The myth of illegal-immigration?
Just read a powerfully argued case that attempts to counter a lot the anti-illegal-immigrant hysteria: http://www.mydd.com/story...
I'd like to hear if anyone has any critiques against the writer's points (ie. any holes in his evidence).
output





















From an e-mail I received.
This speech is from 2004.
American Suicide
Last week there was an immigration overpopulation conference in Washington , DC , filled to capacity by many of America’s finest minds and leaders. A brilliant college professor by the name of Victor Hansen Davis talked about his latest book, “Mexifornia,” explaining how immigration - both legal and illegal was destroying the entire state of California .. He said it would march across the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American Dream.
Moments later, former Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up and gave a stunning speech on how to destroy America
The audience sat spellbound as he described eight methods for the destruction of the United States. He said, “If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let’s destroy America. It is not that hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall and that ‘An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.’”
“Here is how they do it,” Lamm said:
-”First, to destroy America , turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural country. History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar, Seymour Lipset, put it this way:’
The histories of bilingual and bicultural societies that do not assimilate are histories o f turmoil, tension, and tragedy.’ Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, and Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, Corsicans and Muslims.”
Lamm went on:
-”Second, to destroy America, invent ‘multiculturalism’ and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. Make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal; that there are no cultural differences. Make it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due solely to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds.
-”Third, we could make the United States an ‘Hispanic Quebec’ without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently:’
The apparent success of our own multi-ethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentrism and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.’
Lamm said, “I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have various cultural subgroups living in America enforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their similarities.”
-”Fourth, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high school.”
-”My fifth point for destroying America would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money.
I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of ‘Victim.’ I would get all minorities to think that their lack of success was the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority platoon.”
-”My sixth plan for America’s downfall would include dual citizenship, and promote divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other - that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precepts. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together. Look at the ancient Greeks.
The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshipped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic Games. A common enemy, Persia, threatened their liberty. Yet all these bonds were not strong enough to overcome two factors: local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell.
“E. Pluribus Unum” — From many, one. In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the ‘pluribus’ instead of the ‘Unum,’we will “Balkanize” America as surely as Kosovo.
“Next to last, I would place all subjects off limits. Make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of ‘diversity.’ I would find a word similar to ‘heretic’ in the 16th century - that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like ‘racist’ or ‘xenophobe’ halt discussion and debate.
Having made America a bilingual /bicultural country, having established multi-cultism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of ‘Victim,’ I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: That because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good. I would make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions of them.”
In the last minute of his speech, Governor Lamm wiped his brow. Profound silence followed. Finally he said,
“Lastly, I would censor Victor Hanson Davis’s book ‘Mexifornia.’ His book is dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America. If you feel America deserves to be destroyed, don’t read that book.”
According to the email-this was the rest of the story (as I recvd it):
There was no applause. A chilling fear quietly rose like an ominous cloud above every attendee at the conference. Every American in that room knew that everything Lamm enumerated was proceeding methodically, quietly, darkly, yet pervasively across the United States today. Discussion is being suppressed. Over 100 languages are ripping the foundation of our educational system and national cohesiveness.
Even barbaric cultures that practice female genital mutilation are growing as we celebrate ‘diversity.’ American jobs are vanishing into the Third World as corporations create a Third World in America Take note of California and other states. To date, ten million illegal aliens and growing fast. It is reminiscent of George Orwell’s book “1984.” In that story, three slogans are engird in the Ministry of Truth building: “War is peace,” “Freedom is slavery,” and “Ignorance is strength.”
Governor Lamm walked back to his seat. It dawned on everyone at the conference that our nation and the future of this great democracy is deeply in trouble and worsening fast. If we don’t get this immigration monster stopped within three years, it will rage like a California wildfire and destroy everything in its path, especially The American Dream.
Seems to me most of those issues are caused by the govt.
___________
Lisa C.
“Elections are short term efforts; revolutions are long term projects.”
--Ron Paul
Join the rEVOLution here: http://www.campaignforlib...
your article has no merit
your article is not so powerfully argued if
you read closer.
So,in
2005 $9 billion in taxes paid by workers with
incorrect or mismatched data. they have no idea
how much of that was paid by illegal workers.
One year I filed my tax return, I entered my
daughters SS# incorrectly, I bet my info
is included in that data.
the 9 billion is only 1.5 percent of the total
$593 billion paid into social security in 2005.
how much of that is by illegals, lets say half,
then of the $593B collected in SS, 0.75% is from illegal
immigrants. my number is too generous, i would say
more like 0.1%. but, whatever, you can make your own
guestimate, just like your article has done.
And heres how much they cost:
Illegal immigration costs American taxpayers
$346 Billion annually.
http://www.judicialwatch....
your article is very poorly written and argued, just relying on
returns with mismatched data, as I showed you
I myself had one year. even the irs tells us the most
common mistakes on returns are mismatched data.
http://www.irs.gov/taxtop...
which are from legals, cause illegals dont file tax returns
with SS#, only with TIN's.
also your article states:
"Spokesman Mark Hinkle said ...a significant portion probably comes from taxes paid by illegal immigrants."
probably, you want people to believe your article because someone sais
probably. the whole argument is based on "probably".
it has no merit.
It's against the law!
I really enjoyed reading some of the comments hear. There is nothing that could convince me that it's OK because of the money involved. That was just another Gov. agency trying to put a positive spin on a negative subject.
http://www.snopes.com/pho...
This link will disgust you. But will show some of what's really going on.
I dont see where this individual has a valid arguement at all??
First of all the author calls the issue by name, "Illegal" immigration. These individuals broke the United States law of illegal border entry and are criminal upon entry into our nation. Secondly I think it is great that those that are here illegally are paying taxes, but let’s not forget that most of the excrement coming from Nashville is usually from the far left and contradicts itself by listing amounts of taxes paid by illegal’s but the first paragraph explains that there are no clear numbers. The most important thing to remember that if in fact illegal immigrants pay in to the system $428 billion dollars to the nation's $13.6 trillion gross domestic product in 2006, he does not mention the hospitals, schools, social services across the country are going into bankruptcy because of the massive flow of immigrants seeking a free ride. What is the dollar amount to our communities and their social programs (Although I would be fine with doing away wit them completely) when they are bankrupt, hospitals close, and financially burdened schools that now are being asked to provide Spanish speaking teachers that the sstem cannot afford.
Who am I but an individual giving my opinion, and that alone is not very credible. The credibility lies in those with fact, and I suggest you watch and pass this along to everyone in your address book, as this really says it all.
http://www.youtube.com/wa...
It is fine for people to feel that they need to help, but when we cannot help everyone in the world is it worth it to destroy our economy, security, traditions, and heritage to allow criminals unchecked into our country.
I personally have friends that live in the US from both Mexico and Vietnam that are here legally, and to be honest they are also against illegal immigration. My friend from Vietnam will be the first to tell you how great the US is, and in the same breath he will curse politicians that are making moves against the constitution. He is vocal when he compares the communist country of his childhood and the policies that are being created here to stem freedom and liberty, and he does not like it at all. Imagine a Vietnamese man at the age of 35 that is a legal citizen is more of a patriot then most of our leaders today, it is sad really.
I certainly hope you can see where I am coming from, as I am by no means against legal immigration, but it has to be at a controlled level or we risk loosing in the end and can provide no help to the less fortunate here or in any other country.
BT
In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
~Mark Twain
Immigration to the U.S. is legal when executed in
accordance with U.S. law. Immigration to the U.S. that is conducted outside the law is illegal. It is therefore illegal immigration. Whether or not they pay taxes, while perhaps an interesting discussion, is distressingly irrelevant. U.S. law provides procedures whereby individuals, seeking to immigrate to the U.S., can do so. All who immigrate in accordance with U.S. law are welcome. Those who refuse to follow the law in immigrating to the U.S. are, by definition, breaking the law. That is not welcomed. Whether or not they pay taxes or file a tax return has nothing to do with whether or not they have obeyed the law or broken the law. What you call a "powerfully argued case" is in fact no case at all. The article attempts to build a "case" by arguing some kind of economic question which is not even relevant to whether or not a given individual has violated U.S. law in order to be on U.S. soil.
Again, that is only if one adheres to the statist theory of law
I think the foundations of that theory are are incredibly shaky.
The natural law is the only logical legal theory that I've come across.
Atrickpay and his goals
this should give you an idea of where atrickpay is coming from.
http://www.mexica-movemen...
"The day is coming, burning like an oven, when all the wicked will be stubble"
Haha, I don't support any Mexican labour movement
And you still haven't responded to my last post below.
Democrat link
Your link, my direct democracy, is a site overflowing with the muddled and unconstitutional thinking of Democrats. Al Gore even showed up on the front page. This is a republic rather than a direct democracy. The Constitution gives Congress, not aliens, the authority to determine immigration policy. Illegal aliens should neither be paying taxes nor earning paychecks in this country. Meat packers used to have good paying union jobs. Illegals now do the same work for a fraction of the pay. Go peddle your empathy to the union workers who were squeezed out. They were probably paying twice as much in taxes and social security as the underpaid illegals and received fewer government services. Illegals do the work Americans won't do for illegal alien wages. Tricky, you are promoting a caste system to distribute the crumbs Democrats promise the poor.
Disagree in part.
"Illegals" should not be paying taxes. Neither should Americans.
I don't care if "illegals" put a unionized butcher out of a job. Free-market capitalism involves competition.
The State shouldn't be hampering the movement of people and it should not be stealing money to create social programs.
Meat cutters not butchers.
Meat cutters not butchers. People who work for a living understand the distinction and they do care if they have a job. Competition does allow for some rules. Some employers cannot cheat while other employers are trying to survive by observing laws. Our Constitution, again, does allow our Congress to determine immigration policy.
If your argument is that Americans should not be paying taxes, that deserves another thread.
That's true that the Constitution does allow for...
Congress to determine immigration policy. But I only adhere to the Constitution when it is in line with natural law. And Congress' immigration policies have continuously violated natural law...
Border fence construction underway
Some brave patriots have started construction of a fence on the Mexican border.
See
http://www.atom.com/funny...
That's fine as long as they're building it on their own property
The government border fence on the other hand would be an egregious violation of rights.
Think of all that "eminent domain"...
...and defense
Yes, think of it as eminent domain which is legal. Also, think of it as defense. Our federal government is allowed to provide for the common defense or are you against that too?
I would rather punish cheating employers than build a fence. The illegal aliens would not be coming here if there were no jobs. Contractors in nearby Madison, WI can order construction workers from a jobber in Texas who sends illegals north to work for near minimum wages in construction.
Eminent domain is legal?
That is true if one adheres to the statist theory of law.
I adhere to the theory of natural law.
Re: common defense. As long as it doesn't violate rights, then I am not opposed to it.
5th Amendment
Yes, open the Constitution up and look at the 5th Amendment. Fair payment for land acquired is required.
Yes, I don't argue that.
Emiment domain is fully consistent with the statist theory of law.
Lets go through the objections to "illegal immigration"
Its another Govt created "Problem", like the "Drug War" & the "War on Terror". If you understand how those to false wars are government created, it should not be too hard for you to understand how government created the "Illegal Immigration" problem.
Many get hung up on the "illegal" part, as if to suggest, had the government handed everyone wanting to come into the USA a bright new Green Card, it would all be fine.
It is not fine. So they should not go on about the "illegal" part. After all, millions of us all drive 20 miles per hour over the speed limit don't we? Ah come on now! You all are not perfect puritians when it comes to the law. I am sure there is SOMETHING, SOME LAW SOME WHERE that you break regularly. (Shhhhhh taxes?) Ok, so its not about the illegality of the immigrants is it?
No, it is not.
Is it about "safety" then?
Well considering over 10 million came in, we still are very safe. And it is not as if these 10 million are hard core turn of the century Irishmen who drank their paycheck away every Friday night, beat their wife with an Ugly Stick on Saturday night, and made one more little baby mouth to feed and called it "Sean" or "Patty". No, these 10 million mexican illegals are quiet peaceful and trustworthy as immigrants go. After all, they have not rounded us up yet and put us on reservations have they?
So it really is not about safety then is it? Sure it would be NICE if the Government took the Mexican's Id card at the border, did a police background check on them, check them for kiddie porn and drugs --Yoooo theres that drug war & Smutt war getting into our precious Constitutional Rights AGAIN-- Anyway, YES it sure would be NICE if the government could PRE-EVALUATE these people at the boarder, make sure they are not killers on the run or even wanted terrorists....
But if the government did all that, there would still be plenty of Americans upset about "new Legal & Safe Immigrants". Perhaps you would be one of them.
So it is not about being "legal" and it really not about being "safe" is it?
So what if the Federal government Legalized them at the border after giving them a full and complete clean bill of health and Safety check; Would you be happy with that?
No you probably would not be happy with 10 million Safe & Legal Mexican immigrants.
Then is it the welfare? WELFARE! That is your beef? Right? Ok what if we get into those ecomomic figures, and the honest truth of the matter is that it all balances itself out in 2 or 3 years, on net it is a zero cost in year 3. Sure in the first one or two years, its an over all cost to the USA. But in years 3 & 4, its a zero balance....and by years 5, 6 and beyond, "illegal immigrants" are a Benefit to the USA. Sure we could get our experts, argue this and argue that. I could show that the top 5 American states for Welfare have low rates of illegals taking from the system. I could show that immigrates move for JOBS, not Welfare. We could agree to disagree if you like. I could say that the "welfare drain" is not significantly or disproportionately out of balance to what they put in. You could argue otherwise. Perhaps Congress passes a No Welfare for Mexican looking people bill, --unlikely yes--- but would that make you happy? No? So in the end, is all about "Welfare to illegals"? If it is, and you are a Ron Paul Republican, what do you care? You want Welfare abolished ANYWAY. That just adds one more reason to do so.
So, lets recap. For you, "illegal immigration" is really not about "being illegal", or "Safety", or even "welfare".
Then it must be the dam "Spanish language", right? Like Mr. Colorado TanKanerous said, "if we loose our language we loose everything!" Right?
What if you learned that 1st generation immigrants are learning English at the fastest rate of any AMERICAN immigrant population in the history of America! Not fast enough for you? What if I told you the largest English speaking country in the world will soon be .... China! Thats a billion people in 50 years all speaking English. What about India, another billion people are expected to be speaking English in 50 years. Still worried about the "English language"? Do you think that if the Chinese and Indians (from India) all can speak English, that they somehow are no longer Chinese or Indian? No? Then why would Mr. TanKanerous pontificate that if we Americans pick up Spanish as our second language, we somehow are no longer Americans and we "loose everything"? Germans speak both English and French and they somehow remain German. French speak English and Italian, and somehow they remain, "French" through it all. Same for Italians who speak Dutch, or Russians who speak "American". Indeed, if the happy Filipinos can speak "Chinese" and somehow remain "Filipinos", why can't Americans speak Spanish, dance to Cuban music, and think Jennifer Lopez is hot, and STILL BE AMERICANS?.
Aww! So it MUST be the NUMBERS! The 10 plus million people! We are feeling "invaded". Pat Buchanan calls it the "brown Tsunami". They are making more babies than us he screams. In 50 years half of American will be.... wooo, don't say it,....wooo, cover your eyes, yikes, half of "us" will be "brown"!!!! Oh my gosh! From White America to a Brown America. Vdare can't handle the white genes saying "bye bye". (after all it was a Jewish plot, since they always are out to dilute the gentile race with Open Borders but will not dare have it in mother Israel!!!) Yes, it will be so "upsetting" to be brown. No more long hours laying inside of glass coffins so bright you have to cover your pretty blue eyes! No more Sun Screen! No more embarrassing freckles! Oh my gosh America, get over your white self. If you are THAT worried about it, start making babies like the Mormons do.
But its Uncomfortable to be around "those people". Well you got me there. Some of "Those people" are just too much for me to handle too. Sure I know I married one of "them", -- a hot little Colombia number with not a touch of the American Woman Feminist-Nazi BS in her---(yes she is ironing my clothes and cooking my meal right as we speak. I must say, the best part is my 3 boys get 24/7 "mommy care, not 5day DayCare care".) So I can agree with there. Nothing is as freaky as walking around a shopping mall and being the only tall white dude in the crowd. FREAKY.
Finally no one wants to be a minority sticking out in a crowd, so now I can sympathize with "my black American brothas"... if I had one, which I don't, because so few of "them" make me feel comfortable either. Indeed, if I was to go anywhere I would need to go to Salt Lake City or Greenbay to feel comfortable, oh wait I have been there and those cheeseheads are a crazy obnotious bunch those Utah families with that "other Bible" kind of creep me out so I don't feel too comfortable around those white people either. Strike out New York and LA. I would have to go to England or Australia, to feel like I was in the land of white people that I could feel comfortable with... No wait, let me take that back. London was full of the strangest white women? or Men? I had ever seen. Hair spikes and black clothes and oh yea, the coolest & sweetest Jamaican fellow wearing a suit n tie who sold me, well a suit and tie. Oh well, so much for London. Sidney now thats the place for white blokes like me and you! And hot Asian woman. Thousands of them. Smart too, and very ambitious. I am sure we will all be reporting to work for them soon.
Oh well, look, I submit to you there NEVER WAS the "White American" that Pat Bucananan and VDare pines for. When it was "white", people like Pat and websites (if they existed then) would never see the masses of Americans as being "white". Instead they were "British Americans", "Dutch Upper Classmen", Americanized Sweedes, Annoying Jews, those loud Italian Americans, and those Irish Ameican cousins you pretend you don't know.....and so on. So there was never a "white America". We must get comfortable around each other the best way we can. Mexican Americans are not a bad lot. Their 2nd born children though, now those need help. Some how many find their way into the "bad" part of American Culture. Well there you have it, they have "assimilated" in just one generation, but look what they assimilated too! Now there is the problem!
Just what are Mexican Americans ---the legal and illegal ones---assimilating too? I submit it is AMERICA...and the bad self destructive part of American culture. There is the problem. Give me a first generation illegal to work at my company ANYTIME. Just don't ask me to hire his American born and American schooled and thoroughly American Son (or daughter).
So, does American have a problem with illegal immigration? It sure does, they are assimilating to the worst parts of American Culture. But that does not have to do with Numbers failing to Assimilate, or Safety, or Welfare, or being "illegal" does it?
We all like Ron Paul. I liked Ron Paul because unlike others, he said he was NOT OUT TO MAKE ILLEGALS THE SCAPE GOAT TO OUR OWN ECONOMIC PROBLEMS. He could have added, "Our Own Economic & Cultural Problems" to be more precise.
You now, when I watch and laugh with the hilarious comedian Carlos Mencia, the son of an El Salvadorian illegal immigrant, I can't help but think, "I am glad Carlos is an American". Freedom, is universal.
http://youtube.com/watch?...
In Peace & Liberty,
Treg
Who am I but an individual
Who am I but an individual giving my opinion, and that alone is not very credible. The credibility lies in those with fact, and I suggest you watch and pass this along to everyone in your address book, as this really says it all.
http://www.youtube.com/wa...
It is fine for people to feel that they need to help, but when we cannot help everyone in the world is it worth it to destroy our economy, security, traditions, and heritage to allow criminals unchecked into our country?
I personally have friends that live in the US from both Mexico and Vietnam that are here legally, and to be honest they are also against illegal immigration. My friend from Vietnam will be the first to tell you how great the US is, and in the same breath he will curse politicians that are making moves against the constitution. He is vocal when he compares the communist country of his childhood and the policies that are being created here to stem freedom and liberty, and he does not like it at all. Imagine a Vietnamese man at the age of 35 that is a legal citizen is more of a patriot then most of our leaders today, it is sad really.
I certainly hope you can see where I am coming from, as I am by no means against legal immigration, but it has to be at a controlled level or we risk loosing in the end and can provide no help to the less fortunate here or in any other country if we allow the constant flow left unchecked.
BT
In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
~Mark Twain
Did you write that whole thing?
It was long, but I enjoyed the satire!
Yes, I hope you laughed.
I reread it and cringed at the spelling mistakes. I was writing in my "Carlos Mencia mode". So you can go back and read the whole thing with the voice of Carlos in your head.
Feel free to use the ideas and make it all your own.
In Peace & Liberty,
Treg
Oh
If you think illegal immigration is good look here every day or every-now-and-then and find out. The articles from a multitude of sources change frequently.
http://www.americanpatrol...
If there is no distinction between citizens and others then we no longer are a Country.
I'm not bothered by having no distinction between citizens...
and others. In fact, I find the concept of "citizenship" repulsive. It implies that the government of your country owns you.
And regarding that link, from a quick glance it seems like a lot of the "crimes" the "illegals" are committing are for drug-trafficking. I don't know what theory of law you adhere to, but that is definitely not a crime per the natural theory of law.
Oh, I See
Your the expert. The site is not for you!
Haha, I'm not the expert
If you think my arguments are incorrect, please speak up.
Oh....
Not now, I have to go to the store.
Oh.....maybe just maybe your against English as our official language too, huh huh.
I have an argument already written somewhere.
That's fine if a group wants to declare an official language
But if they try and use physical force to get other people to use it, that would be a violation of rights.
Other folks Here
Take a while to find my argument if its still here.
Have to go 'n hug my cactus, they need love too.
SCREW THIS AUTHOR
Yeah, They may pay sales tax on the beer they drink and the gas they purchase, but it's a small price to pay for the perks they get, such as free energy assistance, free housing, free bi-lingul teachers, free education, free lunches, free medical, free dental, free social security benefits ect..They get a chance to retire in thier own country well off, an ability to walk off scott free from our judicial system, a way to steal all of our goods and services jobs ( soon thats all we will have left ) that Americans NEED. A way to drive our wages down, a way to drive crime up ( because being illegal you have no regards to the rule of law ) and a way to disiminate the anglo-saxon race right off the map. No country has ever survived with wide open borders. None. Yeah, this author's story was full of holes, one sided holes.
Social security benefits?
According to the article, they have to pay into SS, but the legislation barrs them from ever getting anything back from it.
Are you sure on that? Can you provide some proof?
Here ya go
You can also do a search on google ect. http://www.washingtontime...
Thanks for that.
That clarifies.
Why even read it?
There is no argument that justifies illegal immigants. If you like I will argue with you about why stealing is a good thing for the economy. Or maybe why sex with ten year old girls can help them grow up to be better women.
Not!! Get real dude.
"The day is coming, burning like an oven, when all the wicked will be stubble"
That's a poor analogy
Illegal immigration doesn't violate anyone's rights. Whereas stealing and rape do. The two items are dissimilar. The analogy falls apart.
It violates the LAW!!
And maybe you should look at the number of crimes committed by the poor downtrodden illegal immigrants and they violate your ability to be secure in your home. As much as I hate this government, this country is still my home and they are not welcome. COMPREHENDE?
"The day is coming, burning like an oven, when all the wicked will be stubble"
I don't subscribe to the statist theory of law.
Big deal if it violates a law that a government has decreed.
"Illegal" immigration doesn't violate anyone's rights.
So I can come in your house
any time I want without your permission? Why don't you give me your address?
It's the same thing.
"The day is coming, burning like an oven, when all the wicked will be stubble"
Cause that's a violation of rights
Say an "illegal" has a contract to work on someone's farm in New Mexico. He is not violating the rights of the farmer. The farmer consented to allow the "illegal" onto his property.
Have you ever heard of logistics?
That illegal doesn't just walk across the border and do the work for the farmer and walk back home. No the farmer hasn't been violated you idiot. But the rest of the community has suffered, because he went to the hospital and got free treatment when he got "hurt", then he went to the foodbank when he got hungry and he stayed in a one bedroom apartment with 20 others against the rules of the landlord. And in the end he sent almost all of the pittance he made to his family in Mexico.
So maybe the community should prosecute the farmer and the illegal? Go tell that to you Mecha/La Raza friends.
"The day is coming, burning like an oven, when all the wicked will be stubble"
Isn't the government to blame there?
There the ones who stole the money and then decided to give some of back as "social services."
No, we are the community
and the farmer is the guy next door. Just because someone taxed us to build the community facilities doesn't release the farmer or the illegal from wrongdoing. Two wrongs don't make a right.
"The day is coming, burning like an oven, when all the wicked will be stubble"
I hate the law as much as the
next guy. But this economics my friend. This country cannot and will not sustain 1.8 million illegals entering this country every year. At the present population growth you have a recipe for infinate disaster, because it will never end. No country has ever maintained such a feat. It does violate our rights friend. It violates the right of the legal working class to ever get ahead. They steal from one class to give to another and no one benefits. You can never build up a country by allowing another country to rape it's neighboring country. When one country is through with the other they will both be impoverished and possibly worse, they end up with no human rights. I do not hate the people for taking the easy way into this country, but that does not mean it is the right way. It has always been my belief that you will never help a country by giving it handouts. Because once they fix the problem there will be no more handouts. There is no incentive to forge ahead. Governments maintain poverty. It is a way to control people. We are heading towards the same fate as Mexico. So tell me where will we go?
How about children?
Could "this country sustain 1.8 more" children? From a birth rate of 2.0 to 2.5 ? It sure has, and it sure as hell could. Further, children are a "drain" on the economy for 18 years... Meanwhile, "illegals" start paying into the system when they start cutting your grass. All people help to produce, and in so doing they ADD to the net wealth of society.
Now I am not for welfare, I am for more freedom .....Thats Freedom for all, as which means freedom trade for both buyers and sellers of labor, freedom for you and me to come and go as we please. I refuse to live inside a Nazi Police State with Closed Borders just because people are fearful of lots of brown people. Like Dr Paul, Illegals are not to be scapegoats for our economy welfare state. Get rid of the welfare.
In Peace & Liberty,
Treg
Treg
First off, I cut my own grass ( trying to get a tan, which that makes me kinda a brown person ) and I am not afraid of brown people. Without borders what we have is simply, globalism. Understand what globalism is and what it will cause. Globalism levels the playing field for all the players. It makes poor nations out of all. It begets a one world government. There is no room for wealthy nations. We all want more freedom, well, gobalism is not the right path to head down for freedom. If I wash your laundry and you wash mine, how are we getting ahead? That is exactly what is happening here with the illegal situation. How are we helping the country of Mexico build up it's own government, when we allow them to tear down ours? No one will ever come out ahead. Not the taxpayers and not the takers. I agree socialism sucks. I wish they would abolish it tommorrow, but I dont see that happening as the big players in the game make to much in kickbacks from these socialistic programs. We have to have borders, because no country ever makes it without them. The illegals are making themselves scapegoats because they are ILLEGAL.
Disagree on rights.
As far as I can reason, there is no basic right for the legal-working class to get ahead.
The only violation of rights that I can see in this situation, is that the government stole money from people to create the damn socialist programs.
Atrick There is a Right.
They are natural citizens. Thus they are here legally. Thus they have the rights granted to them under the Bill Of Rights and the Constitution. The illegals have no rights under our Constitution. Why? Because they are not LEGAL citizens of this country. They dont care to be either, that's why they are illegal. They dont want to assimilate into our culture, we are assimilating into thier culture!!! I am sure we can all trace back ancestors from other countries, mine hail from Germany and Ireland. My great grandmother learned english so she could work in this country, for a better life, she came in thru Ellis Island LEGALLY. There was no future for an immigrant who would not assimilate into the english speaking culture back then. Sadly this is not the case today. We are being forced into thier culture. You must understand the ramifications of this. When the working class of legal americans cannot get ahead because they are being taxed to death from the illegal classes, this in turn, stagnates our economy. In order for the country to grow with jobs created by the working legal classes, we must stop the influx of illegals coming into this country. We can not sustain the never ending flux of illegals and in turn preserve this country from the demise caused by it. Too many people on the ship and down she goes.
The Constitution doesn't give rights
As Badnarik pointed out in his Constitution class, the intent of the framers was to only delineates rights that exist.
I could not disagree with your point more 2bfree
You wrote, "The illegals have no rights under our Constitution. Why? Because they are not LEGAL citizens of this country. "
The Constitution tells our government how it will act and behave towards ALL People. It limits their powers. All people have inalienable rights. That means that HUMAN RIGHTS, the rights to Life, Liberty, and Property, cannot be separated---inalienable--from the body. The Constitution gets its power from "We the People" and we get our power from the "inalienable rights" from our human nature and our "Creator". In no way does the Constitution create a Government that ONLY respects the human lives of "Citizens". If that was the case, then the American government would be a tyrannical creation preying upon other human beings in the rest of the world. Killing, imprisoning, and stealing from other human beings, just because they were Italians, or Australians, or Germans all because they were not American citizens would be monstrous. Fortunately, the Constitution tells the American government how it CAN act, and it can only act civilly respecting the Rights of All of Mankind. The day that does not happen, is a tragedy for me as well as you, citizen or not.
So I disagree with that one point you made above.
In Peace & Liberty,
Treg