Alex Jones Responds to Michael Reagan’s Death Threat Against Mark Dice
Posted June 15th, 2008 by oruval
output
Alex responds to Neo-Con talk show host Michael Reagan's call to have activist Mark Dice lined up and shot for sending out 9/11 truth material to U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Since I am an open 9/11 truth activist and think that parts of our government caused this to enstate a war on terrorism, put the patriot acts 1 & 2 in place as well as create the Department of home land security, does that mean I should be shot as well?
Bookmark/Search this post with:
Michael Reagan Condones Infanticide
http://www.youtube.com/wa...
Has Alex responded
yet to the so called apology on Reagan's show where he starts back peddling and either talks or plays music over Mark's comments? Are there still going to be charges brought against him, because it sounded on his show like he was leaving the country soon?
The 9/11 Commission was a Joke and anybody who looks into it...
will know. To do a real investigation would do much to alleviate the questions... but that would probably implicate those in our government who would rather not be discovered.
I must say I really enjoyed Mark's effort and I don't see why the police haven't arrested Michael Reagan for making a terroristic threat!
Mike
"Fire Team for Freedom" on revolutionbroadcasting.com
Mondays thru Thursdays Midnight EST
or visit www.mikeandjake.com
I use your quote ....
Since I am an open 9/11 truth activist and think that parts of our government caused this to enstate a war on terrorism, put the patriot acts 1 & 2 in place as well as create the Department of home land security, does that mean I should be shot as well?
Even AJ clearly states where he is speculating by using the word he "THINKS".
I thank him for being clear.
We all have our roles.
Yes, so says Reagan's
Yes, so says Reagan's ADOPTED son, who is a fascist criminal and toady to the Bush Administration.
Here's a quote from Ronald Reagan's real son:
"My father crapped bigger ones than George Bush," says the former president's son, in a flame-throwing conversation about the war and the Bush administration's efforts to lay claim to the Reagan legacy.
Editor's note: As the Bush crowd worked shamelessly last week to wrap their man in the holy shroud of Ronald Reagan, the dead president's son, Ron Reagan, delivered an eloquent eulogy that discreetly signaled his conviction that Bush is no Reagan. "Dad was ... a deeply, unabashedly religious man. But he never made the fatal mistake of so many politicians wearing his faith on his sleeve to gain political advantage," said Reagan at the burial service for his father on Friday, and there was no mistaking the meaning of his words.
In an interview with Salon in April 2003, Ron Reagan was much less subtle in his assessment of the Bush presidency, denouncing it as "overly aggressive, overly secretive, and just plain corrupt." Reagan's scorn for the man who would be his father was withering: "My father was a man -- that's the difference between him and Bush."
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
Really is their a difference.
Think..... Thinks.... One is plural one is singular. Notice I didn't say "I know for sure", but then again I can't say I know for sure if will die tomorrow, however I do know I will die.
Rhino what is the point of you always trying to point out speculation? Enough credible data has been amassed that the official story is total bullshit to anyone with two brain cells to rub together who actually looks at the presented info.
If you weren't wasting time playing with riddles and using some of that brain power to figure out things maybe you could realize that we are past speculation in regards to 9/11 being any thing less than an inside job.
There is an enormous difference between
thinking or knowing the official story is not accurate and thinking or knowing what actually happened.
We all have our roles.
Yeah that is
a problem mindless sheep like you have.
Sometimes I reply to simply prevent an edit.
This is one of those times.
We all have our roles.
Well what do you know.
Rhino actively trying to start shit. Hey reply to this as well.
Tell that to these credible people.
130+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials
480+ Engineers and Architects
110+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals
260+ Professors
210+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members
140+ Artists, Entertainers, and Media Professionals
http://patriotsquestion91...
I quote from this link ...
"Many well known and respected senior U.S. military officers, intelligence services and law enforcement veterans, and government officials have expressed significant criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report or have made public statements that contradict the Report. Several even allege government complicity in the terrible acts of 9/11. This website is a collection of their statements. It is not an organization and it should be made clear that none of these individuals are affiliated with this website.
Listed below are statements by more than 130 of these senior officials. Their collective voices give credibility to the claim that the 9/11 Commission Report is tragically flawed. These individuals cannot be simply dismissed as irresponsible believers in some 9/11 conspiracy theory. Their sincere concern, backed by their decades of service to their country, demonstrate that criticism of the Report is not irresponsible, illogical, nor disloyal, per se. In fact, it can be just the opposite."
The only common thread that I saw was that they all believed the official story is not accurate.
Are you saying that some of them are just not smart enough yet, that they are still semi trolls. Not sure how this bolsters your arguement.
We all have our roles.
When I hear mutiple enginneers
on that site as well as people who worked at the WTC and said a much larger
707 could have had multiple impacts and wouldn't bring down those buildings only thing that comes to mind is DEMOLITION. Only one who could have pulled off demolition is parts OF OUR GONERNMENT.
SInce we are posting bios here is the Man who said that.
Frank A. DeMartini – WTC victim. Architect and WTC Construction Manager, North Tower, 88th floor. Demartini first worked at the World Trade Center when Leslie E. Robertson Associates hired him to assess damage from the terrorist truck bombing in 1993.
* Video interview 1/25/01: "The [Twin Tower] building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door. This intense grid and the jet-plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting." http://video.google.com
* Editor's note: The Boeing 767-200s that impacted the Twin Towers on 9/11 were only slightly larger than 707s and DC 8s, the types of jetliners whose impacts the World Trade Center's designers anticipated. The maximum takeoff weight of the 707 is 15% less than the 767.
* Bio: http://www.legacy.com
Now excuse me while I give you some time to pull your head out of your ass.
Since, I guess you are conceding my point above ....
I will move to the new points you bring up.
What does he say happened? Can you quote for me what he says he thinks happened?
Are your links acurate?
We all have our roles.
I did not conced your point above
Riddle boy. I addressed it with the mans testimony. Look at what he said. It doesn't take rocket science to understand that moron.
But you listed all those people of which only ...
"several" may agree with you.
Now you name one. Do they all agree with you or not?
From where I stand, a vast majority agree with me, not you.
What does Frank DeMartini actually say about the 9/11 event?
We all have our roles.
Hey Blind Man.
It's not about me. They are all agreeing on the fact of 9/11's official story being improbable a fallacy, fantasy, created to start an eternal war on terror.
Which means it wasn't terrorist.
I am agreeing with them in that instance. YOU ARE A DISINFO AGENT or else you would have given up long ago.
Look at the testimony if you want to know what he thinks, Riddle Boy.
No they are not, have you not read them all.
They are all agreeing that they think the official report is inaccurate. Period. That is all they agree on. Nothing else. I should be using this link as a source for my arguement.
LOL
We all have our roles.
In accurate to the point
That it's improbable that nothing less than demolition had to be used to bring down the buildings. Because that is the only thing that would.
YOU ARE A FUCKING IDIOT, no I take that back. You are arguing this point way to much with me to only try and discredit these people.
You are willfully stupid to the facts and it is OBVIOUS. Now the reasoning behind this is what I want to know.
I have read at least 25 of the testimonies from the engineers.
The only common thread. The only thing they agree with is that the official explaination can not be accurate.
That is it.
Unless you cherry pick, there are no other assumptions that can be made.
A lot of them mention controlled domolition.
None that I read refer to a conspiracy pertaining to 9/11. Some refer to a possible conspiracy pertaining to a cover up regarding the official explaination.
For the life of me, I can not see how you can not see this.
We all have our roles.
If the official story is in no way accurate.
Then you tell me Rhino... HOW???HOW???? Did three Steel Framed Hirise buildings crumble into their footprint at freefall speed all in the same day and all being the first time in history such an occurance has happened without the use of Demolition.
Sorry for calling you an idiot but if you can't see the obvious distortion in reality here you are helpless for I cannot help you.
I have no idea!!!
That is what I have been trying to tell you.
I am not putting forth a theory. You are.
Apology accepted.
We all have our roles.
You are using evidence about an event ...
from a primary source (Frank) that died in the event and therefore has never commented on the event.
LOLOLOL
We all have our roles.
He is but one man.
You comments scream my name is rhino, I am an idiot. His comments alone predate the event so guess what his testimony is impartial which means it is admissible if it were ever to be used in a court of law. That means that their is no conflict of interest riddle boy.
I will let that speak for itself.
You know what "they" say people resort to when they are losing an arguement?
We all have our roles.
I am tired of holding your hand
And walking your feeble little mind through this. It's like a parent being frustrated with a child after showing them how to do a task multiple times.
This is simple you have no further credible argument.
I will let others decide that.
We all have our roles.
That is your problem.
You can't decide for yourself. Hey guess what. You have been suckered by the MSM into believing that buildings can magically fall like that because of plane impacts without demolition.
No I just have a hard time ...
telling people how to think.
We all have our roles.
Alex is showing sheep
like me how to stand up to bullies. Peace
Insider death threat
It's about time these people are held accountable.
I love how all the people
Who think that 9/11 acitvists hurt Ron Pauls campaign are not commenting on this topic.
Its like the trolls and disinfo agents here are avoiding this like the Plague. Just as how the MSM is avoiding it.
That tickles me a bit.
look at any thread
It's certainly not the only topic that the Daily Paul disinfo troll(s) avoid.
For example, look at any thread that deals with the War Party's/Israeli lobby's proposed attack on Iran. You certainly won't find that stupid disinfo troll commenting there, because I am sure that "it" wants an attack on the scary brown people who don't have WMD.
SUPPORT H.R. 1958, IMPEACHING GEORGE W. BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, OF HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS
Yep Just commented on your
Thread.
Boy this is a sore spot it seems for the Neo-Con establishment.
I say we milk it for everything it's worth.. wouldn't you agree JKap?
Maybe they
Maybe they are being tolerant? Ever think of that?
or.
maybe not because they know that this is wrong... It is peculiar none the less.
Alex Jones is very often alarmistic
and I often feel uneasy about terming something "nazi-like". But he is absolutely right here. The Nazis very often used their press organs to mark someone for the killing. You definetly shouldn't let this guy get away with it. Next time Fox will announce at the Breakfast show who is the to be lynched.
BTW: I, like many foreigners, found Ron Paul via Alex Jones. You have to give him credit for this.
Dr. Paul cured my apathy
With what he is exposing
He can't be anything but an alarmnist. Yet, sadly enough the masses still hit the snooze button. Many, many people found Ron Paul through his site.
Some hit snooze
And others, hit the deny button. As someone so well explained it, people revert back to what they can handle. We are on overdose in the US right now and some are spitting it back out because they cannot handle all that is going on. It is just so huge.
That's why they hide the truth in front of your face.
Most peoples psyche fracture under such an abrubt paradigm change.
That is why peoples first reaction is to deny deny deny.
Truth is 9/11 was an inside job.
good observation...
for that is exactly what happens....its like that truth is wayyyy to painful. to even accept, let alone discuss.
Colognepaulist
I agree.. bit on the radical side.
But in this we are united.
Yea, Pure Evil.. dugg
http://digg.com/people/Al...
31
Dugg
19 diggs
needs to keep going.
I wonder if this guy
Reagan has a history of doing or saying crazy things. I remember it seemed like the Reagans kids were said to be causing a lot of grief for their parents way back then. If it is illegal and they have a tape and many people heard the threat, what are they waiting for? Why don't they just go arrest this guy. They sure leap on the average guy for a whole lot less than this.
My thoughts exactly
If say I were to openly call for the shooting of Cheney and Bush on a live radiostation and said I would pay for the bullets you know how quick the FBI would be kicking my door down. Yeah this whole situtation stinks.
That's right
good point
I too...
found Dr. Paul through Alex Jones as did many of my friends. I respect all of his effort to help promote Ron Paul.
a jones...
you know, i say to hell with alex jones.
i go to his site each morning to scan the featured headlines.
do you know he put NOTHING about ron's change of plans or the campaign for liberty - NOTHING!
what a jerk!