BBC Hit Piece Edits Silverstein Comment In Dirty Tricks Scam
Posted July 9th, 2008 by oruval
output
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Tuesday, July 8, 2008
The BBC’s embarrassing attempt to dig itself out of a hole that keeps getting deeper was again exemplified during their latest yellow journalism hit piece on 9/11 truth, in which they played Larry Silverstein’s “pull it” comment but edited out the most important part of the statement, and in doing so changed its context altogether.
However, in the BBC’s attempt to convince the viewer that “pull it” meant to withdraw firefighters from the building, despite the fact that according to NIST’s WTC collapse lead investigator Shyam Sunder, “There was no firefighting in WTC 7,” and additionally the FEMA report, which stated “No manual firefighting actions were taken by FDNY,” the editors carefully snipped out the last portion of Silverstein’s comments where he states, “and then we watched the building collapse.”
Here it the full video clip where Silverstein admits he pulled "Demolitioned" WTC 7
Also where the NYFD firefighter said the building (WTC 7) is about to blow up
Bookmark/Search this post with:
Bump!
Bump!
Great Post
This ties into our DEBUNK THIS thread really well and supports the undebunkable with even more evidence.
The rats are on the move....
They sure aren't trying to
argue with evidence. That is for certain.
Was listening to BBC world
Was listening to BBC world service on the radio this AM...they did a piece on how the British are the most surveyalled people in the world with once camera per 14 people nationwide!! And they have the largest DNA data base of any nation. Of course, all this surveylance is for the peoples' own protection...but you knew that!
My point is, that they are in cahoots with the NWO folks...and all those cameras and DNA data bases are comming here next.
Ron Paul saw this comming...and the nation as-a-whole is too stupid to see it. Soon, it will be too late.
------------------
BC
If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention!
bump
for new investigation
More Lie's.....................
Thats bull shit.....Everyone was out of that building already when they made that call.
"Observe the masses,and do the opposite."
Oooo.
The dreaded self bump...
In case anyone was wondering
Demolitions = Inside Job.
Here's an inside job
bump for ya,I hate to see a guy have to do it himself! lol
Yeah I am hoping to open some eyes.
Not that most supporters here don't know what is going on I figure I could open a few passing eyes with this bit of self incriminating evidence on Silverstiens behalf.
I wonder what the unedited version looks like.
I knew the "pull it" sound bite was taken out of context.
WAHOR!!
I heart trolls.
I posted it at the bottom of the link champ. The first of the two youtube videos. Sorry but Silverstein is admitting he blew up WTC 7 with his own words. I think that is about red handed as one can get.
No
The raw, unedited version.
WAHOR!!
Double troll points
How can you pull firefighters out of a building when none were in it to begin with. You're right stupid is as stupid does.... and you my shill does a lot of if.
However, in the BBC’s attempt to convince the viewer that “pull it” meant to withdraw firefighters from the building, despite the fact that according to NIST’s WTC collapse lead investigator Shyam Sunder, “There was no firefighting in WTC 7,” and additionally the FEMA report, which stated “No manual firefighting actions were taken by FDNY,”
What sort of fire was there
What sort of fire was there in WTC-7 anyway?
Do ANY photographs exist of these so-called "raging" fires that supposedly triggered the building's collapse? Because I have never seen any such photographs or video.
Any structure fire will belch thick, black smoke. A one-story suburban home on fire will belch thick, black smoke.
All I have ever seen in connection with WTC-7 is photos of white puffy fumes that could be clouds of dust from WTC-1 and 2. Did these fires even exist, and if so, what was their source? CIA agents burning files and microfilm, by chance?
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
Black smoke comes from an oxygen starved fire.
meaning it is not burning at full air fuel mix potential. meaning it did not melt and dislodge all the connecting points,and core columns, at the same time.
Very white smoke ,can come from thermite or thermate burning.
BBC hit piece is weak.
*****************
"My role in the revolution is to wake up the lemmings of this country, who sit back and accept the pablum the media feeds them"
Jesse Ventura
Ventura/Paul 2008
Fire smoke color or not.
The fact that three steel framed buildings supposedly collapsed at free fall speed in one day because of fire and that is the first and only time in history it makes you realize that the only way that could have been accomplished is with the use of demolitoin.