The Biggest False Flag Conspiracy Ever
* There is no news or suggestion whatsoever to support the following thesis *
** This is pure, imaginative conjecture and speculation **
You don't see me hanging out at the 9/11 truther threads. I don't generally run around espousing way-out conspiracy theories (not that 9/11 theories are "way-out"). That being said, you're about to read a ridiculously way-out-there theory that has come to my mind. if nothing else, it would make for a great James Bond plot. I hope that's the most of what comes of this concept.
So I'm reading the articles about how likely we are to make a pre-emptive nuclear strike on Iran (answer: very likely, evidently), and I got to wondering...
...wouldn't this hinder our ability to get oil from that area? Doesn't the U.S. want to be able to get their hands on that oil?
A nuclear blast results in deadly fallout for hundreds of miles around ground zero. This would pretty much make the entire region uninhabitable (and therefore, unworkable) for years and years.
It struck me that it doesn't make sense for us to contaminate a place so rich in the oil we want to have (and control).
Then I considered all the false flag articles that have been floating around, and I got to thinking...
...hey...this could be the biggest false flag conspiracy ever. I'm not saying this is what it is, but, I also wouldn't be too shocked if this were the case. Ready? Then consider the following:
1. Iranian bloggers are threatened with execution if they write something their government is not happy with, including anything which "disturbs mental security in society” (whatever that means). Consequently, Iranian bloggers, fearing for their lives, choose not to journal events (or are forcibly kept from doing so).
2. An Iranian blockade is set up (as reported, Congress, under intense pressure from the Israel lobby, is about to adopt a resolution calling for a naval blockade of Iran, an overt act of war). Anyone dealing with Iran in diplomatic or business undertakings will be Dealt With by the U.S. Consequently, Iran gets pretty much isolated from the rest of the world.
NOTE: Remember this and this from back in February?
3. A Very Large Event takes place in Iran. A loud explosion is heard, the ground shakes, and a certain type of cloud appears in the sky. It is announced that we have nuked Iran. This happens in one or more locations.
4. Press and individuals are unable to confirm the events with people in Iran, either because they are dead or maimed or all their lines of communication are down or they're unable / afraid to blog, etc.
5. It is announced that, due to the fallout, no one can enter within a 250 miles radius of the strike zone(s). Entry is prohibited, and our forces blockade any attempted entry with military personnel -- for your safety.
6. Scientists with geiger counters are allowed to survey the perimeter(s) of the fallout zone(s). Their machines read off the scale and the area is officially declared to be unsafe for entry for a very extended period of time.
7. Meanwhile, U.S. special forces and other certain interests are allowed into the radius. These brave people are there to survey the damage, provide whatever assistance they can to the poor people who were in the wrong place at the wrong time, and armed forces remain there in an attempt to "restore order" after such a cataclysmic event.
[Okay, now here comes the wacky idea stuff -- you are forewarned]
1. There never was a nuclear bomb dropped. It was staged to appear to be such. It may have been some kind of bomb that did some kind of damage, but not a nuke.
2. Prior to this "more benign" bomb drop, radioactive material was planted in high concentrations along a circumference around the proposed target.
3. Those not "in" on the setup are kept out of the area. Those unfortunate to be within the area are either killed or injured from the "less benign" bomb, or are forcibly kept inside the area. No communications with the world outside of the "fallout radius" is allowed.
4. Pre-approved interests go into Iran and pretty much take over the oil fields, and whatever else they want. Everyone else is kept out.
5. Prices and supply of oil are strictly controlled by the interests occupying this area. As a happy side benefit, these interests also get to take over yet another country.
6. [Optional to the theory] Iran's leadership was in on this.
Ridiculous, far-fetched, tinfoil hat stuff, isn't it. Yeah, I warned ya. It's really out there.
No one would ever do such a thing.
output
Good post and well referenced.
But reality will set in.
While possible, a nuclear strike on Iran is not probable.
WAHOR!!
Wow
Have you applied for a job within our government. They'd be fools to let you get away.
Could absolutely happen this way and when would we find out.
Then there is also the fact that the elites may be trying to take over oil, but their bigger agenda is to create chaos and panic in order to establish "peace" with a One World Government. So it really isn't about oil, but a nice side effect for them is to pad the pockets of the oil rich even more and to destabilize anyone dependent upon oil, because elites want to reduce all countries to third world status. So even if they actually nuked, it really obviously isn't about wiping out a nuclear threat, it is about more war to progress us on the path of World Government, UN peace keeping, Communism. So that too is a "false flag." It is causing a problem so we can have war so we can further the agenda of the UN/CFR/Illuminati. They are doin' real good. We-aren't fairing so well.
Not that but
you gave me another idea, which makes more sense actually now that I think about it. It's actually pretty smart and I don't know why I didn't think of it before. Okay, we know about the push for war with Iran. But why the push? Of course, the true reason comes down to oil... but we could never occupy Iran the way we do Iraq and dictate a new U.S. Oil Empire. Totally different set of obstacles and circumstances. BUT... we do constantly hear of a"pre-emptive nuclear strike" to "take out" the dreaded weapons program (which the CIA says stopped in 2003).
Why was Saddam Hussein removed? It was because he tried switching oil sales away from dollars to euros. Iran now advocates the same thing. Targeted nuclear stikes could make the area uninhabitable (and therefore unworkable) to pump and sell oil - in anything. No dollars, no euros, no nothing. Now what happens? Saudi Arabia (staunch oil selling U.S. ally) is now a much more important vendor to the world. Oil prices might rise a bit because Iran was down, but that could be alleviated by Saudi Arabia, and even Iraq, stepping up the production during the near term. The long-lasting effect, though, would be more security for the almighty dollar to be necessary to buy oil.
Really
It is not about nuclear security, it is not about oil dominance, it is about war in order to further the One World Government agenda. The following explains it perfectly.
http://100777.com/myron
Sadly, I don't think it's THAT
far-fetched...who knows in today's crazy world, eh?