HAVING PROBLEMS VIEWING THE SITE? GET FIREFOX! | A NOTE ON ADVERTISING

   

The State Thinks It Owns Your Kids--does it?

Back in the very early days of the Unitarian/socialist inspired public brain laundry movement, there were some men like Robert Owen the socialist and Amos Bronson Alcott, the meandering Transcendentalist, who firmly believed that public education was the best way to reform society, and the best way to do that was to get the children out of the hands of their parents at the earliest possible age.

These men and others became avid supporters of something called the Infant School Movement, a program designed to get children out of the home as early as two years of age. The poor kids supposedly learned all their nasty habits at home during those early formative years. So, if you could get the kids out of the home and into the infant schools of the public school promoters, you could then get rid of all those bad habits, and by the time the youngster was six years old, the public "educator" (change agent) basically controlled him body and soul.

And it seems that the social(ist) engineers just never quite give up. They may lay aside some programs for awhile if they seem to be drawing opposition or hostility. But they realise the public has a notoriously short memory, and so they bide their time and await a further opportunity to foist their socialist programs on an unsuspecting public, in the form of some "new" and exciting and "innovative" program. The same old socialist junk with a nice new Red ribbon tied around it!
http://waronyou.com/2008/...

output

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

MARX PROPOSED NOT JUST ' BIG LOVE'

... but BIGGEST.....Big Brotherly Love....the ultimate in extended family....THE COLLECTIVE......Family compounded

http://www.individualsove...

Having been if family court

on and off for the past few years, I can tell you first hand that the State owns your children. It's all about money and redirecting wealth. It has nothing to do with "best Interest" of the children. It is aimed at destroying the American family.

It was all laid out by Dewey

And his adherents. Since children are future adults and citizens, the state has an interest in their education, further, they believed that left to their own that people would not "acquire the political virtues required to maintain the acheivements of a liberal democracy. "

From the early 1900's there is a legal principle that The STATE has a RIGHT to educate children, and in some cases this right supercedes the parents right.

So yeah, they think they own your kids. Its elitism at its finest.

Maybe.

By signing the birth certificate and receiving a SS number it is said that we are signing over our rights for the priviliges given to us by the Corporation of the US. We become CITIZENS that reside within the corporation.

There is a difference between resident and domicile
Check out this guy
http://www.youtube.com/wa...

Does my burka make my butt look fatwa?

Yes, but it starts sooner than this:

When we apply for a marriage license, receive one, then the children produced from this state approved relationship become the state's. And don't forget that churches are guilty too, applying for 501C-3 status, thereby becoming the state's too.

And all wealth and assets belong to the State

under the license.