HAVING PROBLEMS VIEWING THE SITE? GET FIREFOX! | A NOTE ON ADVERTISING

   

I disagree with the Pope and other church leaders; there is no such thing as a just war!

One common reply to the question, “What ought to be the Christian’s attitude to Christ’s command of non-resistance to evil by force?” consists in declaring that they do not deny the command of non-resistance to evil, but recognize it; but they only do not ascribe to this command the special exclusive value attached to it by sectarians. To regard this command as the indispensable condition of Christian life, as Garrison, Ballou, Dymond, the Quakers, the Mennonites, and the Shakers do now, and as the Moravian brothers, the Waldenses, the Albigenses, the Bogomilites, and the Paulicians did in the past, is a one-sided heresy. This command has neither more nor less value than all the other commands, and the man who through weakness transgresses any command whatever, the command of non-resistance included, does not cease to be a Christian if he hold the true faith.
This is a very skillful device, and many people who wish to be deceived are easily deceived by it. The device consists in reducing a direct conscious denial of a command to a casual breach of it. But one need only compare the attitude of the teachers of the Church to this and to other commands that they really do recognize, to be convinced that their attitude to this is completely different from their attitude to other duties. The command against fornication they do really recognize, and consequently they do not admit that in any case fornication can cease to be wrong. The Church preachers never point out cases in which the command against fornication can be broken, and always teach that we must avoid seductions that lead to temptation to fornication. But not so with the command of non-resistance. All church preachers recognize cases in which that command can be broken, and teach the people accordingly. And they not only do not teach that we should avoid temptations to break it, chief of which is the military oath, but they themselves administer it. The preachers of the Church never in any other case advocate the breaking of any other commandment. But in connection with the commandment of non-resistance they openly teach that we must not understand it too literally, but that there are conditions and circumstances in which we must do the direct opposite, that is, go to war, fight, punish. Consequently, occasions for fulfilling the commandment of non-resistance to evil by force are taught for the most part as occasions for not fulfilling it. The fulfillment of this command, they say, is very difficult and pertains only to perfection. And how can it not be difficult, when the breach of it is not only not forbidden, but law courts, prisons, cannons, guns, armies, and wars are under the immediate sanction of the Church?
Leo Tolstoy
"The Kingdom of God is Within You"

output

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Again it is a title of a book. Has nothing to do with Gnostism.

Read the book, you shall see.
http://www.kingdomnow.org...

However, if you follow Christ, and recieve the Holy Spirit you could say the Kingdom of God Within You.
grant

if the kingdom is within you

if the kingdom is within you and not in the heavens well sorry to tell you buddy but thats antichrist.

MY YOUTUBE http://www.youtube.com/us...

MY WEB SITE http://www.InfoSpill.com

Of course you do, until a gun is pointed in your face.

___________

Lisa C.

“Elections are short term efforts; revolutions are long term projects.”

--Ron Paul

Join the rEVOLution here: http://www.campaignforlib...

Read it first. only 170 pages, not like War and Peace.

I assume you have not read the book "The Kingdom of God is Within You", since if you had you would know it has nothing to do with the Gnostic belief replacing oneself with Christ, on the contrary, it removes the necessity for having the Church mediate between Christ and oneself. You can't judge a book by it's cover, nor it's title, you should read it first. The beginning is a little difficult as Leo Tolstoy outlines doctrines of other groups who hold the non-violent belief, but later the book gives his teachings and enlightenment on the subject. No where does he promote himself in the place of Christ or that we should.
http://www.kingdomnow.org...

Extremely tactical War is justified for liberty!

Freedom from slavery or usury is worth fighting for!
Is anyone with me? My God does not want me to be a slave.
If your god wants you to be a slave you'd better find a new one.
Our own American Revolution is a good example of a justified war.
If we can accomplish the constitution mattering again by being peaceful then I am all in;However if they continue to shut us out and ignore (We The People) and our constitution then we will have no choice but to move swiftly and take off the head of the globalist serpent that plagues our once great country.Do any of you have the balls or shall we just wave signs at the Schmucks that are destroying what so many have died to protect?
I hope something gives soon .When will it be too late to do? Is it already too late? How long before foreigners own our entire country?What will it take to stop the demise of our god given rights to be free?Who shall be the soldiers can any of you fight for real? Our Founders would be ashamed of us for what we put up with.The second amendment is what protects all of the others yet it is being eroded everyday and groups like the NRA who used to fight for all gunowners are just fighting for Hunters now? They completely ignored without mention our hero who has no equal in supporting our 2nd amendment rights.We are in much worse shape as a free republic than many can accept.I don't know what the future holds but it is not looking good for freedom and the late great usa.God bless all of you for your efforts in this fight.We must become the the leaders we all are looking for or no-one else will.When people like Dick Cheney and George bush ignore the oath's they took to our constitution and our people then revolution shoul've been happening the next day.They don't give a crap because they know nobody will do a G-DDAAAMMMMNNN thing and they are right.What cowards our country has become it is a crying shame!!!!
I shall go cry now for the loss of our country's warrior spirit.Please someone respond with a hopeful message I am bummed!!!!

Religion has waged war

Religion has waged war against all who claim to be atheist.

Its safe to say atheist forgive them!

AND THIS IS FOR iehuvihs that says the kingdom is within you:

if that was the truth then that person would be called antichrist.

antichrist

The Antichrist or anti-Christ means a person, office, or group recognized as fulfilling the Biblical prophecies about one who will oppose Christ and substitute himself in Christ's place.
'Antichrist' is translated from the combination of two ancient Greek words. In Greek, means “anointed one” and refers to Jesus Christ. Anti christ means not only anti in the sense of “against” and “opposite of”, but also “in place of". Therefore, an antichrist opposes Christ by substituting himself for Christ.

NO WAY AROUND IT

MY YOUTUBE http://www.youtube.com/us...

MY WEB SITE http://www.InfoSpill.com

The Pope? "The Pope also

The Pope?

"The Pope also found time to bless the U.N. flag."

http://www.infiniteunknow...

"The Pope's comments are of little surprise, given the fact that he has previously called for a "new world order" to combat terrorism, environmental problems, as well as economic imbalances during his Christmas 2005 speech. Pope John Paul II also called for a new world order in a 2004 new years speech. "

http://www.oldthinkernews...

No thanks, Pope.

I'll just leave it at that...

of course he would want a

of course he would want a nwo. he probably thinks it will let him control the world even more

MY YOUTUBE http://www.youtube.com/us...

MY WEB SITE http://www.InfoSpill.com

Romans 13 1-4 speaks of

Romans 13 1-4 speaks of princes who have authority, some understand this to mean earthly princes, I don't believe this true, since all "men" are created equal under God.
Furthermore Romans
13 8 Owe no man any thing, but to love one another. For he that loveth his neighbour hath fulfilled the law.
13 9 For: Thou shalt not commit adultery: Thou shalt not kill: Thou shalt not steal: Thou shalt not bear false witness: Thou shalt not covet. And if there be any other commandment, it is comprised in this word: Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

But rather than go back and forth, you sound interested in the subject and if so I would suggest reading through "The Kingdom of God is Within You" it lays out a very good arguement supporting the doctrine of non-violence.
http://www.kingdomnow.org...

The Kingdom is Within You! You need only to search.

For this reason religion should be a personal relationship with no mediator required other than Christ.

Hey Doc

I re-read my comment and it sounded rather harsh...I apologize for any offense I called, not my intention.
If I believed what we call the enlightenment to have been the height of enlightened thinking, I would agree with you...but I don't. In fact, there are many reasons I believe John Locke was a dangerous thinker...for reasons I don't nearly have teh time to go into.
As far as reasoning from experience...I would have to think a little about exactly what I believe in regards to that. But what I intended to convey was that if Jefferson had grown up in the republic he helped found, his attitude toward the church would probably have been far different. But his experience of the Church and State being essentially one and the same oppressor of freedom colored his view of religion.
Thus, his experience trumped his reason which should have told him, it is the abuse by certain people in power within the religion, that is the problem.

Sorry about that...

It is Romans 13:1-4

Can you be more specific.

Roman 12? I fail to see where it allows nations to raise up the sword.

Don't usually call people out but...

docholloday...I'm tired of people who are looking for a scapegoat for their frustrations, blaming religion. It is not religion, religion can't kill anyone. IT is people who abuse them. Get your facts straight.
Also, since you seem to be an expert on 18th century thinking, you might inform your readers that this was the height of the enlightenment. The period where anything supernatural, or unexplainable by reason was discarded as foolish. Jefferson, Madison, and Adams, were all jaded by the close ties of the Church of England with the royalty of the nation. The philosophy of the time and their experience produced the quotes you have cited. But again, these were responses to the abuse of religion by people. Furthermore, it is a mistake to allow experience to supercede reason...which ironically, is what happened with Jefferson.
The founders left us a great document, but I for one would never want to live in a world devoid of the unexplainable, how boring would that be?

Please take the time to read

Please take the time to read this article and then we could discuss it further.

http://www.aynrand.org/si...

"Furthermore, it is a mistake to allow experience to supercede reason.."

I must admit to being a little confused by your statement above..... how can you divorce "reason" from "experience"? Do we not reason FROM our experience?

Also, if 18th century thinking was the height of the 'enlightenment', then by default you are saying that the founders who lived at that time were in fact, the most ENLIGHTENED, are you not?

How is what is happening today with the religions of the world any different from what the 'founders' experienced?

"Doc" Holladay
Nashville, TN

no kidding.... an

no kidding.... an idea/organization can't kill you, only corrupt individuals who abuse it/turn it into a weapon.

A man without religion is a

A man without religion is a man to live without.

MY YOUTUBE http://www.youtube.com/us...

MY WEB SITE http://www.InfoSpill.com

beware of your definitions...

the idea of just war precludes just about any war today, hence the pope is safe in supporting it. When battles could be fought in fields by people who had signed up to defend their country that was one thing. The war ceases to be just when innocent life is taken. WWII, largely thought by many Christians to be just, wasn't even close. And the actions of this country in Nagasaki and Hiroshima were so reprehensible...well, we deserve much in retribution.

But I would like to say to the original poster, the nation/city-state is given the authority to bear the sword in Romans 12. You see, there is a difference between person to person violence (forbidden by Christ), and army to army (not addressed in the gospels, but by St. Paul), at least theologically speaking. Now for me, I have never joined the service because I could not take another life in the name of my country or otherwise, unless it was totally necessary for self-defense, and I think we all agree that the wars of the last 7 years aren't even close to that!!!

The World is divided into

The World is divided into armed camps ready to commit genocide just because we can't agree on whose fairy tales to believe.
In the end, Religion will kill us all.
-- Ed Krebs

"During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What has been its fruits? More or less, in all places, pride and indolence in the clergy; ignorance and servility in the laity; in both, superstition, bigotry, and persecution."
--James Madison, American president and political theorist (1751-1836)

" I do not find in our particular superstition of Christianity one redeeming feature.....Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burned, tortured, fined and imprisoned.
What has been the effect of this coercion?
To make half the world fools and half hypocrites; to support roguery and error all over the world. "
- Thomas Jefferson

It's downright amazing to see how many people have a direct line to God, yet all receive different messages. - Anon.

"It is a truism that almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so."
-- Robert A. Heinlein

"The clergy converted the simple teachings of Jesus into an engine for enslaving mankind and adulterated by artificial constructions into a contrivance to filch wealth and power to themselves...these clergy, in fact, constitute the real Anti-Christ."
- Thomas Jefferson

"Nothing is more dreaded than the national government meddling with religion."
- John Adams

"I don't know that Atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God."
- President George H.W. Bush

"This would be the best of all possible worlds if there were no religion in it."
-- Adams in The Jefferson-Adams letters

"In every country and every age, the priest has been hostile to Liberty."
--Thomas Jefferson

http://www.myspace.com/do...
"Doc" Holladay
Nashville, TN

Beware of Reunification of the Catholic and Church of England.

Just War Doctrine, was first enunciated by St. Augustine of Hippo (354-430 AD). How many wars were lead under this doctrine?
Although the Just War Doctrine does outline certain rules of engagement. It is still open to interpretation.
It is great that the Pope recognizes that all the war atrocities committed by the Church were wrong, but by continuing to support the concept of Just War nothing will prevent the Church from making the same mistake again. Not every one in the Catholic Church agrees with the Pope on this issue, not to mention the Church of England, otherwise known as "The Protesting Catholics" many who disagree with the prerequisite interpretation of Just War. The danger lies in the future if the Church is controlled again by the wrong men.
grant

SIERRAHPBT do you think that

SIERRAHPBT do you think that people from the middle east are anti christ or asian people etc if so then you have created more anti christ / EVIL

if you do not well then you go against the words of your own LORD.

god himself said, to only worship him and no other false idol

I just never understood the 2 way street religion holds in its belly

religion would be great if it did not teach you to see your fellow man in a darker light!

the entire human race is one organism.... religion fights that idea

thats why elite people worship Lucifer, people who worship Lucifer believe they don't need god, because they feel as they are god....

the definition for antichrist is to be god, or be against god ... look it up

MY YOUTUBE http://www.youtube.com/us...

MY WEB SITE http://www.InfoSpill.com

Ron Paul agrees with the

Ron Paul agrees with the Christian theory of just war.. the war has to be purely defensive in nature... I agree with that.. Switzerland comes to mind.. they did not get involved in any world war even they they were centered right in the middle of both world wars.. they would have only fought to protect there own land mass and that is the way the US should be!

as for me and my home, we shall worship the LORD

It is wrong to take a life

Not that complicated really.

unless that other life is

unless that other life is coming to take yours! and that really is very uncomplicated!

as for me and my home, we shall worship the LORD

I'm Catholic... I don't

I'm Catholic... I don't know much about theology to know what is right or not, but that's one reason we have a pope...

the pope says war is wrong, and I agree with him (not just because he said so).

I also don't think it's fair to blame Catholics/the Church for the things it has done in the past (crusades, injustice, inquisition, killing, etc.). No one denies that those things were wrong, but using that as an argument is kind of lame. It's like me blaming everyone alive today for slavery, even though none of us were alive then and had nothing to do with it.

Wow, sure hope the Pope is not just a man.

"I'm Catholic... I don't know much about theology to know what is right or not, but that's one reason we have a pope..."

Wow, awesome job taking my

Wow, awesome job taking my words out of context.

If you would have read a little further you would have noted that I said that I didn't just agree with him because he's the pope...

I'm saying, ya, I'm not an expert on theology, but from my humble knowledge of it, I have no reason to believe that the pope is wrong, therefore I agree.

Sure, you're not supposed to kill people, but my understanding is that you have the right to defend yourself according to Christian law/Christ.

Do the thing you fear most and the death of fear is certain.

My right to protect my child or loved one, is my choice, however I don't believe that if I chose to kill to defend them that it is justified. Likewise if my children are starving death and I steal to feed them, it is my choice, but I don't believe it is justified.
But honestly how many times have you really had to protect your child from death by the use of force that requires you to kill someone?
As Americans how many times have we been told that murder was necessary to protect ourselves and others from evil, and by doing so, how many children of other parents have died? Would not our perceived enemies have the same right and course of action to protect themselves and others from the evil they percieve in us. So then the circle of violence becomes complete.

peacemakers

you forgot to add Cathars who in millions where slain by the Roman Catholic Church(Roman Empire disguised as Church)

this is my tread dealing with religion.
http://www.dailypaul.com/...

I do not know a BUNCH about

I do not know a BUNCH about history, nor Christians, but it seems to me (Crusades, Holy Wars, Hitlers etc.) that regardless or including what Jesus has said, the Christians have many times taken up arms and killed people who did not manage to believe what they did.

just because they call

just because they call themselves Christians doesn't mean they are.. kinda like George Bush calling himself a republican!

as for me and my home, we shall worship the LORD

Evil does not resolve evil,

Evil does not resolve evil, it only gives birth to it. The sad thing is the very thing that has been put on earth to prevent evil { Religion } may just be the root cause of it.

Hence the reasons why elites want a own world religion.

Imagine if the world had one religion.

Imagine all the wars cause by religion.

Imagine all the harmless humans killed in the name of religion....

MY YOUTUBE http://www.youtube.com/us...

MY WEB SITE http://www.InfoSpill.com

Atheism is Peaceful, eh?

The number of people killed in totalitarian revolutions by officially atheistic regimes, not to mention the wars they've waged, absolutely swamps any deaths "caused" by religion.

Again, since when do independent-minded Ron Paul supporters lamely repeat mainstream propaganda?

MOST of the wars that have

MOST of the wars that have been based against so called evil where in the name of religion including Holy wars crusades NAZI germany wars.... wars against the entire middle east including iraq.... the war on terrorism is just a war against another religion.

All religion does is cause people to hate people. if your not part of the religion they claim is the real one, well then you are considered anti christ ETC

Then all that does is give them a reason to kill the antichrist ETC

I never said that atheism was peaceful but at least it does not teach hate!

and that everyone outside of your religion is anti christ AKA terrorist

MY YOUTUBE http://www.youtube.com/us...

MY WEB SITE http://www.InfoSpill.com

don't confuse true

don't confuse true Christianity with religion... Being a true Christian is being Christ like. You see this in Ron Paul! Being a Christian is having a relationship with Jesus Christ... no pastor, no priest--- just you and him.. it is not a religion! religion is mans invented way to get to God... Jesus tought us this is not so!

as for me and my home, we shall worship the LORD

infospill

I agree with you.
I used to be an Atheist myself for many years...religion breeds war.
spirituality liberty within knowing yourself brings serenity.
here is my post on this subject
http://www.dailypaul.com/...

peace

If you seek you shall find.

There are many examples of words that have been added to the bible, one more recent one is the use of Capstone in the New International Version, where Capstone replaces the word Cornerstone.
Any "true" mason knows the difference between a Capstone and a Cornerstone...
grant

I believe prayer is very powerful.

If you read correctly I did pray for all churches, and I do respect that he doesn't support this war in Iraq and his Pro-life beliefs, but he certainly isn't perfect and I have read a lot of his literature and he does cross the line many times, especially on his writtings refering to justified war, and eventhough he does not claim that this war is justified, he does leave open, as many churches do, the possibility of a justified war. So I will keep praying him on this and many other issues. I would hope he would pray for me as well, since I am not perfect either, and I would hope we would all pray for Satan.

As Mark Twain wrote;
But who prays for Satan? Who, in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most?
grant

Depends on who your truely follow and believe.

A sword could be used for many other purposes, protection against wild animals, to cut off the heads of poisonous snakes, if you wish to see justification in the bible for murder, I don't doubt that you will find it. Not to mention all the words that were or have been added to the books of the bible.
You will find a lot in the Old Testament if you are a follower of the laws of Moses, and that is your choice as well.
But doesn't it really boil down to whether or not you truely believe in the true Jesus. Since why would you be afraid to die, as Jesus was not afraid to die when they came to kill him? If you truely believe in the resurection of Christ, and in the authority of our Father, wouldn't you rather chose only peace and love as your way, never bowing to the desire to do the wrong thing, or relying on a sword or gun or government to protect you?
grant
I bow to only one King and Judge.

It is easier to talk about submission

than to submit to evil. It can seem like an endorsement of evildoers, at times. Also, how can one stand by if your child or loved one is being attacked or killed? I can imagine allowing a wrong to myself, but not to someone I love.

on earth

there will always be sins, and therefore always be strife, war, killing etc etc.
As Christians we can strife for peace and set example, but there will never be heaven on earth, as there will always be sin. And we know all are sinners.
What do you mean with "not to mention all the words that were or have been added to the books of the Bible"? Please explain.

Fear of death is fear of nothing

You are correct saying that truly one should not be afraid of death, if one follows the Risen Lord.
I can't answer for anyone by myself.
If dying by the sword is my end, so be it. I can not change what will happen to me.
IMO, there are things worse than death.
IMO, the folks @ Nazi Concentration Camps would have rather died fighting the Nazis instead of being herded into them... once they realized their fate. Is that sinful?
Were the Jews in Warsaw doing evil by fighting?

If being shot is the only thing preventing my family from going Camp FEMA, I say
"Pass the Ammo, boys! Reload, Woman!"

Shall we become our own judges?

If every man has the right to have recourse to force in face of a danger threatening another, the question of the use of force is reduced to a question of the definition of danger for another. If my private judgment is to decide the question of what is danger for another, there is no occasion for the use of force that could not be justified on the ground of danger threatening some other man. They killed and burned witches, they killed aristocrats and Girondists, and they killed their enemies, because those who were in authority regarded them as dangerous for the people.

Great story.

I remember the story in Pennsylvania, in fact a lot of money was raised to give to the families of those killed, the money was refused and instead they gave it to the wife of the Trucker who killed, saying she needed it more than they would.

I used to live a little closer to that area...

I remember an Old Order Mennonite family in a buggy got pretty-much run over by a pick-up (IIRC) on route 222 near Fleetwood - this was 7 - 10 years ago.

What struck me the most about the story is that the Father was killed, and while he lay (dead) along side the road, the wife/mother and survivors were with, and praying FOR THE DRIVER OF THE TRUCK.

They (old order sects of Christianity) walk-the-walk and they have my deepest respects.

I just disagree with their stance on lack of protection.

Or he called upon Peter to carry a sword, knowing his reaction.

The purpose for Peter to carry the sword was to teach a lesson, a lesson of non-violence.

Words spoken to Peter when he tried to resist by force evil directed against Jesus (Matt. 26:52). Peter was not defending himself, but his beloved and heavenly Master. And Christ at once reproved him for this, saying, that he who takes up the sword shall perish by the sword.

Or he called upon Peter to carry a sword, knowing his reaction.

The purpose for Peter to carry the sword was to teach a lesson, a lesson of non-violence.

Words spoken to Peter when he tried to resist by force evil directed against Jesus (Matt. 26:52). Peter was not defending himself, but his beloved and heavenly Master. And Christ at once reproved him for this, saying, that he who takes up the sword shall perish by the sword.

I disagree

Jesus said to THEM, not Peter, to sell their cloak for a sword if need be.
If the point was only for Peter to carry a sword - to hack the ear off of the Servant of the High Priest - only to have Christ heal it again...
Why didn't Jesus say "Sword for Peter?!?! Anyone have a sword Peter can borrow?"

Upon cutting off Malchus' ear, Jesus instructed Peter to

John 18:11
Jesus commanded Peter, "Put your sword away!...

Jesus didn't say DROP THE SWORD, forsake the sword, give up the sword... just Put it away... keep it, just don't use it here anymore. Peter did what he thought was right - he had no idea of the Cross, or the empty grave in just a few days.

For those who take up the sword shall die by the sword. This isn't a curse, just a statement. Peter had work to do, after the resurrection... if he would've fought and made a stand that night, he wouldn't be able to do God's Work, he'd be dead... and many many thousand never would have heard the Gospel through him.

the only just war

casa6969 is the war against terany

I think you mean

I think you mean Tyranny.

But that is not a good criteria since "tyranny" is so subjective. The Just War doctrine seems to be the best attempt to come up with an objective set of criteria in which war is justified.