HAVING PROBLEMS VIEWING THE SITE? GET FIREFOX! | A NOTE ON ADVERTISING

   

POWERFUL BULLMARKET IN US STOCKS LOOMS as the US prepares for GLOBAL HEGEMONY

http://news.goldseek.com/...

output

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The New American Century. Full spectrum dominance...

Yeah, right.

"Bullmarket". Exactly. A

"Bullmarket". Exactly. A market of bulls&%#t!

Who needs oil?!

More reason to get out of the Federal Reserve Note, many of us aren't willing to exchange blood for oil.
Since the source of all energy, the sun, is right above us, it is free, and we just have to tap into it.
Of course let's not forget that our Creator gave us unalienable rights to the sun which was created for us to use, all we have to do is cut out the middlemen. So contrary to the articles advice don't invest in the stock market, invest directly in solar equipment or a solar equipment company.
grant

But do you think that things could play out

like this and the US would end up in control of the World economy?? I know this article is long, but I would really like some opinions, especially from SIERRA and e_goldstein. If what this author says is true, I'm now kind of freaking out that I took my 401(k) out. HELP!

Don't freak out about your 401 K

They want people to panic right now. Don't play into their hands.

Well, since you asked.

This may get a little technical, and if it does, I apologize in advance. The question of if peak oil, dwindling resources, etc. are real or not, are, in reality, irrelevant. What is relevant are the perceptions that those in charge want the people to believe.

In a free market, declining resources are usually made up for by better technologies doing things more efficiently, or a switch to substitutes. In other words, in a free market, if peak oil was real, then it would be dealt with by better design and creation of more efficient engines, or at least substitute forms of travel (think trains) that are less dependent on oil. Of course, this does not happen because the plutocracy would lose a form of control; so, instead, they keep the people dependent on levels of technology that are over a hundred years old.

By not allowing the free market to come up with alternatives that would mitigate the effects of peak oil, our rulers are putting this nation, and indeed the rest of the world, in a situation where resource wars are not only probable, they are also desired by those in charge. For these people, wars create riches, a method of population control, further control over the populations that survive, and resources under their heel. Control over the chain of distribution of natural resources is key to this. Control oil, you control movement, control food, you can quell dissent through starvation. Control what is considered money, and you control what happens in the entire economy. Control the media, and you can control what and even how, people think.

So, they want people to think there are shortages out there. Why? Why would the plutocracy want people to stock up on food by announcing there are shortages? We know that the food shortages in foreign countries are because of monetary inflation in the world's reserve currency, coupled with the effects of an insane ethanol policy. My guess is that they want to sell as much as they can at higher prices through panic buying before they short sell the grain markets for windfall profits. This would further destroy whatever small farmers we have left, allowing ADM to pick up the pieces, establishing more control over the food supply through corporate take over. I use the grain markets as an example, we can witness the manipulation across the board in many of the commodity markets. The thing that is causing me concern is this so-called water shortage. It's not that there is a water shortage, it's just that people live in cities that are artificial constructs that are far away from fresh water. It seems to me that we are witnessing the early move of the plutocracy into socializing, or more realistically, incorporating, the water supply for their own profit, and possibly setting up a distribution grid similar to our power grid.

Create an artificial problem, cause the people to demand that something be done about it, and come up with a solution to the problem that never existed in the first place, thereby adding to the plutocracy's power. It has happened over and over again, and can be witnessed throughout history.

Now, let us ask, what are the black swans, the unforeseeable problems in the scenario that can throw a wrench in the plutocracy's plan for further Anglo-Saxon hegemony? The most immediate threat isn't the Chinese dumping dollars or treasuries, nor is it Russia accumulating resources in the attempt to create a new reserve currency. In my opinion, the biggest threat to their control is us, we, the people. For the first time in human history, those who have been able to figure out what is going on are able to communicate with each other through the internet. This allows us to hone our message so that we can bring in more people to our side. If we are successful in taking over the Republican party, they have then lost their bastion of blatant corporate fascism. They will loose a tool, and will have only the Democratic party and their socialist platforms to fall back on, but, I digress.

The author of the article makes the assumption that after the United States has secured the oil reserves of Iraq and possibly Iran that our stock market will recover, and the hegemony will be established for the long term. He doesn't take into account the fact that people are tired of the systems of control and are starting to do something about it. Although I believe that the author is correct in thinking that this may be the long-term plan for the plutocracy; I do not think he pays enough attention to the scenarios that can and are already beginning to upset their plans.

For what it's worth, thats my 2 cents.

I think you're mostly spot-on.

I would add my 2 cents in that this is also a very good way to mask a falling dollar from the masses, as it were. Why is gas and food so high? OoOhhh... a shortage.. I understand that...

Is how it's going. Most won't understand that they are losing purchase power.. they will figure that a shortage means that a patriot will tighten thier belt and march on.. pay more taxes and eat a little less, for the freedom we all pay for.

Think of Ants

I'm not so convinced that there are very many people who want to control the world. I think most of them are happy to hoard cats, or action figures, or old newspapers. It seems so comic-book to have Evil Despots out to rule the planet.

However, I had a happy childhood, so maybe it's just me.

I think we're all more like ants. Each of us doing what we think we should be doing (I think I just quoted a line from TRON). Yes, many want power and some will go overboard to get it, but it isn't so much coordinated by some queen ant. Instead, it happens because of the individual natures of ants (or people), just trying to do what they think they should.

IMissLiberty

We Ain't

in kansas anymore toto. And yes when in disney land the pirates of the carribean do eat the tourists when the ride breaks down.

We can all say what needs to be done, but who here led by example today?

Sorry...

but you have a rude awakening coming....

I want...

Lisa C....Akak and Sierra...These guys are the voices I trust on here.

Although e-goldstien is a great one as well.

I'm not sure what you need answered kat.

You are doing what you can to position your family for what is coming.

Can you do more than that? If so, do it.

If you can't do any more than what you are doing now, sleep well.

I know that's simple advice and it's not meant to be flippant but, unless you can solve, say, peak oil, what is the point of worrying yourself sick over it? You have your life to live. Yes, keep trading your bad money for good. Stock up on food, water, toilet paper, etc. but live your life -- plant some flowers, have sex, walk the dog, try a new recipe...

Life's too short not to live it.

___________

Lisa C.

http://www.women4ronpaul....

I'm not really..

Worried about it at all..

The only thing that confused me was that the article went against what I
felt was true in regards to us becoming an economically strong country due to our oil siezures in the Middle East...So we say Depression and he says no way...we'll conquer and become rich...a different perspective, I suppose...

Somehow that scenario had never entered my mind..and sometimes you seek clarity from those who probably have a better feel for the international
climate to come in and spot the bull and call it...

I can't...

Too busy, stocking up on food,water, toilet paper...planting flowers (more like weeding gardens)..having sex (when he doesn't work nights)..combing unruly cats,(Persians) and trying NOT to cook..LOL

"I have once heard that the ability to resist temptation is the truest measure of a mans character."

Dustin Hoffman to Steve McQueen
"Papillion"

Depends on the "tempation" I suppose.

If it's chocolate, I'm in.

As far as all being well with the US economy if we invade Iran and take over their oil reserves, well, I just doubt it. Firstly, look at the mess they've made with Iraq. Gas was supposed to go down after "mission accomplished", right? Secondly, Iran is not Iraq. The Iranians have a huge army and they are ready to fight. The US military is in a state of shambles at the present time. Equipment is poor shape, if available at all, and the troops are spread thinly and fed up.

Don't forget, the world is also fed up with the US. Our "friends" are sick and tired of us running around like the global "Sheriff". They have a big say in how well the US economy is running and, if they decide to, can pull the plug.

Lastly, Iran now belongs to a security group lead by Russia and China (I forget the name of the group -- I can find it if you wish). If anyone attacks a member of this group, they have attacked Russia and China as well (symbolically speaking). Now that alone would cool some of the neo-con jets I would think. I hope so anyway. It was a smart move on Iran's part.

Many things can happen -- just keep on truckin'.

___________

Lisa C.

http://www.women4ronpaul....

This was not meant to diminsh

anyone else...mind you...I truly think everyone on here is wonderful...(just had to add that in.)..But on certain issues...their intellect reaches me.

Kat, I think the author of

Kat, I think the author of this article puts VASTLY too much faith in US military and economic power. While the rest of the world alternately laughs at us and loathes us for our imperial pretensions, we insular Americans go on believing that not only do we have the right to run the world, but we have the infinite arrogance to believe that we can. I think the fact that Iraqi oil production has not reached 70% of what it was under Saddam, after over five years of occupation, speaks for itself.

I see our current situation as somewhat analogous to that of Great Britain in the immediate post-WW II years, as they continued to pretend that they were still a major world player, and desperately tried to maintain an empire that was slipping through their fingers, and soon to be history.

As I said..

I trust your voice...Thank you.

Well, sure anything is

Well, sure anything is possible. We are extremely strong force wise. But if that's the course we forcefully continue instead of allowing our own well-deserved economic collapse, I think your 401k will be the last thing on your mind for a good long time - especially if you live near a major U.S. city or base.

I'm working right now, so I

I'm working right now, so I only skimmed it but I agree with austrianschool below. Another thing to note is that technology for alternative sources of energy can and will thrive in a truly free market as Dr. Paul advocates. That effectively nullifies "Peak Oil" whether it's fact or fiction.

Great article images, though! "War Hero, Bush lands on battleship miles outside of San Diego", and "Oil Chess Board" are classic. :)

The following section is quoted from the referenced

article which, by the article's own declaration, is its main point:

"the United States is widely perceived as an economic basket case on account of its astronomic debts and weakened domestic economy, but it is in the process of seizing control of the world’s most important remaining oil reserves and bringing them on line. Once it has achieved this it will not just be the greatest military power on earth but will assume center stage as the greatest economic power on earth as well and be completely unassailable. By that time no other country will dare to, or perhaps even want to, dump dollars or US Treasuries."

The suggestions embodied in the article are predicated on the notion that the U.S. will, through military force, sieze and control a great portion of the petro-assets of other nations who represent a significant percentage of the available crude oil reserves. If you choose to believe it, then by all means, follow the advice and invest in more paper assets. My reading of the signs tells me to stay away from the U.S. dollar, to the maximum extent possible, and any investment instrument denominated in that currency. That any country or economy is, by the writer's own words, "completely unassailable", is complete poppycock and shows a knowledge of world history that is, to be charitable, poverty-stricken. For those who wish to invest in the notion offered by the article.....good luck to you. May fortune shine brightly upon you. The author's assumption that, having seized some amount of crude oil reserves and having seized control of the involved civil governments, the remainder of the world will simply roll over and meekly submit to the desired end result set forth in the article. I leave it to everyone else to judge the wisdom of such a prediction.

I think you are correct, but

for the near term historically speaking - the next 20 - 30 years - it is very possible that military action could improve the U.S. economy, Despite what people say about new technology, Oil will still be the main source of energy, as well as an important starting material for many pharmaceuticals, and plastics. There are really no substitutes on the horizon that will provide the amount of energy or material needed to replace oil. Continued domination of this region by the west will insure an artificially low price for oil - since we can basically steal it from the people in those countries - keeping the vast majority of their people in poverty. Also, domination in this region means an end to the uncertainty in the supply that keeps oil prices high from commodity speculation. If Iran is truly next, and we will easily defeat Iran, our power and influence will be hard to compete with. Note that the middle east is fairly sparse in population until you get to Pakistan. The huge world population is in Pakistan, Indonesia, Indian and China. These countries want access to Oil to improve their standard of living. Whatever organizations control the middleastern oil, to sell to these groups, will get a huge benefit. What we will see is an increase in value of the U.S. dollar relative to these asian currencies.

The real questions for the U.S. hegemonists, is can we sustain our domination of the middle east long enough to stablize oil prices, and get the dollar back on its feet ? I don't think the Europeans will let the dollar crash, if they can help it. But you never know. And what will china do ?

The small number of losses from occupation in iran and Iraq is hardly enough to stop us, and will serve to keep the public inflamed for the job.

Note that Azerbajan has intercepted a shipment of Nuclear Material from Russia, headed for Iran, and U.S. leased ships have fired at Iranian boats. I would not be suprised to see signidficant conflict with Iran in August or September. This will provide an increase in public support for the war in the middle east.

What will China do?

You worry about that. I'm still busy with the Russians' warnings...

http://www.usatoday.com/n...

and their right to "pre-emptively" attack anyone just as we have...

http://www.breitbart.com/...

So... as Dirty Harry would say "Do you feel lucky, punk? Huh, do ya?"

But don't mind me. If we Americans, supposedly the best and brightest of the world, truly feel that might makes right without fail, then I say to hell with the earth, let's light this puppy up.

Nicely said.

Nicely said.

Whoops

sorry

(No subject)

My uneducated opinion on this is

There is no such thing as peak oil. It is another one of our global games to make people afraid and dependent. The only thing I am afraid of is being dependent.

Can some others please read and comment

on this? This is the exact opposite of what we have been talking about on here. I don't know if I believe in Peak Oil but what this guy says here makes a lot of sense.

On peak oil

Not everyone knows about Lindsey Williams' The Energy Non-Crisis: http://www.youtube.com/wa....

Exactly

There is peak oil if "THEY" want there to be peak oil...if you know what I mean.