 |
 |
 |
United we stand?
Posted May 13th, 2008 by tamckissick
output
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't we (and the other candidates as well) do better by standing together? How come I see so much optimism and support for other candidates that have somewhat close priciples (at least against the war like Huck) when everyone 'should' know that we can't beat anyone if each of 10 different candidates or causes is capturing 10% of our total numbers? I even see dozens of groups planning marches or sit-ins or something at the national convention. That's just one of numerous examples.
Can't we find a way to join forces?
I sometimes think that if we could actually coordinate our masses, we could make something like a boycott or major media event happen in no time.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
Certainly
as soon as the other candidates and their supporters agree that our Constitution has been subverted and that they will stop the growth of government and the theft of our liberties. This INCLUDES the stoppage of illegal, aggressive wars, which are not conservative or Constitutional.
OK?
'Live for yourself, there's no one else more worth living for,
Begging hands and bleeding hearts
Will only cry out for more...'
So find their leader(s)
and get them to admit that neither can win without the other... Then challenge their group to a debate against our group. Leader to leader or representative panel to representative panel. Take them on one by one until we're all united behind a good cause.
I personally have not lost a debate on a single issue for RP. I stand behind his every policy but that has only been since I researched enough of the ones I initially didn't understand.