RON PAUL MAY 15 WILL BE ON CONFERENCE CALL TONIGHT LIVE ON REVOLUTION BROADCASTING 9PM EASTERN KEP BUMPED
Posted May 15th, 2008 by SGP
We will have tonight May 15 at 9pm eastern Dr. Ron Paul as our guest speaker.
Please keep bumped and let everyone know about this 1 year anniversary call with Dr. Ron Paul.
1 YEAR ANNIVERSARY SPECIAL NATIONAL CONFERENCE CALL!
We also have speacial guest speakers tonight :
Earnest Hancock
Steve Dore
Bob Schultz
Linda (granny warrior)
output
*
*
"Steve Parent" quote in 1987? Age and no "doctor"?
"If we are to succeed we must not be afraid to fail, If we fail to try we will never succeed." - Steve Parent 1987.
Did "Steve Parent" even exist in 1987??
Of course he didn't exist in 1987
He doesn't even exist in 2008, except for on these forums. I should know, because I'm his biggest FAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"The internet ghost quotes himself" -me 2008
consumed-breath and let it
consumed-breath and let it go...for the good of the movement, the people, the DP, yourself....Don't you beleive that people's wrong ways will surely find them out. Show more of who you are instead of tearing down a person you say doesn't exist.
Surely Laurie didn't start off on the DP like this...hello...would the real Laurie please stand up.....
Too bad the gardening thread
is gone. I have a small house in the city so all my gardening is restricted to some pots/boxes and cyber gardening aka reading the gardening posts here on DP.
Still here...Sorta
http://www.dailypaul.com/...
"I freed thousands of slaves. I could have freed thousands more if they had known they were slaves."
-- Harriet Tubman
Laurie, as long as you're here...
...and you say you have all the DP posts and comments archived, do you have the original gardening thread saved? Many people here would like that thread retrieved.
Apologies for stepping off-topic in here, but at least I know this is a thread Laurie is visiting...
I had actually looked for Gardening in my archives
Unfortunately, it wasn't a thread I was tracking (vs. the Oil Bourse thread, for instance)
I believe I posted once and I have that, but not all the posts in the thread like I have for many other threads.
I believe the Drupal software has true owner-delete (not found) vs. flagging-delete (access denied).
When Michael is available, see if he can reactivate that thread for people to grap posts of interest? Or he can copy the posts and send them to one person/you?
I would be surprised if the thread was not archived in a backup of the database somewhere.
Sorry - I did try!
Thanks for checking
I appreciate it.
We now return you to the regularly-scheduled programming of this thread. ;)
I guess Lauri and Steve must
I guess Lauri and Steve must have Just recently divorced ?
GOOOOO Steve !!!
Your servant for Ron Paul,
Live Free Or Die
( The 'good o'l boy from S.W. MO.)
P.S. Thank you agian for all your help !!!
We would not done near as well as we did with out it.
SO Did it Happen
I was working last night. Was there a conference call?
Conference call with RP on 5/15 "kinda" happened
RPF "real-time" threads of broadcast:
http://www.ronpaulforums....
http://www.ronpaulforums....
More "technical problems" during RP's time (just like the MSM?), regardless of who is blamed (sounded like a "loop" issue caused by both parties to the broadcast).
she's bbaacckk with all her cronies
and they know everything and we are just stupid. Bring your shame to the DP and attack for the sake of attack. Its so pointless. Do something meaningful. Cyberbully. Laurie you input NOTHING but anti SGP stuff. Is that all your good for. Then I could understand your pathetic rhetoric. You are no different than the neighborhood bully. Who cares what we think of SGP. We have the ability to think for ourselves. There is no desire to take sides. This is all so childish I am beginning to think your doing this for the laugh. I bet you bully fortune 500 folks too. EVERYBODY do things Lauries way. You ramble nonsense. I don't even read your posts cause they are so stupid. and all your fans can kiss my ass they are useless too.
Then why are you continually
Then why are you continually posting on these "useless" threads as well?
calling stupid stupid
purely for entertainment purposes. Yeah I should do what JG says and get off the computer. Its a relief from all the REAL stuff thats going on in the world kinda like reality tv. Just go on and keep me entertained.
Thanks, but no thanks ....
Thanks, but no thanks ....
"Dr. Steve Parent" supporters *never* read
More importantly, they *never* address the legitimate facts and issues.
Are you saying that none of my feedback in my first post today related to the RB site is accurate? If so, you obviously have never seen the site.
I see *zero* evidence of thinking AT ALL.
Isn't that my point?
Suuure, Fortune 500 folks get bullied.
Yet another blatant lack of experience indicated.
Again, I am posting for the LURKERS who do carefully evaluate all information vs. knee-jerk personal attacks that harm the online credibility of those people, such as you, Moonslippers.
Do you think my actions would ever consider your worthless opinion?
Where did I *EVER* say do things my way?
My concern is how many people have posted that they are doing "Dr. Steve Parent's" way when that name is totally made up and that person has zero online history and not a single person has EVER MET HIM, not even in Canada!
And those people are supposed to be credible to "thinking RP supporters"? Do I have a bridge to sell you-
And, again, many people have requested that "Dr. Steve parent" simply start his own forum and then he can block people he disagrees with and only his supportive followers will be allowed to post.
Doesn't sound anything like RP's "message", though, does it?
Thanks for the pop-top:)
I am thinking
SGP's site is very amatuerish. Generic and in beta stages. It may amount to absolutly nothing. 'Who cares.
With all due respect, I do...
When people publish articles, messages, web sites in the name of supporting Ron Paul, and these items are so sloppily thrown together, with grammar errors, misspellings, and unprofessional appearance, it reflects badly on all supporters, and it reflects badly on Ron Paul.
To the folks who think these arguements are stupid, I apologize. However we've worked too hard to let this egomaniacal, uneducated poser detract from the movement.
--------
We don't know how to mind our own business
'Cause the whole worlds got to be just like us
Now we are fighting a war over there
No matter who's the winner
We can't pay the cost
-Steppenwolf 1969
I disagree
so what his site is what it is.(makes him look bad, not RP) It doesn't reflect me or my support of RP. You give it FAR too much credit for that. Individuals are free to speak as they want. Some would say Alex Jones does RP a disservice. Some would say RP gives the GOP a bad name....just cause they say it doesnt make it so... weak arguement.
"Dr. Steve Parent" is not qualified for broadcasting
Non-technical people should not be going into technical businesses.
For the RB website to have so many severe problems, when RP supporters have *volunteered* to help, is just another example of failing to address known problems.
FTR, 8-9 years ago young teenagers created their own websites based on www.lissaexplains.com (read her “About Me”). Those sites were much more sophisticated.
My child was getting 500 hits per day with a music promotion site that many years ago. Now, under 500 hits a day qualifies as “Top 10 Ron Paul Site”?
The reason several candidate sites currently “look a lot alike” is that the developers are using the same code/design as a template, just as architects do with corporate buildings.
Given the fact that Internet Marketers routinely use live *video* vs. audio teleconferences, and the business world routinely uses Live Meeting capabilities with *video*, I personally believe that audio broadcasts are already obsolete.
Even Lou Dobbs has transcripts available for the shows. Activists forward those *transcripts* to others. Video with sound simply cannot be accessed at work without risking the job itself. So, do parents listen to audio broadcasts via the Internet when they are home with their families? I don’t think so.
I can browse transcripts for points of interest in 2-5 minutes vs. a 60 minute show. I have 200+ daily news subscriptions and many more from activists.
Why do I need a "generic" broadcast show that controls my time management?
I don’t even watch TV shows live. I tape-delay all of them and then skip the commercials.
If “Dr. Steve Parent” is the marketing expert he has stated himself to be, then wouldn’t some minimal amount of market research have been appropriate? Not just 100 posts of support on DP?
If older people already are dedicated to various MSM talk show personalities, where will the Internet talk show *political* audience be, when today’s RP college kids have families of their own?
FYI, the RB broadcasts *are* being archived per posts on RPF and DP. So, why aren’t those same links available from RB’s *business* vs. using DP/RPF for advertising?
The name of the game is “Search Engine Optimization” for your own site, not for the sites/forums of others.
I’m not sure what you mean about “they have made some progress”.
The site is worse than it was. The SPAM advertisements are simply for piggybacked content that others initiated. The piggybacked shows have been non-stop “technical problems”.
“Dr. Steve Parent” has already mentioned yet another new project. Does that mean the “debate” is no longer being considered or the RB station?
SGP *is* my arch nemesis through SGP’s public treatment of me, as well as the truly childish/obscene posts of his “cult”/”gang” followers.
I believe “Dr. Steve Parent” has been, and is continuing to be, a major destructive force for legitimate RP supporters.
If I were a Ron Paul candidate or a campaign manager for one, I would never in a thousand years risk my professional credibility in any way that would allow “Dr. Steve Parent” to be considered a spokesperson on my behalf (without permission or any other authority to do so).
“as well as facilitating discussion around third parties and their candidates, like the interviews with LP candidates” is a violation of the DP forum rules.
Until Michael states otherwise, this site is DailyPaul, not DailyBarr or DailyBaldwin.
NOTE: More importantly, this forum is not DailySteveParent.
Given the many, many “destroy the GOP” posts, I no longer believe that “we” want the same things for America. Having the same “enemies” does not make us “friends”.
More importantly, I believe that there are drastic differences of opinion in relation to the *implementation* of “freedom and liberty”.
Certainly, every time “Dr. Steve Parent” publicly posts that some people have “insider information” that others are not allowed to have is a clear indication that those "insider" people are no different than the politicians they wish to displace.
So, then, why would I support such candidates anymore than the ones I already *know*? If RP "supporters" lie to get elected as delegates, what other things are they willing to lie about once they are elected?
Those certainly sound like Ron-Paul-supporters-in-name-only to me-
So, NO, I will never join forces with anonymous people who have proven over and over that their word means nothing.
No legitimate RP supporter would-
Today on "The Steve and Laurie Show"
In today's exciting and climactic episode of "The Steve and Laurie Show", Laurie calls Steve a "poopoo-pants" and accuses him of pulling the wings off butterflies, flying on a broomstick spreading chemtrails, and being the Antichrist. Meanwhile, Steve tells Laurie "I know you are, but what am I?" and accuses her of eating her boogers. And don't miss all the hair-pulling, pinching and kicking, as they fight for the soul of the Ron Paul Revolution!
Stay tuned for all the latest drama and excitement!
OK, akak...
Now that was pretty funny!
hilarious
worst show I have ever been subjected to, oh yeah I guess I am gonna hear the bugman say "you dont have to click on the link". I will defend the DP against all this stupidity. Not all of us are this stupid. We are Patriots who care about the movement. NOT LAURIE AND HER CULT FOLLOWING.
Now THIS really is hilarious!
"LAURIE AND HER CULT"
Coming from a 'Steveite" fanboy?
Now that IS hilarious.
as I have always stated
I do not choose sides. You havent read Laurie call everyone who disagrees with her tactics and speaks against it refer to them as Steve Parent Cult? I am not a Parent fan. I do however, know that I don't know enough about the man to make false accusations and jump on the hate steve bandwagon-I have never taken up for him but have weighed in with my opinions about the site he has and the abuse of him on the DP and its irrelevence to the content on the DP...oh, damn I guess that makes me a "steveit" fanboy--how stupid.....it just goes on and on and on......how many more people are you guys going to run off with this nonsense?
Then, I dunno .... change
Then, I dunno .... change the channel?
just as iI predicted
if I want to, I will. This is your favorite comment to anyone who disagrees with a poster.
Ummm, no ... actually it's
Ummm, no ... actually it's not, but thanks for playing. When YOU have something substantive to add, let me know.
We are doing the best we can
We are doing the best we can and we are actually getting things done. Did you know they were taking bets that Ron Paul would not be on the call?
The moderators asked us personally to stream the call and i was a guest speaker last night and was honored to be part of it.
one who stands there with hands in pockets should not tell one doing the job how ones job should be done. (do not know who said this so i can not give them credit for the quote) if anyone knows let me know.
Great thinkers have always encountered opposition from mediocre minds." - Albert Einstein
"If we are to succeed we must not be afraid to fail, If we fail to try we will never succeed." - Steve Parent 1987.
Dr. Steve Parent
Right on, Dr Steve!!!!
Can I have your autograph? Or is that too personal? I wouldn't want you giving out anything personal.
"The internet ghost quotes himself" -me 2008
Wow!
The old 'self-quote'. An interesting phenomenon.
I was referring to the laurie and steve show
joking comment above. didnt get a chance to listen in on yours.
Totally Pathetic!
This senseless rambling about SGP is absurd. Any post that SGP may put on the forum couldn’t do near the damage all of the lame conspiracies of the day posts do! You wonder why they call RP and his supporter’s kooks. Take a look at the forum. DUH!
SGP just ignore Laurie. She's a troll.
ImATroll
Thank You, You are right on the money.
Thanks for helping to stigmatize conspiracies
It's not helping us be free. It's helping the elites do whatever the hell they want because they know the people are afraid to speak out, for fear of being labelled conspiracy theorists and kooks. I'll bet the Brits thought the Founding Fathers were 'kooks' too.
'Live for yourself, there's no one else more worth living for,
Begging hands and bleeding hearts
Will only cry out for more...'
Another depressing thread
featuring a dispute that no one gives half a damn about. SGP, broadcast if you're going to. If any other network had half the trouble you did, they couldn't get sponsorship from Bazooka Joe. Laurie, give us a break already.
geez
'Live for yourself, there's no one else more worth living for,
Begging hands and bleeding hearts
Will only cry out for more...'
"Dr. Steve Parent" knows it all
The irony is that I earn my living performing Quality Assurance for Fortune 500 companies.
Obviously, "Dr. Steve Parent" sees no need for such a function as the RB website clearly indicates.
Based on feedback like I posted earlier, Senior Management will not even allow such shoddy websites to be moved into production, until the issues are addressed and corrected.
FTR, I also e-mailed the columnist at Wired.com and requested that they research “Dr. Steve Parent”.
I also included the link (http://www.dailypaul.com/...) to OUR NEW PROJECT on the home page of DailyPaul.
My comment was that anyone else, other than “Dr. Steve Parent”, would have requested that the thread be deleted.
NOTE: Just think about the extremely poor impact the posts, both pro/con “Dr Steve Parent”, will likely have on 1) any new visitor to DP and 2) on any campaign managers doing their due diligence for participation of their candidate in any such “debate”.
Note: I differentiated between the legitimate RP supporters and the Ron-Paul-supporters-in-name-only.
That front page thread clearly demonstrates the difference.
care to elaborate
"I earn my living performing Quality Assurance for Fortune 500 companies."
Where do you work?
What are your credentials?
What has been your role in the Campaign on your local level?
I remember reading your first post on SGP and thinking "now thats a conspiracy theory" why should I think any different?
You never answer any of your own questions or those posted to you by other readers.
and to top it all off you dare question the loyalty of DP readers to Ron Paul
if they disagree with you. Lame Laurie Lame.
at first I thought you might be on to something and encouraged you to do the ground work and let us know, but your post bare the truth. You have some sick obsession that has turned downright aggressive to the point that you should be moderated and questioned as to your true intent in the DP community and the Revolution movement.
"Dr. Steve Parent" vs. Laurie - anonymity
FTR, Bryan and several of the moderators of RPF all have my background/information/*cell phone*/*real* name e-mail addresses.
Several of the DP posters also have them and have spoken to me on the phone.
I have also given personal references to many people, *including Ron and Carol Paul*.
So post them online? For strangers? Why?
Hmmm. Yet, "Dr. Steve Parent" has refused to privately give any validation information to *anyone*. Not a single person has ever admitted meeting him in this past year or ever (as Steven Gerard/Girard?)
He states he used to live in FL as a registered Democrat, but now lives in Canada.
So how is "Dr. Steve Parent" suddenly a "spokesperson" for the RP campaign in news articles?
I feel like I'm in Second City, except that this is our real election process for President of the United States!
And, then, "Dr. Steve Parent" requests money through Chip-In that dropped him for TOS violations and he now has a difffent (Hotmail) e-mail address for Paypal?
And he is different than the hoaxes that Snopes routinely debunks? How?
how is steve
whats-his-name in control of a reporter quoting him from the DP....didn't that reporter just troll the site and get their own quote and therefore make him the "spokesperson" by default...why isn't an anonymous ID Ok. If it had been a question on the chip-in request only I would agree, however, disclosure does not insure any monies donated would be spent appropriately-is that your problem that you dont know how he's spending money people donate? anytime your motives are questioned the chip-in is brought up yet all your personal attacks are long winded stretched out insults and conspiracy theories. You give him too much power with your investigation. You put his name at the forefront. Your tactics make people post insults against you-you don't care or you wouldn't continue. Why don't you hire a private investigator. Its not the chip-in you have a problem with, its just a theory you've jumped on and it consumes you. You are consumed by a ghost off the internet. Steve Parent isn't the author of the "revolt at the convention" push....don't you think its a political game that is played at every election. don't you think that delegates are manipulated at every election and if he suggests it don't you think its part of a bigger picture. Maybe he's mole.....
Why did reporter pick "Dr. Steve Parent" to quote (w/o "Dr.")?
Your tactics make people post insults against you-you don't care or you wouldn't continue. Why don't you hire a private investigator.
I "make people". Hmm. I thought RP supporters had wills of their own. Do I make *you* post insults?
Do I care about posted insults against me? ABSOLUTELY NOT!
"In the old days", those are the people who would have been banned.
What has the online world come to?
"Steve Parent isn't the author of the "revolt at the convention" push....don't you think its a political game that is played at every election. don't you think that delegates are manipulated at every election and if he suggests it don't you think its part of a bigger picture. Maybe he's mole....."
In the same "sentence", you indicate that "Steve Parent" isn't the author of the "revolt at the convention" and then you state, "if he suggests it".
Which is it? And on what basis do you post *anything about who the "author" is?
It also sounds like you take "revolt at the convention" as a given. Is it?
If so, what do *you* think (if you are capable of any analytical thought) will be the consequences of such an attempted revolt?
"Maybe he's mole..." D'ya think?
"Dr. Steve Parent" is either truly, truly stupid or he's intentionally destroying the GOP. Does it matter? Either way the results will be the same-
FYI, you can't even get a background check online without knowing a real name. Private investigator? Where in US or Canada? What state/province?
Maybe Wired.com will do an investigation as I suggested-
Thanks again for the "pop-top".
its your conspiracy theory
but I will spell it out for you
you have accused Parent of being the author of the revolt(you find the thread) he suggested something like that, didn't he, according to you (you find the thread) I said "if" as in response to your accusation--BASIS, who needs one inside a conspiracy theory....another attempt by you to twist words to fit your justifcation of this sick obsession you have. Insults and accusations are all you have Laurie, didn't Dr. Paul have to defend himself recently about a revolt at the convention? talk of a revolt at the convention didnt just make rounds on tv and the net. You have a problem letting things die...
Where did media learn about "revolt at RNC" - DP perhaps?
If so, have "we" helped or hurt RP?
"didn't Dr. Paul have to defend himself recently about a revolt at the convention? talk of a revolt at the convention didnt just make rounds on tv and the net."
Is that a "conspiracy theory"?
So, Dr. Paul had to defend himself *due to the actions of grass roots people*? Those involved with the delegate process?
Moonslippers, if *you* were a national delegate from a state that elected you as its representative with rules that required you to be bound to vote for McCain, would you honor your state rules and vote for McCain or would you defy your state rules and abstain or vote for RP?
NOTE: THIS IS ASSUMING THAT "UNBINDING" DOES NOT SUCCEED, SO BOUND DELEGATES ARE STILL BOUND.
I bet you dont read all the way through a post before you decide
to hit that reply button
It is just not logical that you mix words like you do...again let me spell it out for you
To answer your first question I don't know where media got the idea-but I bet you do
second-"we" hurting or helping RP is definetly questionable and if you would listen to any of your critics on the DP you would stop for the possibility that it HURTS him...
third-no Dr, Paul having to defend the accusations that his supporters would be staging some sort of revolt is not a conspiracy theory-I was referring to you and your theories
Fourth-no it was NOT because of the efforts of the grassroots-I don't pretend to know why he had to do so-but you do...
fifth-I asked you this question -your own question- on another thread and you have yet to answer. My answer to your question is really I DON'T KNOW. perhaps I would do as a judge does sometimes and recuse myself. It would be very hard to vote against my conscience especially when the man I support even says he will NEVER endorse McCain unless he changes his policies...it would be a slap in the face to do all the work of getting elected as a delegate then to have to vote against your nominee....but that is assuming you didn't fool everyone from the beginning pretending to be a mccain supporter only to upset the first round vote with abstaining...I would just not go through all that trouble to prove a point...and don't beleive it to be ethical...but it is a political game and not every side is playing fair....NOW YOU?
Nobody cares about anybody
Nobody cares about anybody else's information UNLESS THEY'RE ASKING FOR MONEY!!! (for the umpteenth time)
then
all the other comments posted in disagreement and suspect would have only references to asking for money ONLY. Yet they don't, So?
Dr. Steve Parent: Revolution Broadcasting Mgmt Review
As an ongoing review of Revolution Broadcasting management, my current feedback is below.
Website:
1. Displays two donation options, both expired without having met goals
2. Site has failed to highlight major broadcasts that have been widely posted/discussed on DailyPaul and RonPaulForums
3. Technical recommendations for redesign of site per normal business standards have been ignored
4. Proofreading recommendations of illiterate text at bottom of home page have been ignored
5. Site has no list of audio archives with links for access
6. Site is incompatible with some computers/operating systems, so the blog section is simply a large black rectangle
7. E-mail subscriptions of blog entries do not get sent to subscribers until the next day vs. real-time alerts by all other news organizations.
Revolution Broadcasting fails to indicate whether the content is original or simply a rebroadcast/piggybacking of the efforts of others to schedule interviews and conference calls without attribution to those.
Other than radio talk show broadcasting, has Revolution Broadcasting ever broadcast any content that was unique to its station?
Note: Streaming the audio of Ron Paul speeches live does not qualify as “unique”, particularly when YouTube videos are made available by others within a short amount of time.
When Revolution Broadcasting has “technical problems” with direct or broadcast conference calls, the blame is consistently placed on the other party.
Yet, public posts appear to indicate that the “technical problems” with the 5/15 Meet-Up conference call broadcast were caused by “looping” based on the combination of settings of the Meet-Up call and the settings by Revolution Broadcasting.
When Revolution Broadcasting piggybacks its broadcast, it has failed to independently verify the scheduled speakers.
Specifically, was any representative of the Granny Warriors scheduled/confirmed to appear on the May 15 broadcast? If not, why were they included on the schedule by the Meet-Up or by Revolution Broadcasting?
Per my contacts directly with the Granny Warriors, they knew nothing about being scheduled to speak on the conference call shortly before the conference call began.
Question: Where can RP supporters find reliable information from a credible source?
Laurie
I am sure SPG would be the first to say it is not a perfect yet at all, and has indicated before already that they are working on an archiving of the podcasts. This obviously takes time to organize all the broadcasters etc. But you have to admit they have made some progress and it is fulfilling some positive purpose with some good ideas.
Rather than treating SPG as your arch nemesis, why not be positive and see where you can give constructive criticism with praise as well, you know some confidence and praise goes a long way, also in motivating people. Eventually they could get the same sort of company that constructed the website for Dr. Paul's, Barr and Lawson's compaigns to construct a really top notch website with lots of interesting features and also work towards satellite broadcasting. Through the internet already it works well and I can listen to it from another continent.
You have to admit it is a good idea - how amateurish it may seem to you - to broaden it to involve a wider political discussion and provide the Ron Paul candidates also with a vehicle of getting the message out as well as facilitating discussion around third parties and their candidates, like the interviews with LP candidates.
All in the RP movement have their differences with each other, but has liberty and support of Dr. Paul and what he stands for as common denominator and uniting force, where each one keep his/her identity and opinion.
This could be a good basis to continue and build on?
Here is an idea Laurie; Why
Here is an idea Laurie; Why don't you start your own broadcast network and then you will not have to attack our efforts.
So now the national ron paul meetup was in a conspiracy to hurt Linda?
I was asked personally by FRED from the ron paul meetup to carry the call for them and we agreed to do so.
I was also asked to be a guest speaker last night.
Laurie please find a hobby for your comments are really starting to bore us.
Great thinkers have always encountered opposition from mediocre minds." - Albert Einstein
"If we are to succeed we must not be afraid to fail, If we fail to try we will never succeed." - Steve Parent 1987.
Dr. Steve Parent