HAVING PROBLEMS VIEWING THE SITE? GET FIREFOX! | A NOTE ON ADVERTISING

   

Why You Shouldn't Spend that 'Stimulus' Check

http://www.alternet.org/s...

Posted on May 1, 2008

Why You Shouldn't Spend that 'Stimulus' Check
By Max Keiser

I'll explain two reasons why you should not spend your economic stimulus check: the first applies to people who work regular jobs for wages, the second applies to people who work in investment banks for bonuses.

If you work for wages (or live on a pension), consider this: if every American said, "No thank you" to Bush's stimulus check and refused to cash them, the value of the dollars in your pocket right now, in terms of their purchasing power would go up by a factor greater than the face value ($600) of the stimulus check. In other words, if you didn't spend these checks, you'd be the richer for it.

The reason being that America does not have a hard-money economy, it's a debt-based fiat currency economy. All the money in circulation in America has been borrowed and then re-lent. So borrowing more money ($168 billion for the stimulus package) and then re-lending it to Americans, as Bush is doing, only increases the debt load and debases the value of the currency outstanding (against a backdrop of stagnant wages and minuscule interest rates for savers).

If an American was planning to spend $40K this year on food, clothing, shelter, health and various other expenses and they were hoping to defray some of that cost thanks to Bush's stimulus check understand that by simply adding another $168 billion of debt (the cost of the stimulus package) on top of America's current multi-trillion debt load will continue the Bush-Paulson-Benanke trend of debasing the purchasing power of your money and, therefore, raise the price of goods and services by more than the $600 'gift' (without a commensurate rise in wages or increase in interest paid on savings).

This is why America's debt problems won't go away. Every dollar spent adds debt and spawns more fiat currency issuance which has the effect of decreasing the purchasing power of the U.S. dollars in your pocket. Bush tries to make up the difference by borrowing even more; borrowing 340 million a day to fund the war and close to 3 billion a day to cover U.S. operating expenses, not to mention Wall Street borrowing over $30 billion a day to keep their Ponzi scheme going. All this borrowing keeps alive the vicious financial spiral trending lower towards permanent currency debasement and possible sovereignty loss.

Now, if you work in investment banking, the opposite is true. Bigger money supply growth means bigger fees and bonuses. You may lose more than $600 in purchasing power with that $600 stimulus check, but the fees and bonuses you make processing all that debt (read: dollars) is greater still. In other words, the more the government increases the debt load (money supply), the more you make -- even discounting for the lost purchasing power caused by the inflationary impact of higher money supply growth.

But listen bankers, resist the temptation to spend your stimulus check even though by doing so you are increasing America's indebtedness and, therefore, your fees and bonuses.

In a year or so, after 99.999% of America has cashed their stimulus check, any checks that have not been cashed will accrue value as collector's items.

As such, the value of these checks as un-cashed mementos of the failed Bush presidency should appreciate at the inflation rate plus a collector's item premium rate for years to come.

As a matter of fact, an enterprising soul might make a pretty penny by setting up a website to buy people's un-cashed stimulus checks at the face value plus a small premium. Five to six years from now, you might be able to re-auction and sell these un -cashed checks on eBay for double or triple the price you paid to Asian and European collectors buying these up like visitors to the Berlin Wall who buy chunks of concrete left over after the collapse of East Berlin.

Max Keiser has been involved with markets and finance for 25 years. He started his career as a stock broker on Wall Street after graduating from NYU. He is the creator of the Hollywood Stock Exchange (that operates via his patented Virtual Specialist technology).

© 2008 Huffington Post

output

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

He

was being facetious.

He was illustrating the fact that this stimulus check is another rip off.

At least I think he was.

Spending our neighbors

into debt?

There is a saying amongst Kansas farmers:

"You can't borrow your way out of debt."

Why shouldn't you utilize your own money?

Buy food for storage, silver, gold, or pay down your dept incurred while the govt. stole your own money.

Use some common sense folks.

And oh yea, as far as the collector's items, who with a brain would want them? And what would they purchase the worthless check with?

That's like saying save your flat money (dollars) as it will be collectors items some day. Give me a break!

Hogwash.

If you don't deposit the check, then it remains for the government to spend. Giving money to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to adolescents.

-jcr

Doing this

Doing this, while a great idea would be like trying to educate and convince America to vote for Ron Paul. A great idea that would strongly help us. Americans have become too self centered to care about what is in the best interest of everyone involved. I'm not really spending mine, i'm converting it into silver.

Got to live

If I could afford to burn the gob'ment check..I would..but I have to pay rent. My husband is on a temp. lay off here in western NC...if we don't pay the bills..we have NO WHERE to go and NO ONE to turn too.
There are a lot of others like us...We want to do the right thing and throw it back into the shrubs face...but we have to do what we can to survive...
We wouldn't mind living in a commune...anyone know of any in our area?

Freedom is another way to God...A corrupt government is a straight way to hell.

I like your thinking, but

I like your thinking, but I'm buying gold, silver, guns and butter.

Things are only impossible until they are not.
-- Jean Luc Picard

i look at this differently

the country is on a huge downward spiral and its going to crash, no doubt about it... there was a time when i would have agreed with your idealism but that time has passed,,,i am using my check to shore up my household and prepare for the oncoming attack and to donate to Ron Paul campaign.....being strong, out of their grid and helping our man get into office is the best way i think i can help,,,,

This Doesn't Go Far Enough - Withdraw Cash and Burn It!

I get the idea, but if you really want to help out, you should withdraw evn more cash and burn it. (Note: If you don't save enough to pay your taxes, your other assets will be at risk.)

The difference between a libertarian and an authoritarian is that libertarians are realists (despite being called idealists). Authoritarians think we can change the economy by suggestions like the above: save more, spend more, tax more, rebate more, enact controls.

Libertarians realize that asking or forcing people to to pay, spend, save or whatever, simply doesn't work very well.

Suppose we all know that burning all our cash would be good for the value of the dollar; how many are willing to do it?

IMissLiberty