random people it is hard to call it anything but martial law, where the Constitution is effectively non-existent. I'm not saying this is necessarily in preparation for what Alex Jones would call a "NWO/UN takeover", but it certainly probably has a lot to do with those people. Whether they are truly going to attempt a brazen takeover is questionable, but they are certainly prepared to quell dissent with the coming financial collapse.

I highly doubt an outright takeover, but much more plausible is a) false-flag terror attack the leads to widespread fear, panic, and martial law, or b) martial law declared because of public unrest during a financial collapse. Food shortages are already occurring. Things are getting more and more tense. Full-fledged martial law is becoming less conspiracy and more inevitability. So I would agree with your being skeptical, but I think it is not only a very real possibility, but that it will eventually happen, because SOMETHING has got to give, tensions are only going to keep getting more and more intense as things degenerate......

I agree. It's hard to know

I agree. It's hard to know exactly how things will play out, but SOMETHING has got to give.

Alex Jones

The truth as I see it is-Alex is a LOUD voice for our rights. He's just gotten louder and more confrontational and if he was silenced then people around the nation would have a reason to pick up their arms. The bankers and their minions are fallible and, just like vampires, they are destroyed by sunlight. Alex has been maligned by people who thought he was a kook because some supporters of Alex Jones talk about conspiracy theories without facts. For now he is an oddity and as long as people don't take enough action to make it world wide he is safe. Also, I think they are so far down their path and are so arrogant they cannot foresee anything standing in their way.

When their plans are exposed and others are mobilized against them they normally eliminate the source-Look up clinton murders, JFK, RFK, MLK Jr., Gary Webb, Bill Hooper, Aaron Russo? (oh yes, they have been caught putting radioactive substances in cars to cause cancer) etc.

Alex is so loud for so many years I believe they don't know what to do. The Fear of the NWO has been told by many people for hundreds of years, they are scared of people waking up to thier machinations. Once the people wake up and dedicate themselves to reclaiming their lives then the NWO will be on the run.

Must See Movie -- EXPELLED ...

This weekend I had the opportunity to see "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed," starring Ben Stein. Actually, it's a very well done and highly intelligent documentary exposiing the jackboot tactics that abound in the scientific and educational realms to stiffle any and all opposition to Darwinian evolution. The movie does an excellent job of allowing Richard Dawkins to make a monkey out of HIMSELFwhen he confides a few secrets evolutionists don't generally let out of the bag. More important, it connects the dots from Darwinism to Nazism and Planned Parenthood (or is it Planned Barrenhood ... or maybe it's Banned Parenthood) which started off as a eugenics program to rid the world of undesirables (like black and brown people). Note the similarity to Hitler's idea of ridding the world of "life unworthy of life!" Today, PP is willing to rid the world of just about anyone ... for a price, that is!.

Anyway, for young people who've been spoonfed crap science in government schools and have never had the opportunity to question how a once great nation has become a screwed up, Mickey Mouse, entertainment R us society, capable of following its obviously corrupt leaders to the very gates of the gulag (so long as we're being entertained along the way), I think this movie might blow your minds.

Darwinism is the foundational error of Nazism and Communism.

Wrong

I'm sorry, you're just dead wrong.

Even if it were absolutelty false, the study of evolution (and its secondary, tertiary, and quaternary effects on other biological sciences) has yielded unimaginably accurate and GOOD results in agriculture, medicine, ecology . . . . ID has done none of this, and can't. Intellegent Design is to science what Communism is to economics (read: It ain't!)

I like eating, wearing clothes and being medicated when appropriate. Go sell your propoganda to someone willing to starve or catch Polio.

AND KEEP YOUR RELIGION AWAY FROM OUR GOVERNMENT, PLEASE

Wrong

I'm sorry, you're just dead wrong.

Even if it were absolutelty false, the study of evolution (and its secondary, tertiary, and quaternary effects on other biological sciences) has yielded unimaginably accurate and GOOD results in agriculture, medicine, ecology . . . . ID has done none of this, and can't. Intellegent Design is to science what Communism is to economics (read: It ain't!)

I like eating, wearing clothes and being medicated when appropriate. Go sell your propoganda to someone willing to starve or catch Polio.

AND KEEP YOUR RELIGION AWAY FROM OUR GOVERNMENT, PLEASE

Who's Religion do you want?

Who's Religion do you want? And why the pretense of "please"? You've been perfectly comfortable with the use of force for decades. Why not take spontanous geneation to it's logical conclusion as Hitler did? Most all great scientists were Christians, including Pasteur.

No, You're Wrong ...

In fact, as a scientist states right in the movie, almost all good science is based in Intelligent Design though it can't be admitted publicly or the scientist ... NO MATTER HOW BRILLIANT ... loses his job. The movie interviews enough of them to prove the point.

The movie also interviews enough evolutionists for intelligent viewers to make an informed decision about true science and false scientism. The really great thing about the movie is that most of the bimbo evolutionists think they are taling to friendlies, I guess, because they sure let their hair down. WOW! WOW! WOW!

As to keeping my religion away from "our" government ... not to worry ... the fact that we are controlled by immoral elitists is all the proof you'll ever need that true religion hasn't got a toehold in DC or, for that matter, in you state capital.

I think the murcury in your polio vaccine has done more than protect you from polio. Tsk, tsk..

Last comment: anyone who thinks we are simply dealing with an economic problem ... that everything will be rosy once that is "fixed" is just another clueless wonder. We are about to experience Nazism, first hand. This movie gives you a little insight into how Nazis can actually believe they are doing good while killing people.

thank you

you are right on.

may i suggest alan watt of cuttingthroughthematrix.com

this guy is a walking book of knowledge on history and the elitist plans for humanity

I have to disagree with you as well

Eugenics might be horrible, but Darwin's theories are backed up by Mendelian Genetics. In addition there is a wealth of fossil records from billions of years old to relatives of the human tree from a few thousand years ago.
The only empirical evidence of a creation event is all the evidence for the Big Bang (Doppler effect, Microwave radiation etc.).

Whatever the Nazis and others eugenicists did with eugenics proves their understanding of Evolutionary Theory is wrong. They tried to create the superhuman, but failed miserably as seen in 1936 olympics. Great Humans cannot be created in a test tube-they are randomly chosen by the Generator Of Diversity (G.O.D.).

As a biologist I know the evolution theory is the only scientific theory to explain all the creatures in the world. Whether you think evolutionary theory is valid does not matter in our fight for a constitutional Government. We are all entitled to think our own thoughts and divisive comments like yours do not help our revolution.

The Fossil Record Proves My Point!

There are no transitional life forms between animal and animal or between animal and man. Look at Piltdown Man (fossilized human skull teamed up with real monkey jaw -- PAINTED, MIND YOU, TO LOOK LIKE A FOSSIL). How about Java Man ... bones picked up randomly from a river bed. Peking Man: bashed in monkey heads that the Rockefeller Foundation, after losing (or maybe destroying) the primary evidence, tried to pass off as missing links. How about that great fossil from Nebraska ... I think they created a picture of Mr. and Mrs. Missing Link from it. Alas, it was finally determined that the great fossil was nothing more than a pig tooth. I can't imagine the chutzpah it takes to create an entire bogus being (and his wife) from a pig's tooth. Of course the original story received wide coverage in the press. How far the retraction got I don't know.

The fossil record is 100% complete ... the Smithsonian is full of fossils ... they won't take any more ... and there ARE NO TRANSITIONAL LIFE FORMS THAT LINK ONE SPECIES WITH ANOTHER. (And puleeze spare us the white moth/black moth story ... we already know that one).

By the way, for those who don't know exactly what fossils are and how they are formed. .. when a creature is buried in MUD ... because, perhaps, there was a FLOOD ... the flesh usually rots away. The bone, however, remains. Over time, the mud becomes hard ... rock, in fact ... encasing the bone. Slowly the bone disintegrates, its place in the rock being replaced by liquid minerals which harden and take up the old bone's space. So a fossil is really a mineral imbedded in another mineral and you can bet the farm that if they had ANY of these transitional critters, they would be parading them in front of our eyes morning, noon and night.

Look up Piltdown Man for yourself, folks. Science hard at work pulling the wool over our eyes!

Agreed

Evolution is a tired theory...there are no transitions...none... now there may be mirco-evolutions but there is still not one piece of evidence to even suggest macro-evolution. Sorry...

Sure there are transitions.

Sure there are transitions. How could you have missed them?

Erectus, habilis, cro-magnon --each are points along the spectrum of human development.

Ron Paul Explorer: The All Paul Search Engine

Cro-Magnon IS A HOMO SAPIEN (MAN) LIKE US, EXCEPT ...

He was taller, probably better looking, smarter (based on brain case size), and definitely healthier. So we have DEVOLVED NOT EVOLVED.

Neanderthal is also a homo sapien ... but with an overarching brow (could it be the mark of Cain???). His brain case was larger than ours too. So the "cave men" were probably smarter than some of our modern scientists.

I have to admit I haven't studied Erectus yet. But, the minuite I get the chance, I will. and I'll bet that it's either homo sapien or a fake.

I noticed the Leakey organization was involved in habilis, another tree-swinging 3' monkey with longer arms than legs and curved fingers ... a definite relative of their other find, Lucy-in-the-tree-like-monkeys (For those who don't get my little joke, Lucy was named for the Beatles song about LSD, which is what these numbnutz scientists were probably taking during their jungle journey. Lucy is another, fairly recent fraud, with characteristics extremely similar to habilis.

Now for the dating game ... not many people realize that when scientists date objects to be millions and millions of years old, this is a very subjective science. (In fact, most people with common sense wouldn't believe what scientists MUST BELIEVE in order to believe their own dating system). Their precious dogma is called UNIFORMITARIANISM, without which their dates are all toast!. Look it up if you like. Some intelligent scientists have blown holes right through this dating system. They used it to date LIVING mollusks to be millions of years old. They've also dated lava, from a known eruption, to be ancient.

There is excellent common sense research being done that proves a young earth (no more than 10,000 years old), which makes the bible 100% accurate. If that's so, your salvation depends on what you believe and how you behave. Stop drinking the Kool-ade and consider where you will be spending eternity..

Must See Movie -- EXPELLED ...

This weekend I had the opportunity to see "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed," starring Ben Stein. Actually, it's a very well done and highly intelligent documentary exposiing the jackboot tactics that abound in the scientific and educational realms to stiffle any and all opposition to Darwinian evolution. The movie does an excellent job of allowing Richard Dawkins to make a monkey out of HIMSELFwhen he confides a few secrets evolutionists don't generally let out of the bag. More important, it connects the dots from Darwinism to Nazism and Planned Parenthood (or is it Planned Barrenhood ... or maybe it's Banned Parenthood) which started off as a eugenics program to rid the world of undesirables (like black and brown people). Note the similarity to Hitler's idea of ridding the world of "life unworthy of life!" Today, PP is willing to rid the world of just about anyone ... for a price, that is!.

Anyway, for young people who've been spoonfed crap science in government schools and have never had the opportunity to question how a once great nation has become a screwed up, Mickey Mouse, entertainment R us society, capable of following its obviously corrupt leaders to the very gates of the gulag (so long as we're being entertained along the way), I think this movie might blow your minds.

Darwinism is the foundational error of Nazism and Communism.