Internet Following

I ran across some very interesting results after doing a Yahoo search. I did a search on yahoo for each candidate to see how many websites had relevant hits for them. here's what I found:

Ron Paul :112,000,000 sites
Barack Obama 189,000,000 sites
Hillary Clinton 168,000,000 sites
John McCain 114,000,000 sites

Amazing that the other campaigns did use the Internet as much or more than Ron Paul did, only he's the only one who gets credit for being the Internet guy.

So their Internet Campaigns weren't successful, they were all over the web? Anybody ever say we messed with polls show them this. Their presence is far greater than his.

And lets not forget Google trends: http://www.google.com/tre...
flat line news coverage yet great search numbers. So what does it mean?

The popularity of the current candidates was bought and paid for with propaganda ads and misinformation, Ron Paul's was a result of an incredible message, zero media support or even acknowledgment and grass roots efforts from us. We should be proud of what we've accomplished with our hands tied behind our backs and mouths gaged.

We are Prisons of war, the Election War.

Viva la Revolution!