
Bob Barr's VP claims: "Ron Paul sounds Appologetic to the Terrrists. Blame America 1st Crowd"
Submitted by NotOverYet on Fri, 06/06/2008 - 06:17
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/50904
Barr/Root 2008 ?????????????















I'll volunteer my time to
I'll volunteer my time to campaign against Bob Barr if he keeps up that rhetoric.
Ron Paul is driving the freedom train and it sounds to me as if maybe Bob Barr isn't on it!
John
did you read well? He is wiring about Wayne Allyn Root, NOT Bob Barr. There is a difference. Personally I it seems that Barr is now very much on the same basis as Dr. Paul, and he makes a sincere and intelligent impression. But I have never trusted Root and think he is still something of an interventionist and he does not have any phiolosophical-political basis, unlike Dr. Paul and Barr. W.A.R. clearly do not understand many issues. I wish Dr. Karen Kwiatkowski stood as VP candidate: she would have been the ideal VP candidate to Bob Barr.
Nonetheless, Root is the
Nonetheless, Root is the choice that was made by the Party of (no) Principle.
He is costing Barr support, and he should. He's revolting.
The comebacks to Root that I'm hearing from Barr supporters sound just like the combacks to the Patriot Act issue: excuses, excuses, excuses.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
This is Dr. Ron Paul's Year!
It would be a much better idea to continue to support Dr. Paul as a write in than to continue this trivial argument over third parties.
We should organize the biggest write in campaign in our countries history. If Dr. Paul receives more votes than Barr, Baldwin, and Nader combined, it would make all of our work that much more valuable.
If you choose to support other candidates then you should focus on their message and organize a new campaign under their banner. Most of the people on this site are ardent Dr. Paul supporters. It would be much better time spent if supporters of other candidates spend all their time on Obama and McCain threads than trying to move Dr. Paul's supporters towards their candidate.
I want to see over a million Write-Ins for Dr. Ron Paul!!! Let's make it happen!!!
Kick The NeoCons Out
Kick the NeoCons out of the Republican party and then they can return home to the communist party where they belong.
Nice thought, but
Since Dr. Paul will not be filing the papers to be a write in candidate, even if he got a million write ins, they would not be counted, and therefore not reported. So, it would just be a pointless exercise in self indulgence.
--------
Dr. Paul says Barr is an ally (http://www.newsweek.com/id/139448/page/1)
and would do "a very good job" as president (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5YaqKf-yTg). Barr's GLOWING support and admiration of Paul: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKt
But voting for Barr wouldn't be???
I rather vote for the candidate that I supported with time and money than someone who doesn't even get me the least bit excited.
Dr. Paul's integrity is second to none. The pragmatism in the LP killed the party. If you saw the convention you should know exactly what I mean. I would say at least half of the party left with severe discontent. Ruwart, Kubby, Phillies, and a few others were a much better option. They might have not gotten as much recognition but if that's what your after in a Barr/Root ticket good luck buddy.
I for one will never vote for someone who doesn't MOTIVATE me enough to make me get off my ass and do something about our problems! Sorry Barr/Root fans, he just doesn't turn me on to the freedom message like our good Dr. Paul.
WRITE-IN DR. PAUL!!!!!
I agree that he's not as motivational as Dr. Paul
but without him in the national televised debates, there will be no libertarian/conservative message at all being delivered to the American people. Someone who has that general message needs to reach 15% polling to get in the debates. Barr is the best bet for that since he's already around 6%. You can do both: When pollsters call you, and ask if you support McCain, Obama, or Barr, say Barr, maybe donate a few bucks to Barr; then, at at election time write-in Paul.
--------
Barr's GLOWING support and admiration of Paul: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKt Dr. Paul says Barr is an ally (http://www.newsweek.com/id/139448/page/1)
and would do "a very good job" as president (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5YaqKf-yTg).
I agree
Dr. Paul, in some of the debates, did sound like he was blaming America and apologizing for the terrorists. To say that we were attacked on 9/11 "because" we were intervening in the Middle East, does sound like America is being blamed. It seems to relieve the terrorists of moral culpability, as if they were justified in attacking innocent civilians. Things could have been worded better to preempt some misunderstanding. I know that's not he was saying, but that's what it "sounded" like to most people watching the debates.
I think it's OK to admit this. It may "sound" like I'm bashing Paul, but if you pay close attention you'll realize I'm not. Dr. Paul is not always the best communicator, as he himself admits. Also there was limited time to speak in the debates.
--------
Dr. Paul says Barr is an ally (http://www.newsweek.com/id/139448/page/1)
and would do "a very good job" as president (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5YaqKf-yTg).
Watch for Barr on the Glenn Beck Program Jun 6.
you don't know
what you are talking about. He doesn't blame Americans he blames policy for causing blowback. He doesn't say that what those thugs did wasn't criminal, he is just trying to explain to people why things like that happen.
Exactly.
That's my point. And see how things can "sound" like something other than one is trying to say? You mistook what I was trying to say for something else.
--------
Dr. Paul says Barr is an ally (http://www.newsweek.com/id/139448/page/1)
and would do "a very good job" as president (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5YaqKf-yTg).
Watch for Barr the Glenn Beck Program Jun 6.
Kind of like how you can twist Ron Paul's effort to be polite
when asked about Barr into a full-blown endorsement.
" Libertarians are leery" " I dont plan to get involved"- Ron Paul on Bob Barr
False
Paul has not endorsed Barr, and I've never claimed he has.
Paul has said he would like us to choose for ourselves who to support in the general election. Also, as he has said, both Barr and Baldwin are his friends, so it's difficult for him to make an endorsement for one over the other for that reason as well.
--------
Dr. Paul says Barr is an ally (http://www.newsweek.com/id/139448/page/1)
and would do "a very good job" as president (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5YaqKf-yTg).
Watch for Barr the Glenn Beck Program Jun 6.
so why do you keep trying to attach Ron Pauls name to him?
By definition you are trolling the DP. You acknowledge that RP dosnt endorse him- just because he's maybe less a threat to the Constitution than McCain dosnt make it any less trolling.
"Libertarians are leery" " I dont plan to get involved"- Ron Paul on Bob Barr
Just curious
What presidential candidate will you be supporting in the general election, when Paul is out of the race?
--------
Dr. Paul says Barr is an ally (http://www.newsweek.com/id/139448/page/1)
and would do "a very good job" as president (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5YaqKf-yTg).
Watch for Barr Glenn Beck Program Jun 6.
Because
He has the same general philosophy as Dr. Paul and will say generally the same thing in debates. And Dr. Paul has said that he could do a "very good job" as president. That's not an endorsement, but it as acknowledgement from Dr. Paul that Barr would be a "very good" president. That's pretty notable.
Barr supported Paul in his run, and spoke in support of him. (For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKt2s0LjUHY) They're allies, working for the same cause: Liberty.
--------
Dr. Paul says Barr is an ally (http://www.newsweek.com/id/139448/page/1)
and would do "a very good job" as president (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5YaqKf-yTg).
Watch for Barr the Glenn Beck Program Jun 6.
But you're still trolling the Daily Paul
Can you not admit that.
Find out if you have a local militia - http://www.uaff.us/
Real Patriots for 9/11 truth -- http://patriotsquestion911.com/
No, but you're trolling me.
--------
Dr. Paul says Barr is an ally (http://www.newsweek.com/id/139448/page/1)
and would do "a very good job" as president (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5YaqKf-yTg).
Watch for Barr the Glenn Beck Program Jun 6.
Yes, I am trolling you.
And gladly doing so. Fight fire with fire.
Bob 'CIA' Barr 'was' CIA.
Bob 'CIA' Barr fought in the war against drugs.
Bob 'CIA' Barr voted for the Patriot Act.
Bob 'CIA' Barr voted for the war in Iraq.
Bob 'CIA' Bar =
CIA CIA CIA CIA CIA CIA
CIA CIA CIA CIA CIA CIA
CIA CIA CIA CIA CIA CIA
CIA CIA CIA CIA CIA CIA
CIA CIA CIA CIA CIA CIA
"Doctor Paul sounds almost apologetic to our enemies. He sounds much like the blame America first crowd."
"Libertarian" Vice Presidential Candidate Wayne A. Root
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/021315.html
We will not let your dribble pass for truth. Ever.
Aku Soku Zan
Aku Soku Zan
Bob Barr's glowing support of Ron Paul
Watch here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKt2s0LjUHY
--------
Dr. Paul says Barr is an ally (http://www.newsweek.com/id/139448/page/1)
and would do "a very good job" as president (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5YaqKf-yTg).
Watch for Barr on Glenn Beck Program Jun 6.
all i can say is wow
You still don't get it do you! I couldn't disagree with you more. You equate Dr. Paul's explanation of what he believes to be the motivating factors that drive people to become suicide bombers as being sympathetic towards terrorists? or even more inaccurately you equate his explanation of factual events as blaming American's? Are you still having trouble distinguishing between your country and your fellow Americans with the now degenerated government that we instituted more than 225 years ago? He merely suggests that ten years of bombing Iraq just might have stirred up a little hatred of America in general by the nations of the middle east. The people of the middle east certainly do not distinguish between our government and its people and probably feel that we are in agreement with the government because we sit idle while it all happens.
Warmest Regards
Stephen Dupont
New Bedford, Massachusetts
No
I agree with you totally. That was my point.
My point was just that it "sounded," like he was "blaming American" and sympathizing with the terrorists, to most people watching the debates - due to unfortunate wording and limited time. I'm just saying it could have been communicated better to prevent that mistaken impression.
See how easily a person can "sound" like he's saying something other than he's saying, if you don't play close attention? Just like a lot of people misunderstood what Dr. Paul was saying, you have misunderstood what I was saying.
Even after re-explaining my point twice now, I would not be surprised if someone else comes in and thinks I'm saying something that I'm not.
--------
Dr. Paul says Barr is an ally (http://www.newsweek.com/id/139448/page/1)
and would do "a very good job" as president (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5YaqKf-yTg).
Watch for Barr on the Glenn Beck Program Jun 6.
Ignorance
If anybody can't understand the commonsense behind what Paul is saying about foreign policy, or believes it to be sounding like coddling terrorist, one, they aint fit to discuss foreign policy and two they sure aren't qualified to be VP.
Davy C Rockett
http://www.thelibertypost.com
http://screamfreedom.blogspot.com
http://liberty-central.blogspot.com
Davy C Rockett
http://www.thelibertypost.com
http://screamfreedom.blogspot.com
http://cystic-fibrosis-symptom.com
Me thinks the Libertarian party deserves their own
R.I.P. wreath for choosing a neo-con for both President and VP.
.Libera me, let the truth break, what my fears make--Leslie Phillips
We do not need to get good laws to restrain bad people,
we need to get good people to restrain bad laws. --
--G.K. Chesterton
This idiot Root endorsed a
This idiot Root endorsed a McCain-Lieberman ticket in 2006. Back when he was a Republican.
He converted to what he calls "Libertarianism" in March 2007. And he still believes in interventionist killing of Muslims. And they have the nerve to run this man as a standard bearer!
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
Politicans
Politicans, with the most notable exception being Dr. Paul, are dirty and greedy. It's a dirty business and wow have I found that out here in NV. They will back any party, any platform, so long as they get the vote, the money, and the power. Root's no different.
IT'S DOABLE
Alpacas - IT'S DOABLE
Shameless no-Barr bump
Libera me, let the truth break, what my fears make--Leslie Phillips
We do not need to get good laws to restrain bad people,
we need to get good people to restrain bad laws. --
--G.K. Chesterton
"They hate us because we're
"They hate us because we're not Islamic.
They hate us because we're a Democracy."
"Islamic extremists hate us and will continue to try to kill Americans and our children until we defeat them. To Islamic extremists we aren't humans or Jews or Christians or Americans. To them, we're all infidels."
"On this topic Ron Paul is just plain wrong. They hate us and will continue to try to kill Americans and our children until we defeat them. "
"There will almost certainly be attempts at a nuclear attack on American soil...There will be more attempts to bomb planes and trains. It's coming. Our enemies are plotting and planning high-profile attacks at this very moment."
"Ron Paul is polling at 1% to 3% for only one reason: he is not seen as the leader best able to defend America by 97% to 99% of the American public. That's a fact. "
--"Libertarian" Vice Presidential Candidate Wayne A. Root
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
Ron Paul polls 1 to 3%?
Hmm. Funny. I could swear I saw he won 22% in Montana, 24% in Idaho....oh yeah, in pseudo-libertarian math, that equals 1 to 3%. Gotcha!
LOL.
- -
Get your own "Ron Paul for Treasury Secretary" bumper sticker at
http://www.cafepress.com/thirdparty08
So why is Root...
...polling less than 1%?
""Ron Paul is polling at 1% to 3% for only one reason: he is not seen as the leader best able to defend America by 97% to 99% of the American public. That's a fact."
I'm guessing the fact is...no one a) cares what this guy thinks or b) sees any difference between him and McCain.
- -
Get your own "Ron Paul for Treasury Secretary" bumper sticker at
http://www.cafepress.com/thirdparty08
gah the guy sounds like
Rudy Giulianni ...cause damn
Or Joe Lieberman (to whom
Or Joe Lieberman (to whom Root donated $1000).
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
...
________________________________________________________________
"let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our freedoms & wealth are in jeoprady"
Ron Paul
__________
Freedom. Watch this video
http://youtube.com/watch?v=mhmbzE1TR0s
Pls donate here Ron Paul can still win
http://www.dvds4delegates.com/
Bump SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS'
Bump
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
...
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klSek88t54w
----------------------------------------------------------
We can all say what needs to be done, but who here led by example today?
Find out if you have a local militia - http://www.uaff.us/
Real Patriots for 9/11 truth -- http://patriotsquestion911.com/