HAVING PROBLEMS VIEWING THE SITE? GET FIREFOX! | A NOTE ON ADVERTISING

   

Leaked NIST documents about World Trade Tower 7

Leaked NIST Docs: “Unusual” Event Before Collapse Of WTC 7

Paul Joseph Watson & Aaron Dykes
Prison Planet
Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Leaked confidential NIST documents concerning the investigation into the collapse of WTC 7, the 47-storey skyscraper that was not hit by a plane but imploded in under seven seconds on 9/11, reveal that an "unusual" event preceded the collapse of the building - a "jet of flames" that shot out of several windows after most of the fire had already died down.

The leaked documents precede a BBC hit piece documentary which airs on July 6th and is set to claim that WTC 7 was the first steel-framed building in history to suffer a complete collapse from fire damage alone — a scientific impossibility.

The documents - entitled Confidential and Predecisonal Document NIST Report on Building 7 - form the preamble for a long-awaited final verdict on what caused a structurally reinforced building to fall like a controlled demolition despite suffering relatively minimal fire damage.

Chapter 1: WTC 7 Visual Evidence, Damage Estimates, and Timeline Analysis (William Pitts) is a thorough analysis of window fires by video and picture evidence, which concludes that all major fires before floors 7 and 13 died out prior to collapse.

The report states, "At 4:38 p.m. all of the windows between 13-44A and 13-47C were open, and the fires responsible for opening the windows had died down to the point where they could no longer be observed."

"Just prior to the collapse of the building at 5:20:52 p.m. a jet of flames was pushed from windows in the same area. The event that caused this unusual behavior has not been identified."

The report describes the nature of fires from floors 7-13 and also states, "With the exception of the fires on the 19th, 22nd, 29th, and 30th floors discussed at the start of this section, there is essentially no direct visual evidence of fires on other floors of WTC 7."

The photographs displayed in the report, many of which have never been seen before, do not show any other damage to the building than the small fires from floors 7-13 and the relatively minimal "scoop" observed on the lower right-hand west face of the building.

What could have caused this "jet of flames" to shoot out of windows immediately prior to the collapse of the building? The decompression force of a series of explosives or an incendiary device?

The leaked documents precede a BBC hit piece documentary which airs on July 6th and is set to claim that WTC 7 was the first steel-framed building in history to suffer a complete collapse from fire damage alone - a scientific impossibility.

As we reported on Monday, Deputy Director, Emergency Services Department, New York City Housing Authority Barry Jennings, who was trapped inside Building 7, reported explosions going off and witnessing dead bodies before the collapse of either of the twin towers.

We will be combing through the lengthy NIST documents over the course of the next few days to pick out more irregularities and potential smoking guns over the next few days - stay tuned. Feel free to e mail us with any interesting discoveries of your own.

http://www.infowars.com/?...

output

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

anybody know

How much it would have cost to remove the asbestos from those buildings? I know some people who work for EMC who had tons of equipment there and they would talk about how incompatible the building was with modern computer equipment. I have heard them say the biggest thing holding them back from reworking the computer infrastructure was the asbestos and the costs associated with its removal. I think WTC7 was in the same boat but I'm not sure of that. I thought many companies were moving out due to this and the purchase of the buildings seemed to be ill advised from a financial perspective. The only thing that saved the investor was the free demolition and a ridiculous amount of insurance on the 3 properties.

Heard it was $1 billion.

Just can't remember specifically where I got that number though.

There was an excellent interview on AJ's show today.

It was dealing with this latest NIST leak. There will be reruns for those that missed it.
Alex talks with Kevin Ryan, former engineer and site manager for Underwriters Laboratories fired for questioning NIST's explanation of the WTC collapses. Joining Ryan will be Richard Gage, founding member of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

http://www.infowars.com/

**********************
"My role in the revolution is to wake up the lemmings of this country, who sit back and accept the pablum the media feeds them"
Jesse Ventura
Ventura/Paul 2008
http://www.gopeti

WTC 7

We know there was demolitions.
But who put them there?
Was it the plane hijackers who planted them or black ops?
Speculation will continue because they will not tell the truth.

Marvin Bush.

Head of security company for Towers. So there was oppurtunity for mischief.
(I know, just a coincidence that the Presidents brother happens to run the security company.)

follow the money

How does a guy buy those buildings that don't meet current business needs but are wrapped in asbestos so you can't fix them and make a profit end up with the biggest insurance payoff in history. I agree most business people insure things up to point but this guy's policy was well beyond reason. I am so surprised the truethers haven't persuaded this guy to squeal. If I tripled my wife's insurance policy a few months before she died, who would believe I'm not guilty?

my analysis

Why would the people who mined the buildings bother with the "Arab piloted planes" if they were gonna just detonate them anyways?

Only one conceivable reason:

To pretend no bombs were even used, and just blame it on some patsies.

BTW, Osama Bin Ladin has long standing CIA ties, and it would only be the second time that an American intelligence agency was involved with bombing the WTC:

http://www.youtube.com/wa...

Okay I'm bumping this

Because of the stupid pissing contests now up at the top. Can't people on this forum learn to disregard posts they don't agree with? They'll go to the dustbin if you just leave them alone.

bumping

mostly bumping the point you made, thank you!