Revolutionbroadcasting the new home of the Ron Paul National Meetup Conference Call
Posted May 18th, 2008 by SGP
output
We are now the new home of the Ron Paul National Meetup Conference Call
We are pleased to announce that Steve Harris and Fred Smart founders of the National Conference call has made www.revolutionbroadcastin... the new home of the weekly National Ron Paul Conference Call
We will now host this meeting LIVE for the National Ron Paul Conference Call for these great freedom loving people on our radio network to bring this to everyone for your convenience.
If you prefer to listen via phone you are still free to do so; however, you can now listen via radio for Steve, Fred and revolution broadcasting have agreed to provide this live call to everyone that wishes to take part and hear the special guest speakers and the progress that takes part on this call on a weekly basis and make it easy for you to listen without the hastle of using a telephone or to help you avoid long distance charges on your phone bill. We have also added a live chat room for everyone to enjoy that is profanity free and a place to interact live with other Ron Paul supporters.
This call will take place EVERY Thursday from 9pm to 12pm eastern time.
Please send this information to your meetup groups and make them aware of how easy it is now to take part in this special weekly conference FREE of charge.
Dr. Steve Parent
Bookmark/Search this post with:
"Dr. Steve Parent" and education
In reply to "Please put yourself in Dr. Steve's shoes He is making great steps at educating us. Is that a bad thing?"-
Here are the things I object to:
1. I am perfectly capable of educating myself, thank you very much.
2. Any college debate team could have researched and debated "delegate processes" in 15 hours or so.
3. Many people with *known* credentials have posted about *errors* in what "Dr. Steve Parent" has posted about delegates.
4. Now, "Dr. Steve Parent" is SPAMMING his new *business* on many sites in total breach of the rules of those sites.
5. "Dr. Steve Parent" has totally scattered himself:
- Expert on delegates
- Expert on Robert's Rules of Order
- His own "international marketing company"
- His M.D.
- His Ph.D.
- His new "station"
- His new project to interview *Presidential candidates*, when not a single, large "event" broadcast has not had serious problems (hence no MP3s of those broadcasts).
6. "Dr. Steve Parent" doesn't even live in the United States!
7. "Dr. Steve Parent" has publicly demonstrated many unethical actions.
8. Not a single person has ever admitted to having physically met "Dr. Steve Parent". People are now ridiculing him for that fact alone.
Given the MySpace article posted earlier today on DP about requiring real names, "Dr. Steve Parent" doesn't exist!
Those actions are *past*.
Now, let's talk about the present and the near future.
If "Dr. Steve Parent" has been educating for the delegate process, does that education or does it not include the stealth tactics (publicly posted) and "coup" plans (publicly posted) for the RNC?
Does "Dr. Steve Parent" bear any responsibility for the fact that state-level GOP have organized *specifically against RP delegates*?
Given his much-publicized "6 years administrator with the Dem party", is "Dr. Steve Parent" doing more harm to the RP movement (and to the GOP) than anyone in the Dem party could do?
Will a GOP party *or* an RP movement even exist after the RNC? Are we being "punk'd"?
Put yourself in my shoes - are those results a *good thing*?
Obviously, I don't believe so, because I'm still fighting.
Or should I just "walk away"? Is that what the RP movement is about?
That if a bunch of people disagree with me, I should just stop?
Is that what RP has done in Congress?
If you won't listen to my concerns, with evidence to support them, why do think you can convince people of the value of RP's beliefs?
Again, I am writing for the *lurkers* who don't even risk posting a first time or any longer-
ok
well some of us unselfeducated poeple need help thank you
So, what makes you any different...
Than those who get their "help" from Hillary, Obama, Huck, or Romney?
If you don't at least sample the validity of what you're being taught, how do you decide who has legitimate information to teach you?
And people posted the *links* to disprove some of the delegate "instruction".
Isn't the information/worldview being taught a major problem in the GRTF (government-run-taxpayer-funded) schools of today?
In your K-12 education, were you taught about the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, or the Bill of Rights in school? (I believe Colorado? even had to pass a state law *requiring* that instruction.)
Or did you get "geography", instead of history?
And the comments were wrong
And the comments were wrong too Laurie:
http://www.ronpaulforums....
I have debunked their nonsense many times
This explains it all in very simple terms.
Dr. Steve Parent
"Dr. Steve Parent" - THE THREAD YOU WERE BANNED FOR!
HAHAHA!
The link you gave is to the thread that got you banned, yet again!
The thread was moved to "The Vent" and requires login to see it.
Hmmm, let's see who has more credibility.
Imaginary "Dr. Steve Parent" or Bradley in DC:
Bradley/Biography:
Former legislative staffer for Dr. Paul, worked at Cato, Free Congress Foundation, Forbes for Prez
Location:
Capitol Hill, DC
Somehow, Bradley's *known credentials* make him a truly bad target from an "avatar".
I'll be sure to let RPFs management know about this post.
Wow.
I don't think that any other canadate had the message to bring me to his or her website.
BS
BS BS BS BS I Call BS on Steve Parent the Manson Victim~!
Nice work!
Nice work!
We are trying Dr. Steve
We are trying
Dr. Steve Parent
"Dr. Steve Parent": Weekly technical problems, now?
Prior to the next Meet-Up call broadcast attempt, will there be any testing of the broadcast process to avoid the many "technical" issues that occurred for both broadcasts that were supposed to have included Ron Paul (e.g., 4/24 total failure and 5/15 partial failure)?
Real-time posts for the recent conference call "broadcast" clearly indicate the technical problems and likely cause(s):
http://www.ronpaulforums....
http://www.ronpaulforums....
What does the business world expect of a scheduled conference call?
1. A meeting agenda with expected start times for each topic (people submit desired agenda items and questions in advance)
2. A limited meeting length
3. Action items agreed upon in the meeting
4. Transcription of meeting notes with issues and action items made available to attendees, as well as to those who were unable to attend
Will any of those expectations be met for the weekly conference calls?
Certainly, the 3 hour timeframe fails to do so.
Are people really expected to sit by their speaker phones or their computers for 3 hours straight with no knowledge of when the segment they are interested in will be on?
Or will these 3 hour broadcasts basically be "open mike nights" that are simply talk radio?
- Will MP3/audios be made available? If so, from what URL?
- Will a text transcription be made available, with appropriate source links, so that people can skim to sections of interest and forward on information to activists with other mailing lists? If so, from what URL?
Laurie/Sally08 Most of
Laurie/Sally08
Most of these questions you should ask your meetup group not me.
The 5/15 technical issue that lasted all of 1 minute was not on the end of revolutionbroadcasting it was on the conference call end.
Would you like to transcribe the conference calls? Are you volunteering for the job?
Yes Laurie everything we do is a waste of time and we thank you for your input, as always it is appreciated.
Dr. Steve Parent
..lasted all of 1 minute
Dr Steve, you rule! You still didn't answer Laurie's questions or address her concerns, and I'm a little disappointed that you no longer quote yourself.
Can I please have your autograph? Or is that too personal? I wouldn't want you giving out anything personal...
Laurie does not have
Laurie does not have concerns and many are well aware of this.
I have answered her questions and most need to be taken up with her meetup group.
This is exactly why i refuse to answer her although i gladly respond to many others.
Dr. Steve Parent
Ummm ... you CONSTANTLY
Ummm ... you CONSTANTLY respond to her. You started a whole post about how you weren't going to respond, yet I log on today and see you've been doing exactly that. Make up your mind. Even I am finding this debate extremely tiresome at this point.
"Dr. Steve Parent" responds to me to "bump" the thread
He never even cares that threads may have many, many replies that ridicule him, particularly the OUR NEW PROJECT one from the home page of Daily Paul.
Do note that "Dr. Steve Parent" has been put on "time-out" (e.g., banned) on RPFs, yet again.
"Dr. Steve Parent" dedicated another thread that targeted "Bradley in DC" (the prior one went to more than 40 pages, last I looked).
Somehow, Bradley's *known credentials* make him a truly bad target from an "avatar":
Bradley/Biography:
Former legislative staffer for Dr. Paul, worked at Cato, Free Congress Foundation, Forbes for Prez
Location:
Capitol Hill, DC
Regardless .... I could care
Regardless .... I could care less. I think 99.9% of people here feel that way also. Knock yourselves out.
So change channels:)
Just as you have suggested to others?
Has anything new been added since the original advertisement?
Given the Active Forum Topics list, there's not much reason to visit DP anymore at all-
I don't know if anything new
I don't know if anything new has been added because I don't CARE!!!
Nice snark, btw ... you must be keeping track of my posts, too. The sad thing is, I'm actually on your side, for the most part, but your tactics are doing more harm to your position than good. You are actually no better than SGP at this point, with both of you endlessly posting and ranting and raving. I don't see what it is you're trying to accomplish anymore. Not that you care.
Thanks for monitoring my comments, though ... I will go ahead and take that advice. Like I said ... knock yourselves out.
Wasn't meant to be a "snark"
I did have a smiley face after it (in the subject line)-
And I do realize that you mostly agree with the actual *facts/concerns/evidence* I present.
Irony - Do you realize how much *control* that "Dr. Steve Parent" and his "fan club" members have given me?
Don't (many) of their posts clearly indicate that they are not much different than those who are addicted to MSM soap operas?
Given their illiteracy, they wouldn't do very well on "5th Grader", either (e.g., "your" vs. "you're" in the first "bump").
That's the level that DP has devolved to - doesn't say much for the "long-term", does it?
How about changing websites:)
.
"Dr. Steve Parent" already has his own website
Shouldn't "Dr. Steve Parent" be building *that* site's readership vs. DP and RPFs (or destroying DP/RPFs, as the case may be)?
With his own forum, "Dr. Steve Parent" could guarantee only posts of adoration-
Actually, I already have a domain name and skeleton for a site that would welcome all of the "off-topic" financial/economic/international posts of the many people who I learned to respect on DP.
Unfortunarly, most of them already seemed to have "moved on". You'll notice I quit posting *content*, as well.
"Dr. Steve Parent" also dared me to create an "anti" site. I have a model from one that was very effective several years ago - it wouldn't even take long to modify that with copies of many ridiculous posts by "Dr. Steve Parent" and his followers.
"Dr. Steve Parent": Public posts prove you wrong, yet again
http://www.ronpaulforums....
starting post 43
======
Post #43 05-15-2008, 06:58 PM
ON THE CALL!!! WooHoo!!
======
Post #45 05-15-2008, 07:08 PM
happening now!
Ron paul about to come on!
Sincerely,
Ray Powell
NOTE: RP DID NOT COME ON FOR 20 MORE MINUTES.
======
Post #56 05-15-2008, 07:47 PM
So... it was Dr. Steve's streaming that caused us not to hear Ron Paul's first 5 minutes tonight ??
The call moderator said it was simucasting that caused the looping and interference.
======
Post #60 05-15-2008, 07:56 PM
We were handling the tech end here. It wasn't anything we did. She was just looking for a reasonable excuse to give to Dr. Paul. That's ok. We're not offended.
Sincerely,
Ray Powell
====================
http://www.ronpaulforums....
Post #7 05-15-2008, 07:16 PM
They are expecting Ron Paul any minute..
======
Post #9 05-15-2008, 07:20 PM
175 listeners, still room to get on the call, everyone is on mute, sound quality is very clear
NOTE: Only 175 listeners 20 minutes into the call with call-in lines still available?
======
Post #12 05-15-2008, 07:29 PM
Dr. Paul is now on the call, update on call quality , some idiot has speakerphone on, it's barely audible
======
Post #17 05-15-2008, 07:31 PM
quality is terrible since paul got on
===============
Post #20 05-15-2008, 07:34 PM
Sounds fine now.
NOTE: Sound problems from beginning of RP at 7:29 until 7:34
======
Post #31 05-15-2008, 07:39 PM
Oh man, so short....
NOTE: Of RP's speech of approximately 10 minutes, more than 5 minutes had sound problems *per real-time posts*.
That is a 50% failure rate, *not* "1 minute".
"Dr. Steve Parent", I ask you again:
Are there any intentions of *practicing* such a conference call to broadcast or will it be "trial-and-error" each week?
Laurie
Please put yourself in Dr. Steve's shoes He is making great steps at educating us. Is that a bad thing?
As i stated before the
As i stated before the problem was not on our end and we do not have control of the call itself.
The main reason they want us to host the calls now is to avoid these types of problems.
We are trying to help and all you seem to do is complain.
Set up your own network and show us how to do it and we never have to address each other again. Sounds simple to me.
Dr. Steve Parent
That just goes to show you
That just goes to show you know nothing Laurie.
http://www.ronpaulforums....
Originally Posted by TheAmistad
They can't hear me right?...
Because I'm talking to a person here and I hope the moderator has muted my call.
dude quit talking I cant hear Paul!
It was someone on a speaker phone that was on the actual conference call that caused the problem.
Streaming the feed has nothing to do with the breakup on the conference call itself for we had a direct feed of the call.
Why do you think they want to start running the conference call on the radio network? This is to help from having this problem ever again in the future.
Steve the conference call founder can make this clear if you have your meetup head contact him to confirm this.
Dr. Steve Parent
"Dr. Steve Parent" - so 1 minute or 5 minutes?
But you said, "lasted all of 1 minute". Which is it, 1 or 5?
And I ask you YET AGAIN, will you or will you not do one or more "practice" calls?
Or will you simply continue to use "trial-and-error" to learn how to be a "broadcast station"?
Just how will they run the conference call directly from the station, when they're out of state?
A failure is a failure regardless of where you point the finger later-
Isn't that what RP believes in relation to monetary policy and Iraq?
"Dr. Steve Parent", did those 175 who *called in* actually hear RP's full talk, while those who used your station's access didn't?
If so, what would be the "rational thing" to do for future calls?
If only 175 called in, is there even an audience for 3 hours every Thursday *without RP*?
Or is this just another "marketing ploy" to get listeners?
Per many other posts in those threads, it certainly appeared that the "national call" was totally amateur when compared with the listeners' experiences with their *state* calls.
You also failed to answer whether there is any archive of the call.
If not, WHY NOT?
Thanks, Dr Steve
for this advertisement.
"The internet ghost quotes himself" -me 2008
Thanks
for your effort
You aren't Barry Goldwater
You aren't Barry Goldwater Jr. are you?
I know this may be a stupid question but i have to ask.
Dr. Steve Parent
Just an old time Republican
Screen name, more often mistaken for Marlon Brando in his Pre-fat days
Confenence call
Thanks Dr. Parent
Your welcome Dr. Steve
Your welcome
Dr. Steve Parent
Please "Dr"...
It's "You're welcome". That's a contraction for "You are". "Your" is possessive for something that belongs to you.
Thank you for using good grammar on DP!