Kissinger returning?

"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."
- Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference in Evians, France, 1991

Don't waste time or money with frauds Obama, McCain, Nader or Barr. Support the Constitution - join the Campaign For Liberty! http://www.campaignforlib... A return to the Constitution is more important than voting for the evil of 4 lessers.

They should be heard. Their ideas should be discussed.

Then their ideas should be rejected on reason, not on bigotry.

We all have our roles.

Kissinger is the man who once said of Donald Rumsfeld: "He is the most ruthless man I know."

That's pretty telling.

Zionists are puppets for many secret societies and visa versa. They use numerology as a means of communication. Their members can be found in all religions to lead and confuse people. They worship baal, for which I do not deny their right, but not when they kill for their own greed, and they lead others to kill for them and serve their purpose. Their symbol is an obelisk. The Freedom Tower in New York will be in the form of an obelisk, establishing the city for their empire, in the Empire State, home for the New World Order, under the guise of the United Nations.
grant

also. But, actually, Kissinger never went any place as far as the power goes.

Why would Kissinger, a Zionist, make a deal with Islamists to buy their oil and they should sell their oil in dollars and then they would have most of our dollars and would buy our debt, effectively loaning for interest our dollars back to us. So he made this deal with his own worst enemies, what in order to control them? Obviously in order to control them, have power over them somehow, not sure how. So are the Radical Islamists the ones who are fighting against this system, this control???

He has always been on the periphery to show up and get involved with important issues that he has no reason to get involved with.

Bump

about Kissinger the creepier he gets. Peace

Communism is always used as a bad word by all sides in our country both Democrates and Republican, when the true enemy is Statism. Within the Communist movement there was a division, one side which wanted the State to own and control everything and the other side that didn't want a State at all. People working together collectively is not really a problem, but when a State owns everything or has the ability to tax everything including our income, that is the problem.
grant

fit into the equation? He and his little group are taking us communistic.

Asked if he favored military action against Iran if diplomacy failed, he says, “I’m not recommending it but, on the other hand, it is a grave step to tolerate a world of multiple nuclear weapons centers without restraint. I’m not recommending military action, but I’m recommending not excluding it.”
http://www.cfr.org/public...

Why is it that Nixon fell and this man remained?

Or more precisely, Control what is money and you control the world. Since in a truely free market, everything can serve as money.