HAVING PROBLEMS VIEWING THE SITE? GET FIREFOX! | A NOTE ON ADVERTISING

   

My response to "the ball now bounces back..." <LONG- Keep bumped>

Ok anti-truthers...

Let's assume that they didn't blow up the buildings. There is a strong case to be made for government complicity either way. Does it matter if they allowed it to happen... or even if they were simply incompetent in letting it occur? Someone should still be punished. Someone should lose a job. Maybe some people should go to jail.

But nothing happened to anyone.


Here's what I know for sure. These are irrifutable facts from main stream news sources:

1980s: Osama bin Laden runs a front organization for the mujaheddin—Islamic freedom fighters rebelling against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. The CIA secretly backs the mujaheddin. Pakistan's President Benazir Bhutto, understanding the ferocity of Islamic extremism, tells then President George Bush, "You are creating a Frankenstein." [MSNBC, 8/24/98, Newsweek, 10/1/01]

1994: Two attacks take place which involve hijacking planes to crash them into buildings, including one by an Islamic militant group. In a third attack, a lone pilot crashes a plane at the White House. Yet after Sept. 11, over and over aviation and security officials say they are shocked that terrorists could have hijacked airliners and crashed them into landmark buildings. [New York Times, 10/3/01]

Sept 1999: A US intelligence report states bin Laden and Al-Qaeda terrorists could crash an aircraft into the Pentagon. The Bush administration claims not to have heard of this report until May 2002, though it was widely shared within the government. [CNN, 5/18/02, AP, 5/18/02, Guardian, 5/19/02]

Jan 2000: George Bush Sr. meets with the bin Laden family on behalf of the Carlyle Group. He also met with them in 1998. Bush’s chief of staff could not remember that this meeting took place until shown a thank you note confirming the meeting. [Wall Street Journal, 9/27/01, Guardian, 10/31/01]

July 24, 2001: Larry Silverstein's $3.2 billion 99-year lease of the WTC is finalized. Silverstein hopes to win $7 billion in insurance from the destruction of the WTC towers. [NY Times, 02/16/03, Newsday, 09/25/02]

Also, it had been requested that the WTC towers be demolished in the past because of numerous problems, but the asbestos inside prevented the Port Authority from allowing it. But after the incident occurred, the government assured everyone the air was ok to breathe.

Why would Silverstein buy these buildings that were essentially condemned?

Late July 2001: The US and UN ignore warnings from the Taliban foreign minister that bin Laden is planning an imminent huge attack on US soil. The FBI and CIA also fail to take seriously warnings that Islamic fundamentalists have enrolled in flight schools across the US. [Independent, 9/7/02, more]

Aug 6, 2001: President Bush is warned by US intelligence that bin Laden might be planning to hijack commercial airliners. The White House waits eight months after 9/11 to reveal this fact. [New York Times, 5/16/02] Titled “Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US,” the intelligence briefing specifically mentions the World Trade Center. Yet Bush later states the briefing “said nothing about an attack on America.” [Washington Post, 4/12/04, White House, 4/11/04, CNN, 4/10/04, Intelligence Briefing, 8/6/01, more]

Aug 24, 2001: Frustrated with lack of response from FBI headquarters about detained suspect Moussaoui, the Minnesota FBI begins working with the CIA. The CIA sends alerts calling him a "suspect 747 airline suicide hijacker." Three days later an FBI Minnesota supervisor says he is trying to make sure that Moussaoui does not "take control of a plane and fly it into the World Trade Center." [Senate Intelligence Committee, 10/17/02] FBI headquarters chastises Minnesota FBI for notifying the CIA. [Time, 5/21/02] FBI Director Mueller will later say "there was nothing the agency could have done to anticipate and prevent the [9/11] attacks." [Senate Intelligence Committee, 9/18/02, more]

Sept 10, 2001: A particularly urgent warning may have been received the night before the attacks, causing some top Pentagon brass to cancel a trip. “Why that same information was not available to the 266 people who died aboard the four hijacked commercial aircraft may become a hot topic on the Hill." [Newsweek, 9/13/01] "A group of top Pentagon officials suddenly canceled travel plans for the next morning, apparently because of security concerns." [Newsweek, 9/24/01, more]

Sept 10, 2001: Former president Bush is with a brother of Osama bin Laden at a Carlyle business conference. The conference is interrupted the next day by the attacks. [Washington Post, 3/16/03]

Sept 10, 2001: Defense Secretary Rumsfeld announces that by some estimates the Department of Defense "cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions." CBS later calculates that 25% of the yearly defense budget is unaccounted for. A defense analyst says, “The books are cooked routinely year after year." [DOD, 9/10/01, CBS, 1/29/02] This announcement was buried by the next day’s news of 9/11.


Anyway, there's LOTS more where that came from, pages and pages of interesting little tid-bits like that. I've just barely scratched the surface in this post.

It's all from main stream news articles, no conspiracy websites, and it's all right here in black and white...


Short summary:

http://www.wanttoknow.inf...

25 page summary:

http://www.wanttoknow.inf...

60 page summary:

http://www.wanttoknow.inf...

Now you go look at that. Look at it. Read every page. Read the 60 page summary if you have time. It will blow your mind. Our government is corrupt, and they are covering it all up with these whitewash investigations. Someone should hang, and a different investigation should be done... not by the government... to figure out who all was involved and who dropped the ball. And they all should pay.

output

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

If you don't believe 911

was an inside job then you would have to believe that the 3 stooges
are running this country!

Does it matter

Does it matter if they allowed it to happen... or even if they were simply incompetent in letting it occur?

Yes, there is a huge difference.

Back to Occam's Razor.

The simplest, most likely explanation is incompetence, Government incompetence is as common as flies on shit. This would be the best theory to investigate.

Letting it happen would be a distant second. This is complicated because you have to figure out who let it happen, and why they might have wanted it to happen. I suppose it could be a mix of let it happen and incompetence.

Far and away the worst explanation is the inside job/false flag scenario. This is extremely complex, since you have to identify the actors SPECIFICALLY, their motivation, AND how they created the alternative story.

So, if one was to investigate, the first part of the investigation is investigating incompetence, if there is more to the story, it will come out during a fair investigation of incompetence.

BUT, if you go after the inside job theory from the start, the investigation will founder, since you will constantly be following false leads, making rash assumptions, and will be generally disorganized. Worse, people will think you are crazy to suggest such an outrageous theory.

No one thinks that government incompetence is crazy, so this will have a much better chance of getting public backing, and if there is more corruption than just incompetence and a cover up, it will come out.

So, I suggest that the truth movement is throwing away its chance for a fair investigation, by pushing the inside job theory. Ironic how the people that most want the investigation are the very people that cause the investigation not to happen. , . . .

Anyway, there's LOTS more

Anyway, there's LOTS more where that came from, pages and pages of interesting little tid-bits like that. I've just barely scratched the surface in this post.

It's all from main stream news articles, no conspiracy websites, and it's all right here in black and white...

"Interesting little tid-bits" like that do not add up to knowledge of the act, much less an inside job. There's nothing there. Nothing. 0 + 0 is still 0, last I checked.

relativist

Dialectic relativist

I don't know...

I think I should go down to the library and look at the back issues of Popular Mechanix and try and decide.

But I certainly won't be able to ascertain the facts about the events of 9/11 from the "mainstream" media. Indeed, the central questions are never asked in the propaganda matrix (aka "mainstream" media).

Rational people tend to agree that there is a singular truth to discernible reality.

That's not a theory, that is one basis for our reality. We human beings generally agree that we perceive the same physical reality, that we live on the planet Earth which is in orbit of a star that we call the Sun, that there is night and day and that the Sun rises in the east and sets in the west. In the more temperate climates 4 distinct seasons can be observed. We acknowledge that rain is wet and the winter is colder than the summer. We know that plants and animals grow in the right conditions and that we need food, water, sleep and shelter to survive. We know that the original purpose of human sexuality is to procreate. These are a few of the things we know. I could go on, but you get my point.

So, what are people to do if they disagree with the government and the mass media's version of the truth? What are we to do about the North American Union? What are we to do about American Imperialism? What are we to do about the REAL ID? How would the Anti-Truth-League suggest that we deal with these issues? By not talking about them? Because, the War Party Government and the quote-mainstream media seem to maintain a code of silence on these matters. So are we to simply follow their lead and not question these things as well? What else is off limits? "Global warming"? A water-powered car reported by Reuters?

Is the cause of liberty the cause of political correctness? Who ya gonna believe, your own lying eyes, or Big Brother?

"People make a grievous error thinking that a list of facts is the truth. Facts are just the bare bones out of which truth is made." -Shelby Foote

----

Ron Paul's Campaign for Liberty Money Bomb!

"But nothing happened to anyone."

Smithjr is dead wrong on this one. All the principle players were promoted or recieved massive compensation.

and to add

those who were going to talk were threatened with US government issue anthrax letters.

this is true

WE HAVE OUR HEADS SOOOO FAR UP OUR ASS'S AND CELEBRITIES ASS'S THAT WE CANNOT SEE THE BULL SHIT THEY TOLD US !!!!

WE MUST GET MAD .... WE MUST GET SMART , AND WE MUST EXSPOSE THESE EVIL FORCES OF GOVERNEMNT .... KILLING THIS COUNTRY AND THIS WORLD. .....

one life , one love ..... smoke bud

peace and love

Amen

When the time is right, there will be blood shed. John Adams said, " When your liberties have been lost, they will not return without bood shed." Be thankfull we can still try to reason with little danger.

I haven't been watching the game what's the score now?

This is the first "ball bouncing back" 911 post I've read so I can't say if it's the best one but I like this teams jersey the best. lol

Commission on Presidential Debates - http://www.debates.org/pa...
National Ballot Access - http://www.directdemocrac...
Voters for none of the above - http://nota.org/
Black Box Voting - http://www.blackboxvoting...

Truth will win

More people are waking up every day. This issue has the greatest potential to shake up the buddumber folks.

I agree, HEADS MUST ROLL !!!

First I do believe there HAD to be more people in on the simple 19 hijacker Conspiracy to attack the USA.

Thus the question is, WHO?
Who else was in on it?
Who else simply knew?
Who knew but looked the other way?
Who had a chance to know but instead, but chose to look away?
Who could of known? --
Who knew and even assisted?
Who else knew and profited?
Who else knew and greatly assisted?

and most of all....AMERICANS must get Mean with their "leaders".

We must set a harsh but firm Cultural Tradition --- much like Japan does.

All those that SHOULD HAVE KNOWN ---those heads must roll off the chopping block.

***** I say Americans should throw the heads of the CIA, the FBI, the State Dept, the Pentagon, the Dept Defense, Centcom, NSA, the Head of the Senate, the Head of the House, the Head of the White House ALL, THROW ALL them into a 25ft x 25ft cell with no way out and each with a gun. Then throw away the key. Leave them there to starve or take the 'honorable way out'

Future terrorists attacks would no longer occur.

Its as simple as that,

In Peace & Liberty,
Treg

Here's what I say.

The Neocons did it, just as they stated they "needed" to do it in their PNAC document, only a year before they took power in all the top cabinet level positions and VP.

We may not have irrefutable proof, but the stench is so strong that it's unmistakable.
Whether it will ever be courtroom provable is another matter.
The rest is just details.

Beyond "courtroom provable"

We could most likely convict on a fourth of the evidence. It would take months, or several weeks to present all of the evidence.

Russo using logic to prove 9/11 was a false flag:
http://www.dailymotion.co....

The above movie has been repeatedly taken off YouTube. In fact, it was just taken down a few days ago, and the users' account was closed. This one will most likely disappear as well. Watch it while you can.

If anyone can download this movie I would like a copy. Thanks.

You said it well, Big T

The stench IS strong.

*****************
"My role in the revolution is to wake up the lemmings of this country, who sit back and accept the pablum the media feeds them"
Jesse Ventura
Ventura/Paul 2008

just keep informaing

just keep informaing everyone we can. thats all we can do. thanks for posting.

Its so obvious...

its not even funny. Oh, dont forget how they found two tiny lil passports while everything else was pulverized.

Semper Fortis

No Need

Sorry you had to create this well thought out post.

But Forge and his rag tag band of "scientists',have figured it out for us.

Oklahoma City happened just the way they said it did.
The CIA never interfered with Govts. around the world.
The folks at Waco needed to be burned,because they couldn't have caught Koresh at the Pizza Hut,where he went every Tues. night...
Gulf of Tonkin was not faked.
Pearl Harbor was not allowed to be attacked.
Govt. never conducted experiments on unwitting victims.
The USS Liberty was never attacked by Israeli forces.
Iran Contra never happened.
Govt funneling drugs into our Country,never happened.
Govt is not torturing people around the world.
Opium is not coming from Afghanistan,under NATO control.
Iraq had EVERYTHING to do with 9/11

SEE,It's all good in the hood.
So have some more beer,and some American Gladiators. Everything is going to be OK.

*****************
"My role in the revolution is to wake up the lemmings of this country, who sit back and accept the pablum the media feeds them"
Jesse Ventura
Ventura/Paul 2008

for 32 years Wash.DC had an illegal gun ban on the citizens----

HYDROMAN
who will go to jail for breaking the supreme law of the land? will the citizens convicted and incarcerated for these illegal laws be released and compensated for the crimes against them?

don`t hold your breath-----------------------Remember Waco!!

And also

Don't forget Bin Laden and W were business partners at Arbusto
(Follow the money)
http://impeachment.kucini...
http://www.petitiononline...

Yeah...

the 60-page summary is chock full of things that point to complicity within our government, but it still doesn't have everything.

Too many clues to put on 60 pages!

And no one can refute all this stuff. I don't hear any debunkers out their, do I??